Phase I study of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and concomitant thoracic radiation in the treatment of advanced chest malignancies.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2157-2163 ◽  
Author(s):  
G A Masters ◽  
D J Haraf ◽  
P C Hoffman ◽  
L C Drinkard ◽  
S A Krauss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Thoracic Radiation ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen has superior activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I trial to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this regimen with concomitant thoracic radiation (RT) in patients with advanced chest malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced chest malignancies that required RT were enrolled onto this phase I study of standard chest radiation (30 daily 2-Gy fractions for a total of 60 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin starting at 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine starting at 20 mg/m2/wk. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were treated on this study. Two of three patients treated at the maximum-administered dose of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per cycle and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk experienced acute DLT (neutropenia), which required deescalation. The dose level of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/wk, although tolerated acutely, produced delayed esophagitis, which proved dose-limiting. The recommended phase II dose was cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given 2 of every 3 weeks with concomitant chest RT. CONCLUSION Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine is feasible. The recommended phase II dose is cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given twice over 3 weeks on a day 1/day 8 schedule. Esophagitis is the DLT, with neutropenia occurring at higher dose levels. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) phase II trial is currently underway to evaluate further the efficacy and toxicities of this regimen in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Lonafarnib Administered Twice Daily to Pediatric Patients With Advanced Central Nervous System Tumors Using a Modified Continuous Reassessment Method: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 3137-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Kieran ◽  
Roger J. Packer ◽  
Arzu Onar ◽  
Susan M. Blaney ◽  
Peter Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor ◽  
Continual Reassessment ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels

Purpose A dose-escalation phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib ( SCH66336 ) was conducted in children with recurrent or progressive CNS tumors. Primary objectives were to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and pharmacokinetics of lonafarnib. Farnesylation inhibition of HDJ-2 in peripheral blood was also measured. Patients and Methods Lonafarnib was administered orally twice daily at dose levels of 70, 90, 115, 150, and 200 mg/m2/dose bid. A modified continual reassessment method (CRM) was used to estimate the MTD based on actual dosages of lonafarnib administered and toxicities observed during the initial 4 weeks of treatment. Results Fifty-three children with progressive or recurrent brain tumors were enrolled, with a median age of 12.2 years (range, 3.9 to 19.5 years). Dose-limiting pneumonitis or myelosuppression was observed in three of three patients at the 200 mg/m2/dose level. A relatively constant DLT rate at the 70, 90, and 115 mg/m2/dose levels resulted in a recommended phase II dose of 115 mg/m2/dose. Significant diarrhea did not occur with prophylactic loperamide. Both radiographic response (one anaplastic astrocytoma) and stable disease (one medulloblastoma, two high-grade and four low-grade gliomas, one ependymoma, and one sarcoma) were noted, and seven patients remained on treatment for 1 year or longer. Conclusion Although the estimated MTD by the CRM model was 98.5 mg/m2/dose, because of the relatively constant observed DLT rate at the lower four dose levels, the recommended phase II dose of lonafarnib is 115 mg/m2/dose administered twice daily by mouth with concurrent loperamide.

A phase I study of 17-AAG in relapsed/refractory pediatric patients with solid tumors: A Children’s Oncology Groups study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9018-9018 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Weigel ◽  
S. Blaney ◽  
J. Kersey ◽  
R. Bagatell ◽  
S. P. Ivy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibition ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels

9018 Background: A pediatric phase I study of 17-allylaminogeldanamycin (17-AAG), an Hsp90 inhibitor, was conducted to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), the recommended phase II dose, the pharmacokinetics (PK), and to evaluate a surrogate marker for Hsp90 inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Methods: Cohorts of 3–6 pts were enrolled at dose levels of 150, 200, 270 and 360 mg/m2/dose, administered as a 60 min infusion, on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. PK and PBMC evaluations were done during the first course of therapy. Results: 17 pts (7 male), median 7 yrs of age (range 1–19), were enrolled. 5 pts who developed PD prior to completing a full cycle of therapy were not considered evaluable for toxicity. No DLTs occurred. Non-DLTs included elevated transaminases (n=6), anemia (n=3), and vomiting (n=3). Based on the adult recommended dose and challenges posed by infusing the large volumes of DMSO, dose escalation was stopped at dose level 4. No CRs or PRs were observed; 3 patients remain on therapy at 6, 7 and 9 months with SD. One patient with hepatoblastoma had a reduction in AFP and SD over 3 cycles. PK data is available from the initial 3 dose levels. Drug exposure increases in proportion to dose for both17-AAG and its metabolite 17-AG. At 270 mg/m2/dose the Cmax and AUC of 17-AAG were 5,303 ± 1,591 ng/ml and 13,150 ± 5,086 ng/ml*hr, respectively, similar to the exposure in adults. The mean terminal half-life for 17-AAG was 3.0 ± 0.5 hrs. Induction of Hsp72, a surrogate marker for inhibition of Hsp90 was detected at all dose levels. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of 17AAG is 360mg/m2/day. Non-DMSO formulations may allow for further dose escalation in children and should be studied. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study to determine tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SB-743921, a novel kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2000-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. Holen ◽  
C. P. Belani ◽  
G. Wilding ◽  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
J. L. Heideman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Human Tumor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Potent Inhibition ◽  
Elevated Bilirubin ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Tumor Types

2000 Background: SB-743921, a potent and selective inhibitor of KSP (Ki =100 pM; >40,000-fold selectivity vs other kinesins), causes mitotic arrest, potent inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, and demonstrates activity in a broad range of human tumor xenografts. Methods: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and PK profile of SB-743921 when administered IV over 60 minutes every 21 (Q 21) days (d). Results: 44 patients (pts) (M/F 19/25), median age 61.5 yrs (range 32–80, with solid tumors were treated at doses of 2 (n=2), 4 (n=27), 5 (n=6), 6 (n=3), and 8 (n=6) mg/m2 (median cycles 2, range 1–10, total cycles 101). Frequent tumor types included colorectal (n=11), ovarian (n=5), NSCLC (n=5), esophageal (n=4), and pancreatic (n=4). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 8 mg/m2 consisted of (max CTC grade/pt) prolonged grade (gr) 4 neutropenia (n=2), gr 3 elevated ALT/AST (n=1), and gr 3 elevated bilirubin (n=1). DLTs at 6 mg/m2 were gr 3 hyponatremia (n=1) and prolonged gr 4 neutropenia (n=1). DLTs at 5 mg/m2 were limited to febrile neutropenia (n=2). The 4 mg/m2 dose level was determined as the phase II dose. Toxicities at 4 mg/m2 included gr 1 fatigue (n=8) and neutropenia [gr 1 (n=4), gr 2 (n=7), gr 3 (n=3), gr 4 (n=2)]. Neutropenia nadir was day 6–8 with recovery to gr ≤2 by day 15. Gr 3 non-hematologic toxicities at 4 mg/m2 included gr 3 ALT (n=1), gr 3 AST (n=2), gr 3 hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), gr 3 hypophosphatemia (n=1), and gr 3 alkaline phosphatase elevation (n=1). Median PK values in cycle 1 at 4 mg/m2 were: Cmax 473 ng/ml, AUC0-∞ 5207 ng.hr/ml, and t½ 36 hr. AUC0-∞ and Cmax were proportional to dose. No consistent correlation was observed between DLTs and PK parameters. Stable disease for ≥ 4 cycles (range 4–11) was observed in 6 pts (4 pts at 4 mg/m2; 1 pt at 6 mg/m2; 1 pt at 8 mg/m2). A pt with cholangiocarcinoma had evidence of radiographic tumor regression (post cycle 10) and a >50% decrease in her CA 19–9. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of SB-743921 on the Q 21 day schedule is 4 mg/m2. The observed toxicities at the recommended phase II dose are manageable and reversible. The onset and duration of neutropenia is predictable. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of temsirolimus (CCI-779), carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: NCIC CTG IND 179

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3558-3558
Author(s):  
A. M. Oza ◽  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
S. Welch ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Solid Malignancies ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

3558 Background: Temsirolimus (T) has encouraging activity in many malignancies, including endometrial cancer and a combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel would logical regimen for further development. This trial was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of this combination and expand experience at the recommended dose in pts with endometrial and ovarian cancers. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation Phase I study has been conducted in pts with advanced solid malignancies suitable for carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy who had not received more than 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. To date, 31 eligible pts with a median age of 59 have been treated and 27 are evaluable for toxicity. Pts were entered in 6 dose levels, with the first two levels administering T on Days 8 and 15 and the next 4 levels switching to a D1, 8 administration. Eighteen had received prior chemotherapy and 15 prior radiation. Results: Day 8, 15 administration of T was not feasible due to myelosuppression on day 15. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel on day 1 with T on D1 and 8 has been well tolerated, and patients have received a median of 5 cycles of therapy. At dose level 6 (T 25 mg D1 and 8, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 D1, carboplatin AUC 6 D1) dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in one of 6 pts treated to date (Gr 4 thrombocytopenia) and a second pt had a possible DLT ( Gr 3 fatigue in presence of baseline fatigue). This dose level is being expanded in 4 endometrial and ovarian cancer pts. The regimen is active: of the 26 patients with follow-up data, there have been 10 with partial response (38.5%; med. duration 7.1 mo [1.0–12.7]) and 12 with stable disease (46%; med. duration 6.9 mo [1.3- 7.8]). One patient had progressive disease and three were inevaluable. Conclusions: The results indicate this combination is well tolerated and requires additional assessment in a Phase II setting. The recommended Phase II dose will be dose level 6 provided no further DLTs are observed in the additional 4 patients entered. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of docetaxel with concomitant thoracic radiation therapy.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Mauer ◽  
G A Masters ◽  
D J Haraf ◽  
P C Hoffman ◽  
S M Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Weekly Administration ◽  
Thoracic Radiation ◽  
Radiation Sensitizers ◽  
Administration Schedules

PURPOSE The taxanes have demonstrated activity as radiation sensitizers in preclinical studies. This study was designed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), optimal schedule, and toxicities of docetaxel in combination with concomitant standard chest radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients with advanced non-small-cell lung or esophageal cancer enrolled in this phase I study to evaluate escalating docetaxel doses at three schedules. Docetaxel was administered as two 21-day cycles at doses of 40, 60, and 75 mg/m2 per cycle. Docetaxel administration schedules were as follows: schedule A, once every 3 weeks; schedule B, 2 of 3 weeks; or schedule C, weekly. Six weeks of concomitant standard chest radiotherapy in 1.8- to 2.0-Gy daily fractions was delivered to 60 Gy total. RESULTS Dose-limiting esophagitis and neutropenia were encountered with schedules A and B at docetaxel doses of 60 mg/m2 per cycle. The docetaxel MTD for schedules A and B was 40 mg/m2 per cycle. Dose-limiting esophagitis was also observed with schedule C; however, there was no neutropenia. For schedule C, we identified the MTD as 60 mg/m2 per cycle (20 mg/m2/wk). Other toxicities encountered included thrombocytopenia, hypersensitivity reaction, and pulmonary infiltrates (fatal in two patients). Late toxicity of esophageal stricture occurred in five patients. CONCLUSION Esophagitis and neutropenia are the dose-limiting toxicities of docetaxel administered with concomitant chest radiotherapy. Weekly administration of docetaxel allows for the highest total docetaxel dose during chest radiotherapy. We identified the recommended phase II docetaxel dose as 20 mg/m2 administered weekly with concomitant chest radiotherapy for 6 weeks.

Phase I study of cisplatin/carboplatin/irinotecan (CPI) regimen in patients with ED small-cell lung cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18202-18202
Author(s):  
M. Ichiki ◽  
Y. Yoshida ◽  
A. Ishimatsu ◽  
S. Minami ◽  
K. Taguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Level 1

18202 Cisplatin/irinotecan(IP) is standard regimen for ED-SCLC in Japan. Cisplatin (CDDP)-based treatment requires copious hydration, which can lead to a deterioration of outpatients’ quality of life. CDDP and carboplatin (CBDCA) have a common active form, but are associated with different adverse reactions. We considered that the combined use of these two agents could increase the dose intensity of active form platinum complexes without enhancing their toxicities. The IP was modified to nearly half the dose of CDDP/CBDCA to facilitate outpatient administration. We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of this modified regimen for patients with ED-SCLC and stage IV NSCLC. Eligibility criteria included: PS 0–1, age <75 yrs, no prior therapy, measurable disease, adequate organ functions. DLT was defined as follows: 1) grade 4 neutropenia lasting 4 days or febrile neutropenia, 2) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 3) prolongation of treatment due to toxicity, 4) grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicity. Three patients were enrolled at level 1(CDDP/CBDCA: 25 mg/m2/AUC2), 3 patients at level 2 (25 mg/m2/AUC 2.5) and 3 patients at level 3 (30 mg/m2/ AUC 2.5), respectively. DLT was not observed at level 1, 2, 3. At dose level 4 (30 mg/m2/AUC3), two of three patients experienced DLT, suggesting this level to be the MTD. The recommended dose for phase II study is CDDP 30 mg/m2 on day 1, CBDCA AUC 2.5 on day 1 and irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15. A phase II study of this regimen in ED-SCLC is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A dose-escalating phase I study of biweekly docetaxel in older men with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16117-e16117
Author(s):  
J. McDevitt ◽  
R. Hauser ◽  
J. Simon ◽  
L. Balducci
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

e16117 Background: Docetaxel has been shown to be effective and is used in the treatment of HRPC. This phase I study is designed to investigate the maximum tolerated dose, tolerability and activity of docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule in older patients with HRPC. This study will also explore the feasibility of a self-report geriatric assessment tool in this population. Methods: HRPC patients with progression of metastatic disease during hormonal therapy received docetaxel q 2 wks at dose levels of 40 (level 0), 45 (level 1), 50 (level 2), or 55 mg/m2 (level 3). The trial is a conventional phase I 3+3 dose-escalation design. Treatment was continued until progression, refused further treatment, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were given the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for completion every 4 weeks. Results: 16 patients were enrolled in the study. All are evaluable for toxicity, 10 for response. Pts had a median (range) age 76 (72–87). Median doses administered was 6 (range 3–19). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached in the study. No dose limiting side effects were reported for any of the dosing levels in the 8 week assessment period. Five patients had a ≥50% decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least 2 weeks apart. Of the 10 patients with measureable disease, 2 patients (one at dose level 0 and one at dose level 3) achieved a complete response, 2 patients (one at dose level 1 and one at dose 2) achieved a partial response, and 3 patients had stable disease (one each at dose levels 1, 2, and 3). At the time of entry onto the study, 4 patients required narcotic analgesics for bone pain; after treatment, 1 (25%) discontinued their pain medications. The completion rate of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) was 94.6%. Conclusions: Biweekly docetaxel can be safely administered in older metastatic HRPC patients and showed activity. For phase II evaluation, a bi-weekly dose of 55 mg/m2 appears to be suitable. The administration of the VES-13 was feasible in this population. [Table: see text]

A first-in-human phase I study of ER-α36 modifier icaritin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2614-2614
Author(s):  
Ying Fan ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Xiaoyan Ding ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Jiayu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Chinese Herb ◽  
Hepatocellular Cancer ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Multiple Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Dose Levels

2614 Background: ER-α36 was recently identified to be expressed in varieties of cancers and may play important roles in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Icaritin, a natural prenylflavonoid derived from the Chinese herb Epimedium, is a first of its kind ER-α36 modifier, which demonstrated potent anti-tumor effect in multiple cancer cell lines and their xenograft models. This study aims to determine its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and potential antitumor activity. Methods: This phase I study comprises phase Ia and Ib. In phase Ia part, patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) were treated with escalating doses of Icaritin orally once daily on a continuous 28-day dosing schedule. In phase Ib part, dosing was fixed to 600 or 800mg twice daily and expansion was made to other selected malignancies including hepatocellular cancer (HCC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) to further explore PK parameters and efficacy. Results: 24 patients were enrolled to receive Icaritin at six dose levels ranging from 50mg to 1600mg per day in phase Ia. No dose limited toxicity (DLT) was found even in the highest dose defined in the protocol, thus the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. Only grade 1 drug-related adverse events were observed including neutropenia, ALT elevation, hypercholesteremia, fatigue, anorexia, hypertriglyceridemia, proteinuria, myalgia, hot flash and rash. PK data from the fed dosing showed 3-fold increase of Cmax and AUC compared with the fast dosing. Half life was around 2-7 hours. Among 22 evaluable subjects, no complete or partial response (CR or PR) was detected, 5 patients had stable disease(SD)for 3 months or longer. For phase Ib study, 24 patients had been enrolled. One ABC, 2 CRC and 3 ICC patients progressed after 2 months of medication. Among 7 HCC patients already evaluated, 1 obtained PR and progressed after one year of treatment and 2 remained in the study, stable for 5 months. Similar drug related toxicity profile was noted in phase Ib. Conclusions: Icaritin was generally well-tolerated without DLT across tested dose levels. Evidence of promising antitumor activity was observed in ABC and HCC. Final results will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT01278810.

Phase I study of weekly albumin-bound paclitaxel (ab-P) plus weekly cetuximab (Cet) plus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with stage III/IVb head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6034-6034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Fury ◽  
Eric Jeffrey Sherman ◽  
Shyam S. Rao ◽  
Suzanne L. Wolden ◽  
Stephanie Smith-Marrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Neck Node ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

6034 Background: There is a clinical need to improve the efficacy of standard Cet + concurrent RT for pts with stage III/IVB HNSCC. Taxanes have potent activity against HNSCC, and ab-P may offer therapeutic advantages in comparison with other drugs of this class. Methods: This was a single institution phase I study with a modified 3 + 3 design. 4 dose levels (DLs) of weekly ab-P were explored (30, 45, 60, and 80 mg/m2) during IMRT. Standard Cet (450 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly) concurrent with IMRT (total dose, 70 Gy) was prescribed for all pts. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) would be exceeded if >2/6 pts experienced DLTs at a given dose level. NCI CTCAE v.3 was used, and DLT monitoring extended until 2 wks after IMRT. Results: 25 eligible pts (20M, 5F) enrolled, with median age 58 years (range, 46-84) and median KPS 90 (range 80-100). Primary tumor sites were oropharynx, 20 (10 HPV pos, 5 HPV neg, 5 not done); neck node with unknown primary, 2; and larynx, oral cavity, and maxillary sinus, 1 each. Two pts never received ab-P and were deemed inevaluable. At DL 1 (ab-P, 30 mg/m2), there was one DLT (g.4 pneumonia) among 6 pts. At DL2 (ab-P, 45 mg/m2), there were 2 DLTs (g.4 cerebrovascular accident; g.3 decrease in L. ventricle ejection fraction/CHF exacerbation) among 6 pts. At DL3 (ab-P, 60 mg/m2), there was 1 DLT (g.3 supraventricular tachycardia) among 6 pts. MTD was exceeded at DL4 (ab-P, 80 mg/m2) with 3 DLTS (g.3 neuropathy, g.3 dehydration, g.3 anemia) among 5 evaluable pts. For the entire study population, most common ≥ g3 AEs were: lymphopenia 100%, functional mucositis, 56%, and pain in throat/oral cavity, 52%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Among 23 evaluable pts at a median follow up of 29 months, 2y PFS rate is 64% (95% CI: 41-80%) and 2y OS rate is 90% (95% CI: 66-97). Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose is ab-P 60 mg/m2 weekly when given concurrently with IMRT and standard weekly Cet. This regimen merits further study as an alternative to IMRT + Cet alone for pts who require a non-platinum regimen. This study was approved and funded by the NCCN from general research support provided by Celgene, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00736619.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document