A prospective phase II trial of gemcitabine plus axitinib in patients with sarcomatoid type renal carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 616-616
Author(s):  
Inkeun Park ◽  
Hyo Jin Lee ◽  
Woo Kyun Bae ◽  
Shinkyo Yoon ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Sarcomatoid Carcinoma ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Median Percentage ◽  
Ecog Ps

616 Background: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare but very aggressive type of RCC. The treatment option for SRCC is very limited, and there have been anecdotal reports of very good responders to gemcitabine or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinaase inhibitors (VEGFR TKI). We conducted multicenter phase 2 trial of gemcitabine plus axitinib (GX) in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic SRCC to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent RCC with sarcomatoid component of 25% or more on resected kidney or exclusive sarcomatoid carcinoma on needle biopsy, ECOG PS 0-2, measurable lesion by RECIST v1.1, and adequate cardiac, hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Pts with uncontrolled hypertension, prior exposure to gemcitabine or VEGFR TKI were exclude. Pts received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 by 3-week cycle and axitinib 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1, and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: Twenty-five pts were enrolled between Oct 2014 and Aug 2018. Median age was 61 (range 33-80), and 84% was male. ECOG PS were 1 (92%) and 2 (8%), and 52% had prior nephrectomy. Clear cell carcinoma was the most common histology of carcinoma component, and median percentage of sarcomatoid component was 90% (25-100%). Pts belonged to intermediate (28%) and poor (72%) risk group according to IMDC risk stratification. Median 6 cycles of GX were administered, and 56%, 28%, and 12% of pts achieved PR, SD, and PD, respectively, with an ORR of 56% and median duration of response of 2.5 months. With a median follow-up duration of 21.4 mo, median PFS was 4.9 mo (95% CI, 3.5-13.3), and median OS was 8.4 months (95% CI 3.5-13.3 months). Most adverse events were manageable, and no unexpected toxicities were found. One pt died of grade 5 pneumonia. Conclusions: GX showed promising efficacy in pts with SRCC. GX might be considered as one of treatment options for pts with SRCC, although efficacy of GX should be confirmed in larger trial.

MC044h, a phase II trial of sorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A Phase II Consortium (P2C) study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hobday ◽  
J. Rubin ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
J. Picus ◽  
R. Donehower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of gefitinib in patients (pts) with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A Phase II Consortium (P2C) study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4043-4043 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hobday ◽  
K. Holen ◽  
R. Donehower ◽  
J. Camoriano ◽  
G. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Islet Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Ecog Ps

4043 Background: Systemic treatment options for progressive metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Gefitinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase, has been shown to inhibit the growth of NET cell lines. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: radiographic progression by RECIST criteria, ECOG PS ≤ 2, ≤ 1 prior chemotherapy, and good organ function. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide (if disease progression documented on stable dose) were allowed. Pts received gefitinib 250 mg po daily. We evaluated 6 month (mos) progression-free survival (PFS) in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. 6 mos PFS rates of 30% (CT) and 10% (ICC) were considered promising. Results: 96 pts were enrolled: (57 CT, 39 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 23 of 38 (61%) CT pts and 9 of 29 (31%) pts with ICC were progression-free at 6 mos. 1 PR and one minor response (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) were observed in 40 CT pts; 2 PR and 1 MR in 31 ICC pts. In addition, 32% (12/38) of CT and 14% (4/29) of ICC pts had stable disease on study for a duration that exceeded by at least 4 months the time to progression documented prior to study entry. Grade 3–4 toxicity was infrequent with fatigue (6%), diarrhea (5%) and rash (3%) most common. Evaluation of markers of the EGFR pathway on tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Gefitinib is well-tolerated and results in prolonged disease stabilization in pts with prior documented objective progression of CT and ICC, with rare objective responses. Supported by NOI CM17104. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Results from TreeTopp: A randomized phase II study of the efficacy and safety of varlitinib plus capecitabine versus placebo in second-line (2L) advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4597-4597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Wei-Peng Yong ◽  
Nicola McIntyre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

4597 Background: Patients with advanced or metastatic BTC who progress on first-line (1L) gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy have few 2L treatment options. Varlitinib is a reversible small molecule pan human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) inhibitor with low nanomolar potency against HER1 (EGFR), HER2 and HER4 with promising early results in advanced BTC. Methods: TreeTopp (NCT03093870) was a global, multicenter, double blind phase 2 study in which patients with advanced BTC who progressed after 1L therapy that included ≥6 doses of gemcitabine, with radiographically measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0 or 1 and albumin ≥3 g/dL were randomized (1:1) to varlitinib (300 mg BID) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 BID 14 days on/ 7 off)(V+C) or placebo plus capecitabine (P+C). The dual primary endpoints were Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) defined as the time from randomization to radiological progression assessed by Independent Central Review. Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS). Results: Overall, 127 patients were randomized (V+C, n = 64; P+C, n = 63) from May−Dec 2018 and demographics/baseline characteristics were generally well balanced, although the V+C arm had a lower proportion of females vs. P+C (31% vs. 48%). The odds ratio for ORR was numerically higher with V+C vs. P+C was 2.278 (9.4% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.42), the HR for PFS for V+C vs. P+C was 0.90 (median PFS, 2.8 vs. 2.8 months; p = 0.63), and the HR for OS for P+C vs. V+C was 1.11 (median OS, 7.8 vs. 7.5 months; p = 0.66). Although not powered to evaluate sub-group interactions, in sub-group analysis, V+C showed PFS benefit versus P+C in two sub-groups; gallbladder cancer (GBC, HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.22; median PFS, 2.9 vs. 1.6 months) and females (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.28, 1.23; median PFS, 4.1 vs. 2.8 months). There was no PFS benefit for V+C vs. P+C among males and non-GBC. Toxicities were generally balanced between arms apart from a slightly higher incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, diarrhea and fatigue in the V+C vs. P+C arm. Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 66% and 59% of patients in the V+C and P+C arms, respectively. Conclusions: V+C is well tolerated but did not improve ORR, PFS or OS vs. P+C in 2L advanced BTC. Exploratory analyses suggested that patients with GBC and female patients achieved comparatively higher median PFS with V+C vs. P+C. Clinical trial information: NCT03093870 .

Palbociclib (P) in patients (pts) with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with CDK4 amplification: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11565-11565
Author(s):  
Scott Schuetze ◽  
Michael Rothe ◽  
Pam K. Mangat ◽  
Liz Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

11565 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of STS pts with CDK4 amplification treated with P are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced STS, no standard treatment options, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received P at 125 mg orally once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off until disease progression. Pts matched to P had CDK4 amplification and no RB mutations. Simon 2-stage design tested the null disease control (DC) - defined as partial (PR), complete response (CR) or stable disease at 16+ weeks (SD 16+) - rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 29 pts (66% male) with STS with CDK4 amplification were enrolled from July 2016 to Nov 2019. 1 pt was not evaluable and excluded from efficacy analyses. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. One pt with partial response (PR) and 12 pts with SD16+ were observed for DC and objective response (OR) rates of 48% (95% CI: 31%, 62%) and 3.7% (95% CI: 0.1%, 19%), respectively, and the null DC rate of 15% was rejected (p<0.001). 9/13 pts with DC continued on treatment for >32 weeks. 14 pts had at least one grade 3-4 AE at least possibly related to P with the most common being low WBC/platelets. Other grade 3 AEs included increased alanine aminotransferase, anemia, and fatigue. Conclusions: Monotherapy P demonstrated anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts with STS with CDK4 amplification. Additional study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of P in pts with STS with CDK4 amplification. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535. [Table: see text]

ABT-869 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Interim results

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8074-8074
Author(s):  
E. Tan ◽  
R. Salgia ◽  
B. Besse ◽  
G. Goss ◽  
D. R. Gandara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

8074 Background: ABT-869 is a novel orally active, potent and specific inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. Methods: This ongoing, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 2 trial of ABT-869 at 0.10 mg/kg daily (Arm A) and 0.25 mg/kg daily (Arm B) until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, was initiated to assess antitumor activity and toxicity of ABT-869 in patients (pts) with NSCLC. Eligibility criteria included locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC; ≥ 1 prior systemic treatment, and ≥1 measurable lesion by RECIST criteria. The primary endpoint was the progression free (PF) rate at 16 wks. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CT scans were assessed by the investigator and centrally; central assessment results are provided. Results: 138 patients (pts) were enrolled from 08/07–10/08 from 27 centers with interim data available for 94 pts (Arm A, n=43; Arm B; n=51). Median age was 64 years and 62 years in Arm A and B respectively. For the interim analysis population (Arm A, n=24; Arm B, n=24), 16 (33.3%) pts were PF at 16 wks: 7 (29.2%) in Arm A and 9 (37.5%) in Arm B. The ORR in Arm A (n=30) was 0% and 7.3% in Arm B (n=41). The median TTP and median PFS were 110 and 109 days, and 112 days and 108 days in Arm A and B, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) in Arm A were fatigue (35%), nausea (21%), and anorexia (21%), and in Arm B were hypertension (51%), fatigue (51%), diarrhea (43%), anorexia (41%), nausea (31%), proteinuria (31%) and vomiting (26%). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in the Arm A were fatigue (7%), ascites (5%), dehydration (5%), pleural effusion (5%), and in the Arm B were hypertension (23%), fatigue (8%), PPE syndrome (8%), dyspnoea (6%) and stomatitis (6%). Most AE's were mild/moderate and reversible with interruptions/dose reduction/or discontinuation of ABT-869. Conclusions: ABT-869 demonstrates an acceptable safety profile and appears to be active in NSCLC patients. [Table: see text]

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Hee Kyung Ahn ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Ps

488 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Methods: 34 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 17 (50%) females, median age 57 years (28-72), 28 (82%) ECOG PS 0-1. S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was four (range 1-9). ORR was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-26.6) and disease control rate was 58.8% (95% CI 42.2-75.3) with five partial responses and fifteen stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.3-7.0). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.3-4.1) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI 7.0-16.5). Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (12%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (3%) and diarrhea (3%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was well tolerated and efficacious for heavily pre-treated mCRC pts, and could be an alternative for pts with good PS but no further treatment options.

PrE0204: A multi-institutional, single arm, two-stage phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma—A PrECOG LLC study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4072-4072
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Sahai ◽  
Paul J. Catalano ◽  
Sam Joseph Lubner ◽  
Mark R. Menge ◽  
Hidayatullah G. Munshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Metabolizing Enzyme ◽  
Ecog Ps

4072 Background: Pts with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) have limited response to current chemotherapy regimens and poor overall survival (OS). Nab-Paclitaxel (nabPAC) can increase the intra-cellular concentration of gemcitabine (GEM) through depletion of its metabolizing enzyme, cytidine deaminase (CDA). We investigated the nabPAC+GEM combination in a ph II single arm trial in advanced or metastatic CCA pts with exploratory biomarker evaluation, including CDA, hENT1, SPARC and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Methods: Key eligibility criteria: advanced or metastatic CCA with no prior systemic chemotherapy, age > 18, ECOG PS 0-1 and Child-Pugh < 8. Pts received nabPAC (125 mg/m2 IV) and GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV) days 1, 8 and 15 Q4 weeks until progression. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Secondary endpoints: safety, time to progression (TTP), objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), median PFS and OS, as well as correlation of change in CA 19-9 to clinical efficacy. The study required > 43 of 67 evaluable patients alive and progression-free at 6 months to conclude the 6-month PFS rate is at least 70% against a null hypothesis of 55% based on historical data. Results: 73 eligible patients (41.1% male, 91.8% Caucasian, 45.2% ECOG PS 0) were enrolled across 22 sites with a median age of 62 (range 36-87) years and received a median of 6 (range 1-18) cycles. The primary endpoint of PFS rate at 6 months was 54.7% on intention to treat analysis. Response evaluation is underway and will be reported at the meeting. The median PFS and OS were 6.5 (95% CI, 5.1-7.7) and 10.3 (95% CI, 9.1-14.6) months, respectively. The safety profile of nabPAC+GEM was similar to that reported in ph III MPACT trial. The most common treatment-related G3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (24.3%), fatigue (13.5%) and anemia (12.2%). Five patients remain on the trial. Exploratory analyses are pending. Conclusions: The observed PFS rate at 6 months with nabPAC+GEM in CCA is insufficient to reject the null hypothesis of 55% PFS at 6 months, and appears to be as effective as the historical control. Clinical trial information: NCT02181634.

Pembrolizumab (P) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with high tumor mutational burden (HTMB): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1014-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajjai Shivaram Alva ◽  
Pam K. Mangat ◽  
Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Ricardo H. Alvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

1014 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating the anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with specific genomic alterations. P is an immune checkpoint inhibitor and HTMB is an emerging predictive biomarker for checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Results in a cohort of MBC pts with HTMB treated with P are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced cancer, no standard treatment options, ECOG PS 0-1, measurable disease and acceptable organ function. Genomic testing was performed using commercially available tests selected by sites. Pts matched to P had HTMB defined as ≥9 mutations/megabase (Muts/Mb) by a FoundationOne test (n=20) or approved by the TAPUR Molecular Tumor Board for other tests (n=8). A Simon two-stage design was used to test a null rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have disease control (DC) (objective response (OR) or stable disease at 16 weeks (wks) (SD16+)), an additional 18 pts are enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the drug is considered worthy of further study. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Twenty-eight female MBC pts were enrolled from October 2016 to July 2018. Pts received P at 2 mg/kg (n=8) or 200 mg (n=20) IV over 30 minutes, every 3 wks. HTMB ranged from 9 to 37 Muts/Mb. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table (N=28). No relationship was observed between #Muts/Mb and PFS or OS. Two grade 3 AEs (weight loss and hypoalbuminemia) and 1 grade 2 SAE (urinary tract infection) were reported as at least possibly related to P. Conclusions: P demonstrated anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated MBC pts with HTMB . Additional study of P is warranted in MBC pts with HTMB. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Treatment Options in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Focus on mTOR Inhibitors

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. CMO.S1590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta Kumar Pal ◽  
Robert A. Figlin
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii

The agents currently approved for use in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) can be divided broadly into two categories: (1) vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-directed therapies or (2) inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). The latter category includes everolimus and temsirolimus, both approved for distinct indications in mRCC. Everolimus gained its approval on the basis of phase III data showing a benefit in progression-free survival relative to placebo in patients previously treated with sunitinib and/or sorafenib. In contrast, temsirolimus was approved on the basis of a phase III trial in treatment-naïve patients with poor-risk mRCC, demonstrating an improvement in overall survival relative to interferon-alfa. While these pivotal trials have created unique positions for everolimus and temsirolimus in current clinical algorithms, the role of mTOR inhibitors in mRCC is being steadily revised and expanded through ongoing trials testing novel sequences and combinations. The clinical development of mTOR inhibitors is outlined herein.

The effect of cytoreductive radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) on results of therapy with sunitinib or interferon-alpha (IFN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with a small primary tumor.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsimafeyeu ◽  
Bin Chung ◽  
Janie S. Zart ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Small Primary ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

414 Background: At least 5% of the patients (pts) with small primary RCC initially present with metastasis. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate the role of cRFA in metastatic RCC pts with small primary tumor treated with immuno- or targeted therapy. Methods: Three parallel single-arm prospective studies were conducted. Eligibility criteria were nearly identical for all trials, and included histopathologically confirmed RCC; metastatic measurable disease; size of primary tumor ≤5 cm; good prognosis by MSKCC model; no previous therapy. Study 1: Pts were treated with percutaneous cRFA under CT guide and following IFN, 9 MIU, s.c, 3 tiw. Study 2: Pts received cRFA and following sunitinib in repeated 6-week cycles of 50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off. Study 3: Pts with unresected primary RCC received sunitinib alone. The primary endpoint was a 33% increase in progression-free survival (PFS) over expected 5 months in study 1 and over expected 11 months in studies 2-3 (power 80%; significance .05). Sample size was 38 pts for each study. Results: Studies were comparable by baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, histology, ECOG PS, number of metastatic sites, primary tumor size). Efficacy data for 114 evaluable pts showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 8% (95% CI 4.5, 10.5) for study 1, 28.9% (95% CI 15.2, 34) for study 2, and 31.6% (95% CI 20.3, 38.9) for study 3; median PFS of 9.1 (95% CI 6.9, 10.2), 13.4 (95% CI 9.8, 14), and 12.7 (95% CI 11.3, 13.5) months for studies 1-3, respectively. ORR and PFS were significantly higher in sunitinib trials comparing with study 1 (P<.01 all differences); no differences were found between studies 2 and 3 (ORR, P=.1; PFS, P=.6). The study 1 met its primary end point, showing that PFS was significantly increased. There were no unexpected toxicities of medical treatment and complications of cRFA. Conclusions: cRFA is a safe and effective approach for select patients with metastatic RCC treated with immunotherapy. Cytoreductive ablative technique did not improve PFS in pts treated with sunitinib. Sunitinib was effective in metastatic RCC pts with unresected small primary tumor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document