The efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus raltitrexed as second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) patients: An interim analysis of a multicenter, phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15061-e15061
Author(s):  
Yunpeng Liu ◽  
Zan Teng ◽  
Xiujuan Qu ◽  
Yan qiao Zhang ◽  
Zhendong Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Elevated Transaminases

e15061 Background: There are limited therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer which fail first-line chemotherapy. Phase I studies have shown that the combined application of the irinotecan (CPT-11) and raltitrexed has significant synergistic effect and acceptable toxicity. The aim of this multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of second-line raltitrexed plus irinotecan in Chinese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This is an open-label,single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial (Registered in clinicaltrials.gov with NCT03053167).Brief inclusion criteria: patients were aged 18 to 75 years with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil therapy. Enrolled patients received CPT-11 (180 mg /m2 , d1) and raltitrexed (3 mg/m2, d1) each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) and safety. In all, 100 patients were required for primary point testing. Results: Between November 2016 and December 2018, a total of 70 patients were screened for enrollment and 53 patients reached the primary endpoint. Nine patients achieved a partial response and twenty-seven stable disease. The overall response rate was 17% (9/53) and the disease control rate was 67.9% (36/53). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.3 months and median overall survival was not observed. The most common adverse events were elevated transaminases (21/53), fatigue (14/53), diarrhea (12/53), neutrocytopenia (10/53), erythrocytopenia (9/53), hypohemoglobin (8/53) and leukocytopenia (6/53). The total incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was 17% (9/53) , mainly diarrhea (2/53), neutrocytopenia (2/53) and elevated transaminases (2/53). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that CPT-11 plus raltitrexed is active and feasible in patients with second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. This trial will progress as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03053167.

Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Two Different Schedules of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1307-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gabriela V. Kornek ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
Birgit Schüll ◽  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
To Receive

Purpose: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study. Patients and Methods: Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease. Results: Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P = .0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%). Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.

Phase II trial of irinotecan, S-1, and bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) combination chemotherapy as second line for advanced colorectal cancer (NCCSG04).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 496-496
Author(s):  
Yasumasa Takii ◽  
Kouichi Hurukawa ◽  
Satoshi Maruyama ◽  
Toshiyuki Yamazaki ◽  
Jun Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Therapy

496 Background: The FIRIS study (Muro K et al. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:853-860) previously demonstrated the non-inferiority of Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) to FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with progression-free survival as the primary endpoint. IRIS plus bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) was reported an active and generally well-tolerated first-line treatment for mCRC (Yuki et al. ASCO 2012 #3593). We planned a Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IRIS/Bev as second-line therapy for patients with mCRC. Methods: The study design was multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study. Eligible patients had to have mCRC with confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, history of oxaliplatin containing regimen as first-line therapy, an age from 20 to 80 years, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1. S-1 65 mg/m2 daily p.o. was given on days 1-14 and Irinotecan 75mg/m2 and Bevacizumab 10mg/kg i.v. were given on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (OR), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and safety. Results: From 08/12 until 11/06, 35 patients were enrolled. One patient did not start therapy. Thirty-four patients were investigated. Median age was 63 years (range, 38 to 82). Twenty-five patients were male. The mean of relative dose intensity of TS-1/Irinotecan/Bev were respectively 92.1%/87.0%/86.2%. The OR was 21.1% (7/33) and disease control rate was 84.8% (28/33). Median PFS was 9.3 months, median TTF was 8.2 month and median survival time 23.1 month. On safety analysis, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were as follows: neutropenia, 14.7%; fatigue, 14.7%; white blood cell decreased, 11.8%; anorexia, 8.8%; anemia, 8.8%; diarrhea, 2.9%; proteinuria, 5.9%; thromboembolic event, 2.9%. Conclusions: IRIS/Bev is an active and well-tollarated second-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000001631.

scholarly journals Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Castration-Resistant, Androgen Receptor–Expressing Salivary Gland Cancer: A Phase II Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura D. Locati ◽  
Stefano Cavalieri ◽  
Cristiana Bergamini ◽  
Carlo Resteghini ◽  
Elena Colombo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Castration Resistant

PURPOSE The activity of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in androgen receptor–positive (AR+) salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) has been established in the past few years. Second-line treatment in castration-resistant patients is still unknown. We investigated the activity of abiraterone acetate as second-line treatment in ADT-resistant, AR+ patients with SGC. METHODS This was a single-institution phase II trial. A two-stage Simon's design was applied. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate. Secondary end points were disease control rate, safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Patients were eligible when the following criteria were met: histologic diagnosis of AR-overexpressing SGC, measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1, clinical and/or radiologic progression on ADT, suppressed serum testosterone, and no limits for the number of previous chemotherapy lines. All patients received abiraterone 1 g daily plus prednisone 10 mg and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist until progression or unacceptable toxicities. RESULTS From 2015 to 2019, 24 AR+ patients with SGC (23 men; median age 65.8 years) were treated within the study. The overall response rate was 21% (5 partial responses), with a disease control rate of 62.5%. The median duration of response was 5.82 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.65 months (95% CI, 1.94 to 5.89), and median overall survival was 22.47 months (95% CI, 6.74 to not reached). Objective response to previous ADT did not correlate with the activity of abiraterone. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 22 cases (92%) with grade 3 AEs in six patients (25%): fatigue (two), flushing (one), supraventricular tachycardia (one), and two non–drug-related AEs. No drug-related grade 4 or 5 AEs were recorded. CONCLUSION Abiraterone plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist is active and safe as a second-line option in AR-expressing, castration-resistant SGC.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
M. Suenaga ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

588 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009. Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial comparing pemetrexed with gefitinib as the second-line treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR (CTONG0806).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8042-8042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinji Yang ◽  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Mingfang Zhao ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Hong hong Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Nsclc Patients

8042 Background: Pemetrexed or gefitinib is one of the standard second-line treatments for advanced non-squamousNSCLC in East Asia. The CTONG 0806 a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of pemetrexed versus gefitinib as the second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients without EGFR mutation. Methods: The patients with locally advanced or metastatic, non-squamous NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and no EGFR mutation in exons 18-21 were enrolled. Patients were 1:1 randomized to receive either gefitinib 250 mg per oral every day (G arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 iv day 1 with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplement every 21 days (P arm) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation of treatment due to other reason. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were 4-month and 6-month progression-free survival rate, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life using the FACT-L questionnaire and safety, EGFR and K-ras mutation status were evaluated and correlated with outcomes. Results: From Feb. 2009 to Aug. 2012, 157 evaluable patients were randomized (81 cases in G arm and 76 in P arm). Baseline age, gender, and ECOG performance status were balanced between arms. The primary endpoint of PFS was met with 1.6 months for G arm versus 4.8 months for P arm, the HR is 0.51 (95% CI 0.36~0.73, P<0.001). Overall response rates were 14.7 % and 13.3 % (P=0.814) and DCR were 32.0% and 61.3% (P<0.001) for G arm and P arm, respectively. OS data were not yet mature. More skin rash and diarrhoea were seen in G arm, but more fatigue and ALT increased in P arm. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 of AEs was 12.3% in G arm and 32.9% in P arm (p=0.002). The further analyses of efficacy evaluated by IRR and biomarkers analysis will be presented on the ground. Conclusions: CTONG0806 is the first trial to show significant improvements in PFS and DCR with pemetrexed compared with gefitinib in second-line setting for advanced NSCLC with EGFR wild type. Patients with EGFR wild type did not benefit from EGFR TKI gefitinb in second-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00891579.

scholarly journals A comparison of FOLFIRI (Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil and Irinotecan) Plus Bevacizumab and FLOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Sang Lee ◽  
Yong-Pyo Lee ◽  
Hongsik Kim ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: To date, there are few clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab or aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) pretreated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed the treatment outcomes of patients receiving FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab or aflibercept as second-line treatment for mCRC between October 2017 and March 2020. This analysis included 67 patients receiving FOLFIRI plus aflibercept and 83 receiving FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.6% (95% CI: 4.85-22.34) in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group and 14.7% (95% CI: 6.68-22.71) in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group. This difference in ORR was not statistically significant. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group and 8.5 months in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group (P = 0.752) (Fig. 1). Patients in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group showed a median overall survival (OS) of 12.4 months, while patients in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group had a median OS of 13.7 months (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in survival between the two treatment groups. The adverse events were also largely similar between the two groups. However, hypertension of grade 3 or more was more frequent in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group. Conclusion: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus aflibercept had similar anti-tumor activities and toxicity profiles when used as second-line therapy in mCRC patients. Based on these data, both aflibercept and bevacizumab are suitable anti-angiogenic agents when used in combination with FOLFIRI for mCRC.

Gemcitabine and capecitabine as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of irinotecan and oxaliplatin.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 620-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Qiu ◽  
F. Bi ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
Q. Li ◽  
C. Yi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

620 Background: There is no standard chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) progressing after combination regimens including irinotecan and oxaliplatin and having good performance status. 5-FU and gemcitabine are synergistic in preclinical studies of colon cancer cells. And gemcitabine also increases intracellular release of 5-FU from capecitabine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the gemcitabine/capecitabine combination as third-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: Between May 2007 and September 2009, the data on 12 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing regimens reviewed retrospectively. The median patient age was 54.0 years (range 37-77). The ECOG performance status was 0, 1 or 2. All patients has 2 or more previous chemotherapy. Patients received GemCap regimen (oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). Eleven patients were evaluable for the response and all patients were evaluable for toxicity. Results: No partial response was achieved and disease stabilization in 4 (36.4.3%) cases. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 9.1 weeks (range 3.0-18.0) and 22.3 weeks (range 10.5- 53.0). Four patients with disease stabilization had longer median progression-free survival than those with disease progression (13 weeks vs. 6.2 weeks). No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (in 2 patients), neutropenia (in 2 patients) and mucositis (in 1 patient), hand-foot syndrome (in 1 patient) and GI toxicity (in 2 patients). Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine was found to be a safe palliative regimen for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic CRC. Despite no patients had radiologic response, patients with disease stabilization achieved better progression-free survival. This regimen seems to be potentially effective regimen in the treatment of CRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document