Polymorphisms in XRCC1, XRCC3, and CCND1 and Survival After Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (36) ◽  
pp. 5645-5651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Bewick ◽  
Michael S.C. Conlon ◽  
Robert M. Lafrenie
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival

Purpose Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair and cell cycle control genes may alter protein function and therefore the efficacy of DNA damaging chemotherapy. We retrospectively evaluated the association of SNPs in DNA repair genes, XRCC1-01 (Arg399Gln) and XRCC3-01 (Thr241Met), and a cell cycle control gene, CCND1-02 (A870G), with progression-free survival (PFS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods SNPs in 95 patients with MBC enrolled onto one of five prospective clinical trials of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation were evaluated using genotyping assays. Results For XRCC1-01, the hazard ratio (HR) for BCSS was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.60 to 5.00) and the HR for PFS was 2.0 (95%CI, 1.12 to 3.43). For XRCC3-01, the HR for BCSS was 2.0 (95%CI, 1.12 to 3.70) and the HR for PFS was 2.0 (95%CI, 1.09 to 3.59). For CCND1-02, the HR for BCSS was 1.8 (95%CI, 1.12 to 2.78) and the HR for PFS was 1.8 (95%CI, 1.15 to 2.85). Patients carrying one variant genotype (HR, 1.7; 95%CI, 1.07 to 2.82) or combinations of any two variant genotypes (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.41 to 8.94) had significantly poorer BCSS compared with patients carrying zero variants. In multivariable analysis, XRCC1-01, presence of liver metastases, and bone metastases independently predicted BCSS. Combinations of any two variant genotypes were stronger independent predictors of BCSS and PFS than the presence of liver or bone metastases. Conclusion XRCC1-01, XRCC3-01, and CCND1-01 may be predictive of survival outcome in patients with MBC treated with DNA damaging chemotherapy.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the alkylating agent modulator novobiocin in combination with high-dose chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1136-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Kennedy ◽  
D K Armstrong ◽  
A M Huelskamp ◽  
K Ohly ◽  
B V Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE Resistance to alkylators may potentially be overcome by drugs that inhibits DNA repair, thus improving the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy. This trial was performed to determine if novobiocin, an agent that inhibits DNA repair, could be given with high-dose alkylators. Study aims were to define the toxicities and maximal-tolerated dose (MTD) of novobiocin and the pharmacokinetics of novobiocin and high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-eight women with responsive metastatic breast cancer received high-dose cyclophosphamide (3 to 6 g/m2 over 4 days), thiotepa (400 to 800 mg/m2), and novobiocin (0.5 to 5.0 g/d x 7, orally) with autologous marrow support. Toxicity was monitored. The pharmacology of novobiocin, cyclophosphamide, and thiotepa was evaluated. RESULTS There were no toxic deaths. The MTD of novobiocin was 4 g/d. All seven patients treated at 5 g/d developed grade III/IV mucositis and vomiting. The severity of mucositis correlated with the plasma levels of novobiocin. Other severe toxicities were not observed. Plasma novobiocin levels > or = 100 micrograms/mL, which are associated with reversal of drug resistance in animal models, were consistently seen at dose levels greater than 2 g. The dispositions of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa were not altered by novobiocin. CONCLUSION Novobiocin may be given with high-dose alkylators in doses that produce plasma levels that augment the activity of these cytotoxics in experimental models. The pharmacology of high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa is unaffected. Novobiocin 4 g/d orally for 7 days is recommended for future study.

scholarly journals Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer in the large-scale real-life multicenter French ESME cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Grinda ◽  
Natacha Joyon ◽  
Amélie Lusque ◽  
Sarah Lefèvre ◽  
Laurent Arnould ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Tumour Progression ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Risk Of Death

AbstractExpression of hormone receptor (HR) for estrogens (ER) and progesterone (PR) and HER2 remains the cornerstone to define the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the ESME database, a National real-life multicenter cohort of MBC patients. Patients with results available on both primary tumour and metastatic disease within 6 months of MBC diagnosis and before any tumour progression were eligible for the main analysis. Among the 16,703 patients included in the database, 1677 (10.0%) had available biopsy results at MBC diagnosis and on matched primary tumour. The change rate of either HR or HER2 was 27.0%. Global HR status changed (from positive = either ER or PR positive, to negative = both negative; and reverse) in 14.2% of the cases (expression loss in 72.5% and gain in 27.5%). HER2 status changed in 7.8% (amplification loss in 45.2%). The discordance rate appeared similar across different biopsy sites. Metastasis to bone, HER2+ and RH+/HER2- subtypes and previous adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not relapse interval were associated with an HR discordance in multivariable analysis. Loss of HR status was significantly associated with a risk of death (HR adjusted = 1.51, p = 0.002) while gain of HR and HER2 discordance was not. In conclusion, discordance of HR and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer cannot be neglected. In addition, HR loss is associated with worse survival. Sampling metastatic sites is essential for treatment adjustment.

Phase I/II trial of high dose mitoxantrone in metastatic breast cancer: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Cristofanilli ◽  
Frankie Ann Holmes ◽  
Laura Esparza ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Dose

Up-Front Tandem High-Dose Chemotherapy Compared With Standard Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schmid ◽  
Walter Schippinger ◽  
Thorsten Nitsch ◽  
Gerdt Huebner ◽  
Volker Heilmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Intent To Treat

Purpose The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. Trials with late intensification HDCT have failed to show an advantage in overall survival. This study was initiated to compare up-front tandem HDCT and standard combination therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to standard combination therapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) or double HDCT with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. HDCT was repeated after 6 weeks. Patients were stratified by menopausal and hormone-receptor status. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates. Results A total of 93 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Intent-to-treat CR rates for patients randomized to HDCT and AT were 12.5% and 11.1%, respectively (P = .84). Objective response rates were 66.7% for patients in the high-dose group and 64.4% for patients in the AT arm (P = .82). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two treatments in median time to progression (HDCT, 11.1 months; AT, 10.6 months; P = .67), duration of response (HDCT, 13.9 months; AT, 14.3 months; P = .98), and overall survival (HDCT, 26.9 months; AT, 23.4 months; P = .60). HDCT was associated with significantly more myelosuppression, infection, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea and vomiting, whereas patients treated with AT developed more neurotoxicity. Conclusion This trial failed to show a benefit for up-front tandem HDCT compared with standard combination therapy. HDCT was associated with more acute adverse effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document