Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with recurrent squamous carcinoma of the cervix after chemoradiation

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15023-15023
Author(s):  
B. E. Miller ◽  
D. L. Tait

15023 Background: Treatment for recurrent cervical cancer is palliative; therefore a low side effect profile is important. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin has been used for the initial treatment of cervical cancer with success. We assessed the tolerance of a weekly schedule in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Methods: Patients with advanced recurrent squamous carcinoma of the cervix with a performance status of 2 or better were enlisted in a phase I study evaluating carboplatin at an AUC of 2 and docetaxel at the following dose levels: L1, 25 mg/m2; L2, 30 mg/m2; L3, 35 mg/m2; and L4, 40 mg/m2 i.v. for 3 consecutive weeks of a 4 week cycle. Results: So far 9 patients have been completely evaluated. The median age is 55 years. The median time to recurrence is 13 months. Previous treatment included chemoradiation and in 2 patients additional platinum based chemotherapy. Areas of metastasis included the lung, lymphnodes, abdomen, liver and the pelvis. Dose levels 1 to 3 are completed. A total of 34 courses were administered, an average of 3.6 per patient. One patient received 8 courses. Treatment was discontinued due to progressive disease in 7 patients and due to toxicity in 2 patients one with grade 3 onycholysis and another with a grade 3 allergic reaction to carboplatin. There were no treatment delays due to hematologic toxicity, no grade 2 or higher granulocytopenia, no thrombocytopenia. The mean hemoglobin level dropped from 12 g/dl prior to course 1 to 10.6 g/dl prior to course 3 and 10.2 g/dl prior to course 5. No grade 3 anemia was seen. The main non-hematologic side effects were fatigue, nausea and alopecia, none of which reached grade 3. Accrual on the L4 cohort is still ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin given on a weekly schedule is well tolerated in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Dose levels similar to those reported for initial treatment can be reached. [Table: see text]

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-479
Author(s):  
Seiji Mabuchi ◽  
Eriko Yokoi ◽  
Kotaro Shimura ◽  
Naoko Komura ◽  
Yuri Matsumoto ◽  
...  

ObjectivesWe conducted a phase II study to investigate the efficacy and toxicities of irinotecan plus oral S-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy were enrolled. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) was administered intravenously over the course of 90 min on day 1, and S-1 (80 mg/m2) was given orally in two divided doses from days 1 to 14 of a 21 day cycle. The primary endpoint of this phase II study was response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression free survival, and overall survival.ResultsA total of 19 patients were enrolled and treated. The response rate was 29.4%. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities were observed in three patients (15.7%). The only grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity observed was grade 3 diarrhea. The median progression free survival and overall survival were 3 months and 9 months, respectively.ConclusionS-1 plus irinotecan in a 3 weekly setting is safe and active in women with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy. Future corroborative clinical studies are warranted.


1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Nicholson ◽  
M Krailo ◽  
M M Ames ◽  
N L Seibel ◽  
J M Reid ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12004-12004
Author(s):  
R. Morgan ◽  
F. Valdes-Albini ◽  
T. Synold ◽  
G. Somlo ◽  
S. Shibata ◽  
...  

12004 Background: Bortezomib (B) and topotecan (T) have been shown in pre-clinical testing to be synergistic. Based on this data we have performed a phase I study to determine the maximally tolerated dose and toxicities (tox) of B and T delivered sequentially. Methods: 24 pts (KPS<ECOG 3) with advanced malignancies were treated with T (2.0, 2.5, 3.0 or 3.5 mg/m2 in sequential cohorts) IV on days 1 and 8 of each three week cycle. B 1.3 mg/m2 iv was administered six hours following T on days 1 and 8, and alone on days 4 and 12. Pts were treated in cohorts of 3, the MTD dose was expanded to include 10 additional pts for PK analysis. There was no limit on prior therapies. DLT was defined as any gr 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity not reversible in 48h or any gr 3 thrombocytopenia lasting >7 days or associated with bleeding or any gr 4. Results: Tumor types included: breast (4), ovary (5), lung (3), others (12). 24 pts were entered (11M 13F). The median age was 55 (range: 34–83). DLT was thrombocytopenia, observed in two pts at 3.5 mg/m2 and one pt at 3.0 mg/m2 (MTD). Other grade 3 or 4 tox included fatigue, lymphopenia, hypomagnesemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Of the 24 enrolled pts, stable disease was observed in 4 (4 or 5 cycles), 9 progressed, 5 were inevaluable and 6 are too early. PK analysis is pending. Conclusions: T and B delivered sequentially are well tolerated on a weekly schedule. DLT is thrombocytopenia. PK will be presented.(Supported by NCI Grant CA33572). [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3039-3039
Author(s):  
Minish Mahendra Jain ◽  
Chetan Dilip Deshmukh ◽  
Shailesh Arjun Bondarde ◽  
Niraj Bhatt ◽  
Vijay Shinde ◽  
...  

3039 Background: PICN is a novel solvent and protein-free 100-110 nm particle formulation of paclitaxel stabilized with polymer and lipid using Nanotecton Technology. Paclitaxel has shown superior safety and efficacy profile when administered on a weekly schedule. We studied safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PICN using a weekly schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Methods: Patients aged18-65 years with advanced solid malignancies, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, estimated survival ≥ 12 weeks, and adequate organ function were enrolled. A standard phase I, 3+3 dose escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PICN administered on a weekly schedule (three consecutive weeks, one week recovery) was employed. PICN dose was escalated at pre-determined fixed dose levels of 80, 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2. PICN was administered as a 30 min infusion without any premedication for hypersensitivity. Results: Twenty-one patients treated with PICN had a mean age of 52.1 yrs (range 35-67); 20 were female and entered with metastatic breast cancer (MBC; n=15), cervical cancer (n=3), skin cancer (n=2). One male had oral cancer. Doses studied were 80 (n=3), 100 (n=3), 125 (n=3), 150 (n=3), 175 (n=6), and 200 (n=3) mg/m2. Despite the lack of dexamethasone premedication, no patient receiving PICN reported hypersensitivity reaction. Two DLTs (neutropenia and febrile neutropenia; both grade 3) were reported at PICN 200 mg/m2. PICN PK (AUC0-24, AUC0-∞, and Cmax) increased in a dose proportionate manner from 80 to 200 mg/m2. Grade 3 or worse related AEs were: neutropenia, leucopenia, peripheral neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, syncope, hypotension and maculopapular rash. Partial responses were observed in MBC (100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2) and cervical cancer (80 mg/m2). Conclusions: PICN on thrice monthly schedule was tolerable in the dose range evaluated. Two DTLs were reported: neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (both grade 3). Anti-tumor activity was observed in MBC and cervical cancer. Final trial data for PICN PK, safety, and efficacy will be presented at the conference. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2011/11/002124.


2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1165-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. C. Maluf ◽  
A. L. Leiser ◽  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
P. Sabbatini ◽  
S. Pezzulli ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a tirapazamine (TPZ)/cisplatin drug combination in patients with stage IV or recurrent cervical cancer. The chemotherapy was administered for a maximum of eight cycles every 21 days. TPZ was administered intravenously at 330 mg/m2 over a 2-h infusion, followed 1 h later by cisplatin intravenously at 75 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1. All patients received antiemetics including dexamethasone, ondansetron, and lorazepam. Subsequent doses were unchanged, reduced, or omitted according to observed toxicity and protocol guidelines. Response evaluation was performed every two cycles. Thirty-six patients with stage IV or recurrent cervical cancer were treated. Ninety-four percent of patients had prior radiotherapy. Two patients had prior chemotherapy. There were two complete responses and eight partial responses (27.8%). An additional 11 patients (30.6%) had stable disease as their best response. Response rate was greater in tumors outside of the previously radiated field (44.4% vs 11.1%). The median time to progression was 32.7 weeks. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and fatigue, which occurred in 30.6%, 25%, and 22% of subjects, respectively. Anemia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity at 8.3%. We conclude that the combination of cisplatin and TPZ was reasonably well tolerated in patients with recurrent or advanced cervical cancer. Further evaluation of this drug combination may be warranted.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3661-3661 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Inwards ◽  
Paul Fishkin ◽  
Betsy R. LaPlant ◽  
Matthew T. Drake ◽  
Paul Kurtin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3661 Objective: We conducted this trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and schedule of temsirolimus added to an established regimen comprised of rituximab and cladribine for the initial treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and to generate preliminary information on the toxicity and efficacy of this combination. Methods: A standard phase I cohort of 3 study design was utilized. MTD was defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients). DLT was defined as grade 4 ANC (<500) for ≥5 days, grade 4 ANC (<500) associated with fever (>100.5 F) and/or active infection, PLT <25,000, grade 4 infection, or ≥grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity during the first cycle of therapy as per NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The fixed doses of rituximab and cladribine were 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 and 5 mg/m2/d IV days 1–5 of a 28 day cycle, respectively, as previously published. There were 5 planned temsirolimus IV dose levels: 15 mg day 1; 25 mg day 1; 25 mg days 1 and 15; 25 mg days 1,8 and 15; and 25 mg days 1,8,15, and 22. The fifth dose level is as previously published in combination with rituximab. Results: A total of 17 patients were treated: 3 each at dose levels 1–4 and 5 at dose level 5 (25 mg temsirolimus days 1,8,15, and 22). The median age was 75 years (52–86). There were 11 males and 6 females. At presentation 88% had stage IV disease, and 94% had extranodal disease. MIPI scores were low in 6% (1 patient), intermediate in 59% (10 patients), and high in 35% (6 patients). There was a single DLT recorded at dose level 3 based on the initial DLT criteria, though this cytokine release syndrome was clearly rituximab related, and occurred prior to the first dose of temsirolimus. Five patients were treated at the highest planned temsirolimus dose level (25 mg days 1,8,15, and 22) with no DLT observed. No further dose escalation was planned, and this level was determined to be tolerated, though higher levels may be tolerable. All patients were evaluable for adverse events. Hematologic toxicity was frequent, with grade 3 anemia in 12% of patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 35%, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 30%, grade 4 lymphopenia in 47%, grade 3 neutropenia in 24%, and grade 4 neutropenia in 18% of patients. There were 3 thrombotic episodes, 2 of which were attributed to therapy, and 3 episodes of pneumonitis. The overall response rate was 94% with 53% CR and 41% PR. The median progression free survival was 18.7 months. Conclusions: Temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly may be safely added to rituximab and cladribine at 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 and 5 mg/m2/d IV days 1–5 of a 28 day cycle, respectively. This regimen had promising preliminary activity in an elderly cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Temsirolimus for mantle cell lymphoma.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1458-1458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Alan List ◽  
David Cuthbertson ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
Thomas Loughran ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Early MDS becomes more advanced as immature myeloid cells proliferate, angiogenesis increases, genetic lesions accumulate, and tumor suppressor genes become inactivated through hypermethylation. Progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may be prevented by targeting these defects through combination therapy, using an immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic agent, lenalidomide (LEN), and a hypomethylating drug, azacitidine (AZA). Methods: We conducted a multicenter, Phase I trial in patients (pts) with advanced MDS (IPSS score ≥1.5, or FAB or WHO classification with ≥5% myeloblasts) starting in 6/06, with results reported through 7/07. Pts were enrolled using a “3+3” design (See Table), and could not receive LEN or AZA previously. Cycles lasted 28 days, to a maximum of 7 cycles of therapy. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs, defined as Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity or &gt;50% neutrophil (ANC) or platelet (plt) drop without recovery by Day 56) of the combination. A secondary endpoint was response as defined by the Modified International Working Group. Dose Level AZA Schedule LEN Schedule 1 75 mg/m2 SC days 1–5 5 mg PO days 1–14 2 75 mg/m2 SC days 1–5 5 mg PO days 1–21 3 75 mg/m2 SC days 1–5 10 mg PO days 1–21 4 50 mg/m2 SC days 1–5, 8–12 5 mg PO days 1–14 5 50 mg/m2 SC days 1–5, 8–12 5 mg PO days 1–21 6 50 mg/m2 SC days 1–5, 8–12 10 mg PO days 1–21 Results: Seven patients have been enrolled, 6 are evaluable for toxicity data. Median age was 64 years (range 52–70), 1 pt was female, and median follow-up is 5.5 months (range 1.5–13). All pts had RAEB-2; IPSS scores were 1.5 (4), 2.0 (2), and 3.0 (1), with IPSS cytogenetic risk categories of poor (1), intermediate (1), and good (5). No pt had a del (5q) lesion. Median time from MDS diagnosis was 3.5 wks (range 2–106). No DLTs occurred in Dose Levels 1 or 2, and MTD has not yet been reached. Grade 1/2 non-hematologic toxicities (n=6) included fatigue (4), injection site reaction (6), rash (3), pruritis (3), constipation or diarrhea (6), dizziness (1), and mucositis (1). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (1). Median ANC drop was 16.4% and plt drop was 10.4%. Although one patient was delayed 1 week in starting cycle 2 for neutropenia, there were no dose-reductions for toxicities. Four pts are evaluable for response: 2 had a complete response, 1 an erythroid response, and 1 progressive disease. Conclusions: The combination of LEN and AZA is well-tolerated and early results suggest efficacy in advanced MDS. Responses and toxicity data from higher Dose Levels will be presented.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1775-1775
Author(s):  
Jeremy S Abramson ◽  
Tak Takvorian ◽  
Eric D Jacobsen ◽  
Jennifer R Brown ◽  
Jeffrey A. Barnes ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1775 Background: Clofarabine is a second-generation purine analogue currently FDA-approved for intravenous use for relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL. Purine analogues demonstrate significant clinical activity in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), though clofarabine offers potential pharmacologic advantages over existing agents. Clofarabine is a more efficient substrate for deoxycytidine kinase, more completely inhibits ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerase α, and demonstrates improved activity in cells that are non-dividing or have a low proliferation rate. This phase I trial is the first evaluation of an oral formulation of clofarabine in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and define dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Efficacy was a secondary objective. Patients (pts) were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory B-cell or T-cell NHL without prior stem cell transplant. All pts were required to have adequate organ function and performance status ≤2 as well as absence of both CNS involvement and HIV infection. No routine infectious prophylaxis was given. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels (1mg, 2mg, 4mg and ultimately 3mg) with oral clofarabine administered once daily on days 1–21 of a 28 day cycle for up to 6 cycles. Three to 6 pts were treated at each dose level in a traditional 3+3 design. Response assessment occurred after cycles 2 and 6. DLT was assessed during cycle 1 and was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurring for ≥5 days, any grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity, and grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity that did not recover prior to the subsequent cycle of therapy. Results: Twenty-one pts were enrolled on the dose-escalation phase of the study. The median age was 63 years (range 51–85). The median number of prior regimens was 2 (range 1–7). Histologies included follicular lymphomas (FL; 5 pts), small lymphocytic lymphomas (SLL; 5 pts), diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL; 4 pts), marginal zone lymphomas (MZL; 4 pts), mantle cell lymphomas (MCL. 2 pts) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL; 1 pt). Median number of cycles administered was 5.5. No DLTs were observed at the 1mg or 2mg dose levels. Three pts were accrued at 4mg with 1 patient experiencing DLT of persistent grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia. No additional DLTs occurred in the cohort, but the majority of pts required late dose reductions due to grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity. The dose was therefore de-escalated to 3mg and 6 additional pts were accrued. No DLTs were observed at the 3mg dose level with a median of 6 cycles administered (range 5–6); 3mg was declared the recommended phase 2 dose. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (7 pts), thrombocytopenia (4 pts), and anemia (2 pts). Grade 1–2 non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon, and included fatigue, diarrhea, cough, and dizziness. There were no grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities. Seventeen pts completed one cycle of therapy and were evaluable for response. Radiographic disease reduction was observed in 11 of 17 pts (65%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 35% (6 of 17), all partial responses (PR). Responders included FL (2 pts), MZL (2 pts), SLL and LPL (1 pt ea.). ORR among low grade histologies (FL, MZL, SLL) was 43% in this phase 1 trial. Seven pts had stable disease, including 5 pts with reduction in tumor size that did not reach threshold for PR. Of the 4 pts with progressive disease, 2 had DLBCL, 1 had MCL and 1 had FL with biopsy following relapse identifying ALK-negative anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma. Of the 4 pts not evaluable for response, 1 pt died of progressive DLBCL during cycle 1 on dose level 1 and was replaced, 1 pt was the DLT pt on the 4mg dose level and was removed due to prolonged cytopenias, and 2 pts withdrew consent (1pt at 4mg, 1pt at 3mg), and were replaced. The 3mg dose level has been expanded in a 10-patient dose-expansion cohort limited to low-grade NHL and MCL. Conclusions: Oral clofarabine demonstrates encouraging tolerability and efficacy in relapsed B-cell NHL, particularly in low-grade histologies, warranting further investigation. Disclosures: Abramson: Genzyme: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Clofarabine is not FDA approved for NHL.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2573-2573 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Bendell ◽  
G. J. Weiss ◽  
J. R. Infante ◽  
E. G. Chiorean ◽  
M. Borad ◽  
...  

2573 Background: TH-302 is a 2-nitroimidazole prodrug of the DNA alkylator, bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM). TH-302 is essentially inactive under normoxia but in severe hypoxia and in the presence of certain reductases, it is reduced and Br-IPM is released. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had ECOG ≤1, advanced or metastatic solid tumors, evaluable by RECIST, and acceptable hematologic, liver and renal function. A modified accelerated titration design was used. TH-302 was administered intravenously over 30–60 minutes on Day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. CT scans were obtained after every 2 cycles. Detailed pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on Days 1 and 15. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: Twenty-nine pts enrolled at 3 sites at 9 dose levels from 7.5–670 mg/m2. Median age: 64y. 20 male/9 female. ECOG 0/1: 16/13. Primary tumor: prostate (8), colorectal (8), lung (5) other (8). Two of 5 pts at 670 mg/m2 had DLT: Herpes simplex perianal/rectal ulcers and dehydration due to mucositis. Reversible skin and mucosal adverse events (AE) occurred in 12 of 15 (80%) pts at ≥480 mg/m2 including grade 3 events in 3 pts. The most common TH-302-related AEs were nausea, skin lesions, vomiting and fatigue. Hematologic toxicity was mild and limited: two pts with grade 1 and one pt with grade 2 neutropenia and five pts with grade 1 thrombocytopenia. Five pts had grade 3 and one grade 4 lymphopenia. Four pts have enrolled at an intermediate dose of 575 mg/m2 with no DLT so this is likely the MTD and is well above the predicted biologic effective dose of 100 mg/m2. One pt with SCLC treated at 480 mg/m2 and one with melanoma treated at 670 mg/m2 had unconfirmed partial responses; 12 pts had stable disease (6 continuing after 4 or more cycles), 7 had PD, 4 were unevaluable and 4 are too early to assess. Cmax and AUC for TH-302 and Br-IPM increased linearly with no accumulation at Day 15. Conclusions: Weekly TH-302 has remarkably little hematologic toxicity. Skin and mucosal AEs have developed at the higher dose levels. Skin/mucosa are known to have hypoxic regions. TH-302 is the first HAP to demonstrate tumor responses in Phase I. The MTD is likely 575 mg/m2. Studies in combination with chemotherapy are ongoing. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document