Pentostatin and Cyclophosphamide: An Effective New Regimen in Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1278-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Weiss ◽  
Peter G. Maslak ◽  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
David A. Scheinberg ◽  
Timothy B. Aliff ◽  
...  

Purpose: Purine analogs and alkylators are important agents in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Previously, combinations of fludarabine and chlorambucil were abandoned because of increased toxicity from overlapping myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Of the purine analogs active in CLL, pentostatin may be least myelosuppressive. We hypothesized that combining pentostatin with cyclophosphamide would have less myelotoxicity than combinations using other purine analogs. Patients and Methods: We studied 23 patients with previously treated CLL. All patients received pentostatin 4 mg/m2. Seventeen patients received cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, and six patients received cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of each cycle, and cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for six treatments. Filgrastim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and acyclovir were administered prophylactically. The median number of prior treatment regimens was three (range, one to five) with 13 patients (57%) refractory to prior fludarabine therapy. Results: The cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2 dose level was associated with moderate to severe nausea, and we chose cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 as the dose for further study. There were 17 responses (74%; 95% confidence interval, 63% to 85%), including four complete responses. The response rate was 77% in fludarabine-refractory patients. Myelosuppression was acceptable with grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, seen in 35% and 30% of patients, respectively. The relative sparing of thrombopoiesis can be seen in that only one patient (5%) with an initial platelet count of more than 20,000 required platelet transfusions while receiving therapy. Conclusion: Pentostatin 4 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 is safe and effective in previously treated patients with CLL. On the basis of these results, we are currently studying pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (PCR) therapy in patients with CLL.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1575-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Matt Kalaycio ◽  
Peter Maslak ◽  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Mark Heaney ◽  
...  

Purpose Purine analogs and alkylators are important agents for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Early studies combining fludarabine and chlorambucil were abandoned owing to increased toxicity from overlapping myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Of the purine analogs active in CLL, pentostatin appears to be the least myelosuppressive. We previously reported that pentostatin and cyclophosphamide (PC) is active and well-tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. Subsequently, we added rituximab, and now report on this three-drug combination. Patients and Methods We treated 46 patients with either previously treated CLL (32 patients) or other low-grade B-cell neoplasms (14 patients). Patients received pentostatin 4 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 (PCR). All drugs were administered on the same day (rituximab omitted from cycle 1), and patients received six cycles at 3-week intervals. Filgrastim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and acyclovir were administered prophylactically. Results The median age was 62 years (range, 30 to 80 years). The median number of prior regimens was two (range, one to seven). For CLL patients, there were 24 responses (75%), including eight complete responses (25%). In fludarabine-refractory patients, 75% responded. Toxicity was acceptable, with grade 3/4 infections (including fever of unknown origin) in 28%. The regimen was well tolerated, with 72% of patients receiving the planned treatment at full dose. Conclusion PCR is safe and effective in previously treated patients with CLL. In comparison with our prior two-drug regimen, we find that rituximab did not seem to add significantly to the toxicity, but did appear to confer a survival advantage. Based on these results, we are currently studying PCR as initial therapy for patients with CLL.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3115-3115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Mark L. Heaney ◽  
Renier J. Brentjens ◽  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Mark A. Weiss

Combination therapy with purine analogs, alkylators, and/or monoclonal antibodies has markedly improved the quality of responses in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Most regimens have utilized fludarabine as the purine analog but the severe myelosuppression and immunosuppression of these combinations require careful attention to dosing and schedule to minimize these toxic complications. Of the purine analogs active in CLL, pentostatin is the least myelosuppressive. Previously, we reported that combination pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab was very active and acceptably safe to administer to patients with CLL and in the salvage setting this regimen appeared to have less myelosuppression and less frequent infectious complications than comparable fludarabine-based combinations. The current study combines pentostatin 4mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2, rituximab 375mg/m2 (omitted from cycle 1) and mitoxantrone (dose escalated in a phase 1 portion starting at 6mg/m2, 8mg/m2, and 10mg/m2) all administered on day 1 of 28-day cycles for a total of 6 treatments. Supportive measures included prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, acyclovir, and antiemetics. Renal function was closely monitored and all patients received at least 1.5 liters of intravenous hydration with the administration of chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients (median age 62, range 44–74) with CLL (17 patients) or other low grade B cell neoplasms (4 patients) have been enrolled. There were 16 men and 5 women. Of the CLL patients all had either high risk disease (71%) or “active” intermediate (29%) risk disease and their median pretreatment WBC count was 74,000/μl, HGB 9.9 g/dl, and PLT 144,000/μl. The median β-2 microglobulin was 3.3 mg/l. The median number of prior treatment regimens was two (range 1–6). Most of the CLL patients (65%) had previously been treated with chemoimmunotherapy utilizing PCR or FCR. Response data is currently available for 16/17 of the CLL patients. In this group there were 15 responses (94%), including 4 CRs (25%) and 11 PRs (69%). Prior therapy with PCR or FCR did not adversely affect the frequency of response with 91% of these patients responding (CR in 19% and PRs in 73%). These preliminary results indicate that PCRM therapy is very active and well tolerated even in patients who have previously received FCR or PCR.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3484-3484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Matt Kalaycio ◽  
Peter Maslak ◽  
Joseph Jurcic ◽  
David A. Scheinberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Combination therapy with purine analogs, alkylators, and/or monoclonal antibodies represents a promising new approach in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other low grade B cell neoplasms. Most regimens have utilized fludarabine as the purine analog, but the severe myelosuppression and immunosuppression of these combinations requires careful attention to dosing and schedule to minimize these complications. Of the purine analogs in CLL, pentostatin appears to be least myelosuppressive. We have previously reported our experience with pentostatin and cyclophosphamide (PC regimen) in a cohort of heavily pretreated patients with CLL (JCO21:1278, 2003). We have since added rituximab to this active combination (PCR regimen) and have treated a second cohort of patients with CLL and other low grade B cell neoplasms. We now report on our cumulative experience of 69 patients (23 received PC and 46 received PCR) treated with pentostatin combination therapy. The PC regimen consisted of pentostatin 4mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2, given every 3 weeks for a total of 6 treatments. In the 2nd cohort of CLL patients, rituximab 375mg/m2 was added to this regimen starting with cycle 2. Supportive measures in both studies included hydration with each treatment (and monitoring of renal function) and prophylactic administration of filgrastim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, acyclovir, and antiemetics. In the first cohort of patients treated with the PC regimen, the median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1–5) with the median age being 64 (32–77). There were responses achieved in 74% of patients with 17% complete responses seen in this heavily pretreated group. Similar (or perhaps slightly better) results were obtained with patients treated with the PCR regimen. For this cohort the median age was 62 (30–80) and the median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–7). Of the 32 patients with CLL 28 are evaluable for response: 79% responded and this includes 29% who achieved a complete response. Ten of the 14 patients with other low grade B cell diseases (SLL 8 patients, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia 2 patients, follicular lymphoma 4 patients) are evaluable for response. The overall response rate for these patients was 50% (all PRs). These regimens were generally well tolerated with grade 3/4 toxicity consisting primarily of myelosuppression and its complications. We conclude that PC and PCR are highly active, well tolerated regimens even in heavily pretreated patients. We plan to conduct a multicenter study of PCR as initial therapy in patients with CLL.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19074-e19074
Author(s):  
K. Kudo ◽  
F. Ohyanagi ◽  
A. Horiike ◽  
E. Miyauchi ◽  
I. Motokawa ◽  
...  

e19074 Background: S-1 is a novel oral 5-fluorouracil derivative that exhibits obvious activity against various tumor types including NSCLC. However, the effects of S-1 against SCLC have not been reported. The present phase II trial assesses the efficacy and safety of S-1 in previously treated SCLC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had pathologically documented SCLC that relapsed after platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function. Patients with untreated or symptomatic brain metastasis were excluded. Treatment comprised the oral administration of S-1 at 40 mg/m2 twice each day for 28 days every 6 weeks. The primary end point was the objective tumor response rate (RECIST). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Twenty-six evaluable patients were enrolled (Simon's two-stage optimal design; α = 0.1; β = 0.1; P0 = 0.05; P1 = 0.25) with the following characteristics: male: female, 22/4; median age, 68 (33 - 79) y; PS0–1, n = 21; PS2, n = 5. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 (1–3). S-1 was administered for a mean of 1.3 cycles (1 - 5). One patient (3.8%) partially responded, 10 (38.5%) had stable and 15 (57.7%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 3.8% and the disease control rate was 42.3%. The median time to progression was 33 days. The median survival time was 8.0 months and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. This regimen was well tolerated. The common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (7.7%), leukopenia (7.7%), anemia (7.7%), hyponatremia (7.7%), rush (7.7%), infection (7.7%), and diarrhea (3.8%). None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia and no deaths were attributed to treatment. Conclusions: S-1 is well tolerated but has low activity as a single agent in previously treated patients with SCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Januaro Castro ◽  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
...  

AbstractPreclinical data demonstrate enhanced antitumor effect when lumiliximab, an anti-CD23 monoclonal antibody, is combined with fludarabine or rituximab. Clinical data from a phase 1 trial with lumiliximab demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We therefore pursued a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study of lumiliximab added to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in previously treated CLL patients. Thirty-one patients received either 375 mg/m2 (n = 3) or 500 mg/m2 (n = 28) of lumiliximab in combination with FCR for 6 cycles. The toxicity profile was similar to that previously reported for FCR in treatment of relapsed CLL. The overall response rate was 65%, with 52% of patients achieving a complete response (CR), which compares favorably with the CR rate previously reported for the FCR regimen alone in relapsed CLL. The estimated median progression-free survival for all responders was 28.7 months. The addition of lumiliximab to FCR therapy is feasible, achieves a high CR rate, and does not appear to enhance toxicity in previously treated patients with CLL. A randomized trial comparing lumiliximab plus FCR with FCR alone is underway to define the benefit of this combination in relapsed CLL. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00103558.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del 17p) follow an aggressive clinical course and demonstrate a median survival of less than 2 years in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Ibrutinib (ImbruvicaTM), a first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has been approved for previously treated patients with CLL and for patients with del 17p CLL. We report results from the primary analysis of the Phase II RESONATETM-17 (PCYC-1117-CA) study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent ibrutinib for treatment of patients with R/R del 17p CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Methods: Patients with del 17p CLL or SLL who failed at least one therapy were enrolled to receive 420 mg oral ibrutinib once daily until progression. All patients receiving at least one dose of ibrutinib were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per an independent review committee (IRC). Other endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of ibrutinib. Results: Among 144 treated patients (137 with CLL, 7 with SLL), the median age was 64 (48% 65 years or older) and all had del 17p. Baseline characteristics included 63% of patients with Rai Stage III or IV disease, 49% with bulky lymphadenopathy of at least 5 cm, and 10% with lymphadenopathy of least 10 cm. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was 32.9 x 109/L with 57% of patients with a baseline ALC at least 25.0 x 109/L. Baseline beta-2 microglobulin levels were at least 3.5 mg/L in 78% of patients (range 1.8-19.8 mg/L), and lactate dehydrogenase levels were at least 350 U/L in 24% of patients (range 127-1979 U/L). A median of 2 prior therapies (range 1-7) was reported. Investigator-assessed ORR was 82.6% including 17.4% partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). Complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) were reported in 3 patients. IRC-assessed ORR is pending. At a median follow up of 13.0 months (range 0.5-16.7 months), the median PFS (Figure 1) and DOR by investigator determination had not been reached. At 12 months, 79.3% were alive and progression-free, and 88.3% of responders were progression-free. Progressive disease was reported in 20 patients (13.9%). Richter transformation was reported in 11 of these patients (7.6%), 7 of the cases occurring within the first 24 weeks of treatment. Prolymphocytic leukemia was reported in 1 patient. The most frequently reported adverse events (AE) of any grade were diarrhea (36%; 2% Grade 3-4), fatigue (30%; 1% Grade 3-4), cough (24%; 1% Grade 3-4), and arthralgia (22%; 1% Grade 3-4). Atrial fibrillation of any grade was reported in 11 patients (7.6%; 3.5% Grade 3-4). Seven patients reported basal or squamous cell skin cancer and 1 patient had plasma cell myeloma. Most frequently reported Grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (14%), anemia (8%), pneumonia (8%), and hypertension (8%). Major hemorrhage was reported in 7 patients (4.9%, all Grade 2 or 3). Study treatment was discontinued in 16 patients (11.1%) due to AEs with 8 eventually having fatal events (pneumonia, sepsis, myocardial or renal infarction, health deterioration). At the time of data cut, the median treatment duration was 11.1 months, and 101 of 144 patients (70%) continued treatment with ibrutinib. Conclusions: In the largest prospective trial dedicated to the study of del 17p CLL/SLL, ibrutinib demonstrated marked efficacy in terms of ORR, DOR, and PFS, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. At a median follow up of 13 months, the median DOR had not yet been reached; 79.3% of patients remained progression-free at 12 months, consistent with efficacy observed in earlier studies (Byrd, NEJM 2013;369:32-42). The PFS in this previously treated population compares favorably to that of treatment-naïve del 17p CLL patients receiving fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) (Hallek, Lancet 2010;376:1164-74) or alemtuzumab (Hillmen, J Clin Oncol 2007;10:5616-23) with median PFS of 11 months. The AEs are consistent with those previously reported for ibrutinib (Byrd, NEJM 2014;371:213-23). These results support ibrutinib as an effective therapy for patients with del 17p CLL/SLL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Jones:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mato:Pharamcyclics, Genentech, Celegene, Millennium : Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siddiqi:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Brown:Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy. Stevens-Brogan:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Li:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Fardis:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hallek:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Pharmacyclics, Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7504-7504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Porter Sharman ◽  
Danielle M. Brander ◽  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
Suman Kambhampati ◽  
John M. Burke ◽  
...  

7504 Background: Patients (pts) with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) defined by interruptions in TP53 (either by mutation or deletion) or loss of chromosome 11q experience inferior outcomes with ibrutinib (IB) monotherapy (O’Brien ASH 2016). Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel glycoengineered mAb with enhanced ADCC targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen. GENUINE is the first randomized Ph 3 trial conducted assessing the addition of a novel agent to ibrutinib in high-risk rel/ref CLL, and evaluates IB monotherapy vs. UTX + IB. Methods: Eligible pts with rel/ref CLL and centrally confirmed del17p, del11q, and/or a TP53 mutation were randomized 1:1 to receive IB (420 mg QD) alone or with UTX (900 mg on D1, 8, 15 of Cycle 1, D1 of Cycle 2-6, and Q3 Cycles thereafter). There was no limit on number of prior therapies. Prior IB exposure was excluded. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per iwCLL 2008 criteria, with secondary endpoints including CR rate, MRD negativity, PFS, time to response (TTR) and safety. Results: 126 pts were randomized at sites in the US and Israel, with 117 pts treated (59 on UTX + IB, 58 on IB alone). Median age 67, median 3 prior therapies (range 1-8), > 70% of were male. High-risk cytogenetics were relatively balanced with ~ 50% of pts having del17p. UTX+IB was well tolerated, with infusion reactions the most prevalent AE (44%, GR3/4 5%). Neutropenia was comparable with the combination (17%, Gr3/4 7% vs. 10%, Gr3/4 9%), and other AE’s were similar or lower with UTX+IB vs. IB alone (all grades), including fatigue (17% vs. 31%), dizziness (12% vs. 21%), contusion (12% vs. 26%), anemia (10% vs. 16%), and myalgia (9% vs. 14%). At median follow-up of 12 mo, best ORR per independent central review was 80% for UTX + IB vs. 47% for IB alone (p < 0.001). While not powered for secondary endpoints, observed advantages were seen in PFS and radiographic CR rate in the UTX + IB arm. CR and MRD confirmation is ongoing. Median TTR for the combo was 1.97 mo vs. 3.8 mo for IB alone. Both arms have responses pending confirmatory assessments. Conclusions: The addition of UTX to IB demonstrated a superior response rate compared to IB alone without additional clinically significant toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02301156.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 330-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Fischer ◽  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
Carmen D Schweighofer ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Jasmin Renschler ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Bendamustine, an alkylating agent with additional properties of a purine analogue, has shown considerable activity in monotherapy for solid and lymphoid malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In vitro studies have demonstrated synergistic pro-apoptotic effects of bendamustine and the CD20 antibody rituximab (BR) in primary CLL cells. Encouraging clinical results have been obtained using BR combination treatment in relapsed/refractory and previously untreated Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. This phase II trial represents the first study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in combination with rituximab in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory CLL. Patients and Methods: 81 pts with a median number of 2 (1–3) pretreatments were enrolled between March 2006 and June 2007. Patients received 70 mg/m² bendamustine on day 1 and 2 combined with 375mg/m² rituximab for the first cycle and 500 mg/m² for the second and subsequent cycles. BR treatment was administered every 28 days for up to 6 courses. Blood samples were taken for molecular cytogenetics by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and analysis of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgVH) mutational status prior to the first treatment course. Assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) was performed by four-colour flow cytometry of peripheral blood and bone marrow. Primary endpoint of the trial was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, duration of response, event-free survival, MRD response rate and overall response rate in biological defined risk groups. Results: 81 pts (mean age 66.7 years) received a total of 328 treatment cycles. A mean number of 4.5 courses was administered. In total 123 CTC grade 3/4/5 adverse events were reported, most frequently on myelosuppression and infections: grade 3/4 anemia occurred in 6.1%, grade 3/4 leukopenia/neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 11.9% and 9.1% of all given courses, respectively. 16 episodes (4.9%) of CTC grade ≥3 infections were documented, most of them could be successfully managed. However, treatment related mortality occurred in 3.7% of pts: three pts died due to severe infections associated with treatment related neutropenia including 1 fatal pneumonia, one sepsis after diagnosis of Richter’s syndrome and 1 urosepsis. In 62 pts data for response assessment were available: 19 pts were not evaluable for response due to withdrawal or missing of consent, violation of enrolment criteria or early discontinuation of therapy. The overall response was 77.4% with complete remissions (CR) in 14.5% (9 pts) and a partial response (PR) in 62.9% of pts (39 pts). An MRD level below 10E-4 was measured after completion of therapy in 2 of 30 evaluable pts in peripheral blood, while none of the pts achieved MRD negativity in bone marrow. Stable disease (SD) was achieved in 17.7% (11 pts) whereas 3 pts (4.8%) had progressive CLL (PD). Differences in response were observed among genetic subgroups: 12 of 13 pts with 11q- achieved a remission with 11 PR and 1 CR (ORR: 92.3%). Accordingly, 8 of 8 patients with +12 responded (7 PR, 1 CR). In the high-risk group with 17p-, four of nine pts showed a partial remission (ORR: 44,4%). 29 of 39 pts (ORR: 74.4%) with unmutated IgVH status were responsive to BR. Conclusion: Bendamustine plus rituximab is an effective treatment regimen for pts with relapsed and/or refractory CLL and has notable activity in high-risk CLL disease. Major but tolerable treatment toxicities were myelosuppression and infections. Ongoing trial follow-up analysis will define response duration and long-term safety. In a forthcoming trial the German CLL Study group will investigate the efficacy of BR in comparison to fludarabine-based immunochemotherapy (FCR) for first-line treatment of CLL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document