Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2564-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Saxman ◽  
K J Propert ◽  
L H Einhorn ◽  
E D Crawford ◽  
I Tannock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Intergroup Trial ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE A previously reported randomized intergroup trial demonstrated that combination chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) was superior to single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. We conducted a long-term analysis of patients included in the intergroup trial to examine factors associated with long-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two-hundred fifty-five assessable patients with urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either single-agent cisplatin (70 mg/m2 on day 1) or combination chemotherapy with methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 22), vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on days 2, 15, and 22), doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 on day 2), and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 on day 2). Courses were repeated every 28 days. The association between patient characteristics and survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS With long-term follow-up evaluation, survival in the M-VAC arm continues to be superior to cisplatin (P = .00015, log-rank test). Predictors of survival include performance status, histology, and the presence of liver or bone metastasis. Only 3.7% of the patients randomized to M-VAC are alive and continuously disease-free at 6 years. CONCLUSION Long-term follow-up evaluation of the intergroup trial confirms that M-VAC is superior to single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma; however, durable progression-free survival is rare. Patients with non-transitional-cell histology, poor performance status, and/or bone or visceral involvement fare poorly and are unlikely to benefit significantly from M-VAC chemotherapy.

Durable Responses in Patients Treated with Galiximab (Anti-CD80) in Combination with Rituximab for Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase II Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1004-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
Anas Younes ◽  
David C. Fisher ◽  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Joseph O. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Costimulatory Molecule ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Variable Regions ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
Lymphoma Therapy

Abstract Galiximab is an anti-CD80 monoclonal antibody with human IgG1 constant regions and macaque variable regions. CD80 is an immune costimulatory molecule that is constitutively expressed on the surface of follicular lymphomas. Modest single-agent clinical activity (ORR 11%) was demonstrated in a single agent Phase I study of galiximab in relapsed/refractory, follicular NHL with the observation of late and prolonged responses. We previously conducted a phase II multicenter study evaluating the combination of galiximab and rituximab for relapsed/refractory follicular NHL, and demonstrated an ORR of 64% (17% CR, 14% CRu, and 33% PR). Here, we analyze long-term safety and efficacy data from this trial. Patients received galiximab (500 mg/m2 qwk x 4 weeks) concurrently with a standard course of rituximab (375 mg/m2 qwk x 4 weeks). No maintenance therapy was allowed. Sixty-four patients received treatment. Mean age at study entry was 59 yrs. The majority of patients (88%) were Stage III/IV, and FLIPI risk groups were distributed as low (27%), intermediate (39%), and high (34%). All patients had received at least 1 prior lymphoma therapy; 42% were rituximab naïve; rituximab-refractory patients (no response or a response with TTP<6 months) were excluded. The median follow-up of responding patients is 45 months (range 9–59 months). The median PFS was 12.2 months. 20% of patients had PFS durations exceeding 2 years. 37% of patients did not require any additional lymphoma therapy for at least 2 years following treatment (TTNT); 28% had a TTNT of more than 3 years. Grade, tumor bulk, age, stage, prior rituximab exposure, and FLIPI score did not predict for PFS duration of > 2 years, or TTNT duration of > 2 years (p=NS, chi-square analysis). Obtaining a CR predicted for PFS and TTNT duration >2 years (p=0.001). Response duration to prior therapy was not correlated to outcome following rituximab/galiximab therapy (p=0.18). Quantitative immunoglobulin levels (IgA, IgM and IgG) did not differ between prolonged responders and other patients, and did not significantly change over the first year of follow-up. Median Cmax, half-life, AUC and Cl were similar between prolonged responders and other patients. No late opportunistic infections, secondary malignancies, or infusion-associated deaths have been reported. We conclude that the combination of rituximab and galiximab is well-tolerated in long-term follow-up, with a substantial number of durable responses. Almost one-third of patients treated with only 4 weeks of this combination do not require additional lymphoma therapy for more than three years. There is no clear prognostic marker that predicts for prolonged benefit from the combination. These durable responses provide strong rationale for ongoing phase III clinical trials of the galiximab/rituximab combination.

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) versus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 4-year update from CheckMate 227.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9016-9016
Author(s):  
Luis G. Paz-Ares ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Jong-Seok Lee ◽  
Laszlo Urban ◽  
Reyes Bernabe Caro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

9016 Background: 1L NIVO + IPI was shown to provide durable long-term overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemo regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC in CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826); 3-year OS rates were 33% vs 22% in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.67–0.93]) and 34% vs 15% in pts with PD-L1 < 1% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51–0.81]). Here we report updated results from the study with 4 years’ minimum follow-up. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ ALK alterations , and ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled; pts were stratified by squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (NSQ) histology. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (n = 1189) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO alone (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with PD-L1 < 1% (n = 550) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. OS with NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% was the primary endpoint. Results: With minimum follow-up of 49.4 months (database lock, Feb 18, 2021), pts were at least 2 years beyond the protocol-specified end of immunotherapy treatment. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% continued to show durable benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.90]); 4-year OS rates were 29% (NIVO + IPI), 21% (NIVO), and 18% (chemo). At 4 years, 14% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO), and 4% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 34%, 30%, and 7% remained in response, respectively. In an exploratory analysis in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 4-year OS rates were 37% (NIVO + IPI), 26% (NIVO), and 20% (chemo). In pts with PD-L1 < 1%, OS HR for NIVO + IPI vs chemo was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.81); 4-year OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 13% (NIVO + chemo) and 10% (chemo). At 4 years, 12% (NIVO + IPI), 7% (NIVO + chemo), and 0% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 31%, 13%, and 0% remained in response, respectively. Among pts who progressed on NIVO + IPI vs chemo, 7% vs 40% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%), and 9% vs 33% (PD-L1 < 1%), received subsequent immunotherapy. Benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed for both SQ and NSQ histology (Table). With long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: With 4 years’ minimum follow-up, 1L NIVO + IPI continued to provide durable, long-term OS benefit vs chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Nontransplant therapy for bone marrow failure

Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle M. Townsley ◽  
Thomas Winkler
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Bone Marrow Failure ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Telomere Attrition ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Abstract Nontransplant therapeutic options for acquired and constitutional aplastic anemia have significantly expanded during the last 5 years. In the future, transplant may be required less frequently. That trilineage hematologic responses could be achieved with the single agent eltrombopag in refractory aplastic anemia promotes new interest in growth factors after years of failed trials using other growth factor agents. Preliminary results adding eltrombopag to immunosuppressive therapy are promising, but long-term follow-up data evaluating clonal evolution rates are required before promoting its standard use in treatment-naive disease. Danazol, which is traditionally less preferred for treating cytopenias, is capable of preventing telomere attrition associated with hematologic responses in constitutional bone marrow failure resulting from telomere disease.

Single-agent Taxane Versus Taxane-containing Combination Chemotherapy as Salvage Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 634-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
Gregory R. Pond ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Stephanie Mullane ◽  
Guenter Niegisch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

T1 Top Line Results of the DETECT Enzymatic Debridement Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S1
Author(s):  
William L Hickerson ◽  
Jeremy Goverman ◽  
Sigrid A Blome-Eberwein ◽  
Adam Singer ◽  
Lucy Wibbenmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Acute Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Introduction Bromelain Based Debridement (BBD) of deep burns is approved for use in Europe, Argentina, Russia, South Korea, Peru and Israel. In the United States it is an investigational product and currently there are 2 multicenter RCTs (DETECT – adults, CIDS – children). Patient enrollment in the DETECT adult trial has been completed. The aim of this abstract is to present the acute stage top line results of the DETECT trial. Methods 175 adult patients suffering from deep burns were included in a phase III multicenter, multinational, randomized, controlled, assessor blinded trial. Patients were randomized to 3 arms – BBD, Standard of Care (SOC), or Gel vehicle (Placebo control) in a 3:3:1 ratio (75 BBD, 75 SOC, 25 Gel). The primary endpoint was the incidence of complete eschar removal (BBD vs Gel). Additional acute stage endpoints included the time to complete eschar removal, incidence of surgical eschar removal and eschar removal associated blood loss.Time to complete wound closure (BBD vs SOC) was assessed as a safety endpoint. Following the acute stage, a long-term follow up period of 2 years is being conducted. Results Patient demographics and wound baseline characteristics were comparable across study arms.The incidence of complete eschar removal was significantly higher for BBD vs Gel patients (93.3% vs 4%, p&lt; 0.0001). The incidence of surgical eschar removal was significantly lower for BBD vs SOC patients (4% vs 72%, p&lt; 0.0001). The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly shorter for BBD vs SOC patients (1 day vs 3.8 days, p&lt; 0.0001). Calculated eschar removal associated blood loss was significantly lower for BBD vs SOC patients (14ml vs 815ml, p&lt; 0.0001). The median time to complete wound closure was similar for BBD and SOC patients (27 and 28 days). The overall safety profile of BBD treated patients was good and consistent with the safety data known from previous studies.The results of the long term follow up period are not yet available. Conclusions The acute stage results of this robust phase III RCT demonstrate the safety and efficacy of BBD and are in line with previous trial results. Applicability of Research to Practice The results of this trial may help pave the way for US approval of BBD.

scholarly journals Continued Excellent Outcomes in Previously Untreated Patients With Follicular Lymphoma After Treatment With CHOP Plus Rituximab or CHOP Plus 131I-Tositumomab: Long-Term Follow-Up of Phase III Randomized Study SWOG-S0016

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazyar Shadman ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Lisa Rimsza ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Mark S. Kaminski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Malignancies ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose SWOG S0016 was a phase III randomized study that compared the safety and efficacy of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with CHOP-RIT (CHOP followed by consolidation with iodine-133–tositumomab radioimmunotherapy) for previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma. Understanding the long-term outcome of patients provides a benchmark for novel treatment regimens for FL. Patients and Methods Between 2001 and 2008, 531 previously untreated patients with FL were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles of R-CHOP or six cycles of CHOP-RIT. Patients with advanced-stage disease (bulky stage II, III, or IV) of any pathologic grade (1, 2, or 3) were eligible. Results After a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 10-year estimates of progression-free and overall survival were 49% and 78% among all patients, respectively. Patients in the CHOP-RIT arm had significantly better 10-year progression-free survival compared with patients in the R-CHOP arm (56% v 42%; P = .01), but 10-year overall survival was not different between the two arms (75% v 81%; P = .13). There was no significant difference between the CHOP-RIT and R-CHOP arms in regard to incidence of second malignancies (15.1% v 16.1%; P = .81) or myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia (4.9% v 1.8%; P = .058). The estimated 10-year cumulative incidences of death resulting from second malignancies were not different (7.1% v 3.2%; P = .16), but cumulative incidence of death resulting from myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia was higher in the CHOP-RIT arm compared with the R-CHOP arm (4% v 0.9%; P = .02). Conclusion Given these outstanding outcomes, immunochemotherapy should remain the standard induction approach for patients with high-risk FL until long-term follow-up of alternative approaches demonstrates superiority.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1844-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
B G Redman ◽  
D C Smith ◽  
L Flaherty ◽  
W Du ◽  
M Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Total Bilirubin Level ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Treatment Delays ◽  
Eligibility Requirements ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Dose Reductions

PURPOSE Both paclitaxel and carboplatin have single-agent activity against carcinoma of the urothelium. We evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced cancers of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cancers of the urothelium who had no prior chemotherapy (prior adjuvant chemotherapy > 6 months allowed) were eligible for treatment. Eligibility requirements were performance status of 2 or less, creatinine level less than 2.0 mg/dL, granulocyte count (AGC) 1,500/microL or greater, platelet count 100,000/microL or greater, and total bilirubin level less than 1.5 mg/dL. Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5, Calvert formula) were administered every 21 days. Patients were evaluated for toxicity weekly and assessed for response every 6 weeks. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were entered onto the study and 35 patients were assessable for response. A total of 184 cycles were administered (median, six cycles per patient). Nine patients required one dose reduction, and seven patients required two dose reductions for a nadir AGC less than 500/microL, with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and sepsis. Myalgias and arthralgias of grades 1 to 2 occurred in 16 patients and usually lasted 2 to 3 days after treatment. There were no treatment delays because of toxicity. There were 18 responses; seven complete responses (CRs) and 11 partial responses (PRs) (response rate 51.5%; 95% confidence interval, 35 to 68). Median response durations for CR and PR were 6 and 4 months, respectively. Overall median survival was 9.5 months. CONCLUSION The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Because of the modest toxicity of this combination, paclitaxel and carboplatin should be considered for addition to other agents with activity in urothelial carcinomas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document