Should non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy (Non-A) substitute anthracycline-based (A) when combined with taxanes (T) as 1st-line chemotherapy (CT) for advanced breast cancer (ABC)? Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) balancing efficacy and toxicity

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
P. Carlini ◽  
E. Bria ◽  
F. Cuppone ◽  
I. Sperduti ◽  
V. Vaccaro ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Sandro Barni ◽  
Giacomo Bregni ◽  
Filippo de Braud ◽  
Serena Di Cosimo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifei Yan ◽  
Qi Jiang ◽  
Mengye He ◽  
Peng Shen

Background: We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced breast cancer. Methods: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.2 analysis software. Results: Six eligible randomized clinical trials involving 2080 patients were included. Regimens containing PARP inhibitors were significantly associated with higher objective response rate, longer progression-free survival and overall survival. The PARP inhibitor regimen group had a significantly higher rate of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia than the chemotherapy-only group. Conclusion: Regimens containing PARP inhibitors are effective and safe for BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer patients. The efficacy appears to be only marginal in patients with BRCA status unselected.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (16) ◽  
pp. 2144-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Gennari ◽  
Martin Stockler ◽  
Matteo Puntoni ◽  
Mariapia Sormani ◽  
Oriana Nanni ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate the effect of different first-line chemotherapy durations in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods We searched literature databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared different chemotherapy durations in the first-line treatment of MBC. Only trials with unconfounded comparisons of additional cycles of chemotherapy were included. The main outcome measures for this analysis were OS and PFS. Published data from retrieved studies were analyzed according to standard meta-analytic techniques. Results We found 11 randomized clinical trials including 2,269 patients. Longer first-line chemotherapy duration resulted into a significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99; P = .046) and PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.76; P < .001). There were no differences in effects on either OS or PFS between subgroups defined by time of random assignment, study design, number of chemotherapy cycles in the control arm or concomitant endocrine therapy. Conclusion Longer first-line chemotherapy duration is associated with marginally longer OS and a substantially longer PFS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document