Randomized trial assessing the addition of interferon alpha-2a to fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 2280-2288 ◽  
Author(s):  
M T Seymour ◽  
M L Slevin ◽  
D J Kerr ◽  
D Cunningham ◽  
R D James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ifn Alpha ◽  
The United Kingdom

PURPOSE To determine the effects of interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha) on the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FUra) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred sixty chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to FUra/LV alone or FUra/LV plus IFN alpha. All patients received: LV 200 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 hours, then FUra 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus plus 400 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 22 hours, all repeated on day 2. Treatment was every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Patients randomized to IFN alpha received 6 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously every 48 hours throughout. Objective response (OR) and toxicity were assessed conventionally; in addition, palliative benefit and adverse effects were assessed using quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. RESULTS There were no differences in OR rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival. OR rates in assessable patients were as follows: FUra/LV alone (n = 104), complete or partial response (OR) = 27%, no change (NC) = 34%; FUra/LV/IFN alpha (n = 101), OR = 28%, NC = 30%. Median survival was 10 months in both arms. Dose-limiting FUra toxicities were not significantly increased by co-administration of IFN alpha, and the delivered FUra dose-intensity was not significantly reduced. However, QoL was adversely affected: patients on IFN alpha were less likely to report improvement in pretreatment physical and psychologic symptoms, and more likely to report new or worsening symptoms. CONCLUSION IFN alpha, at a dose that impaired QoL, did not improve the efficacy of FUra/LV. The power of this trial is sufficient to exclude with 95% confidence a benefit of 15% in OR or 10 weeks in median survival. Accordingly, we cannot recommend the use of IFN alpha as a clinical modulator of FUra/LV in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

A dose attenuated schedule of irinotecan and capecitabine in combination with celecoxib in advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3584-3584
Author(s):  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. K. Heilbrun ◽  
M. M. Zalupski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Cox 2

3584 Background: The cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme is overexpressed in the majority of colorectal cancers. Inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme can sensitize colorectal cancer cells to the apoptotic effects of chemotherapeutic agents and block angiogenesis. This phase II study was undertaken to determine the effects of adding celecoxib to a dose attenuated irinotecan and capecitabine regimen. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan, capecitabine, and celecoxib. Previously untreated patients, except for adjuvant therapy, with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were eligible for this study. Patients received irinotecan 70 mg/m2 (over 30 minutes) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Celecoxib was administered at a dose of 400 mg twice-daily starting on day -7 until termination from study. Results: A total of 51 patients (median age 58 years) have been enrolled on the study. The results presented are for the first 48 patients registered to the study. Median performance status was 1. A median number of 5.5 cycles (range 0- 18) were administered. In an intention to treat analysis, objective response rate was 50%. The median progression free survival was 6.9 months (90%CI; 4.7–8.2). Median survival is ≥19.4 months. No treatment related deaths were observed. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea in 2 (4%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (33%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), nausea (13%), vomiting (8%) and neutropenia (12%). Conclusion: Lowering the dose intensity of irinotecan in this study did not appear to compromise the treatment outcome and markedly improved the therapeutic index of this combination. Celecoxib can be safely administered in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine. Based on the observed progression free survival and response rate, the regimen has promising activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Olaparib with or without bevacizumab or bevacizumab and 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: Phase III LYNK-003

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Julien Taieb ◽  
Ellen B Gurary ◽  
Nati Lerman ◽  
Karen Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Reduced Toxicity

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with a regimen such as FOLFOX with or without targeted therapy is a standard of care option for advanced colorectal cancer; however, long-term exposure to oxaliplatin is associated with cumulative toxicity. Growing evidence suggests maintenance therapy with a less intensive regimen after platinum-based induction therapy can provide continuing benefit with reduced toxicity. We describe the rationale and design of the Phase III LYNK-003 trial, which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib with or without bevacizumab compared with 5-fluoruracil plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer that has not progressed on an induction course of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. The primary end point is progression-free survival by independent central review; secondary end points include overall survival, objective response, duration of response and safety. Clinical trial registration: NCT04456699

Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2545-2550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Ravaioli ◽  
Maurizio Marangolo ◽  
Enzo Pasquini ◽  
Andrea Rossi ◽  
Dino Amadori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Initial Dosage ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Bolus Administration ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE: A phase II trial investigated the activity and toxicity of a bolus administration schedule of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) therapy in patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients in this multicenter, open, nonrandomized study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on the first day of each course and 5-FU and LV 350 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2, respectively, as a daily bolus for 5 days, every 21 days, for a maximum of six courses. RESULTS: Partial responses occurred in 18 patients, giving an intent-to-treat response rate of 40.0%. Median time to response was 12.7 weeks; median duration of response was 18.4 weeks. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months; median survival was 14 months. The independent prognostic factors for improved overall survival were good performance status and negative carcino-embryonic antigen blood level. Incidences of adverse effects were reduced after the 5-FU dose was reduced to 300 mg/m2. Reversible neurologic toxicity occurred in 44.4% of patients. CONCLUSION: Bolus administration of oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and LV as first-line therapy for untreated advanced colorectal cancer is efficacious and safe. In addition to a more favorable safety profile, the 300 mg/m2 dosage offered improved dose-intensity compared with the initial dosage.

Failure of orally administered dipyridamole to enhance the antineoplastic activity of fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1201-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
C H Köhne ◽  
W Hiddemann ◽  
J Schüller ◽  
J Weiss ◽  
H P Lohrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Antineoplastic Activity ◽  
Nucleoside Transport ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Significant Difference

PURPOSE A randomized trial was performed to investigate the ability of the nucleoside transport inhibitor dipyridamole (DP) to enhance the antitumor activity of fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eighty-one untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive 5-FU 600 mg/m2 plus FA 300 mg/m2 on days 2 to 4 with or without DP 75 mg orally three times daily on days 1 to 5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Only patients with documented tumor progression before therapy were eligible. 5-FU pharmacokinetics using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were assessed in 11 nonrandomized patients receiving paired cycles with or without DP. RESULTS One hundred seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and response. There was no significant difference in toxicity, except DP-related headache in 24% of patients. An objective response rate of 15% (one complete response [CR] and 13 partial responses [PRs]) for 5-FU/FA and 13% (two CRs and nine PRs) for 5-FU/FA/DP was observed. The dose-intensity of 5-FU delivered was significantly higher (1.09- to 1.16-fold) for the DP-containing arm. Pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU did not differ significantly, except for a prolonged half-life (t1/2) induced by DP. The median time to progression (P = .8) and the median survival time (11.6 months for 5-FU/FA v 9.3 months for 5-FU/FA/DP; P = .14, log-rank test) were not different between treatment arms. CONCLUSION Orally administered DP did not improve the antineoplastic activity of 5-FU/FA in patients with advanced colorectal cancer when used at this dose and schedule. The observed increase in 5-FU dose-intensity for FU/FA/DP was not clinically relevant.

Cediranib Plus FOLFOX/CAPOX Versus Placebo Plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study (HORIZON II)

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (29) ◽  
pp. 3596-3603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo M. Hoff ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Bernhard C. Pestalozzi ◽  
Niall C. Tebbutt ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Points ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response

PurposeCediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. HORIZON II [Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN) in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] assessed infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/CAPOX) with or without cediranib in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and MethodsEligible patients were initially randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cediranib (20 or 30 mg per day) or placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX. In an early analysis of this and two other cediranib studies (HORIZON I [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] and HORIZON III [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]), the 20-mg dose met the predefined criteria for continuation. Subsequent patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the cediranib 20 mg or placebo arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary end points.ResultsIn all, 860 patients received cediranib 20 mg (n = 502) or placebo (n = 358). The addition of cediranib to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in PFS prolongation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = .0121; median PFS, 8.6 months for cediranib v 8.3 months for placebo) but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.12; P = .5707; median OS, 19.7 months for cediranib v 18.9 months for placebo). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points of objective response rate, duration of response, or liver resection rate. Median chemotherapy dose-intensity was decreased by approximately 10% in patients treated with cediranib. Adverse events (AEs) associated with cediranib were manageable.ConclusionAddition of cediranib 20 mg to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in a modest PFS prolongation, but no significant difference in OS. The cediranib AE profile was consistent with those from previous studies. Because of the lack of improvement in OS, cediranib plus an oxaliplatin-based regimen cannot be recommended as a treatment for patients with mCRC.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib Combined with Toripalimab in the Third-Line and beyond Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Wei Yu ◽  
Qiaomeng Tao ◽  
Yufeng Zhang ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
Long Feng
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Line

Background. The most effective treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is restricted in microsatellite instability (MSI-H) subsets of advanced colorectal cancer, but MSI-H only accounts for 4-5% among them. ICIs are completely ineffective in advanced colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), according to literatures published. Regorafenib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) that could normalize tumor blood vessels by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and its downstream, thus improving cytotoxic T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment, which has a synergistic effect with ICIs. Toripalimab is a type of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody produced by Junshi Biosciences in China. Herein, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Methods. We evaluated the outcomes of MSS patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2019 to January 2021. These patients had previously received at least second-line treatment; the regimens were oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or accompanied with bevacizumab or cetuximab. Thirty-three patients were treated orally with regorafenib 80 mg or 120 mg once daily for 21 days, 28 days as a cycle, combined with intravenous toripalimab until disease progression or intolerant to adverse reactions. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the rate of progression-free survival (PFS) and log-rank method to do a statistical test of the survival curve. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the influence of multiple factors on PFS. The primary endpoints were objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse reactions and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Results. The evaluation of treatment effects was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Four patients (12.12%) got partial response, twelve patients (36.36%) experienced stable disease, and seventeen patients (51.52%) suffered progressive disease. ORR was 12.12% and DCR was 48.48%. mPFS was 113 days (95% CI: 0–272.1). In univariate analysis, patients who had previously received second-line treatment were significantly better than those who had received third-line or more treatment ( p = 0.005 ). Lung metastasis was a negative factor in combined therapy ( p = 0.032 ). Five patients without previous treatment of bevacizumab were effective. Previous treatment without bevacizumab showed a trend of effective when combination therapy ( p = 0.034 ). It was also a positive factor that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) score was 0 ( p = 0.034 ). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the number of previous chemotherapy lines and excision of primary lesions were independent prognostic factors. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were hand-foot syndrome (33.33%), liver dysfunction (27.27), hypothyroidism (24.24%), fever (24.24%), fatigue (21.21%), leukopenia (15.15%), hypertension (12.12%), platelet count decreased (6.06%), diarrhea (3.03%), and myocarditis (3.03%); one patient stopped treatment as myocarditis. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions was 9.09%. Conclusions. Regorafenib combined with toripalimab has a promising effect in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In the early use of combination therapy, excision of primary lesions can have a positive impact in regorafenib and toripalimab combination. This treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerant in combined therapy.

KRASandBRAFMutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 5931-5937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. Richman ◽  
Matthew T. Seymour ◽  
Philip Chambers ◽  
Faye Elliott ◽  
Catherine L. Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
The Impact

PurposeActivating mutation of the KRAS oncogene is an established predictive biomarker for resistance to anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We wanted to determine whether KRAS and/or BRAF mutation is also a predictive biomarker for other aCRC therapies.Patients and MethodsThe Medical Research Council Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS) trial compared treatment sequences including first-line fluorouracil (FU), FU/irinotecan or FU/oxaliplatin in aCRC. Tumor blocks were obtained from 711 consenting patients. DNA was extracted and KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 and BRAF codon 600 were assessed by pyrosequencing. Mutation (mut) status was assessed first as a prognostic factor and then as a predictive biomarker for the benefit of adding irinotecan or oxaliplatin to FU. The association of BRAF-mut with loss of MLH1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.ResultsThree hundred eight (43.3%) of 711 patients had KRAS-mut and 56 (7.9%) of 711 had BRAF-mut. Mutation of KRAS, BRAF, or both was present in 360 (50.6%) of 711 patients. Mutation in either KRAS or BRAF was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; P < .0001) but had minimal impact on progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.36; P = .05). Mutation status did not affect the impact of irinotecan or oxaliplatin on PFS or OS. BRAF-mut was weakly associated with loss of MLH1 staining (P = .012).ConclusionKRAS/BRAF mutation is associated with poor prognosis but is not a predictive biomarker for irinotecan or oxaliplatin. There is no evidence that patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated tumors are less likely to benefit from these standard chemotherapy agents.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhui Jin ◽  
Xiaodan Zhu ◽  
Xiaona Huang ◽  
Tingjie Gong ◽  
Zhipeng Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) by meta-analysis. Methods: Electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included investigations of efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 agents in patients with CRC. Corresponding indicators were calculated. Results: A total of 15 articles were included. The pooled objective response rate, overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate and adverse event rate were 33, 56, 46 and 59%, respectively. The objective response rates for CRC with deficient mismatch repair and CRC with proficient mismatch repair were 43 and 3%, respectively, in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusion: The authors' study indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors manifest promising clinical responses in the treatment of CRC with deficient mismatch repair with acceptable treatment-related adverse events.

Chemotherapy dose intensity correlates strongly with response, median survival, and median progression-free survival in metastatic neuroblastoma.

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
N V Cheung ◽  
G Heller
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Intensification ◽  
End Points ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Dose

We examined the efficacy of five commonly used drugs, teniposide (VM26), cisplatin (CDDP), cyclophosphamide (CPM), doxorubicin (DOXO), and vincristine (VCR) in a retrospective analysis of 44 clinical trials of induction chemotherapy for stage IV neuroblastoma patients newly diagnosed at older than 1 year of age. Dose intensity (DI) of each drug was calculated as milligrams per square meter per week. Linear regression analyses showed that the Dls of VM26 and CDDP had the greatest influence on clinical outcomes (ie, proportion of major response, median survival, and median progression-free survival [PFS]), while those of CPM and DOXO were less significant. VCR had no influence on the three clinical end points. Although many protocols extended treatment to more than 1 year, none of these end points correlated positively with the duration of therapy. Twenty-one weeks appeared adequate for achieving superior response, median survival, and median PFS. These results suggest that maximal dose intensification of selective drugs over a short duration may improve the outcome of patients with poor-risk neuroblastoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document