Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with topotecan in advanced solid tumor malignancies

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12004-12004
Author(s):  
R. Morgan ◽  
F. Valdes-Albini ◽  
T. Synold ◽  
G. Somlo ◽  
S. Shibata ◽  
...  

12004 Background: Bortezomib (B) and topotecan (T) have been shown in pre-clinical testing to be synergistic. Based on this data we have performed a phase I study to determine the maximally tolerated dose and toxicities (tox) of B and T delivered sequentially. Methods: 24 pts (KPS<ECOG 3) with advanced malignancies were treated with T (2.0, 2.5, 3.0 or 3.5 mg/m2 in sequential cohorts) IV on days 1 and 8 of each three week cycle. B 1.3 mg/m2 iv was administered six hours following T on days 1 and 8, and alone on days 4 and 12. Pts were treated in cohorts of 3, the MTD dose was expanded to include 10 additional pts for PK analysis. There was no limit on prior therapies. DLT was defined as any gr 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity not reversible in 48h or any gr 3 thrombocytopenia lasting >7 days or associated with bleeding or any gr 4. Results: Tumor types included: breast (4), ovary (5), lung (3), others (12). 24 pts were entered (11M 13F). The median age was 55 (range: 34–83). DLT was thrombocytopenia, observed in two pts at 3.5 mg/m2 and one pt at 3.0 mg/m2 (MTD). Other grade 3 or 4 tox included fatigue, lymphopenia, hypomagnesemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Of the 24 enrolled pts, stable disease was observed in 4 (4 or 5 cycles), 9 progressed, 5 were inevaluable and 6 are too early. PK analysis is pending. Conclusions: T and B delivered sequentially are well tolerated on a weekly schedule. DLT is thrombocytopenia. PK will be presented.(Supported by NCI Grant CA33572). [Table: see text]

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12008-12008 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Hwang ◽  
J. L. Marshall ◽  
S. Malik ◽  
H. Chun ◽  
T. Ahmed ◽  
...  

12008 Background: Taxanes have demonstrated activity across a broad range of cancers, but resistance remains an issue. TPI 287 is a third generation taxane designed to overcome issues of resistance secondary to mdr and mutant tubulin. The purpose of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of IV TPI 287. Methods: Phase I study: TPI 287 is administered IV on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle (Q7D) with at least 3 patients treated per dose escalation, in a typical phase I design. Dosing began at 7 mg/m2 and has advanced to the fifth cohort of patients, who are being treated at a dose of 85 mg/m2. Tumor response is assessed after every second cycle via imaging and tumor measurements. Samples are collected for PK analysis and circulating tumor cell (CTC) quantitation. Results: Sixteen pts have been enrolled (9 males, median years = 60.11; 7 females, median years = 50.71: median number of previous chemotherapies = 4). Diagnoses included colorectal (4), prostate (3), breast, kidney, cervical, brain, lung, osteosarcoma, basal cell, endometrial, ovarian cancers. Of 16 pts, 8 and 5 have completed 1, 2 cycles, respectively. Only one drug related grade 3 adverse event (hypersensitivity reaction) occurred, at 14 mg/m2. No other reported toxicities are related to TPI 287. PK and CTC studies are ongoing. Conclusions: These initial results show that TPI 287 is well tolerated at a dose up to 56 mg/m2 administered Q7D, and dose escalation continues. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2053-2053 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Wolff ◽  
P. M. Hoff ◽  
A. Mita ◽  
M. Fukushima ◽  
J. C. Blais ◽  
...  

2053 Background: TAS-102 consists of trifluorothymidine (FTD) and an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). FTD, like 5-fluorouracil, is an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. However, when orally administered, FTD is rapidly degraded to an inactive form, primarily by TP. Co-administration of FTD with an inhibitor of TP elevates FTD concentrations. Since tumor xenograft models demonstrated greater anti-tumor activity with divided daily dosing of TAS-102, and a phase I trial of once-daily TAS-102 showed a short FTD half-life, this trial was designed to explore a three times a day dosing schedule. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors having received prior therapy, with adequate organ function, and performance status Zubrod 0–2, were eligible. TAS-102 was administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks, followed by two weeks off. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 15 patients (8 female, age 37–72 years) were enrolled into the study; three at 60 mg/m2/day, 6 each at 70 mg/m2/day and 80 mg/m2/day. Nine patients had colorectal cancer, 2 carcinoma of unknown primary, 2 pancreatic cancer, one each medullary thyroid cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Toxicity was assessed throughout all courses of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were the most common, including 3 episodes of grade 3 neutropenia at 60 mg/m2/day, 5 at 70 mg/m2/day, 5 at 80 mg/m2/day with only 1 instance of grade 3 thrombocytopenia at 80 mg/m2/day. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (1 at 70 mg/m2/day), colitis, gout, and hematuria (1 each at 70 mg/m2/day), and fatigue (1 at 70 mg/m2/day and 2 at 80 mg/m2/day) Two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed at 80 mg/m2/day: grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia. Although there were no objective responses, nine patients (60%) maintained stable disease with a median duration of disease stabilization of 4.3 months (range, 1.9 to 8.6 months). Conclusions: TAS-102 is well tolerated with manageable hematologic toxicity and few non-hematological toxicities. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia. The suggested phase II dose of TAS-102 is 70 mg/m2/day when administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks followed by two weeks off every 4 weeks. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13523-e13523
Author(s):  
R. C. Ramaekers ◽  
J. Elkahwaji ◽  
E. Reed ◽  
A. Ganti ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
...  

e13523 Background: Imatinib-mediated inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor lowers tumor interstitial pressure allowing for improved intratumoral antineoplastic drug concentration. A phase I study of imatinib (Im) with the synergistic combination of gemcitabine (Gem) and capecitabine (Cape) was undertaken. Methods: Eligibility requirements included refractory solid tumors, ECOG 0/1 and adequate organ function. A 3-week treatment cycle was used with the dose levels (DL) 0 and -1 as outlined in the table. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as occurring within the first 2 cycles of therapy. Patients remained on therapy unless DLT occurred or disease progression. Results: Twelve patients with a median age of 59.5 (range 44 - 77) were evaluable. Baseline characteristics included ECOG PS 0/1: 6/6; prior systemic therapies: median 3 (range 1–6); tumor types: renal (4), melanoma (2), prostate, esophageal, pancreatic, small cell lung, breast, unknown primary. At DL 0, 2 of 6 patients experienced DLT (gr. 3 thrombocytopenia; gr. 4 leucopenia). At DL -1, 1 of 6 patients experienced DLT (gr. 3 thrombocytopenia). No patient missed a dose; one patient in DL -1 completed only 1 cycle. Median cycles administered was 2 (range, 1 - 19). At cycle 2 evaluation, 7 pts had stable disease, 4 had progressive disease and 1 was not evaluable. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, hyperglycemia and weakness. All hematologic grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in patients having received ≥3 cytotoxic regimens previously. Most common grade 1/2 toxicities included anemia, nausea/emesis and fatigue. One patient with renal cell had stable disease (SD) for 15 cycles and one patient with melanoma had SD for 19 cycles. Conclusions: Im in combination with Gem and Cape is well tolerated in patients without extensive exposure to cytotoxic therapy. Activity is seen in various tumor types particularly melanoma and renal cell. The suggested dose for phase II studies is Im 400 mg/d, Gem 400 mg/m2 and Cape 400 mg/m2 in the dose schedule as described above. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8058-8058
Author(s):  
Huaqing Wang ◽  
Wenqi Jiang ◽  
Su Li ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Peng Sun ◽  
...  

8058 Background: TQ-B3525 is a novel and selective oral PI3K α/δ inhibitor with activity 41 and 138 folds higher than Buparlisib against PI3K α and PI3K δ in pre-clinical research. This Phase I study (NCT03510767) assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of TQ-B3525 in Chinese patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma who have experienced at least two prior systemic anti-cancer treatments, and advanced solid tumor who have failed standard anti-cancer treatment, were enrolled. TQ-B3525 was administered orally from 2mg, 5mg, 10mg, 20mg once daily (qd) to 10mg, 20mg twice daily (bid). DLT was observed in the first cycle (28 days) of dose-escalation phase. Dose-expansion phase started at the dose level which objective response occurs. Results: Between June 2018 and December 2019, a total of 40 patients were enrolled, Including 27 patients with R/R lymphoma and 13 patients with advanced solid tumor. Three DLTs (both grade 3 hyperglycemia) were observed: two in the 20mg bid dose cohort and one in the 10mg bid. The common AEs of all grades were hyperglycemia (65.0%), glycosylated hemoglobin increased (35.0%) and diarrhea (32.5%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 patients (27.5%), with the most common one also being hyperglycemia (10.0%). TQ-B3525 was rapidly absorbed (Tmax: 1-2 h) and moderately eliminated (T1/2: 10-12 h). At steady state, the geometric mean AUC0-24 and Ctrough of TQ-B3525 at 20mg qd were 1060.7 ± 198.6 h*ng/mL and 23.4 ± 9.5 ng/mL, which was above IC50 (4.2 ng/ml). 23 lymphoma patients were evaluable for clinical response per 2014 Lugano Classification. The overall response rate (ORR) was 60.9% (95% CI, 38.5-80.2). The ORR at ≥10mg qd was 70.0% (14/20, [95% CI, 49.9-90.1]). For R/R FL, the ORR was 72.7% (8/11, [95% CI, 46.4-99.1]). At data cut-off (2nd February, 2020), the median PFS for lymphoma was not reached (events rate: 33.3%). The longest duration of response at data cutoff was 11.8 months in a patient with FL. Conclusions: TQ-B3525 is well-tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced malignancies, and demonstrated high promising antitumor activity in R/R lymphoma patients. Recommended phase II dose was established at 20mg qd. A single-arm phase 2 trial of TQ-B3525 in patients with R/R FL is currently underway. Clinical trial information: NCT03510767 .


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4185-4185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
Farrukh T. Awan ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Sabarish Ayyappan ◽  
Robert A Baiocchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Combined obinutuzumab (O) and lenalidomide (L) has demonstrated safety and preliminary efficacy in follicular lymphoma1. Venetoclax (V), a BCL2 inhibitor, as a single agent2 and in combination with rituximab3 is under development in several subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We are conducting a phase I study of the combination of O, V, and L to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and preliminary efficacy. Methods: Pts with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), transformed, high grade B-cell, Burkitt, marginal zone, and follicular (FL) lymphoma who have received ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible. Prior autologous but not allogeneic stem cell transplant were permitted. Prior L or BCL2 family inhibitors, CNS involvement, and active hepatitis or HIV infection were not permitted. ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 75,000/mm3, creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min, ALT/AST ≤ 3 x ULN, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and ECOG PS 0-2 were required at study entry. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of L days 1-21 and V days 1-28 of a 28 day cycle (Table 1). O 1000 mg was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 2-6. A 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed. DLTs included: treatment delays > 28 days; ANC < 500 / mm3 or platelets <25, 000 / mm3 persisting > 28 days; grade 4 febrile neutropenia or infection or grade 3 that fails to resolve within 7 days; and any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: DVT, tumor flare reaction controllable with steroids, tumor lysis syndrome that does not require dialysis, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting responsive to medical treatment, transient electrolyte abnormalities or elevations of ALT / AST that resolve ≤ grade 1 within 48 hours, grade 3 infusion reactions responsive to medical therapy. Pts without significant toxicity or progression could continue treatment up to 12 cycles. Response was assessed every 3 months for 12 months and then every 6 months until disease progression. Results: 14 pts have been treated. Median age is 61 years (range 35-78 years) with 10 males. Median prior therapies is 2 (range 1-10). 5 pts had bulky disease (≥ 7.5 cm) and median baseline lactate dehydrogenase was 274 U/L (range 151-894, 12/14 above ULN 190 U/L). 10 pts were refractory to their last therapy. Histologies include DLBCL/transformed lymphoma (n=11) and FL (n=3). 3 pts were treated at dose level (DL) 1 (V 400 mg / L 15 mg). One pt experienced DLT, grade 3 neutropenic fever lasting > 7 days. DL 1 was expanded and no additional DLTs occurred. One pt with DLBCL was replaced for disease progression. 4 pts were then treated at DL 2 (V 600 mg / L 15 mg), and no DLTs were encountered. One pt was replaced due to missed doses of the oral agents. A total of 3 pts have been treated at DL 3 (V 800 mg / L 15 mg) and no DLTs have occurred at the time of data cutoff. Related grade 3-4 toxicities were primarily hematologic including neutropenia (n= 11, 78.6%), anemia (n=1, 7%), and thrombocytopenia (n=2, 14.3%). Grade 3-4 infections included sepsis, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and a urinary tract infection. No clinically significant tumor lysis has occurred. Pts have received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-12) and 4 remain on therapy. Five pts have achieved a response. At DL 1, a pt with DLBCL, GC type, achieved a complete response (CR) and 2 pts with transformed FL achieved a partial response (PR). At DL 2, 1 pt with FL achieved a CR. At DL 3, 1 pt with transformed FL/double hit achieved a PR. Ten pts have discontinued, 6 with progression and 1 for DLT, alternative treatment, physician preference, and diagnosis of MDS in a patient with 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: Combined treatment with O, V, and L administered up to 12 cycles has been feasible with hematologic toxicity being the most common adverse event. Enrollment is ongoing and will include expansion cohorts in FL and DLBCL.Fowler et al. Activity of the immunologic doublet of lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab in relapsed follicular lymphoma: Results of a phase I/II study. JCO 2015; 35: 7531.Gerecitano et al. A Phase 1 Study of Venetoclax (ABT-199 / GDC-0199) Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Blood 2015; 126: 254.Zinzani et al. Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax Plus Rituximab or Randomized Ven Plus Bendamustine+Rituximab (BR) Versus BR in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Interim Data. Blood 2016; 128:617. Disclosures Maddocks: Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Blum:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Christian:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1124-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raajit K. Rampal ◽  
John O. Mascarenhas ◽  
Heidi E. Kosiorek ◽  
Dmitriy Berenzon ◽  
Elizabeth Hexner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) includePolycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF). These stem cell disorders carry a propensity to evolve into acute myeloid leukemia (MPN-blast phase [BP] or post-MPN AML) with a dismal prognosis not meaningfully improved by conventional anti-leukemia therapy. Thus, MPN-BP is an urgent unmet clinical need. Responses in patients with MPN-BP to hypomethylating agents and single agent ruxolitinib have been reported. More recently, combination of ruxolitnib and decitabine has demonstrated synergistic activity in vitro in cells derived from patients with MPN-BP and from a murine model of MPN-BP (Rampal et al PNAS 2014). These observations led us to explore the safety of combined decitabine and dose escalation of ruxolitinib in MPN-BP. Objective: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib in combination with a fixed dose of decitabine (DEC-RUX). Methods: We conducted an open label Phase I trial in patients with MPN acceleration phase (AP) as defined by 10%-19% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow or a diagnosis of MPN-BP as defined by ≥ 20% blasts in the blood or bone marrow, following a previous diagnosis of ET, PV or PMF. Patients were enrolled in a standard 3+3 phase I design with an MTD defined as a dose <33% DLT. Ruxolitinib was administered at doses of 10mg, 15mg, 25mg, or 50mg every 12 hours in combination with concurrent decitabine at a dose of 20mg/m2 daily intravenously over 5 days and repeated every 28 days. Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. DLTs were defined as Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity events not clearly related to disease and grade 4 hematologic events with a bone marrow cellularity of ≤5% and no evidence of leukemia. Response assessment was carried out every cycle using modified Cheson criteria: CR required 0% peripheral blood blasts, WBC ≥4x109/L, hemoglobin ≥10g/L, and platelets ≥100x109/L; CRi required 0% peripheral blood blasts with incomplete count recovery; and PR required ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood blasts regardless of blood counts. Results: A total of 21 patients were accrued to study (Table 1). The median age was 63 years (range 48-88). 52% carried a diagnosis of MPN-AP, and 48% carried a diagnosis of MPN-BP. 29% of patients and 24% of patients had prior exposure to ruxolitinb and decitabine, respectively. The median number of cycles received varied from 10.5 cycles in the 10mg BID cohort to 2 and 2.5 cycles in the 25mg BID and 50mg BID cohorts, respectively (Table 2). The most common Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AEs observed were due to infection in all dosing cohorts. In terms of hematologic toxicity, treatment emergent Grade 3/4 anemia was observed in 1 patient in each of the 10mg BID, 15mg BID, and 50mg BID cohorts. Grade 3/4 leukopenia was observed in only 1 patient at the 50mg BID cohort, and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 2 patients in the 10mg BID cohort and 1 patient in the 15mg BID cohort. DLT rate was below 33% for all dose levels so the MTD was not reached. The most common reason for ending study treatment was toxicity/adverse events (33%) followed by disease progression (22%). 9 patients died during study or follow-up. Of those, 5 (56%, 2 in 10mg BID cohort, 1 in 15mg BID cohort, 2 in 50mg BID cohort) died of infection, 3 (33%, 1 in each of 10mg, 25mg, and 50mg BID cohorts) of progressive disease, and 1 (11%, 25mg BID cohort) of hemorrhage. The median overall survival for patients on study was 10.4 months (95% CI 3.3 mo - not reached). CR/CRi as best response was observed in 7/21 patients (33%, 95% CI 15-57%; 2 CR, 5 CRi; Table 2). Conclusions: DEC-RUX combination therapy was safely administered to patients with MPN-AP/BP and an MTD was not reached. Based on pre-clinical data, observed safety profile, duration of treatment, and clinical responses in this phase I trial, the Recommended Phase II Dose of RUX was selected as 25mg BID for an induction cycle followed by 10mg BID in all ensuing cycles. Molecular and bone marrow pathology responses will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Promedior: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: DSMB , Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Other: Clinical Trial Steereing Committee, Research Funding. Hexner:Blueprint medicines: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Abboud:Alexion: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gerson and Lehman Group: Consultancy; Cardinal: Honoraria. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15023-15023
Author(s):  
B. E. Miller ◽  
D. L. Tait

15023 Background: Treatment for recurrent cervical cancer is palliative; therefore a low side effect profile is important. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin has been used for the initial treatment of cervical cancer with success. We assessed the tolerance of a weekly schedule in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Methods: Patients with advanced recurrent squamous carcinoma of the cervix with a performance status of 2 or better were enlisted in a phase I study evaluating carboplatin at an AUC of 2 and docetaxel at the following dose levels: L1, 25 mg/m2; L2, 30 mg/m2; L3, 35 mg/m2; and L4, 40 mg/m2 i.v. for 3 consecutive weeks of a 4 week cycle. Results: So far 9 patients have been completely evaluated. The median age is 55 years. The median time to recurrence is 13 months. Previous treatment included chemoradiation and in 2 patients additional platinum based chemotherapy. Areas of metastasis included the lung, lymphnodes, abdomen, liver and the pelvis. Dose levels 1 to 3 are completed. A total of 34 courses were administered, an average of 3.6 per patient. One patient received 8 courses. Treatment was discontinued due to progressive disease in 7 patients and due to toxicity in 2 patients one with grade 3 onycholysis and another with a grade 3 allergic reaction to carboplatin. There were no treatment delays due to hematologic toxicity, no grade 2 or higher granulocytopenia, no thrombocytopenia. The mean hemoglobin level dropped from 12 g/dl prior to course 1 to 10.6 g/dl prior to course 3 and 10.2 g/dl prior to course 5. No grade 3 anemia was seen. The main non-hematologic side effects were fatigue, nausea and alopecia, none of which reached grade 3. Accrual on the L4 cohort is still ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin given on a weekly schedule is well tolerated in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Dose levels similar to those reported for initial treatment can be reached. [Table: see text]


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3576-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tang ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
C. Townsley ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
G. Pond ◽  
...  

3576 Background: VOR (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA) is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) that binds directly to the enzyme’s active site in the presence of a zinc ion. Aberrant HDAC activity has been implicated in a variety of cancers. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and VOR is synergistic in preclinical tumor models. Methods: This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of VOR and CAP in pts with advanced solid tumors. VOR was administered orally daily while CAP was administered orally bid on days 1–14 of a 21 d cycle. Results: Three dose levels have been evaluated (VOR (mg/d)/CAP (mg/bid)): 300/750, 300/1,000 and 400/1,000. Twenty-three pts have been treated: 6M/17F, median age 59 (range 41–73), ECOG 0:1:2 = 9:13:1, prior therapy 1:2:3 or more = 3:7:13. Pts had colorectal cancer (n=6), nasopharyngeal (n=3) and various other tumors. A total of 104 cycles have been administered, with median = 2 (range 1–15). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 diarrhea) occurred in 6 patients at dose level 1. No DLT were observed at dose level 2, and 2 DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 nausea/vomiting) occurred at dose level 3. RPTD was determined to be VOR 300 mg/d and CAP 1,000 mg/bid. Most common toxicities of any grade and at least possibly attributable (n=22) are: thrombocytopenia (59% of pts), fatigue (55%), nausea (55%), vomiting (50%), hypoalbuminemia (45%), anemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), anorexia (41%), elevated creatinine (36%), lymphopenia (36%), hyponatremia (36%), and hyperglycemia (36%). Common grade 3 toxicities included: hand-foot syndrome (23% of pts), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%), and lymphopenia (14%). One pt died on study from ventricular fibrillation due to sotalol and hypocalcemia from pre-existing hypoparathyroidism. Five patients with various tumor types had PR (2 confirmed, 3 unconfirmed) (2 nasopharyngeal, 1 each of ovarian, endometrial and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck). In addition, disease stabilization was seen in 12 patients. Conclusions: VOR and CAP are well tolerated, and this combination is active in several tumor types. Further evaluations of VOR and CAP are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4710-4710
Author(s):  
Hossein Borghaei ◽  
Mitchell Smith ◽  
Michael Millenson ◽  
Danielle Shafer ◽  
Linda Thibodeau ◽  
...  

Abstract Y90-ibritumomab tiuxetan, or Zevalin (Z), is an effective therapy against CD20+ lymphomas and is approved for use in patients with relapsed or refractory low grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Gemcitabine also is active against NHL and is a potent radiation sensitizer. We are conducting a phase I trial to assess the safety of concomitant administration of Z and gemcitabine in patients with NHL. Nine patients in three cohorts will be treated with 250 mg/m2 of gemcitabine IV on days 1 and 8 of the Z treatment program of rituximab + In 111-ibritumomab on day 1 and rituximab + Y90 ibritumomab on day 8, with Z at 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 mCi/kg respectively. The next cohort can only accrue after all patients in the prior cohort have hematologic toxicity that has recovered to grade 0–2 or after 60 days from the date of the last treated patient in the previous cohort. Once it is confirmed that a Z dose of 0.4 mg/kg can be safely administered with gemcitabine 250 mg/m2, Z will remain constant at 0.4 mCi/kg while gemcitabine will be escalated according to a Bayesian based system. Response evaluation is by standard criteria. Eligibility criteria include: any histology of recurrent NHL (not candidates for high dose therapy), platelets ≥ 150,000/ul; &lt; 25% bone marrow involvement by lymphoma; prior radiation to &lt;25% radiation of bone marrow and no prior bone marrow or stem cell transplant. Seven patients have been treated thus far, four with follicular NHL (FL) and three with diffuse large B cell (DLBCL). Median age is 74 (range 55–82). The median number of prior treatments is 3 (range 1–6). The first three patients received Z at 0.2 mCi/kg, next three patients 0.3 mCi/kg and the seventh patient has received standard 0.4 mCi/kg of Z, all with 250 mg/m2 of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8. Toxicity has consisted of: one grade 3 and two grade 2 neutropenia in the first three weeks, three grade 3 leukopenia and one grade 2 in the first 4 weeks of the trial, three grade 2 anemia (one patient has remained with grade 2 anemia for 14 weeks), four grade 2 thrombocytopenia in weeks 6 through 12, and one grade 3 thrombocytopenia in weeks 8&9 resolving to grade 2 (this patient received standard dose of Z). One grade 3 infection occurred, unrelated to the protocol or the study drugs. No grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity has been seen. In follow up, two patients with FL and one with DLBCL achieved CRu. Two patients with DLBCL and one with FL have progressed. One patient with FL is not yet evaluable. Conclusion: Our preliminary findings suggest that Zevalin can be safely combined with gemcitabine 250 mg/m2 in the treatment of patients with NHL. Accrual to the cohort with full dose Zevalin and gemcitabine is continuing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document