The utility of an investigational real-time RT-PCR assay system for the detection of micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer confirmed by 0.2 mm histological interval analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10560-10560
Author(s):  
M. Kurozumi ◽  
Y. Kobayashi ◽  
H. Takei ◽  
K. Kitsugi ◽  
M. Ueno ◽  
...  

10560 Background: Comparison between real-time RT-PCR and histological analysis for the detection of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients is difficult because of the necessary use of different tissue for the two tests. In order to minimize this challenge this study used histology sections taken every 0.2 mm and all tissue between the sections was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Methods: 129 Lymph nodes (LNs) were obtained by Sentinel LN biopsy and/or axillary dissection from 80 breast cancer patients. All LNs were cut in half. One half of each LN was used for the routine intra-operative diagnosis. The other half was used for the 0.2mm histological interval analysis. All 10μm sections cut for histology at 0.2 mm intervals were analyzed using frozen section H&E under a light microscope. All remaining tissue between the sections used for histological analysis was assayed by real-time RT-PCR using the genetic markers mammaglobin and cytokeratin-19 (investigational GeneSearch Breast Lymph Node Assay, Veridex, LLC, Warren, NJ, USA). Cutoffs were pre- set for the real-time RT-PCR to detect only metastasis greater than 0.2 mm. Results: Compared to the histological diagnosis using 0.2 mm interval frozen sections, the real-time RT-PCR results were as follows; sensitivity of 100.0% (34/34), specificity of 93.7% (89/95) and overall accuracy of 95.3% (123/129). Conclusions: These data suggest by utilizing the 0.2 mm histological interval analysis, sampling discrepancies are minimized and a high level of sensitivity and overall accuracy is seen for the real-time RT-PCR assay. Assay specificity calculations may be less than 100% due to interpretation challenges in frozen section histology, especially in the cases of smaller metastases and/or lobular cancer, causing a small percentage of clinically relevant metastasis to be missed. [Table: see text]

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 628-628
Author(s):  
M. Kurosumi ◽  
Y. Kobayashi ◽  
H. Takei

628 Background: Analysis using real time RT-PCR for the detection of metastases in lymph nodes (LN) increases sampling but is associated with a risk of too much sensitivity as compared to histological analysis. Determining the appropriate cutoff value is important in introducing this system to routine clinical practice. Our study confirms the reliability of the cutoff values of a real-time RT-PCR assay (GeneSearch, Veridex LLC) to detect metastases larger than 0.2 mm by detailed 0.2 mm frozen section histological diagnosis. Methods: 129 sentinel and non-sentinel lymph nodes were obtained by sentinel LN biopsy from 79 breast cancer patients. All LNs were cut in half. One half of each LN was used for routine intra-operative diagnosis. The other LN half had sections cut every 0.2 mm for histological analysis. All frozen sections were H&E stained and examined by on-site pathologists. These sections were then re-stained immunohistochemically using a pancytokeratin antibody (AE1/AE3) for detecting submicrometastses. All remaining tissue between the histology sections was assayed by the real-time RT-PCR assay using the genetic markers mammaglobin (MG) and cytokeratin-19 (CK-19) (note: tissue processing method was investigational and off-label). Cutoff values were pre-set in a large US study (n = 304). Results: Compared to the histological diagnosis using 0.2 mm interval frozen sections, the real-time RT-PCR results were as follows; sensitivity of 100.0% (34/34), specificity of 93.7% (89/95), and overall accuracy of 95.3% (123/129). Submicrometastases were recognized by IHC in 3 of 95 samples (2 solitary and 1 multiple sites) diagnosed as negative by H&E-stain sections, and 3 samples were negative for RT-PCR. Conclusions: Results of 0.2 mm interval histological analysis suggest a near perfect sensitivity of the real time RT-PCR assay, allowing reliable detection of LN metastases larger than 0.2 mm. In addition, at least three samples with submicrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry for pancytokeratin were above the preset cutoff values of this real time RT-PCR assay. [Table: see text]


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10561-10561
Author(s):  
P. Blumencranz ◽  
K. B. Deck ◽  
P. W. Whitworth ◽  
P. McCue ◽  
D. S. Reintgen ◽  
...  

10561 Background: In order for a RT-PCR test to accurately diagnose the metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes the test must perform well across all primary tumor types. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at 11 clinical sites to evaluate a real- time RT-PCR assay (investigational GeneSearch™ Breast Lymph Node Assay, Veridex, LLC, Warren, NJ, USA) for the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer. Detection limits were pre-set to detect only metastases that are clinically relevant (> 0.2 mm). Tumor information such as tumor stage, size, type and other molecular characteristics were collected. RT-PCR assay was then compared against permanent section H&E and IHC for final performance calculations. A total of 416 patients’ results were analyzed for overall assay performance: sensitivity 87.6% and specificity 94.2%. The assay was then evaluated within each primary tumor characteristics category. Results: Overall RT-PCR sensitivity is an improvement (p= 0.039) over that of current intra-operative methods (frozen section H&E), while specificity is similar (p=0.054). For the various tumor sub-types, in a matched dataset, the RT-PCR assay has up to 35.7% (Invasive Lobular) higher sensitivity compared to frozen section H&E. Conclusions: The data suggest that the RT-PCR assay performs well and has higher sensitivity than frozen section H&E regardless of primary tumor characteristics and, therefore, can be used to detect metastasis for all types of invasive breast cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara K. Zehentner ◽  
Heather Secrist ◽  
Dawn C. Hayes ◽  
Xinqun Zhang ◽  
Richard C. Ostenson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu-Jun Loh ◽  
Kuo-Ting Lee ◽  
Ya-Ping Chen ◽  
Yao-Lung Kuo ◽  
Wei-Pang Chung ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard approach of the axillary region for early breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes. The present study investigated patients with false-negative sentinel nodes of intraoperative frozen section (FNSNs) in real-world data.Methods: A case–control study with a 1:3 ratio was conducted. FNSN was diagnosed when sentinel nodes (SNs) are negative in frozen sections but positive for metastasis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. The control was defined as having no metastasis of SNs in both frozen and FFPE sections.Results: A total of 20 FNSN cases and 60 matched controls were enrolled from 333 SLNB patients between April 1, 2005, and November 31, 2009. The demographics and intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer were similar between FNSN and controls. The FNSN patients had larger tumor sizes in preoperative mammography (P = 0.033) and more lymphatic tumor emboli in core biopsy (P < 0.001). Four FNSN patients had metastasis in the non-relevant SNs. Another 16 FNSN patients had benign lymphoid hyperplasia of SNs in frozen sections and metastasis in the same SNs from the FFPE sections. Micrometastasis was detected in seven of 16 patients, and metastases in non-relevant SNs were recognized in two patients. All FNSN patients received a second operation with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). After a median follow-up of 143 months, no FNSN patients developed recurrence of breast cancer. The disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival in FNSN were not inferior to the controls.Conclusions: The patients with a larger tumor size and more lymphatic tumor emboli have a higher incidence of FNSN. However, outcomes of FNSN patients after completing ALND were noninferior to those without metastasis in SNs. ALND provides a correct diagnosis of patients with metastasis in non-sentinel axillary lymph nodes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11584-e11584
Author(s):  
H. Kawaguchi ◽  
H. Shigematsu ◽  
C. Koga ◽  
E. Mori ◽  
S. Nishimura ◽  
...  

e11584 Background: In woman with breast cancer, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) provides staging information and a favorable effect on quality of life if the SLN does not have metastasis. While many reports already showed safety and reliability about SLNB for breast cancer patients in Western countries, few reports have published from Asian countries. Our purpose of this study is to prove the technical success, accuracy and safety of this method for Asian population. Methods: We did feasibility study of 183 patients from 2000 to 2002. After that, we evaluated detection rate, positive rate, axillary relapse rate in 1,000 consecutive patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer at a single institute in Japan from 2002 to August 2008. In this series, both radioactive agent (technetium) and vital blue die (indigocarmine) were used to investigate the SLNs. Results: We could accurately predict SLNs in 994 (99.4%) of the 1,000 patients. The proportion of technical success was high regardless of surgeon's experience. Intraoperative frozen section histology showed that positive SLNs were found in 176 (17.7%) patients (13 micrometastasis and 163 macrometastasis). Defenitive histology found metastasis in 24 cases who defined as negative by the frozen section examination. 15 of 24 (62.5%) cases underwent delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after definitive histology. The histological concordance between frozen section and permanent sections of SLNs was 97.6%. Finally, 796 patients were followed up without ALND. With a median follow-up time of 3.5 years (0.5–5.2), axillary lymph node recurrence were occurred in 5 patients (5 of 796, 0.6%). The relapse time since SLNB ranged from 16 to 33 months. There were not any patients with allergic reactions. Conclusions: This is the report about observation study including more than 1,000 patients from Asian country. SLNB is seemed to be a safe and acceptably accurate method for Asian early breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weston C Hymas ◽  
Wade K Aldous ◽  
Edward W Taggart ◽  
Jeffery B Stevenson ◽  
David R Hillyard

Abstract Background: Enteroviruses are a leading cause of aseptic meningitis in adult and pediatric populations. We describe the development of a real-time RT-PCR assay that amplifies a small target in the 5′ nontranslated region upstream of the classical Rotbart enterovirus amplicon. The assay includes an RNA internal control and incorporates modified nucleotide chemistry. Methods: We evaluated the performance characteristics of this design and performed blinded parallel testing on clinical samples, comparing the results with a commercially available RT-PCR assay (Pan-Enterovirus OligoDetect kit) that uses an enzyme immunoassay–like plate end detection. Results: We tested 778 samples and found 14 discrepant samples between the 2 assays. Of these, the real-time assay detected 6 samples that were negative by the OligoDetect kit, 5 of which were confirmed as positive by sequence analysis using an alternative primer set. Eight discrepant samples were positive by the OligoDetect kit and real-time negative, with 6 confirmed by sequencing. Overall, detection rates of 97% and 96% were obtained for the OligoDetect kit and real-time assays, respectively. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the targeted region. The comparative sensitivities of the 2 assays were equivalent, with the limit of detection for the real-time assay determined to be approximately 430 copies per milliliter in cerebrospinal fluid. Conclusions: This novel real-time enterovirus assay is a sensitive and suitable assay for routine clinical testing. The presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms can affect real-time PCR assays.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chutikarn Chaimayo ◽  
Bualan Kaewnaphan ◽  
Nattaya Tanlieng ◽  
Niracha Athipanyasilp ◽  
Rujipas Sirijatuphat ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world. Hence, there is an urgent need for rapid, simple, and accurate tests to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Performance characteristics of the rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be evaluated and compared with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for diagnosis of COVID-19 cases. Methods The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test, Standard™ Q COVID-19 Ag kit (SD Biosensor®, Republic of Korea), was compared with the real-time RT-PCR test, Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene®, Korea) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens. Four hundred fifty-four respiratory samples (mainly nasopharyngeal and throat swabs) were obtained from COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals, including pre-operative patients at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand during March–May 2020. Results Of 454 respiratory samples, 60 (13.2%) were positive, and 394 (86.8%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time RT-PCR assay. The duration from onset to laboratory test in COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals ranged from 0 to 14 days with a median of 3 days. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s sensitivity and specificity were 98.33% (95% CI, 91.06–99.96%) and 98.73% (95% CI, 97.06–99.59%), respectively. One false negative test result was from a sample with a high real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct), while five false positive test results were from specimens of pre-operative patients. Conclusions The rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection showed comparable sensitivity and specificity with the real-time RT-PCR assay. Thus, there is a potential use of this rapid and simple SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test as a screening assay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document