A dose-escalating phase I study of biweekly docetaxel in older men with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16117-e16117
Author(s):  
J. McDevitt ◽  
R. Hauser ◽  
J. Simon ◽  
L. Balducci
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

e16117 Background: Docetaxel has been shown to be effective and is used in the treatment of HRPC. This phase I study is designed to investigate the maximum tolerated dose, tolerability and activity of docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule in older patients with HRPC. This study will also explore the feasibility of a self-report geriatric assessment tool in this population. Methods: HRPC patients with progression of metastatic disease during hormonal therapy received docetaxel q 2 wks at dose levels of 40 (level 0), 45 (level 1), 50 (level 2), or 55 mg/m2 (level 3). The trial is a conventional phase I 3+3 dose-escalation design. Treatment was continued until progression, refused further treatment, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were given the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for completion every 4 weeks. Results: 16 patients were enrolled in the study. All are evaluable for toxicity, 10 for response. Pts had a median (range) age 76 (72–87). Median doses administered was 6 (range 3–19). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached in the study. No dose limiting side effects were reported for any of the dosing levels in the 8 week assessment period. Five patients had a ≥50% decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least 2 weeks apart. Of the 10 patients with measureable disease, 2 patients (one at dose level 0 and one at dose level 3) achieved a complete response, 2 patients (one at dose level 1 and one at dose 2) achieved a partial response, and 3 patients had stable disease (one each at dose levels 1, 2, and 3). At the time of entry onto the study, 4 patients required narcotic analgesics for bone pain; after treatment, 1 (25%) discontinued their pain medications. The completion rate of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) was 94.6%. Conclusions: Biweekly docetaxel can be safely administered in older metastatic HRPC patients and showed activity. For phase II evaluation, a bi-weekly dose of 55 mg/m2 appears to be suitable. The administration of the VES-13 was feasible in this population. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, Administered Daily in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Chang-Min Choi ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Rivoceranib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 and subsequent angiogenesis through this receptor signaling pathway. This phase I study was the first global study with rivoceranib outside of China in Korean and Caucasian patients and was designed to determine the safety profile (including maximum tolerated dose), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-one adult patients with advanced malignant solid tumors were enrolled to investigate 6 dose levels of rivoceranib. Twenty-five patients were initially enrolled to 5 dose levels of rivoceranib from 81 to 685 mg and an additional 6 patients were later enrolled in a supplemental study to evaluate the 805 mg dose level. Rivoceranib was very well tolerated. At the 805 mg dose level, 2 dose-limiting toxicities were observed but the 685 mg dose was well tolerated over multiple cycles of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose for rivoceranib was 685 mg (equivalent to 850 mg rivoceranib mesylate) and recommended for further study in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common adverse events were hypertension (all grades %/≥G3%: 58/29), nausea (42/0), diarrhea (39/0), anorexia (32/3), and fatigue (29/6). Rivoceranib pharmacokinetics were proportional across all dose levels but interpatient variability was high. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 21 were evaluable for efficacy. In this evaluable group, partial response was recorded in 5 patients, stable disease in 10, and disease progression in 6. Results indicate the potential clinical benefit of daily rivoceranib in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors with a tolerable safety profile.Trial registration: NCT01497704 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on December 22, 2011 and NCT02711969 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on March 17, 2016.

Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

A phase I study of 1-methyl-D-tryptophan in combination with docetaxel in metastatic solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2620-TPS2620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Jackson ◽  
Susan E. Minton ◽  
Roohi Ismail-Khan ◽  
Heather Han ◽  
Anthony Neuger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Indoleamine 2 ◽  
Solid Malignancy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

TPS2620 Background: The indoleamine 2, 3 dioxygenase pathway (IDO) can create immune suppression and unresponsiveness to tumor antigens in tumor-bearing hosts. 1-methyl-D-tryptophan (1-MT), an oral inhibitor of the IDO pathway, showed favorable toxicity profile and biologic activity in prior studies. Remarkably, in prior animal models (MMTV-neu mice), 1-MT in combination with chemotherapy produced 30% greater tumor regressions. Based on this data, a phase I trial was initiated to study the synergism of 1-MT with docetaxel. The primary goal of this trial is to determine the MTD and toxicity for the combination of docetaxel and oral 1-MT. A secondary endpoint will be to determine the PK data and the overall response rate. Methods: This phase I study utilizes a 3+3 design comprised of five dose levels. Dose levels 1-4 will evaluate docetaxel 60mg/m2 IV d1 q3wks plus 1-MT at 300mg, 600mg, 1000mg, and 2000mg PO BID d1-21 respectively. Dose level 5 is docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV d1 q3wks + 1-MT 2000mg PO BID d1-21. Eligibility for this study includes patients with measurable metastatic solid malignancy, no prior docetaxel for metastatic disease, age ≥18, life expectancy >4 months, and adequate organ/marrow function. Patients will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: chemotherapy within the past 3 weeks, untreated brain metastases, active autoimmune disease, or GI disease causing malabsorption. In addition, any patients who have received prior immunotherapy such as ipilimumab are excluded. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/physician discretion. Accrual to dose level 3 is complete and dose level 4 accrual is underway. The PK of 1-MT and docetaxel will also be characterized, using an HPLC assay. PK measurements for 1-MT are drawn on C1D1 after a single dose of 1-MT is given and then on C1D8 after the morning dose of 1-MT is given. (Drawn at 0,1,2,4,8,12,24, and 48 hours) Because IDO is hypothesized to cause regulatory T cell expansion, circulating Tregs will be quantified utilizing flow cytometry for CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ cells. (NCT01191216)

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3564 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90. Preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between HSP90 inhibition and fluorouracil. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts with refractory solid tumors received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose levels were capecitabine 1000mg/m2 PO BID d 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 IV days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 pts were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n= 6). No DLTs were observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (43%; 17%), fatigue (30%; 13%), nausea (39%; 0), hand-foot skin reaction (30%; 5%), anorexia (30%; 4%), vomiting (30%; 0), and darkening vision (26%; 0). Vision darkening, a class effect of HSP90 inhibitors, was reversible with drug hold and retreatment was possible. Two pts (9%) had hematologic G 3/4 events of neutropenia. Of the 19 pts evaluable for response, partial response was noted in 4 patients (colorectal, 2; breast, 1; stomach, 1); 2 had progressed on prior fluorouracil, and remained on treatment for 13-35 wks. Stable disease was noted in 8 pts (35% [colorectal, 5; pancreas, 2; breast, 1]) with a median duration of 25.5 wks (range: 11-44+). All 5 colorectal pts were refractory to 5-FU. Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, particularly as seen in pts previously resistant to fluorouracil, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I study of stereotactic body radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Ballas ◽  
Monish Aron ◽  
Shamim Jhimlee ◽  
Igor Shuryak ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Toxicity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

TPS158 Background: Although multiple Phase I/II studies demonstrate safety and low rates of toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the intact prostate, there are limited data on hypofractionation and SBRT after prostatectomy. This Phase I study was performed to evaluate acute toxicity associated with dose escalation from 3.6 Gy per fraction to 7.1 Gy per fraction to the prostate bed in the post-prostatectomy treatment of prostate cancer. We hypothesize that the toxicity of escalating the dose per fraction to the prostate fossa in the post-operative setting will be well tolerated; and we expect toxicity to be comparable to normal fractionation schedules. Methods: This study (NCT02446366) was designed to look at acute toxicity, defined as toxicity that occurred within the first 10 weeks of RT, of different dose fractionation schemes in the post-prostatectomy setting. The doses chosen for dose escalation on this study are based on an equivalent biological effective dose to a previously published hypofractionated post-prostatectomy study that showed no increase in acute bowel or bladder toxicity. The dose levels are as follows: Level 1 -3.6 Gy x 15 fractions; Level 2- 4.7 Gy x 10 fractions; Level 3 - 7.1 Gy x 5 fractions. Eligibility for participation on the trial was for patients who had pT3N0 disease regardless of margin status in the post-prostatectomy setting, pT2N0 patients with positive margin or with a negative surgical margin and a rising post-operative PSA. Patients could be on concurrent ADT and enroll on this study. Dose was escalated according to a 6+6 schema. For purposes of deciding whether to escalate to a new dose level, expand a dose level or de-escalate from a dose level, we used toxicities and adverse events that occur during the 1st 10 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. Six patients were enrolled on each new dose level with a total of 12 patients required at the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 4.03). Dose levels 1 and 2 have been completed without any DLT. Dose level 3 has enrolled 9/12 patients without any DLT. Clinical trial information: NCT02446366.

Results of a Phase I/II Study of the Combination of 5-aza-2′-Deoxycytidine (DAC) and Valproic Acid (VPA) in Patients (pts) with Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 263-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Blanca Sanchez-Gonzalez ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Antiepileptic Agent ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract DAC is a potent hypomethylating agent with clinical activity in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). VPA is a histone deacetylase inhibitor used as an antiepileptic agent. In vitro, the combination of DAC with VPA results in synergistic antileukemia activity at doses of VPA above 1mM. Based on this data, we have developed a phase I/II study of this combination for pts with leukemia. The phase I of the study followed a classic 3+3 design. The dose of DAC was fixed: 15 mg/m2 iv daily for 10 days. This was based on a previous phase I study (Blood2004;103:1635) that indicated that this schedule had an optimal toxicity-response profile in this population. Three dose levels of VPA were selected: 20, 35 and 50 mg/kg. VPA was given orally for 10 days concomitantly with DAC. 22 pts have completed the phase I portion of the study (median age 56 years, range 4–78, 20 pts AML, 2 MDS). At dose level 1 (20 mg/kg of VPA) no grade III-IV toxicity was observed. At dose level 2 (VPA 35 mg/kg), 2 out 6 pts developed grade III neurotoxicity. Both pts were receiving high doses of other neurotropic agents. After IRB approval, 3 mores pts were treated at this dose level with no significant toxicity. Subsequently, 3 pts were treated at the highest planned dose level (50 mg/kg) with no toxicity observed. This cohort was then expanded to a total of 10 pts. One pt developed grade III neurotoxicity. No other severe drug-related toxicities were observed, but 5 patients at all dose levels developed grade II sedation/somnolence. Pancytopenia was induced in all pts. At dose level 1, one pt with refractory AML achieved complete remission (CR) after the second course of therapy. This is now maintained for 5 courses. At dose level 2, a patient with HIV disease and relapsed AML achieved CR after the third course of therapy, and 2 pts with relapsed AML achieved complete marrow responses (marrow blasts less then 5%, no recovery of peripheral counts). Of 3 pts evaluable for response at dose level 3, 1 pt with MDS has achieved CR after 1 course, and 1 with relapsed AML a complete marrow response. Median free VPA levels pretreatment were 0, and 25 mg/L on both days 5 and 10 and returned to 0 prior to next course. Histone acetylation measured by Western blot was observed in 3 pts (25%), all at doses above 20 mg/kg of VPA. Reactivation of p21 expression was induced in 4 out 11 pts analyzed. Global hypomethylation measured using a bisulfite PCR LINE assay was induced in 1 out 3 pts so far studied. Based on the toxicity observed, the phase II portion of the study was initiated. This is restricted to pts with AML/MDS. Seven pts have been accrued to this phase, and 8 out the 10 pts at dose level 3 of the phase I are also evaluable. The response data of this pts will be updated at the meeting. In summary, the combination of low dose DAC and VPA up to doses of 50 mg/kg can be safely administered to pts with leukemia although it may be complicated by neurotoxicity. Clinical and biological activity was observed at all dose levels.

FOLFOX and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) for advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase I study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258
Author(s):  
Howard Safran ◽  
Kevin Charpentier ◽  
Kimberly Perez ◽  
Kalyan Mantripragada ◽  
Trevor Clark Austin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

258 Background: FOLFIRINOX improves survival in advanced pancreatic cancer, however the contribution of irinotecan is uncertain. The addition of irinotecan to gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine alone in pancreatic cancer, however nab-P demonstrates a survival benefit. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the addition of nab-P to fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-A). Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior treatment received oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 with 3 dose levels of nab-P (125, 150 and 175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. Pegfilgrastim was required during the first 2 cycles. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the first 2 cycles of treatment. Results: Fifteen patients were entered: Dose level 1 (n=6), dose level 2 (N=6), dose level 3 (N=3). The median age was 64 (35-81). Ten patients had metastatic and 5 had locally advanced disease. DLTs of nausea and fatigue occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose level 3. Two patients developed grade 3 neuropathy after >= 10 cycles of treatment. One patient had grade 3/4 neutropenia. Eight of fifteen patients (53%) had a partial response. Conclusions: The MTD of nab-P is 150mg/m2 every 2 weeks with FOLFOX. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy, similar to other FOLFOX regimens, is the most significant toxicity generally occurring after >= 10 cycles of treatment. FOLFOX-A has substantial activity and may represent a promising regimen in pancreatic cancer. Patients are currently being accrued to an expansion phase utilizing dose level 2. Supported by the Davis and Browning families and LIFEcycle. Clinical trial information: NCT01744353.

Phase I trial of regorafenib, hydroxychloroquine, and entinostat in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15580-e15580
Author(s):  
Timothy J Brown ◽  
Thomas Benjamin Karasic ◽  
Charles John Schneider ◽  
Ursina R. Teitelbaum ◽  
Kim Anna Reiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

e15580 Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

A phase I/II study of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine in advanced carcinoma of the esophagus and stomach

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14046-14046 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Evans ◽  
T. Miner ◽  
T. Ng ◽  
P. Akerman ◽  
D. Harrington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Esophagus ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Brown University ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

14046 Background: The Brown University Oncology Group has attempted to modify the regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) to reduce toxicity, simplify administration and maintain efficacy. We have a completed a phase I/II study of weekly doxetaxel, carboplatin and capecitabine for patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (Safran et al, Am J Clin Oncol, 2006). In this phase I study we have substituted oxaliplatin for carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly docetaxel and oxaliplatin with capecitabine. Methods: Patients with metastatic esophageal and gastric cancers received docetaxel and oxaliplatin on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine in divided doses, twice daily, on days 1–10, with each cycle repeated every 21 days. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels as shown in the table. Results: Fourteen patients have been enrolled. The median age was 58.5 years. Eight patients had esophageal cancer and six had gastric cancer. Grade 3/4 dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of diarrhea, nausea, and febrile neutropenia occurred in three of four patients at dose level 3. An intermediate dose level was added (2A), reducing the capecitabine dose. Conclusion: Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 35 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 with capecitabine 750 mg/m2 BID × 10 days in 21 day cycles may represent a promising, easily administered regimen for metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer. Enrollment continues at dose level 2A. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase I Study of a Weekly Schedule of Irinotecan, High-Dose Leucovorin, and Infusional Fluorouracil as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Vanhoefer ◽  
Andreas Harstrick ◽  
Claus-Henning Köhne ◽  
Wolf Achterrath ◽  
Youcef M. Rustum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a weekly schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and a 24-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU24h) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer and to assess preliminary data on the antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this phase I study. In the first six dose levels, fixed doses of CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) and LV (500 mg/m2) in combination with escalated doses of 5-FU24h ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 g/m2 were administered on a weekly-times-four (dose levels 1 to 4) or weekly-times-six (dose levels 5 to 6) schedule. The dose of CPT-11 was then increased to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7). RESULTS: Seventy-nine cycles of 5-FU24h/LV with CPT-11 were administered in an outpatient setting. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the first cycle at dose levels 1 to 6, but diarrhea of grade 4 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) was observed in three patients after multiple treatment cycles. Other nonhematologic and hematologic side effects, specifically alopecia and neutropenia, did not exceed grade 2. With the escalation of CPT-11 to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7), diarrhea of grade 3 or higher was observed in four of six patients during the first cycle; thus, the MTD was achieved. Sixteen of 25 response-assessable patients (64%; 95% confidence interval, 45% to 83%) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for further studies are CPT-11 80 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2, and 5-FU24h 2.6 g/m2 given on a weekly-times-six schedule followed by a 1-week rest period. The addition of CPT-11 to 5-FU24h/LV seems to improve the therapeutic efficacy in terms of tumor response with manageable toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document