scholarly journals Efficacy of First-Third generation EGFR inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in a real-world setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Wei Chen Ming-Wei Chen ◽  
An-Tai He . ◽  
Yi Pei .
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mean Survival Time ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
To Receive

Abstract BackgroundTo explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients who harbor sensitive EGFR mutations, a head-to-head study was performed to compare chemotherapy and gefitinib-erlotinip, osimertinib treatment in combination or with either agent alone as first-line therapy, in terms of efficacy and safety.MethodsA total of 200 untreated patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbored sensitive EGFR mutations were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib-erlotinip combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin group, gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin group, pemetrexed plus carboplatin alone group, or gefitinib-erlotinip alone group, osimertinib alone group.ResultsThe progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the gefitinib-erlotinip combination group Mean Survival Time PFS 22.00 month,95%CI[16.29,27.70] and osimertinib gefitinib-erlotinip combination group Mean Survival Time PFS 40.00 month,95%CI[28.12,51.87]was longer than that of patients in the chemotherapy alone group PFS10,81 months, 95% CI,[ 8.99–12.64],gefitinib-erlotinip alone group PFS14.00 month.95%CI[11.98-20.01], osimertinib alone group PFS 26.66 month 95%CI[24.77-29.22].The gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib combinational resulted in longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.46, p = 0.016) or gefitinib-erlotinip alone (HR = 0.36, p = 0.01). osimertinib alone (HR = 0.26, p = 0.01).ConclusionsOur finding suggested that treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib-erlotinip and pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib group could provide better survival benefits for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

scholarly journals Vasculogenic mimicry, a negative indicator for progression free survival of lung adenocarcinoma irrespective of first line treatment and epithelial growth factor receptor mutation status

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejun He ◽  
Jijun You ◽  
Haibing Ding ◽  
Zhisheng Zhang ◽  
Lin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Vasculogenic Mimicry ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background Vascular mimicry (VM) was associated with the prognosis of cancers. The aim of the study was to explore the association between VM and anticancer therapy response in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with lung adenocarcinoma between March 1st, 2013, to April 1st, 2019, at the Second People’s Hospital of Taizhou City. All included patients were divided into the VM and no-VM groups according to whether VM was observed or not in the specimen. Vessels with positive PAS and negative CD34 staining were confirmed as VM. The main outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Sixty-six (50.4%) patients were male. Eighty-one patients received chemotherapy as the first-line treatment, and 50 patients received TKIs. Forty-five (34.4%) patients were confirmed with VM. There was no difference regarding the first-line treatment between the VM and no-VM groups (P = 0.285). The 86 patients without VM had a median PFS of 279 (range, 90–1095) days, and 45 patients with VM had a median PFS of 167 (range, 90–369) days (P < 0.001). T stage (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.71), N stage (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.09–1.86), M stage (HR = 2.85, 95%CI: 1.76–4.61), differentiation (HR = 1.85, 95%CI: 1.29–2.65), therapy (HR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.21–0.49), VM (HR = 2.12, 95%CI: 1.33–3.37), and ECOG (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.84) were independently associated with PFS. Conclusion The benefits of first-line TKIs for NSCLC with EGFR mutation are possibly better than those of platinum-based regimens in patients without VM, but there is no difference in the benefit of chemotherapy or target therapy for VM-positive NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

scholarly journals Better Progression-Free Survival in Elderly Patients with Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Treated with the First-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Ju Tsai ◽  
Jen-Yu Hung ◽  
Mei-Hsuan Lee ◽  
Chia-Yu Kuo ◽  
Yu-Chen Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations usually have a good response rate (RR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the treatment efficacy to uncommon EGFR mutations remains controversial. We, therefore, performed a retrospective study, screening 2958 patients. A total of 67 patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR mutations were enrolled and 57 patients with stage IV diseases receiving a first-line EGFR TKI were included for further analyses. The patients were classified into 27 (47%) “a single sensitizing uncommon mutation”, 7 (12%) “multiple sensitizing mutations”, 5 (9%) “a sensitizing mutation and a resistant uncommon mutation”, and 18 (32%) “other resistant uncommon mutations”. No significant difference was noted in PFS or overall survival (OS) between groups. Patients receiving different first-line EGFR TKIs had similar PFS and OS. The elder patients had a significantly poorer performance status than the younger patients but a significantly longer PFS than the younger patients (median PFS: 10.5 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.0320). In conclusion, this is the first study to identify that elderly patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR mutation might have a longer PFS. Large-scale prospective studies are mandatory to prove our findings.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Afatinib and Gefitinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations in Indonesia: Observational Studies with Retrospectives

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3516-3522
Author(s):  
Seftika Sari ◽  
Tri Murti Andayani ◽  
Dwi Endarti ◽  
Kartika Widayati
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Effectiveness data can describe the results or performance of an intervention (treatment) in daily clinical practice and also provide recommendations to policymakers regarding the need or not of health technology to be implemented into the health care system. Research related to the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib is still minimal, especially in Indonesia. This study aims to provide an overview of the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib in daily clinical practice (the real world) as first-line therapy. This research is an observational study with a retrospective approach that observes the medical records of NSCLC patients who have EGFR mutations in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta and Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Semarang, Java Island, Indonesia in the period January 2016 - March 2019. The effectiveness seen is the Progress Free Survival and Overall Survival based on the patient's medical records and analyzed using the Kaplan Meier test to see survival. There were 113 patients identified, 27 patients using afatinib and 86 patients using gefitinib. Afatinib had significantly superior progression-free survival (448 days or 14.7 months; 95% CI = 12-17.4 months; p = 0.002) compared to gefitinib (344 days or 11.3 months; 95% CI = 8, 4-14.3 months), however, overall survival of afatinib is no better than gefitinib (472 days or 15.5 months; 95% CI = 13.8-17.2 months vs 653 days or 21.4 months; 95% CI = 18-24.8 months) with a value of p = 0.302. Afatinib has superior progression-free survival compared to gefitinib, but not overall survival as first-line therapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

scholarly journals Prediction of the VeriStrat test in first-line therapy of pemetrexed-based regimens for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Jia ◽  
Zhi Dong ◽  
Di Wu ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Meina Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Poor Efficacy

Abstract Background：Although advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have significantly better survival outcomes after pemetrexed based treatment, a subset of patients still show intrinsic resistance and progress rapidly. Therefore we aimed to use a blood-based protein signature (VeriStrat, VS) to analyze whether VS could identify the subset of patients who had poor efficacy on pemetrexed therapy. Methods：This study retrospectively analysed 72 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line pemetrexed/platinum or combined with bevacizumab treatment. Results：Plasma samples from these patients were analysed using VS and classified into the Good (VS-G) or Poor (VS-P) group. The relationship between efficacy and VS status was further investigated. Of the 72 patients included in this study, 35 (48.6%) were treated with pemetrexed plus platinum and 37 (51.4%) were treated with pemetrexed/platinum combined with bevacizumab. Among all patients, 60 (83.3%) and 12 (16.7%) patients were classified as VS-G and VS-P, respectively. VS-G patients had significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS) (Unreached vs. 4.2 months; P<0.001) than VS-P patients. In addition, the partial response (PR) rate was higher in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group (46.7% vs 25.0%, P=0.212). Subgroup analysis showed that PFS was also significantly longer in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group regardless of whether patients received chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Conclusions：Our study indicated that VS might be considered as a novel and valid method to predict the efficacy of pemetrexed-based therapy and identify a subset of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who had intrinsic resistance to pemetrexed based regimens. However, larger sample studies are still needed to further confirm this result.

scholarly journals Prediction of veristrat test in first-line therapy of pemetrexed based regimen for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Jia ◽  
Zhi Dong ◽  
Di Wu ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Meina Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Poor Efficacy

Abstract Background: Although advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have significantly better survival outcome on pemetrexed based treatment, a subset of patients still show intrinsic resistance and progress rapidly. Therefore we aim to use a blood-based protein signature (VeriStrat, VS) to analyze whether VS could identify the subset of patients who had poor efficacy on pemetrexed therapy. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 72 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line pemetrexed/platinum or combined with bevacizumab treatment. Results: Plasma samples from these patients were analyzed using VS and classified as Good (VS-G) or Poor (VS-P) group. The relationship between efficacy and VS status was further investigated. Of 72 patients included in this study, 35 (48.6%) were treated with pemetrexed plus platinum and 37 (51.4%) were treated with pemetrexed/platinum combined with bevacuzumab. Among all patients, 60 (83.3%) and 12 (16.7%) patients were classified as VS-G and VS-P, respectively. VS-G patients had significantly better median progression free survival (PFS) (Unreached vs. 4.2 months; P＜0.001) than VS-P patients. Besides, partial response (PR) rate was higher in VS-G than that in VS-P group (46.7% vs 25.0%, P=0.212). Subgroup analysis showed that PFS was also significantly longer in the VS-G than that in VS-P group no matter for patients received chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Conclusions: Our study indicates that VS could be considered as a novel and valid method to predicit efficacy of pemetrexed based therapy and identify a subset of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who have intrinsic resistance to pemetrexed based regimen.

Clinical outcomes of sunitinib (Su) for patients (pts) with desmoid tumors (DT).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11052-11052
Author(s):  
Salvatora tindara Miano ◽  
Guido Francini ◽  
Serenella Civitelli ◽  
Roberto Petrioli ◽  
Edoardo Francini
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Radiological Progression ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive

11052 Background: The incidence of DT is steadily increasing in pts affected by familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and represents the first cause of death for pts who underwent preventive proctocolectomy. Currently, there is no standard therapy for DT and Tamoxifen (20 mg once daily) + Meloxicam (15 mg once daily) (TM) is the most commonly used regimen in clinical routine. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of Su, the most active PDGFR TKI, as first-line therapy for pts with DT. Methods: In this phase II IRB approved prospective study, pts with progressive, symptomatic, or recurrent DT were randomized to receive either Su (52 mg once daily) or TM. The primary end point was progression-free survival, defined as time from treatment start to clinical or radiological progression, whichever came first, at 2 years (2yr-PFS). Secondary endpoints were rates of objective response (OR), evaluated per RECIST criteria version 1.1, time to OR (ttOR), and toxicity. Adverse events (AE) were assessed per NCI-CTCAE version 4.02. Results: Of the 32 pts enrolled, 22 received Su and 10 TM. In both groups, median age at diagnosis was 43.5 years No OR was observed in the TM group. In the Su group, 17 pts had a partial response and 5 stable disease and the ORR was 75% (95% CI, 50 to 100). At a median follow-up of 27 months, the 2yr-PFS was 81% (95% CI, 69-96) and 36% (95% CI, 22-57) in the Su cohort and TM cohort, respectively (HR = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05- 0.31; P<0.001). The median ttOR among pts who had an OR was 24 months. In the TM group, no toxicity was observed. The most frequently reported AE in the Su group were grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism (73%), fatigue (67%), hypertension (55%), and diarrhea (51%). (HR: 0.260; p = 0.0035). All AE responded to dose reduction (37.5 mg). Conclusions: In a cohort of pts with progressive, recurrent, or symptomatic DT, Su seems to be well tolerated and improve 2yr-PFS and OR rate compared with TM therapy. Further prospective studies with larger samples are needed to verify these results.

scholarly journals Prediction of the VeriStrat test in first-line therapy of pemetrexed-based regimens for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Jia ◽  
Zhi Dong ◽  
Di Wu ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Meina Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Poor Efficacy

Abstract Background Although advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have significantly better survival outcomes after pemetrexed based treatment, a subset of patients still show intrinsic resistance and progress rapidly. Therefore we aimed to use a blood-based protein signature (VeriStrat, VS) to analyze whether VS could identify the subset of patients who had poor efficacy on pemetrexed therapy. Methods This study retrospectively analysed 72 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line pemetrexed/platinum or combined with bevacizumab treatment. Results Plasma samples from these patients were analysed using VS and classified into the Good (VS-G) or Poor (VS-P) group. The relationship between efficacy and VS status was further investigated. Of the 72 patients included in this study, 35 (48.6%) were treated with pemetrexed plus platinum and 37 (51.4%) were treated with pemetrexed/platinum combined with bevacizumab. Among all patients, 60 (83.3%) and 12 (16.7%) patients were classified as VS-G and VS-P, respectively. VS-G patients had significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS) (Unreached vs. 4.2 months; P < 0.001) than VS-P patients. In addition, the partial response (PR) rate was higher in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group (46.7% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.212). Subgroup analysis showed that PFS was also significantly longer in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group regardless of whether patients received chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Conclusions Our study indicated that VS might be considered as a novel and valid method to predict the efficacy of pemetrexed-based therapy and identify a subset of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who had intrinsic resistance to pemetrexed based regimens. However, larger sample studies are still needed to further confirm this result.

scholarly journals The benefits and risks of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized control trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiangyun Liu ◽  
Yixuan Zhang ◽  
Miaowen Liu ◽  
Ruoxin Xu ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background Although pembrolizumab has shown clinical benefit in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), its actual efficacy in combination with a conventional chemotherapy drug has not been determined. We performed this study to discern the efficacy and risk of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in SCLC patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results We identified 2980 articles and included 6 studies (5 were noncomparative open-label studies and 1 was a randomized controlled trial [RCT]) involving 396 patients in our meta-analysis. The pooled median OS (mOS) was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0-11.2), and the pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.1). The 1-year overall survival rate (OSR-1y) and 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR-6m) were 45.1% (95% CI, 33-57.2%) and 41.6% (95% CI, 24.3-59%), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 38.8% (95% CI, 11.9-65.67%), disease control rate (DCR) was 69.30% (95% CI, 51.6-87.0%), complete response (CR) was 2.20% (95% CI, 0.8-3.7%), partial response (PR) was 34.70% (95% CI, 7.8-61.5%), and stable disease (SD) was 20.90% (95% CI, 9.1-32.6%). The grade 3-4 adverse effect (AE) rate was 20.88% (95% CI, 1.22-54.85%). The most common AEs were neutropenia (90.16%), anemia (53.21%), dysphagia (41.96%), platelet count decrease (34.87%), and esophagitis (32.89%); severe AEs included neutropenia, respiratory failure, pneumonitis, acute coronary syndrome, and colitis/intestinal ischemia. Conclusions The combination of pembrolizumab with conventional chemotherapy is an effective therapeutic schedule with acceptable and manageable efficacy and toxicity in patients with SCLC. More high-quality and well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are warranted to further validate our findings.

Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8322-8330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alison L. Jones ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity. Results Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document