Weekly association of gemcitabine and topotecan in early recurrent ovarian cancer patients: A French multicenter phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16016-16016
Author(s):  
F. Joly ◽  
T. Petit ◽  
P. Pautier ◽  
E. Guardiola ◽  
F. Mayer ◽  
...  

16016 Background: A weekly association of gemcitabine and topotecan was tested with the aim of evaluating its efficacy and tolerance in patients recurring after first line platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. Methods: From December 2004 to April 2006, 77 patients whose disease has progressed within 12 months (time-free interval, TFI) after first line chemotherapy were enrolled in a multicenter phase II study. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and topotecan (2.5 mg/m2) were given day 1, 8 and 15 (q 28 d) for 6 to 9 cycles. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST or Rustin criteria. Clinical response was assessed using symptoms improvement in responders and patients with stable disease. Follow-up was updated December 2006. Results: Initial characteristics were: median age 63 years (38 to 80), WHO PS 0–1 93%, serous histology 85%, TFI < 6 months 45%, measurable disease 71%. Four cycles (1 to 8) were administered in average. The only major toxicity was neutropenia (Grade 3 and 4 in 17% and 6% of patients) with one febrile neutropenia; one toxic death (pneumopathy) was observed. 34% of cycles were incomplete (d8 and/or d15 not administered) because of grade 1–2 thrombopenia or grade 1–4 neutropenia. Lenograstim and erythropoietin were administered in 14% and 34% of patients, respectively. Sixty-six (86%) patients were evaluable for response (2 cycles administered). The ORR was 14% (CR=3%, PR=11%); there were 53% of stable disease. ORR was 7% and 20% in patients with TFI < 6 months and = 6 months, respectively. Symptoms were improved in 18 (64%) of 28 patients and pain in 11 (39%) of 28 patients. Median event-free survival time was 3.7 months. Median overall survival time was 12.3 months (7.5 and 15.6 months in patients with TFI < 6 months and = 6 months, respectively; p=0.0244). Conclusions: In resistant/refractory ovarian cancer, weekly gemcitabine and topotecan is associated with low objective response rate but with a high proportion of stable disease and symptoms control leading to acceptable quality of life. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5032-5032 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Gabra

5032 Background: DMXAA (AS1404) is a small-molecule vascular disrupting agent, which in animal models shows additive or supra-additive effects with cytotoxics, including taxanes and platinum agents. This phase II study evaluated DMXAA in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients with a progression-free interval of more than 6 months after response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: Patients had first diagnosed disease FIGO stage Ic-IV, with presence of recurrent disease confirmed by imaging. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive up to 6 cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/ml × min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) with or without DMXAA (1200 mg/m2). Safety assessments included EKG, adverse events, laboratory screens and ophthalmic exam. Efficacy endpoints are objective response rates, time to progression, duration of response and stable disease, and median and 1-year survival. Results: 55 patients have been enrolled to date from a planned total of ∼70. Initial safety findings in the two arms are comparable. Preliminary investigator-assessed RECIST response data show the following unconfirmed outcomes: of 17 patients in the DMXAA arm, there are 10 with partial responses (PRs), 7 with stable disease (SD) and 0 with progressive disease (PD); of 14 patients in the control arm, there are 8 PRs, 6 SDs and 0 PDs. Conclusions: Initial safety findings suggest that addition of DMXAA to standard doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel did not add significantly to toxicity. Efficacy assessments are ongoing to determine the value of the triple combination in recurrent ovarian cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4087-4087 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bennouna ◽  
R. Faroux ◽  
E. François ◽  
C. Ligeza ◽  
C. El Hannani ◽  
...  

4087 Background: A phase II study (ASCO 2004) established that the combination of UFT (tegafur-uracil) with LV and irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) could be safely administered to pts with unresectable mCRC, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 34% and a median time to progression (TTP) of 5.7 months. We initiated CETUFTIRI, a phase II study, to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cetuximab added to TEGAFIRI in chemonaïve pts with unresectable mCRC. Methods: Patients in this single-stage study were aged =18 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed, bidimensionally measurable mCRC, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. EGFR expression was not an inclusion criterion. Treatment consisted of UFT 250 mg/m2/day d1–14, LV 90 mg/day d1–14, and irinotecan 250 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks, plus cetuximab 400 mg/m2 week 1 then 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter. The primary endpoint was ORR and the planned sample size was 61 pts. The study is now closed to accrual. Results: To date, 48 patients are evaluable for safety and 31 are evaluable for efficacy. Patient characteristics (n=48): median age 65 years (range 45–84 years); ECOG PS 0/1: 73/27%; male 65%; tumor sites: colon 69%; rectum 17%; junction 14%; liver metastasis 83%; lung metastasis 46%; other 27%. Adverse events per patient (n=48) after a total of 230 cycles were: grade G3 mucositis 10%; G3/4 neutropenia 10%; G3 nausea/vomiting 8%; G3 asthenia 6%; febrile neutropenia 6%; G3 hypokalemia 6%; G3/4 anemia 4%; G3 diarrhea 2%; acne-like rash G1/2 50% (G3 4%); infusion- related reaction to cetuximab 6%. Two of 31 evaluable pts had a complete response and 11 had a partial response, for an ORR of 42%; 5 pts had stable disease (16%) and 11 pts had progressive disease (35.5%). An independent radiologist review is planned for all 61 pts included up to December 2006. Conclusions: The CETUFTIRI combination seems to have an acceptable toxicity profile with an attractive objective response rate in the first-line treatment of pts with mCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4085-4085
Author(s):  
R. Greil ◽  
H. Letocha ◽  
E. Gamelin ◽  
J. Thaler ◽  
R. Hofheinz ◽  
...  

4085 Background: The fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody pmab, has proven monotherapy activity in chemotherapy refractory mCRC pts with wild-type KRAS-expressing tumors. This first-line, single-arm phase II study is prospectively evaluating whether KRAS status predicts response to treatment when pmab is combined with FOLFIRI. Methods: In this ongoing study, pts with histologically confirmed mCRC (no prior systemic treatment) and ECOG PS 0–2 were enrolled at 36 sites across Europe. Pmab (6mg/kg) and FOLFIRI are administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; secondary endpoints include disease control rate, duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival, time to progression and safety. Results: Data cut-off for the initial interim analysis was 27 June 08 and pending approval of protocol amendment 2, the cut off date for 16 week response rate is 15 Oct 08. Of the 154 pts enrolled, 68% are male; median age is 64 yrs (range, 21–84) and the majority (95%) of pts had ECOG PS 0–1. All pts have received at least one cycle of study treatment; 18% of pts have received ≤2 cycles of full combination therapy and the median number of cycles received is 6. At time of data cut-off, 112 patients (73%) were still receiving at least one element of combination therapy and 29% had stopped treatment with pmab. The most common reason for discontinuing treatment was disease progression (10%). Median follow-up time was 14.3 weeks for all enrolled pts. A total of 97% of patients had experienced at least one adverse event (any grade) and 55% of patients had experienced a grade 3/4 adverse event. There were four reported grade 5 events (hematemesis, rectal hemorrhage, vena cava thrombosis, general physical health deterioration). At time of interim analysis, tissue samples for KRAS analysis are available for approximately 80% of patients. Conclusions: Combining pmab with FOLFIRI in the first-line setting appears to be a well-tolerated regimen. Response rate at 16 weeks in the overall population and by KRAS status and updated safety will be presented. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 463-463
Author(s):  
Ho Min Kim ◽  
Hitoshi Soda ◽  
Shoichi Hazama ◽  
Takao Takahashi ◽  
Naoki Nagata ◽  
...  

463 Background: Cetuximab and chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with KRAS wild type prolong survival. However, COIN trial has not demonstrated the survival benefit of FOLFOX or XELOX and cetuximab therapy. Few data are available on its benefit for patients with KRAS and BRAF wild-type. Methods: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of first-line FOLFOX or bi-weekly XELOX and bi-weekly cetuximab in KRAS/BRAF wt mCRC. Chemonaive patients received FOLFOX or biweekly XELOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/ m2/day 1 plus capecitabine 2000/m2/days 1-7) and biweekly cetuximab 500mg m2/ day 1 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was response rate(RR), other secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, DCR, safety, DI and resection rate. KRAS test (codon12,13) and BRAF test (V600E) by direct sequence were performed in Yamaguchi University. Patients with KRAS/BRAF wt were enrolled in this study. The regimen of FOLFOX or XELOX were selected by investigator’s preference, not randomized. Results: From April 2010 to May 2011, 139 pts were preregistered. KRAS and BRAF were examined from paraffin-embedded sample. 70 (50.3%) pts were KRAS/BRAF wt, and 62 pts were enrolled: The main characteristics of the entered pts were: sex (M/F) 34/28, median age 66 yrs (range 34-83 yrs). Grade 3/4 adverse events were leucopenia 4.8%, neutropenia 25.8%, skin toxity (paronychia/fissure) 9.7%, and acne 9.7%. Two CR (3.2%) and 40 PR (64.5%), 15 SD (24.2%) and 3 PD (4.8%) 2NE were observed, with an overall response rate of 67.7% and a disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 91.9%. The RR of FOLFOX or XELOX were 64.9% (24/37) and 72.0% (18/25), DCR were 89.2% and 96% respectively. Conclusions: FLEET was the first multicenter phase II study with prospective KRAS/BRAF analysis as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab in first-line mCRC in Japan. Results of this study indicate that both biweekly combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. Biweekly XELOX+cetuximab study (FLEET2) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003253.


2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Recchia ◽  
Gaetano Saggio ◽  
Giovanna Amiconi ◽  
Anna Di Blasio ◽  
Alisia Cesta ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 956-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Wijermans ◽  
M. Lübbert ◽  
G. Verhoef ◽  
A. Bosly ◽  
C. Ravoet ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine; DAC) is a DNA hypomethylating agent that has shown a 50% response rate in a small phase II study in elderly patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. We performed a second, multicenter phase II study in a larger group of patients to confirm our findings and to study the toxicity of DAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1996 and September 1997, 66 patients (median age, 68 years) from seven centers received DAC 45 mg/m2/d for 3 days every 6 weeks. For patients in whom a complete response (CR) was reached after two courses, two further cycles were administered as consolidation therapy. In case of a stable disease situation, improvement, or a partial response (PR), a maximum of six cycles was administered. The primary end points were response rate and toxicity. The secondary end points were response duration, survival from the start of therapy, and overall survival. RESULTS: The observed overall response rate was 49%, with a 64% response rate in the patients with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) high-risk score. The actuarial median response duration was 31 weeks, with a response duration of 39 weeks and 36 weeks for patients who reached a PR or CR, respectively. The actuarial median survival time from the time of diagnosis was 22 months and from the start of therapy was 15 months. For the IPSS high-risk group, the median survival time was 14 months. The median progression-free survival time was 25 weeks. Myelosuppression was rather common, and the treatment-related mortality rate was 7% and was primarily associated with pancytopenia and infection. Significant responses were observed with regard to megakaryopoiesis, with increases in platelet counts having already occurred after one cycle of DAC therapy in the majority of the responding patients. CONCLUSION: We were able to confirm our previous observation that DAC therapy was effective in half of the studied patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and is especially active in the patients with the worst prognoses. Myelosuppression was the only major adverse effect observed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5559-5559
Author(s):  
Marco Marinaccio ◽  
Emilia Mele ◽  
Vito Lorusso ◽  
Valeria Vincenza Fumarulo ◽  
Fausta Sozzi ◽  
...  

5559 Background: The prognosis of patients with REOC is extremely poor after several lines of chemotherapy. The choice and timing of therapies must be individualized to optimize survival and quality of life. This open-label, nonrandomized, phase II study was aimed at evaluating efficacy and toxicity of Trabectedin as a single-agent therapy in patients with preteated Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (REOC). Methods: Sixteen patients (median age 51 yrs, range 44 – 71) with REOC who progressed after 2 (18.7%), 3 (56.3%) or 4 (25.0%) previous lines of chemotherapy were treated with Trabectedin at the dose of 1.1 mg/m2 via a 3-hour i.v. infusion with dexamethasone pretreatment every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or when a stability of disease was reached. Clinical objective response was the primary efficacy endpoint; the secondary one was safety. Response to treatment was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST, version 1.1), and toxicities were graded according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. Results: The median number of treatment cycles per patients was 5 (range, 2-9 cycles). A total of 81 cycles were administered. A dose reduction was never required. Main toxicities included anemia (20.9%), leucopenia (15.0%), thrombocytopenia (4.5%) and asthenia (22.2%). No deaths were attributable to therapy. No one showed complete response, while 9/16 partial response (56.2%) and 4/16 stable disease (25.0%) were observed. 3/19 pts (18.8%) progressed on therapy. The median progression-free interval was 18 weeks in patients with partial response; stable disease was maintained for a median time of 12 weeks. Conclusions: Trabectedin 1.1mg/m2 given as a 3-hour i.v. infusion every 3 weeks was well tolerated and has confirmed a very interesting antitumor activity in this heavily pretreated population and it seems also to be a very tolerable regimen. The co-treatment with dexamethasone improves the safety of Trabectedin by reducing drug-induced myelosuppression and hepatotoxicity. Trabectedin has a manageable toxicity profile, and can be safely administered thanks to its secure action profile also in patients with no other viable therapeutic options.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16021-e16021
Author(s):  
Hakim Mahammedi ◽  
Mélanie Pouget ◽  
Eloise Planchat ◽  
Herve Cure ◽  
Xavier Durando ◽  
...  

e16021 Background: Prostate cancer is a major problem in the aging male population. Docetaxel, the first-line reference treatment in CRPC induces a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in 45% of patients and an objective tumor response in 12%. Preclinical studies suggested that curcuminoids inhibit tumor metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis and reverse drug resistance. We wanted to potentiate docetaxel by curcuminoïds in CRPC first line. Our previous phase I study showed the safety and the tolerability of CCM associated to docetaxel for advanced breast cancers. We have conducted in 2009-2010 a phase II study to assess the response of CRPC to this combination. Methods: Patients (n=30) with progressing CRPC and rising PSA were enrolled to receive the experimental treatment. Docetaxel was given in standard conditions (75mg/m², 1h i.v infusion every 3 weeks for 6 cycles + prednisolone) with CCM orally at the dose of 6gr/day (7 days by cycle: d-4 to d+2). The primary endpoint was response rate assessed by biological and paraclinical examinations. The secondary endpoints included safety, time to progression and compliance. Twenty nine patients were evaluable on PSA assessment and 15 on RECIST criteria. Results: 26 patients received the treatment totality and 4 withdrew prematurely. No patient withdrew for toxicity (2 deaths and 2 PSA progressions). A PSA response was observed in 17/29 patients (59%) (4 complete and 13 partial) observed rapidly (before the 3rd cycle) for 15 patients. The median time to subsequent PSA progression (TTP) was 5.8 months. Six patients (40%) had a partial objective response and 9 (60%) a stable disease. The median TTP on targets was 7.85 months (n=13/15). The regimen was well tolerated, with uncommon grade 3/4 toxicity; no adverse event was attributed to CCM. Of 169 cycles, 150 (89%) were completed with perfect compliance. Overall survival was 19 months (mean) and 24 months (median) with 17 events as of december 2012. Conclusions: These results are promising in improving the response rate to docetaxel in terms of both PSA decrease and objective response, with good tolerability and acceptability of CCM. A randomized trial is necessary to confirm this results. Clinical trial information: NCT01012141.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document