Hormonal status and the quality of life of testicular cancer survivors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4548-4548 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Wiechno ◽  
M. A. Sadowska ◽  
K. S. Kubiak ◽  
T. Demkow ◽  
J. Kaminska

4548 Background: Testicular cancer is a highly curable neoplasm and treated patients may potentially survive many decades. The aim of the study was to assess the rate of hormonal abnormalities among testicular cancer survivors and the effect of these changes on patients’ quality of life. Methods: Men with complete remission of testicular cancer lasting over 2 years were eligible. Patients completed State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF), Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and rated their physical and psychological well-being, quality of life and relationship with partners. Levels of the following hormons were determined: testosterone, estradiol, thyreotropin, folicule stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin. Relations between hormone levels and questionaires results were analysed. Results: A total of 326 men were tested from November 2004 till December 2005. Median age was 37 years (range: 18–72). Median disease free survival was 59 months (range: 19–291). Only 24% of patients had all tested hormones within normal ranges. The most common of endocrine abnormalities were gonadotropins over normal (LH - 55% and FSH - 49% of cases) and lowered testosterone (15%). Percentage of patients with abnormal anxiety levels was 27% (STAI) and 28% (HADS), depression rate was 15% (BDI) and 18% (HADS), 40% of patients had erectile disfunction. Hormone levels and scores of the used scales corelated strongly with patients’ age, then a linear regression analysis was performed to exclude the influence of age factor. It was shown that higher depression levels in BDI are found amongst patients with elevated LH (p = 0.010) or FSH (p = 0.017). Men with higher than normal FSH were more anxious in STAI (p = 0.026). Patients with overnormal LH shown more sexual problems in SFQ (p = 0.030). Abnormal gonadotropins levels corelated with a deteriorated physical well-being (p = 0.028). Men with abnormal estradiol were more prone to erectile disfunction (p = 0.009). Conclusions: Hormonal abnormalities are frequent among testicular cancer survivors and have negative impact on the patients’ physical and psychological well-being as well as on their sexual functioning. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fleer ◽  
H. J. Hoekstra ◽  
D. T. Sleijfer ◽  
M. A. Tuinman ◽  
E. C. Klip ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (14) ◽  
pp. 5927-5936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munir Abu-Helalah ◽  
Motasem Al-Hanaqta ◽  
Hussam Alshraideh ◽  
Nada Abdulbaqi ◽  
Jameel Hijazeen

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (10) ◽  
pp. 1313-1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott C Adams ◽  
Darren S DeLorey ◽  
Margie H Davenport ◽  
Adrian S Fairey ◽  
Scott North ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Alacacioglu ◽  
Eda Ulger ◽  
Umut Varol ◽  
Tugba Yavuzsen ◽  
Murat Akyol ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1990-2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. van der Spek ◽  
J. Vos ◽  
C. F. van Uden-Kraan ◽  
W. Breitbart ◽  
P. Cuijpers ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors (MCGP-CS) to improve personal meaning, compared with supportive group psychotherapy (SGP) and care as usual (CAU).MethodA total of 170 cancer survivors were randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: MCGP-CS (n = 57); SGP (n = 56); CAU (n = 57). The primary outcome measure was the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP; total score). Secondary outcome measures were subscales of the PMP, psychological well-being (Scales of Psychological Well-being; SPWB), post-traumatic growth (Posttraumatic Growth Inventory), Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC), optimism (Life Orientation Test-Revised), hopelessness (Beck's Hopelessness Scale), psychological distress (anxiety and depression, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS) and quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; EORTC QLQ-C30). Outcome measures were assessed before randomization, post-intervention, and after 3 and 6 months of follow-up (FU).ResultsLinear mixed model analyses (intention-to-treat) showed significant differences between MCGP-CS, SGP and CAU on the total PMP score, and on (sub)scales of the PMP, SPWB, MAC and HADS. Post-hoc analyses showed significantly stronger treatment effects of MCGP-CS compared with CAU on personal meaning (d = 0.81), goal-orientedness (d = 1.07), positive relations (d = 0.59), purpose in life (d = 0.69); fighting spirit (d = 0.61) (post-intervention) and helpless/hopeless (d = −0.87) (3 months FU); and distress (d = −0.6) and depression (d = −0.38) (6 months FU). Significantly stronger effects of MCGP-CS compared with SGP were found on personal growth (d = 0.57) (3 months FU) and environmental mastery (d = 0.66) (6 months FU).ConclusionsMCGP-CS is an effective intervention for cancer survivors to improve personal meaning, psychological well-being and mental adjustment to cancer in the short term, and to reduce psychological distress in the long run.


2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1948-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis N. Butow ◽  
Lynley Aldridge ◽  
Melanie L. Bell ◽  
Ming Sze ◽  
Maurice Eisenbruch ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. S66
Author(s):  
M. Kurobe ◽  
T. Suetomi ◽  
K. Kawai ◽  
K. Tanaka ◽  
A. Ikeda ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 1448-1455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Wiechno ◽  
Tomasz Demkow ◽  
Krzysztof Kubiak ◽  
Małgorzata Sadowska ◽  
Janina Kamińska

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document