scholarly journals Moderators of Interventions Designed to Enhance Physical and Psychological Functioning Among Younger Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 5710-5714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Scheier ◽  
Vicki S. Helgeson ◽  
Richard Schulz ◽  
Suzanne Colvin ◽  
Sarah L. Berga ◽  
...  

Purpose To identify factors that condition or moderate the impact of a previously described set of interventions on psychological and physical adjustment after diagnosis and treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods Younger women (age < 51 years, N = 252) with early-stage breast cancer within 2 months of having completed active nonhormonal adjuvant therapy were randomly assigned to a three-arm clinical trial, consisting of a control arm, an education arm, and a nutrition arm. Primary end points, assessed before random assignment and 4 and 13 months later, included mental functioning, physical functioning, and depressive symptoms. Four types of moderator variables were identified, including two sets reflecting psychosocial resources, specifically personality factors and factors related to the person's social environment, a set reflecting demographic variables, and a set reflecting treatment and disease variables (including comorbidities). Results Psychosocial factors were more likely to moderate treatment effects than were demographic and disease-related factors, but the moderating effects of these psychosocial factors were limited to patients receiving the nutrition intervention. Patients with lower psychosocial resources benefited from the nutrition intervention, whereas patients with a greater amount of psychosocial resources did not. Conclusion Future trials of this type should stratify by or select for the moderating variables identified here (ie, dispositional pessimism, unmitigated communion, and negative social interaction) to establish more firmly their role in responses to psychosocial interventions. Effort should also be made to collect data to inform the delivery of interventions to those who might benefit the most.

2009 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. de Bock ◽  
H. Putter ◽  
J. Bonnema ◽  
J. A. van der Hage ◽  
H. Bartelink ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1671-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shari Gelber ◽  
Alan S. Coates ◽  
Aron Goldhirsch ◽  
Monica Castiglione-Gertsch ◽  
Gianluigi Marini ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of subsequent pregnancy on the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients who became pregnant after diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer were identified in institutions participating in International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) studies. Fourteen had relapse of breast cancer before their first subsequent pregnancy. The remaining 94 patients (including eight who relapsed during pregnancy) formed the study group reported here. A comparison group of 188 was obtained by randomly selecting two patients, matched for nodal status, tumor size, age, and year of diagnosis from the IBCSG database, who were free of relapse for at least as long as the time between breast cancer diagnosis and completion of pregnancy for each pregnant patient. Survival comparison used Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Overall 5- and 10-year survival percentages (± SE) measured from the diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer among the 94 study group patients were 92% ± 3% and 86% ± 4%, respectively. For the matched comparison group survival was 85% ± 3% at 5 years and 74% ± 4% at 10 years (risk ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.96; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Subsequent pregnancy does not adversely affect the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer. The superior survival seen in this and other controlled series may merely reflect a healthy patient selection bias, but is also consistent with an antitumor effect of the pregnancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariacarla Valli ◽  
Simona Cima ◽  
Paola Fanti ◽  
Barbara Muoio ◽  
Alessandra Vanetti ◽  
...  

Objective: To analyze the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) and overall survival (OS) in patients older than 69 years with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: From January 2007 to June 2015, we analyzed retrospectively 137 women with estrogen receptor–positive T1–2 invasive breast cancer, with negative axillary lymph nodes, dividing them into 2 subgroups: 70 to 79 years and older than 79 years. Results: After a median follow-up of 43.2 months, the 3-year IBR-free survival in patients treated with surgery plus RT was 98.8% and 92.1% in patients treated with surgery alone, with a significant difference ( p = .01). Radiotherapy did not impact overall survival ( p = .10). A higher percentage of patients aged between 70 and 79 years received RT after conservative surgery if compared with the older subgroup ( p < .01). Conclusions: In elderly women, adjuvant RT reduced the IBR, but did not improve OS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona McNally ◽  
Paul H. Shepherd ◽  
Terri Flood

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the use of exercise in managing fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. To explore the effectiveness of different exercise practices and explore how optimum management of fatigue might be achieved.MethodA CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) database search of literature was undertaken and publications screened for retrieval with 24 qualifying for inclusion in the review.ResultsThere is evidence to support various forms of exercise including aerobic, resistance, alternative and combination exercise in the management of fatigue in early stage breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. The benefits of exercise for patients with later stage and metastatic disease is less clear and there is a lack of published research related to this category of patient.ConclusionExercise is considered a safe, non-pharmacological intervention for early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Further investigation is required into optimum exercise interventions and the effectiveness and viability of supervised and unsupervised models. Patient centred tailored advice and guidance needs to be developed and effectively promoted by therapeutic radiographers in order for patients to fully realise the benefit.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6031-6031
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Churilla ◽  
Patrick E. Donnelly ◽  
Christopher A. Peters

6031 Background: Mastectomy and breast conserving therapy (BCT, partial mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy) are equivalent in survival for treatment of early stage breast cancer. This study evaluated the impact of radiation oncologist accessibility on choice of mastectomy versus BCT, and the receipt of radiotherapy after BCT. Methods: In the NCI SEER database, breast cancer cases from 2004-2008 were selected with the following criteria: T2N1M0 or less, lobular or ductal histology, and treatment with simple mastectomy or partial mastectomy (+/-) adjuvant radiation. The HRSA Area Resource File was combined to define average radiation oncologist density (ROD, number of radiation oncologists/100K people) by county over the same time period. Tumor characteristics, demographic information, and ROD were evaluated with respect to mastectomy rates and receipt of radiation therapy after BCT in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: In the 118,961 cases analyzed, mastectomy was performed 33.3% of the time relative to BCT. After adjustment for demographic and tumor variables, the odds of having mastectomy versus BCT were inversely associated with ROD (OR [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.93-0.96]; p<0.001). Adjuvant radiation therapy was not administered in 23.4% of BCT cases. Likewise, the odds of having BCT without adjuvant radiation were inversely associated with ROD (0.96 [0.95-0.98]; p<0.001, table). Conclusions: There was a significant, inverse and linear relationship between ROD and mastectomy rates independent of demographic and tumor variables. An inverse trend was also observed for the omission of radiotherapy after BCT. Access to radiation oncologists was a factor in surgical choice and receiving appropriate BCT in early stage breast cancer. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document