scholarly journals Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
George Kim ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Background: No clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting. Methods: Embase and MEDLINE databases through 22 January 2019, and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2019 abstracts were searched for real-world, retrospective studies comparing first-line nab-P/G versus FOLFIRINOX in mPC or aPC that met specific parameters. Studies with radiotherapy were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Of 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative ( n = 356) or not first line ( n = 245). The remaining 34 studies (21 mPC; 13 aPC) assessed >6915 patients who received nab-P/G or FOLFIRINOX. In the studies identified, the median overall survival (OS) reached 14.4 and 15.9 months with nab-P/G and FOLFIRINOX, respectively, and median progression-free survival reached 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Safety data were reported in 14 studies (2205 patients), including 8 single-institutional studies. In most single-institutional studies that reported safety data, rates were higher with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-P/G for grade 3/4 neutropenia (five of six studies) and febrile neutropenia (all three studies), while rates of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy were higher with nab-P/G in four of seven studies. Conclusions: Although FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592090540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor H. F. de Jesus ◽  
Marcos P. G. Camandaroba ◽  
Vinicius F. Calsavara ◽  
Rachel P. Riechelmann
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Background: There are no randomized data to guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma following first-line FOLFIRINOX. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX to assess treatment efficacy and toxicity. Methods: We included studies published between 2011 and 2018 that evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any grade 3/4 toxicity rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). We used the random-effects model to generate pooled estimates for proportions. Results: Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, ORR was 10.8%, DCR was 41.1%, and any grade 3/4 toxicity rate was 28.6%. In subgroup analyses, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with superior ORR (14.4 versus 8.4%; p = 0.038) and DCR (53.5 versus 30.5%; p < 0.001) compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Median PFS ranged from 1.9 to 6.4 months and numerically favored gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Conclusions: Our study suggests gemcitabine-based chemotherapy likely outperforms best supportive care after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Also, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel seems to be more active than single-agent gemcitabine (CRD42018100421).

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 291-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Bradley G. Somer ◽  
Joon Oh Park ◽  
Chung-Pin Li ◽  
Max E. Scheulen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

291 Background: Trametinib, an oral MEK1/2 inhibitor, holds promise for tumors that frequently harbor RAS activating mutations, such as pancreatic cancer. Trametinib monotherapy or in combination with gemcitabine showed preliminary activity in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Eligible pts with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized (double-blind, 1:1) to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously weekly x 7 for 8 weeks, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks, plus either trametinib 2 mg or placebo daily. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). OS and ORR were also analyzed based on baseline KRAS status as determined in plasma cell free DNA (cfDNA). Results: Baseline characteristics for the 160 randomized and treated pts were similar across arms. Skin related events (73% vs. 34%), diarrhea (54% vs. 28%), thrombocytopenia (40% vs. 28%), and stomatitis (36% vs. 8%) were more frequent with trametinib, as was grade 3/4 anemia (22% vs. 11%). However, rates of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were similar between the arms. More pts on trametinib arm required dose reduction or interruption due to AEs (68% vs. 49% and 74% vs. 43%, respectively). Median OS was 8.4 months with trametinib compared to 6.7 months with placebo [HR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.44, p=0.453)]. Median PFS was 16 weeks on trametinib and 15 weeks on placebo arm. ORRs and median DoRs were 22% and 23.9 weeks and 18% and 16.1 weeks on trametinib and placebo arm, respectively. The median OS and ORR in the subgroup of pts with KRAS mutations (n=143) was similar to OS and ORR for all randomized pts. Conclusions: This is first randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the combination of gemcitabine with a MEK inhibitor. There was an increased incidence of skin, GI, and hematologic toxicities with trametinib compared to placebo. The addition of trametinib did not improve OS, PFS, or response rate. These outcomes remained independent of KRAS mutations based on cfDNA. Clinical trial information: NCT01231581.

scholarly journals Second-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after First-Line FOLFIRINOX Failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Mita ◽  
Takuji Iwashita ◽  
Shinya Uemura ◽  
Kensaku Yoshida ◽  
Yuhei Iwasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

FOLFIRINOX (FX) and gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been reported as effective regimens for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). FX may be more effective but is also associated with more adverse events (AEs). Therefore, first-line treatment with FX followed by second-line GnP may be appropriate. Aims: To assess the safety and efficacy of second-line GnP for patients with APC after first-line FX failure. Methods: This study was a multicenter prospective phase II study evaluating second-line GnP in patients with APC after failed first-line FX. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and the frequency and degree of adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty patients (14 male; median age, 64 years) were enrolled. The RR was 13.3%, with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months. The median OS and PFS were 7.6 and 3.8 months, respectively. From the beginning of first-line treatment, the median OS and PFS were 14.2 and 9.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 70% of patients. Conclusion: Second-line GnP after FX failure for patients with APC could be more effective than GEM alone. Further comparison studies are warranted.

Gemcitabine and S-1 as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 492-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijia Fang ◽  
Peng Zhao ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Weiqin Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

492 Background: Gemcitabine and S-1 are both effective antitumor chemotherapeutic agents for pancreatic cancer. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1 (GS) as first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer who had measurable lesion(s) were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 1,000 mg/m (2) during 30 min on days 1 and 8 and oral S-1 was given twice daily (BSA < 1.25 m(2), 80 mg/day; 1.25 ≤ BSA < 1.50 m(2), 100 mg/day; 1.50 m(2) ≤ BSA, 120 mg/day) on days 1-14 followed by a drug-free interval of 1 week every 21-day cycle. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2014. The assessed overall response rate was 24 % partial response in 6 patients, 56 % stable disease in 14 patients, and 20 % progressive disease in 5 patients. Sixteen patients (64 %) received second-line chemotherapy. The estimated median progression-free survival and median overall survival times were, respectively, 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1-6.7 months) and 10.2 months (95 % CI 6.5-14.2 months). The major hematological toxicities were included grade 3/4 leucocytopenia in 8 patients (32 %), grade 3/4 neutropenia in 13 patients (52 %), and one patients (4 %) suffered grade 1 febrile neutropenia. The common grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity was Anorexia, rash and fatigue, held the proportion of 12%, 16% and 12%, respectively. Conclusions: Gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) combination therapy showed promising activity with acceptable toxicities as first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3575-3575
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

3575 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. his trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally-advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of alternate-day oral therapy with S-1 for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer: An updated report.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 252-252
Author(s):  
Sohei Satoi ◽  
Motoki Miyazawa ◽  
Masaji Tani ◽  
Manabu Kawai ◽  
Seiko Hirono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

252 Background: Based on the results of GEST, S-1 was confirmed to be non-inferior to gemcitabine. However, the recommended regimen of 4 weeks of administration interrupted by 2 weeks of drug withdrawal frequently causes adverse effect. Grade3/4 toxicities (%) in S-1 were neutropenia 8.8, anorexia 11.4, diarrhea 5.5. On the other hand, we experienced in clinical practice that the alternate-day administration of S-1 reduced adverse effects and was tolerable for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer patients unwilling to continue the standard daily administration. We therefore conducted a multi-center cooperative prospective study to compare daily with alternate-day administration of S-1 for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (PS, 0 to 1; age, 20 to 80 years; no other therapy) were eligible for enrollment in this trial. S-1 was administered a dose of 40 to 60 mg twice daily, assigned according to body-surface area, on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday (specified days). Each treatment cycle will be 42 days (6 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were safety, response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF). Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled from Sep 2009 to Feb 2011. 48 patients were evaluable for response. Male/Female was 21/27, PS: 0/1 was 40/8. With a median follow-up time of 28.2 months, OS as primary endpoint was 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.4-10.8) with the 1 year survival rate 29.2%. PFS was 5.5 months, and TTF was 3.9 months. RR was 10.4% (95% CI: 3.5-19.1), and Disease Control rate was 79.2%. Grade 3/4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were minor. All of those adverse reactions were tolerable and reversible. Conclusions: We will report the data from the final analysis at this meeting. The current data show mitigation of adverse effects with alternate-day administration of S-1, and it appears to be a more sustainable option for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase II trial comparing this regimen of S-1 with standard regimen of S-1 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: 000003453.

Investigation of the tolerability of FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer: Single-institution experience in Japan.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 487-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouichirou Miyashita ◽  
Takashi Sekikawa ◽  
Ken Shimada ◽  
Taikan Yamamoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Kaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Practice Methods

487 Background: FOLFIRINOX therapy has contributed to the overall survival extension of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. This regimen is however associated with significant toxicity. And doing the treatment, while careful to toxicity at our institution. We investigated the tolerability of FOLFIRINOX for the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX between November 2012 and August 2014. FOLFIRINOX is as follows: irinotecan at 150 mg/m2; oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at 400mg/m2 bolus, 2,400mg/m2 continuous infusion. Patients' characteristics, objective response, survival and toxicities were collected. Response were evaluated with RECIST version 1.1 and toxicities with NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Results: 13 patients were includes (8 males and 5 females). Treatment eligibility criteria in our institution were Performance Status 0 or 1, and UGT1A1 polymorphisms were excluded. Median age was 58.6 years (41-74). Clinical stage IVa/IVb was 3/10. The mean number therapy was 7.7 (3-15) cycles. The toxicity of all grade was 100% and grade 3 was 80%. The non-hematological toxicities included nausea in 8 patients (61.5%) and anorexia in 9 (69.2%). The hematological toxicities included neutropenia in 12 patients (92.3%), of which 11 (84.6%) presented a grade 3/4 neutropenia. In patients who developed grade 3 neutropenia, the treatment of FOLFIRINOX could be continued once every three weeks (triweekly) without reducing the dose. Response rate was 38.5% (CR: 0, PR: 5, SD: 6, PD: 2) and disease control rate was 84.6%. Time to treatment failure was 175 days. Relative dose intensity was 95.0% for oxaliplatin, 88.9% for irinotecan, 81.9% for 5FU (bolus), and 95.6% for 5FU (continuous). Conclusions: In clinical practice, it is expected that FOLFIRINOX is an effective, well-tolerated regimen by reducing the dose or determining the appropriate dosing interval.

Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase 3 trial of first-line ribociclib + letrozole in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–), advanced breast cancer (ABC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1038-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi ◽  
Salomon M. Stemmer ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Yoon Sim Yap ◽  
Gabe S. Sonke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Grade 3

1038 Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the basis of first-line (1L) treatment for HR+ ABC. However, ET resistance are almost universal. At the first interim analysis (IA) of MONALEESA-2 (NCT01958021), ribociclib (RIB; cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) + letrozole (LET) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) + LET in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2– ABC.1 Here we report updated efficacy and safety data from MONALEESA-2 with a further ~11 months of follow-up. Methods: Postmenopausal women with no prior therapy for ABC were randomized 1:1 toRIB (600 mg/day, 3-weeks-on/1-week-off) + LET(2.5 mg/day, continuous) vs PBO + LET. The primary endpoint was locally assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS; key) and safety. OS significance was defined by a p-value threshold of 3.15 x 10-5. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks for the first 18 months, and every 12 weeks, thereafter. Results: 668 pts were enrolled (334 in each arm). At the second IA for OS (data cut-off Jan 2, 2017), the median duration of follow-up was 26.4 months; 116 deaths and 345 PFS events had occurred. OS data remain immature, with 15.0% vs 19.8% of pt deaths in the RIB + LET vs PBO + LET arm (HR = 0.746; 95% CI: 0.517–1.078; p= 0.059). Updated PFS analyses confirmed continued treatment benefit in the RIB + LET vs PBO + LET arm. The 24-month PFS rates (RIB + LET vs PBO + LET) were 54.7% vs 35.9%. Treatment benefit was consistent across pt subgroups. The most common Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities (≥10% of pts; RIB + LET vs PBO + LET) were decreased neutrophils (62.6% vs 1.5%), decreased leukocytes (36.8% vs 1.5%), decreased lymphocytes (16.2% vs 3.9%), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (11.4% vs 1.2%). Conclusion: After 26+ months of follow-up, treatment benefit with 1LRIB + LET persists in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– ABC. The study remains immature for OS analysis. The safety profile of RIB + LET remains manageable. 1. Hortobagyi G, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1738–48. Clinical trial information: NCT01958021.

Retrospective comparison of modified FOLFIRINOX with full-dose FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer: A Japanese cancer center experience.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 469-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ohba ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
Chigusa Morizane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Grade 3

469 Background: Various modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) regimens have been reported and widely used in clinical practice. Although there are retrospective studies and single-arm phase 2 studies comparing modified regimens to the full-dose regimen of the historical control group, head-to-head comparisons in the same population are limited. This study aimed to compare mFFX with full-dose FOLFIRINOX (fFFX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Methods: We reviewed 85 patients with APC who received mFFX (no bolus fluorouracil and irinotecan 150 mg per square) or fFFX as first-line chemotherapy between January 2014 and December 2016. mFFX has been used since January 2016 on the basis of results of a Japanese phase 2 study. The efficacy, safety, and dose reduction pattern were evaluated. Results: A total of 56 eligible patients (26 treated with mFFX and 30 with fFFX) were selected. Baseline characteristics of each group were well-balanced. The median relative dose intensities of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil, and continuous infusion fluorouracil were 68.6%, 78.5%, 0%, and 88.5% in the mFFX group, and 80.5%, 76.5%, 25.6%, and 83.6% in the fFFX group, respectively. Second cycle dose reduction occurred in 38% of the patients in the mFFX group and in 62% of those in the fFFX group. The median overall survival (OS) was 19.0 months in the mFFX group, compared to 13.2 months in the fFFX group (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.25–1.47, P = 0.27). In a multivariate analysis to adjust for prognostic factors for OS, the hazard ratio for death with mFFX was significant (adjusted HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14–0.93, P = 0.04). The median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in the mFFX group and 5.9 months in the fFFX group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.44–1.54, P = 0.55). The response rate was 35% in the mFFX group versus 30% (P = 0.78) in the fFFX group, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia (15% versus 40%), neutropenia (42% versus 70%), febrile neutropenia (8% versus 17%), and nausea (4% versus 13%) were decreased in the mFFX group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: mFFX had equivalent or higher efficacy and improved safety compared to fFFX in the same population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document