Concomitant administration of weekly oxaliplatin, 5FU continuous infusion and radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): A GERCOR phase II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
J. Phélip ◽  
P. Afchain ◽  
L. Mineur ◽  
T. André ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Concomitant Administration ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Concomitant Boost ◽  
Grade 3

4039 Background: According to previous GERCOR studies in LAPC, concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is indicated for non-progressive patients (pts) after systemic chemotherapy (CT). In order to improve the results of a classical 5FU-based CCRT, this study was designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly oxaliplatin (Ox), 5FU continuous infusion (c.i.) and radiation therapy (RT) in LAPC pts. Methods: Eligibility criteria included non resectable pathologically-proven LAPC, age > 18 yrs, PS < 2, and no prior CT or RT. All patients were first treated with 4 cycles of GEMOX (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, 100 min IV, d1; Ox 100 mg/m2, 2h IV, d2, every 2 wk). One month after cycle 4, non-progressive pts with PS < 2 received 45 Gy (25 fractions, 5 d/wk) + 10 Gy (concomitant boost in macroscopic tumor during wks 4 & 5, six hours apart large volume irradiation), combined with 250 mg/m2/d 5FU c.i. and weekly Ox. Initial 50 mg/m2 Ox dose was increased to 60 mg/m2 in absence of unacceptable toxicity after the 3 first included pts. Results: 60 pts were included (29 F/ 31 M, age 65.8 ± 9.6 yrs, range 37 - 80). 50 pts (83%) received CCRT, while 10 did not for the following reasons: metastatic progression (7 pts), OMS>2 (1), and CT toxicity (2). 44 pts (73 %) received the full planned CCRT dose-intensity. NCI-CTC grade 3–4 toxicities during CCRT and the following month (% of pts) were : neutropenia (14%), thrombocytopenia (10%), nausea-vomiting (20%), diarrhea (12%) and neuropathy (2%). 2 toxic deaths occurred during CCRT. With a median follow up of 15 mo, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole population were 7.6 mo and 13.8 mo, respectively. For pts who received CCRT, median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 13.9 mo, respectively (2.6 and 9.9 mo, respectively, for pts who did not received CCRT). Conclusion: Chemotherapy before CCRT can identify pts who might potentially benefit of CCRT. Concomitant administration of weekly Ox, continuous IV FU and RT in LAPC is feasible with an acceptable toxicity. The results in terms of PFS and OS compare favourably with a classical 5FU-based CCRT. [Table: see text]

Concomitant Administration of Weekly Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil Continuous Infusion, and Radiotherapy After 2 Months of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Induction in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Groupe Coordinateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie Phase II Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1080-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
Jean-Marc Phélip ◽  
Pauline Afchain ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Concomitant Administration ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Experience Disease Progression ◽  
Concomitant Boost

Background According to previously reported Groupe Coordinateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) may be recommended for patients who do not experience disease progression after systemic induction chemotherapy (CT). To further improve patient outcome with classical fluorouracil (FU)-based CCRT, this study was designed to prospectively investigate a CCRT with FU infusion and weekly oxaliplatin after 2 months of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) induction chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Nonpretreated patients with LAPC having WHO performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 received four induction cycles of GEMOX (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2; day 1 of a 15-day cycle). One month after cycle 4, patients who did not experience disease progression with PS 0 to 2 received 45 Gy over 5 weeks + 10 Gy (as a concomitant boost during the last 2 weeks) of radiotherapy (RT), with daily 250 mg/m2 FU as a continuous infusion and 60 mg/m2of oxaliplatin weekly. Results Of 59 patients, 50 patients (84.7%) received CCRT, whereas nine patients did not because of disease progression (seven patients), CT toxicity (one patient), or personal decision (one patient). Forty-four patients (74.5%) completed the fully planned CCRT. Median progression-free survival and overall survival durations were 7.6 and 12.2 months, respectively, for the whole population and 9.4 and 12.6 months, respectively, for patients who completed CCRT. CCRT grade 3 to 4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) were neutropenia (10.4%), thrombocytopenia (8.4%), nausea and vomiting (16.7%), and diarrhea (12.5%). Conclusion Concomitant administration of weekly oxaliplatin, continuous-infusion FU, and RT in patients with LAPC is feasible, with an acceptable acute and late safety profile. The encouraging results observed despite a nonoptimal patient selection (owing to the short induction time) indicates that further randomized evaluation to better define the specific role of oxaliplatin in CCRT is deserved.

scholarly journals Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
George Kim ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Background: No clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting. Methods: Embase and MEDLINE databases through 22 January 2019, and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2019 abstracts were searched for real-world, retrospective studies comparing first-line nab-P/G versus FOLFIRINOX in mPC or aPC that met specific parameters. Studies with radiotherapy were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Of 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative ( n = 356) or not first line ( n = 245). The remaining 34 studies (21 mPC; 13 aPC) assessed >6915 patients who received nab-P/G or FOLFIRINOX. In the studies identified, the median overall survival (OS) reached 14.4 and 15.9 months with nab-P/G and FOLFIRINOX, respectively, and median progression-free survival reached 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Safety data were reported in 14 studies (2205 patients), including 8 single-institutional studies. In most single-institutional studies that reported safety data, rates were higher with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-P/G for grade 3/4 neutropenia (five of six studies) and febrile neutropenia (all three studies), while rates of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy were higher with nab-P/G in four of seven studies. Conclusions: Although FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

Investigation of the tolerability of FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer: Single-institution experience in Japan.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 487-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouichirou Miyashita ◽  
Takashi Sekikawa ◽  
Ken Shimada ◽  
Taikan Yamamoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Kaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Practice Methods

487 Background: FOLFIRINOX therapy has contributed to the overall survival extension of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. This regimen is however associated with significant toxicity. And doing the treatment, while careful to toxicity at our institution. We investigated the tolerability of FOLFIRINOX for the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX between November 2012 and August 2014. FOLFIRINOX is as follows: irinotecan at 150 mg/m2; oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at 400mg/m2 bolus, 2,400mg/m2 continuous infusion. Patients' characteristics, objective response, survival and toxicities were collected. Response were evaluated with RECIST version 1.1 and toxicities with NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Results: 13 patients were includes (8 males and 5 females). Treatment eligibility criteria in our institution were Performance Status 0 or 1, and UGT1A1 polymorphisms were excluded. Median age was 58.6 years (41-74). Clinical stage IVa/IVb was 3/10. The mean number therapy was 7.7 (3-15) cycles. The toxicity of all grade was 100% and grade 3 was 80%. The non-hematological toxicities included nausea in 8 patients (61.5%) and anorexia in 9 (69.2%). The hematological toxicities included neutropenia in 12 patients (92.3%), of which 11 (84.6%) presented a grade 3/4 neutropenia. In patients who developed grade 3 neutropenia, the treatment of FOLFIRINOX could be continued once every three weeks (triweekly) without reducing the dose. Response rate was 38.5% (CR: 0, PR: 5, SD: 6, PD: 2) and disease control rate was 84.6%. Time to treatment failure was 175 days. Relative dose intensity was 95.0% for oxaliplatin, 88.9% for irinotecan, 81.9% for 5FU (bolus), and 95.6% for 5FU (continuous). Conclusions: In clinical practice, it is expected that FOLFIRINOX is an effective, well-tolerated regimen by reducing the dose or determining the appropriate dosing interval.

LOTUS (NCT02162719): A double-blind placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized phase II trial of first-line ipatasertib (IPAT) + paclitaxel (P) for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Alexandra Dent ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Marc Espie ◽  
Sibel Blau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Median Cumulative Dose

1009 Background: The oral Akt inhibitor IPAT is being evaluated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/Akt pathway activation, including TNBC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had measurable inoperable locally advanced/metastatic TNBC previously untreated with systemic therapy. Pts were stratified by prior (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval and tumor PTEN status, and randomized 1:1 to P 80 mg/m2 (d1, 8 & 15) with either IPAT 400 mg or PBO (d1–21) q28d until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in the ITT population and pts with PTEN-low tumors by IHC. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and overall survival in the ITT and IHC PTEN-low populations, efficacy in pts with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Efficacy is shown below. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (grouped terms) were diarrhea (23% IPAT+P vs 0% PBO+P; no grade 4 or colitis in either arm), neutropenia (18% vs 8%), asthenia (5% vs 6%), peripheral neuropathy (5% vs 5%) and pneumonia (5% vs 0%). More pts receiving IPAT+P than PBO+P had an AE leading to dose reduction of IPAT/PBO (21% vs 6%) or P (38% vs 11%) but median cumulative dose intensity was similar (IPAT/PBO: 99% vs 100%; P: 100% vs 100%). AEs led to IPAT/PBO discontinuation in 13% vs 11% of pts, respectively; 2 pts (3%) discontinued IPAT for grade 3 diarrhea. Conclusions: Adding IPAT to P for TNBC modestly improved PFS in the ITT pts. The effect was more pronounced in the prespecified subgroup with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, warranting further evaluation of IPAT in these pts. AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT02162719. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of bolus 5-FU/l-LV regimen as salvage line chemotherapy for oral fluorouracil resistant unresectable gastric cancer (HGCSG1502).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS177-TPS177
Author(s):  
Tetsuhito Muranaka ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Kentaro Sawada ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Bolus Injection ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Concentration Dependent Manner ◽  
Free Survival

TPS177 Background: S-1, oral fluorouracil agent compounding tegafur, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydropyrimidine, and potassium oxonate for gastric cancer showed non-inferiority relative to a continuous infusion of fluorouracil in JCOG9912 trial. Similarly, in ISO-5FU10 trial, S-1 revealed non-inferiority effect compared with the treatment with bolus 5-FU/l-LV treatment. It is known that there is a different mechanism of anti-cancer effect between continuous 5-FU and bolus injection of 5-FU. Continuous infusion of 5-FU and oral fluorouracil inhibit DNA synthesis, however, bolus injection of 5-FU causes dysfunction of RNA in a concentration-dependent manner. So we considered bolus 5-FU/l-LV treatment might be useful for oral fluorouracil resistant patients with gastric cancer. Methods: This is a multi-centered single-arm prospective phase II study in Japanese patients with oral fluorouracil resistant gastric cancer. The key eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) Pathologically diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma: 2) Unresectable advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease; 3) resistance of S-1 or capecitabine; 4) resistance or intolerance of cisplatin or oxaliplatin, paclitaxel or docetaxel, and ramucirumab; 5) 20 years of age or older; 6) ECOG PS of 0, 1 or 2. Bolus 5-FU/l-LV regimen consists of l-LV 250mg/m2/2h iv and 5-FU 600mg/m2 iv bolus given intravenously once weekly followed by 2-week rest period, within a 8-week cycle. The primary endpoint is progression free survival rate after 1cycle administration. And the secondary endpoints are response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, progression free survival, time to treatment failure, adverse events, dose intensity and QOL by EORTC QLQ-C30. This study is recruiting in Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group and registered as UMIN000018882. Clinical trial information: UMIN000018882.

Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine plus 5-Fluorouracil Followed by Gemcitabine-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ender Kurt ◽  
Meral Kurt ◽  
Ozkan Kanat ◽  
Sibel Kahraman Cetintas ◽  
Sevilcan Aygun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3

Aims and background To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new treatment approach including induction chemotherapy (CT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods Twenty-four patients with LAPC were enrolled in the study. They first received induction CT consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (500 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2), which were given weekly for 3 weeks of every 4. Patients showing a response or disease stabilization after 2 cycles of induction CT received CRT consisting of external beam radiotherapy (50.4-54 Gy in fractions of 1.8 Gy/day) and gemcitabine (350 mg/m2, weekly for 6 weeks). Patients without disease progression received 2 additional cycles of CT consisting of 5FU plus gemcitabine with the same doses and schedule as given in the induction CT. Results After the end of the study, 2 (8%) and 5 (21%) patients showed complete and partial responses, respectively. Five patients (21%) had disease stabilization. The grade 3 and 4 toxicities associated with CT were neutropenia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). The grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurring in patients who received CRT were neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (24%), diarrhea (18%), and nausea (12%). The median progression-free survival for all patients was 6 months (95% CI, 3.6-8.4), and the median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI, 8.16-13.84). Conclusions The CRT approach of this study is moderately active and has an acceptable toxicity profile. However, the incor-poration of combination CT into CRT at the present schedule could not produce any additional benefit over CRT alone. Newer agents with more systemic activity are clearly warranted.

Phase I study of nivolumab (Nivo) + nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) + gemcitabine (Gem) in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 298-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Edward Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Ben George ◽  
Aparna Kalyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

298 Background: Chemotherapy may work synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors by increasing tumor antigen exposure. This 2-part phase I study assessed safety and efficacy of Nivo + nab-P + Gem in APC. Methods: Treatment-naive patients (pts) with APC (locally advanced or metastatic) received nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 on d 1, 8, and 15 + Nivo 3 mg/kg on d 1 and 15 of each 28-d cycle until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Pts could continue Nivo alone beyond initial PD. Part 1 assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determined the recommended Part 2 dose; Part 2 (expansion phase) further assessed safety. The primary endpoints were DLTs (Part 1) and safety and tolerability (Parts 1 and 2). Key secondary endpoints were response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: As of July 13, 2018, 50 pts with APC were treated: 6 in Part 1; 44 in Part 2. The median age was 67.5 years; 56% were male; 62% had an ECOG PS 1. Of 40 pts with available data, 12 (24%) had ≥ 1% and 6 (12%) had ≥ 5% PD-L1 expression at baseline (data missing for 10 pts). The median follow-up was 11.3 mo. In Part 1, 1 DLT (hepatitis, as evidenced by grade 3 elevated liver function tests; suspected to be related to nab-P + Gem) was reported. In Parts 1 and 2, 48 pts (96%) had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 TEAE; 7 (14%) discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. Most common (> 10%) grade 3/4 TEAEs of special interest were anemia (36%), neutropenia (36%), gastrointestinal events (24%), hepatic toxicity (22%), peripheral neuropathy (16%), thrombocytopenia (12%), and colitis (12%). One grade 5 TEAE, respiratory failure (most likely pneumonitis), was reported. The table shows treatment responses. Of 7 pts (14%) who continued Nivo beyond initial PD, 4 achieved disease control. The median PFS was 5.5 mo (6-mo PFS rate, 47%). The median OS was 9.9 mo (6-mo OS rate, 73%). Conclusions: Combining Nivo with nab-P + Gem is feasible in pts with APC: 1 DLT was reported, and no unexpected safety signals were detected. Clinical trial information: NCT02309177. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A phase II study of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and S-1 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 476-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boram Han ◽  
Hyeong Su Kim ◽  
Dae Ro Choi ◽  
Byoungyong Shim ◽  
Kyung Hee Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Modest Improvement ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Treatment Dose ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Improvement In Survival

476 Background: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is considered as a standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although addition of erlotinib or S-1 to gemcitabine has yielded better outcomes, it has showed just modest improvement in survival. To overcome this limitation, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and S-1 for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with pathologically proven locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were assessed for eligibility. Gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on day 1, and 8, erlotinib at 100 mg/day was administered on day 1-21, and S-1 at 60 mg/m2 was administered on days 1-14 every 21 days and continued to maximum of 8 cycles of treatment. Dose escalation of S-1 to 80 mg/m2 was permitted from second cycle for pre-defined tolerable patients. Results: Thirty-seven patients (median age 61.5 years) were enrolled. A total of 140 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median of 3.8; range 1–8 cycles). Toxicities were evaluated in 36 patients, and the responses were evaluated in 31 patients. Major grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (25%), febrile neutropenia (2.8%), fatigue (22.2%), infection (8.3%), vomiting (5.6%), and mucositis (5.6%). The overall response rate was 12.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.1-28.9%] and disease control rate was 74.2% (95% CI, 56.8-86.3%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 months (95 % CI, 2.3-4.5 months) and 5.7 months (95 % CI, 3.9-7.6 months), respectively. Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and S-1 provided an acceptable toxicity profile and modest clinical benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01693419.

Gemcitabine in Combination With Oxaliplatin Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a GERCOR and GISCAD Phase III Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (15) ◽  
pp. 3509-3516 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Louvet ◽  
R. Labianca ◽  
P. Hammel ◽  
G. Lledo ◽  
M.G. Zampino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion). Results Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem). Conclusion These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

FOLFIRI regimen as second-/third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma refractory to gemcitabine and platinum salts: A retrospective series of 70 patients.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 272-272
Author(s):  
C. Neuzillet ◽  
O. Hentic ◽  
B. Rousseau ◽  
V. Rebours ◽  
L. Bengrine-Lefèvre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Adaptation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

272 Background: Gemcitabine-based regimen is a standard of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) and 5-FU/oxaliplatin combination is an option for second line (Oettle, 2009). Some data suggest a potential efficacy of 5-FU/irinotecan regimen (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment (Taïeb, 2007)or in patients with gemcitabine/platinum-refractory advanced PAC (Yoo, 2009; Gebbia, 2010). Methods: All consecutive patients with unresectable advanced PAC (01-2005/05-2010) and OMS≤2 received FOLFIRI-1 (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 D1, n=60) or FOLFIRI-3 regimen (irinotecan 100 mg/m2 D1/D3 n=10) after failure of gemcitabine- and platinum-based chemotherapies as a systematic policy in two institutions. Following data were analyzed: tumor response, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival rate (OS), and grade 3-4 toxicities. Results: Seventy patients were studied. Median age was 60 years (range: 24-81); 37 (52.9%) were male; 30 (42.9%) were PS 0, 27 were PS 1 and 13 were PS 2. Cancer was locally advanced in 15.7% and metastatic in 84.3% of patients. Before FOLFIRI regimen, patients received 1 line (n=24, 34.3%), 2 lines (n=40, 57.1%) or ≥ 3 lines (n=6, 8.8%) chemotherapy. PFS with previous line was less than 3 months in most patients. Tumor control was achieved in 31 (44.3%) patients (partial response: 5, stable disease: 26). PFS was 17% at 12 months and 3% at 24 months. Median PFS was 23 weeks (range: 2-147). OS was 24% at 12 months and 9% at 24 months. Median OS was 24 weeks (range: 2-147). From the initial diagnosis, 1-year and 2-year survivals were 79% and 32%. Dose adaptation was required in 21 (30.0%) patients. Eighteen (25.7%) patients had grade 3-4 toxicities, mainly hematologic (n=13) or digestive (n=6). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 patients without death. Conclusions: FOLFIRI regimen after failure of gemcitabine- and platinum-based regimens for advanced PAC in our study had an acceptable toxicity and a surprising efficacy in patients OMS 0-2. These results suggest that FOLFIRI regimen should be further tested as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document