Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with aimpila, a glycoside/alpha-fetoprotein complex

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3589-3589 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Pak ◽  
O. Molchanov ◽  
M. Vincent

3589 Background: Aimpila is a non-covalent complex of two natural compounds: porcine alpha-fetoprotein (PAFP) and a glycosidic apoptosis inducer (AI). PAFP is able to bind selectively to the AFP receptor-positive cancer cells and deliver the AI intracellularly due to AFP receptor-mediated endocytosis. The AI opens mitochondrial permeability transition pores, resulting in apoptosis. Preclinically, the complex is cytotoxic. We investigated the single agent activity of aimpila in patients (pts) with liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Eligibility Criteria: Age >18 yrs, mCRC, any prior treatment, having documented progressive metastatic liver disease. Treatment consisted of oral capsules at a fixed sub-maximal dose (0.3 mg of active substance in an oral capsule, twice a day for 8 weeks). 12 pts were accrued, 6 chemonaïve; median ECOG performance status was 0, median age 56 years (range 45–65), and median time from previous treatment failure was 9.0 months (range 1–20). CT scans were performed before and after. Results: Of the 12 patients, 9 are evaluable for response by RECIST. Two achieved a complete response (CR), 1 a partial response (PR); subsequent confirmatory CT scans are pending. Three achieved stabilization (SD), in 2 cases = 2 months; 3 experienced disease progression. Of 3 non-evaluable pts, 1 experienced clinical deterioration without a CT scan, 1 experienced stable disease >2 months but with both lesions <10 mm in diameter, and a third developed nausea and vomiting leading to interruption of treatment, the only recorded significant adverse event. CEA estimations before and after treatment are available from 2 pts; 1 pt (radiological CR) going from 816 ng/ml to 268 ng/ml; the other (radiological SD) going from 1,243 ng/ml to 638 ng/ml. In this latter patient, one of the liver lesions disappeared, radiologically. The PR pt and 1 of the SD pts had progressed after previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Median survival has not yet been reached, with a median follow-up of 4 months. Conclusion: Single agent aimpila was well-tolerated in this patient population and produced major objective responses in some patients with liver mCRC. Further study is warranted. [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Azim Jalali ◽  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Lucy Gately ◽  
...  

71 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. In Australia, TAS-102 was initially made available locally through patients self-funding, later via an industry sponsored Medicine Access Program (MAP) and then via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in real world Australian population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to all TRACC patients and those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Results: Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102 (non-PBS n = 27, PBS n = 80), The median number of patients per site was 7 (range: 1-17). The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 67 for all TRACC patients and 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102 and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 39% vs 49% were RAS wild type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median clinician assessed progression-free survival was 3.3 compared to RECIST defined PFS of 2 months in RECOURSE study, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths in the real-world series, where TAS102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion. In the RECOURSE study there was a 4% febrile neutropenia rate and one treatment-related death. Conclusions: TRACC registry patients treated with TAS102 were younger than both TRACC patients overall and those from the RECOURSE trial. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS. However overall survival outcomes achieved with TAS102 in real world patients were comparable to findings from this pivotal trial with an acceptable rate of major adverse events.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Kaechele ◽  
Jürgen Hess ◽  
Wolfgang Schneider-Kappus

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly improves overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The most common treatment-related event (grade ≥3) was hematological toxicity. We here report long-term disease-stabilizing FTD/TPI treatment of an mCRC patient (KRAS wild-type, ECOG performance status 1 at baseline and at the end of FTD/TPI therapy) with multifocal synchronous metastases and a longstanding history of extensive hematological events during previous treatments. Finally, this 62-year-old male patient was treated for 10 months with FTD/TPI by consecutive alteration of treatment parameters: (i) initial daily dose reduction to 80 mg (72% of the recommended dose), (ii) 20 days dose delay, (iii) a second and later third dose reduction to 70 mg and 60 mg (about 64% and 55%, respectively, of the recommended dose), and (iv) 30 µg per day of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration first for 3 days, and later for 5 days, for each treatment cycle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3540-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Fukuoka ◽  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Yosuke Kumekawa ◽  
...  

3540 Background: It is unclear which drug of REG or TAS-102 should be used earlier for the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have access to both drugs. This study investigated the comparison of the efficacy between REG and TAS-102 in patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: The clinical data of patients who were treated with REG or TAS-102 among these drugs naive mCRC patients between Jun 2014 and Sep 2015 were retrospectively delivered from 24 institutions of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Propensity score (PS) was calculated with a logistic regression, in which using baseline parameters were included. Two methods, adjusted and matched analysis, to take propensity score were used. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models based on PS adjustment and matching. Results: Total of 589 patients were enrolled and 550 patients (223 patients in the REG group and 327 patients in the TAS-102 group) met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The results from PS adjusted analyses showed that OS was similar between the two groups (HR of TAS-102 to REG, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.18). There were also no statistically significant differences between two groups for progression-free survival (HR 0.94) and time to ECOG Performance status≥2 (HR 1.00), expect for time to treatment failure (HR 0.81; P = 0.025). In the subgroup analysis, REG showed favorable survival compared with TAS-102 in the age of < 65 years patients and unfavorable survival in ≥65 years patients (P for interaction = 0.012). In the PS matched sample (174 patients in each group), the clinical outcomes were similar to the results of the PS adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Although REG and TAS-102 showed a similar efficacy in mCRC patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies, the choice of the drug by age might affect the survival. Supported by JSCCR. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020416


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 547-547
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Pickering ◽  
Holly Tovey ◽  
Tony Elliott ◽  
Stephanie M. Burnett ◽  
Amit Bahl ◽  
...  

547 Background: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens are used in the treatment of carcinoma of the penis, but toxicity limits their value for patients with metastatic disease. This trial aims to define both the toxicity and the rate of disease control for the non-platinum cytotoxic agent Vinflunine. Methods: A phase II single-arm trial was designed to demonstrate a clinical benefit rate of at least 40% and to exclude a rate of less than 15% (p0 = 0.15, p1 = 0.40, α = 0.05, β = 0.80, Fleming-A’hern exact design). 22 evaluable patients were required. Key eligibility criteria included measurable, histologically-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the penis staged as M1; or M0, Tx, N3; or M0, Tx, N2 and deemed inoperable by multidisciplinary team; or M0, T4 any N. Patients were required to have ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2 and adequate hepatic and renal function. Treatment comprised four 21-day cycles of vinflunine (320mg/m2) with RECIST v1.1 restaging following cycle 4 (response primary endpoint). Patients deemed to be benefitting from treatment were permitted to continue vinflunine at the discretion of the treating clinician until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 25 patients were recruited from 8 UK centres between June 2014 and May 2017. Median age was 68 years; 19 patients had metastatic (M1) disease. All patients have completed trial treatment and primary endpoint assessment. Data cleaning for the primary analysis is currently in progress, with the snapshot for the primary analysis due in October 2017 and primary analysis to be presented to the trial oversight committees in November 2017. Conclusions: It is hoped that single-agent vinflunine will be associated with a favourable toxicity profile combined with meaningful clinical responses. The results will be available for presentation at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02057913.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5573-5573 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Argiris ◽  
M. A. Goldwasser ◽  
B. Burtness ◽  
R. Deconti ◽  
R. Axelrod ◽  
...  

5573 Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is usually resistant to chemotherapy. Bortezomib (B) is a highly selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome which is central for the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway. Inhibition of NF-κB activity achieved by B may be important for inhibition of the growth of ACC. Preclinical studies have shown synergy between B and doxorubicin (D). Methods: Eligibility criteria included incurable ACC, any number of prior therapies but without an anthracycline, unidimensionally measurable disease, ECOG performance status 0–2, ejection fraction within normal limits (WNL), absolute neutrophil count >1500/μL, platelets >100,000/μL, and total bilirubin WNL. Patients (pts) with stable disease (SD) for 9 months or more were excluded. Pts received B 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1,4,8, and 11, every 21 days, until progression. Doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 was added at the time of progression. Response assessment was performed after every 2 cycles using RECIST. Immunohistochemistry for biomarkers affected by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway on baseline tumor and measurement of serum inflammatory and angiogenic cytokines before and in response to therapy were performed. Results: 25 pts were enrolled; 18 were females; median age was 56 years (26–73); distant metastatic sites: lung (21), liver (4), bone (2). Best response to single-agent B: 16 pts (64%) had SD, 7 progressed, and 2 were unevaluable (1 with symptomatic deterioration). The median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. In 4 evaluable pts who received B plus D, 1 partial response and 2 SD were observed. 1 pt died 7 months after starting treatment without documented progression. Worst grade (G) 3/4 toxicities with B alone in 22 evaluable pts were: G3 neutropenia 5%, G4 neutropenia 5%, G3 thrombocytopenia 5%, G3 sensory neuropathy 14%; G3 generalized weakness 5%, G3 fatigue 9%, G3 anorexia 5%, G3 diarrhea 5%, G3 hyponatremia 5%, G3 dyspnea 5%. Conclusions: B was well tolerated and resulted in disease stabilization in a high percentage of pts but no objective responses. Updated response data with the addition of D will be available. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 502-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Ishibashi ◽  
Yoshinori Munemoto ◽  
Masaki Matsuoka ◽  
Taishi Hata ◽  
Michiya Kobayashi ◽  
...  

502 Background: Combination chemotherapy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab is commonly used as standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A previous meta-analysis showed that there was no difference between two age groups of <65 years and ≥65 years on overall survival (OS) after treatment with chemotherapy with bevacizumab. However, the safety and efficacy of XELOX with bevacizumab in elderly patients (pts) ≥75 years with mCRC remain unclear. Methods: This study was an open-label multicentre phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XELOX with bevacizumab in pts ≥75 years with metastatic CRC. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the safety, response rate (RR), time to treatment-failure (TTF) and OS. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Pts characteristics were; median age 78 (range 75-86); male/female, 21/15; ECOG performance status 0/1, 30/6; colon/rectum 24/12, creatinine clearance (CCr) 60.2 ml/min (range 32.6-84.6). Median follow-up period was 220 days. RR was 55.6% and median TTF was 209 days. The median PFS and median OS are not reached. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 22 pts (62.8%). Common grade 3 or 4 AEs were hypertension (11.4%), leukopenia (20.0%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (14.3%), hand foot syndrome (8.6%), and fatigue (8.6%). Examining the relationship between renal function (CCr) and AEs, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 AEs in the lower CCr group was significantly higher than that in the higher CCr group (61.6% vs. 47.8%; p=0.013); hematological toxicities (87.5% vs. 14.8%; p=0.0003) and non-hematological toxicities (61.5% vs. 11.1%; p=0.018). Conclusions: XELOX with bevacizumab is safely administered in elderly patients ≥75 years. Renal function (CCr) could be a good predictive marker for grade 3 or 4 AEs. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003500.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 662-662
Author(s):  
Metin Ozkan ◽  
Oktay Bozkurt ◽  
Halit Karaca ◽  
Ersin Ozaslan ◽  
Osman Onur Daloglu ◽  
...  

662 Background: Oxaliplatin and irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) accepted as the standard treatment. There is no standard treatment approach for patients after progression with these agents. In this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer a salvage combination with oral 5-fluorouracil (tegafur-uracil UFT) or Mitomycin C and Raltitrexed. Methods: In the 7 centers, data of 62 patients who received Raltitrexed 2.6 mg/m2 (max. 5 mg) (day 1) and UFT 500 mg/day (1-14. days), or Mitomycin C 6mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks, with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer, between December 2008 and June 2013 has been analyzed retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profiles were evaluated. Results: The median age of patients was 51 (min-max: 18-76 years), and 35 (56%) were male and 27 (44%) were female. Thirty nine patients (63%) had ECOG performance status 0 and 1. Four patients (10%) received a combination of UFT and Raltitrexed at the second line and 38 patients (90%) had third, fourth, and fifth lines. Otherwise Mitomycin C plus Raltitrexed protocol used at the second and third lines. Twelve patients (19%) developed grade 3/4 toxicities as diarrhea and fatigue and 13 patients (21%) needed to dose reduction. In all patients the median PFS was 3 months (%95 CI, 2,65–3,34) and the median OS was 6 months (%95 CI, 2,09–9,90). Two groups were evaluated separately; the median PFS was 3 months (%95 CI, 2,60–3,39) and median OS was 6 months (%95 CI, 2,47–9,53) in UFT arm and, the median PFS was 3 months (%95 CI, 1,64–4,35) and median OS was 12 months (%95 CI, 2,83–21,1) in Mitomycin C arm. Statistical significance could not be determined (p>0.05). Conclusions: Thecombination of Raltitrexed with UFT and Mitomycin C showed an acceptable survival time and toxicity in the treatment of patients with previously treated mCRC. It could be considered as a salvage treatment option in mCRC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS787-TPS787
Author(s):  
Richard Dale Huhn ◽  
Jamie Lowe ◽  
Michele Grady ◽  
Corina Candiani Taitt ◽  
Michele Anne Gargano ◽  
...  

TPS787 Background: Imprime PGG (Imprime) is a novel immune modulator (complex carbohydrate biologic), which harnesses innate immune cells to enhance killing of antibody-targeted tumor cells. In a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial in mCRC, the combination of Imprime with cetuximab resulted in 24% ORR, 62% disease control rate (DCR), and median time to progression (TTP) of 12 wks (Tamayo ME, Ann Onc 2010), representing approximate 100% increases vs historical control (Cunningham, NEJM 2004). ORR was 45%, DCR, 82% and TTP, 24 wks in pts with KRAS WT tumors (post hoc analysis). Single-agent cetuximab has been shown to improve objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing, KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based therapy or are intolerant to irinotecan. The mechanism of action of cetuximab is thought to rely on competitive blockade of endogenous ligand binding and downstream signaling, internalization and down regulation of EGFR, as well as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Erbitux SmPC). The current trial, sponsored by Biothera (registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01309126) is to confirm these findings in phase 3. Methods: Eligible pts will have had prior oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based therapy or be intolerant to irinotecan, and will meet key inclusion criteria including measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. In a 2:1 randomization, stratified by geographic region, prior chemotherapy and site, approximately 795 pts will receive weekly open-label Imprime plus cetuximab or cetuximab alone. The primary endpoint of the study is OS and primary analysis will occur when ~709 deaths have occurred. Secondary endpoints include PFS, ORR (based on RECIST 1.1), quality of life, safety and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker analyses. Pt screening and enrollment is underway in the United States and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT01309126.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14528-14528 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bouchahda ◽  
T. Macarulla ◽  
J. P. Spano ◽  
J. B. Bachet ◽  
G. Liedo ◽  
...  

14528 Background: Cetuximab ( C ) has demonstrated activity both as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan (CPT11) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) refractory to CPT 11 and oxaliplatin based chemotherapy. This European retrospective study explored the tolerability and activity of C combined with CPT 11 in an unselected population of elderly pts with CPT11- refractory mCRC Methods: 67 pts with mCRC aged = 70 yrs were treated with C (400 mg/m2 loading dose over 2 hours, then 250 mg/m2 over 1 hour weekly). C was given alone (2 pts), combined with CPT11 (56 pts) or CPT11 + 5FU-LV as conventional (4 pts) or chronomodulated delivery (5 pts). Treatment was administered as 2nd to 6th line. Primary endpoint was time to tumor progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were toxicity, objective response rate (RR) (with RECIST Criteria) and overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 77 yrs (70–84); M/F: 44/23; WHO performance status 0/1/2/unknown: 12/40/11/4; EGFR expression: + in 55 pts, - in 2 pts and unknown in 10 pts; colon/rectum/unknown: 49/14 /4. More frequent toxicities included acneiform skin rash, which occurred in 33 pts (Grade (G) 2: 24 pts, 35%; G3: 9 pts, 13%), diarrhea (G3, 11 pts, 16%; G4, 2 pts, 3%) and neutropenia (G3: 4 pts, 6%; G4: 5 pts, 7%). RR was 23% including 1 complete and 14 partial responses. Disease control rate (RR + stable disease) was 53%. No correlation was found between skin rash and response. Median TTP (intent-to treat) was 4.5 months [95% CI: 3.2 - 5.7]. Median OS was 15 months [12.0–17.9]. Conclusions: The combination of C with CPT11-based chemotherapy resulted in good activity and acceptable tolerability in elderly patients with heavily pre-treated mCRC, comparable to that of the younger patients. This treatment option can be reasonably proposed to the elderly population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document