The impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on stage of cancer at time of diagnosis: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6505-6505
Author(s):  
C. M. Booth ◽  
G. Li ◽  
W. J. Mackillop
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Incident Cases ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Universal Health

6505 Background: Lower SES is known to be associated with worsened cancer survival. Here we evaluate the impact of SES on stage of cancer at diagnosis in Ontario which has universal health insurance. Methods: All incident cases of breast, colon, rectal, non-small cell lung, cervical and larynx cancer diagnosed in Ontario 2003–2005 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Stage information is only captured routinely for patients seen at Ontario's 8 Regional Cancer Centers (RCCs). This represents approximately 68% of the population and forms the basis for all analyses. Using a best stage grouping approach, cases were assigned stage based on pathologic TNM if available and clinical TNM otherwise. The population of Ontario was divided into quintiles based on community median household income reported in the 2001 Canadian census. Using postal code at time of diagnosis cases were assigned to quintiles (Q); Q1 represents the communities where the poorest 20% of the Ontario population resided. Comparisons between Q1 and Q2–5 were made using the chi-square test. A Cox model was used to evaluate overall survival, SES, stage, and age. Results: Stage at diagnosis was available for 19,239/23,254 (83%) of cases seen at RCCs. Among cases with breast cancer, those in Q1 were less likely to have stage I disease (43 vs 47%, p = 0.004) and more likely to have stage IV disease (5 vs 4%, 0.008) than Q2–5. With lung cancer, cases in Q1 were more likely to have stage I disease compared to Q2–5 (16 vs 13%, p = 0.015). Distribution of stage I and stage IV disease did not differ by SES across other individual diseases. However, for all 6 cancers combined, cases in Q1 were less likely than Q2–5 to have stage I disease (27 vs 30%, p = 0.001) and more likely to have stage IV disease (21 vs 18%, p < 0.0001). We found significant gradients in 3-year overall survival across Q1-Q5 for breast (5% absolute difference in survival, p < 0.001), colon (4%, p = 0.049), and cervical (18%, p = 0.031) cancers. Adjustment for stage and age only slightly diminished these survival gradients. Conclusions: Despite universal health care, SES remains associated with survival among patients with cancer in Ontario. These data suggest that the difference in outcome is only partially explained by differences in stage at diagnosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Stage at cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Washington state.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Laura Elizabeth Panattoni ◽  
Veena Shankaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Washington State ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Stage Iv Cancer ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Impact

145 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical care, including routine cancer screening for breast, colorectal, lung and cervical cancers. We aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on stage at diagnosis for cancer patients. Methods: Using data from the Washington State SEER records we compared AJCC stage for patients diagnosed with cancer in 2017-2019 to 2020 for two time periods, March to June (initial pandemic months) and July to December (later pandemic months). Patients were included if they were age 18+, diagnosed with a solid tumor, and not diagnosed at autopsy. Results: In the early phase of the pandemic, March – June 2020, there was a shift to cancers being diagnosed at a later stage compared to the same time period in 2017-2019 (Stage III: 13.5% to 14.9%, Stage IV: 16.2% to 19.7%). There was also a decrease in cancer diagnoses for cancers that are often detected through routine screening. As a percentage of all cancer diagnoses, both melanoma (13.2% to 9.8%) and colon cancer diagnoses (7.2% to. 6.7%) decreased during the early pandemic. In the later phase of the pandemic, July to December 2020, the stage at diagnosis showed an indication of returning to pre-pandemic levels with an increase in the proportion of early stage cancers (In situ: 16.6% to 19.3%, Stage I: 38.8% to 41.1%). Stage at diagnosis trends varied by tumor type. For colorectal cancer, the overall number of diagnoses decreased during the initial pandemic months. Stage I diagnoses decreased and Stage IV cancer diagnoses increased in both early and late stages of the pandemic. Conclusions: In Washington State, the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on stage at diagnosis potentially caused by delays or interruptions in medical care. Additional studies are needed to understand how this shift in stage at diagnosis impacted treatment and outcomes for patients.

Clinical pathways implementation in a community-based oncology practice: Real-world outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer segmented by disease stage at diagnosis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18719-e18719
Author(s):  
Natalie R. Dickson ◽  
Karen Beauchamp ◽  
Toni S. Perry ◽  
Ashley Roush ◽  
Deborah Goldschmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

e18719 Background: Clinical pathways have been introduced as tools to optimize cancer care delivery, but evidence of their value in the real world is limited. This retrospective study was performed to assess treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before and after pathway implementation at Tennessee Oncology (TO). Methods: Chart data were abstracted for patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with Stage I-IV NSCLC who initiated first-line (1L) systemic treatment at a TO clinic and had follow-up for ³6 months or until death. Patients were divided into two cohorts: pre-pathways (treatment initiation 2014–2015) and post-pathways (treatment initiation 2016–2018). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were described and compared across cohorts. An exploratory study endpoint was the evaluation of outcomes based on disease stage at diagnosis. Results: Among 501 patients (251 pre-pathways and 250 post-pathways), most had advanced or metastatic NSCLC at diagnosis (Stage III: 40%; Stage IV: 42%). Chemotherapy comprised almost all 1L systemic therapy used pre-pathways (Stage I/II: 100%; Stage III: 96%; Stage IV: 83%). Post-pathways, chemotherapy remained the most common 1L therapy in patients with Stage I/II (89%) and Stage III (72%) disease, but among patients with Stage IV disease, use of chemotherapy decreased (47%) and immuno-oncology (IO) therapy alone or in combination became common (45%). Median duration of 1L therapy was longer post-pathways in patients with Stage III (2.1 months vs 1.4 months pre-pathways; P < 0.01) and Stage IV disease (3.3 months vs 2.3 months pre-pathways; P < 0.01) but did not differ among Stage I/II patients. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer post-pathways in patients with Stage IV disease (7.0 months vs 4.2 months pre-pathways; P < 0.05), but not in other disease-stage subgroups. Median overall survival increased non-significantly post-pathways for all disease stage subgroups (Stage I/II: 26 months vs 20 months pre-pathways; Stage III: 26 months vs 20 months; Stage IV: 10 months vs 9 months). For each disease stage, rates of severe adverse events were similar between cohorts. Conclusions: While outcomes for patients diagnosed with Stage III/IV NSCLC were generally improved following the implementation of clinical pathways, this change coincided with a dramatic shift in available treatment options. Improvements post-pathways were mainly observed in patients diagnosed with advanced disease. Thus, differences in outcomes between pre-pathways and post-pathways cohorts in our study are more likely attributable to other evolving practices in cancer care, particularly the availability of newer, more effective treatments such as IO therapy as part of standard practice, than implementation of the clinical pathways.

The impact of primary surgery on stage IV breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1113-1113
Author(s):  
Ella Harris ◽  
Malcolm R. Kell ◽  
Reem Salman ◽  
Maurice Stokes ◽  
Tom Gorey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Primary Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Primary Disease ◽  
Stage Iv Breast Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
The Impact

1113 Background: The role of primary surgery in metastatic breast cancer is unclear. Here in we have performed metaanalysis on available data to assess the role of surgery on oncological outcome in patients with stage IV breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search for published trials that examined outcome following removal of primary disease in stage IV breast cancer was performed using MEDLINE and cross referencing available data. Reviews of each study were conducted, and data were extracted. Primary outcome was overall survival related to surgical removal of primary disease. Results: We identified 15 relevant studies of which 10 were appropriate for analysis. Data was available on 28,693 patients with stage IV disease, of whom 52.8% underwent removal of the primary carcinoma. Patients undergoing primary surgery in this setting were more likely to be alive at 3 years 40% vs. 22% (OR 2.32 CI 2.08-2.6, p<0.01 (surgery vs. no surgery)). Analysis of subgroups for selection to surgery or not, favoured smaller tumours, fewer comorbidities, fewer metastases (p<0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in location of metastases, grade of tumour or receptor status. Conclusions: Patients undergoing removal of primary carcinoma in the setting of stage IV breast cancer appear to have an improved overall survival. However the available data suggest that these surgical patients probably have better prognosis stage IV disease than those patients not undergoing surgery.

Urothelial cancer: Impact of gender on stage at diagnosis and survival.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 316-316
Author(s):  
Jeanne Michelle du Manoir ◽  
Suzanne Richter ◽  
Srikala S. Sridhar
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Gender Disparity ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

316 Background: Gender differences for disease course and survival in various cancers exist. Gender disparity for both stage at diagnosis and overall survival (OS) has been observed in urothelial cancer (UC). We report a single institution analysis of UC patients treated with chemotherapy to further investigate gender differences in outcomes. Methods: We identified 198 bladder cancer pts treated with chemotherapy since 2002. Chemotherapy was either given as adjuvant or palliative and the most common regimens used were gemcitabine and cisplatin, gemcitabine and carboplatin or gemcitabine alone. Age and stage at diagnosis, sex, smoking status, radiation exposures, bloodwork as a measure of organ dysfunction and overall survival info was collected. Outcomes were compared using Chi Square Statistic. Results: Age at diagnosis, smoking status and prior pelvic radiation were not significantly different (females 66.1 yrs vs males 63.6 yrs; 54% smokers in both groups; 8.3% females vs 7.6% males exposed to radiation). Significantly more females were diagnosed with advanced disease than men (70.8% vs 58.7%, p=0.049) vs earlier stages (stage 0-I) (12.2% vs 35.9%, p=0.03). For patients deceased, OS was not significantly different between genders when analysed for all stages combined (deceased 41.5 vs 39.9 mos), or for those diagnosed only at Stage IV (deceased 12.4 vs 8.6 mos). Of patients still alive at time of review, a survival advantage was apparent for men at all stages (54.8 vs 38.7 months), as well as with stage IV disease (35.9 vs 19.7 months). Gemcitabine-cisplatin was given more often to men with stage IV disease than females (93% vs 63%, p<0.02) despite no difference in organ dysfunction, or ECOG performance status in females. Conclusions: We observed that while both genders are similar with respect to age at UC diagnosis, risk factors exposures (smoking, radiation) and pathological variants, females were diagnosed at later stages, and receive standard first line therapy less often. Our data suggest that this impacts negatively on OS in females diagnosed in earlier disease stages. Further research is needed to identify if we can improve outcome by promoting earlier diagnosis and more aggressive management in earlier disease in females.

The impact of prostate cancer on overall cancer stage migration over time.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35-35
Author(s):  
Jay P. Ciezki ◽  
Chandana A. Reddy ◽  
Eric A. Klein
Keyword(s):  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Subsequent Increase ◽  
Female Breast ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

35 Background: To define cancer stage migration according to year of diagnosis and type of cancer diagnosis. Methods: Cancer stage, site, and year of diagnosis information were retrieved from an academic radiation oncology center's database. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to assess changes over time. Results: From 2005 to 2014, 12,807 newly diagnosed patients (pts) were seen. The distribution of pts by stage was 2% stage 0, 17% stage I, 33% stage II, 16% stage III, and 32% stage IV. The pattern of stage distribution significantly changed over time as seen in the table (p = 0.0016). For 4 of the 5 most commonly seen cancers, (female breast, lung, esophagus, head and neck, and prostate (CaP)) over time fewer late stage cancers were diagnosed or had no change in stage. The only exception was CaP, the largest number of pts (26.5% of total). In 2005, 10.76% of new CaP cases presented with stage IV disease, dipped to 4.6% in 2011, and rose to 8.47% in 2014 (p < 0.0001). The changes in stage I definition accounted for the increase seen in stage I disease, but could not account for the dip and subsequent increase in stage IV disease. Conclusions: The presentation of cancer by stage has changed over time, and it was predominately driven by CaP. The changes seen in stage IV CaP incidence in which it fell and then rose over the study period suggests that global practice changes may be present. An increased preference for active surveillance, recommendations against PSA screening, and increasing insurance deductibles may have favored a delay in treating/diagnosing CaP pts in the recent past. [Table: see text]

The impact of colorectal cancer screening on incidence and stage IV disease in the Netherlands.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3531-3531
Author(s):  
Myrtle F Krul ◽  
Marloes AG Elferink ◽  
Niels FM Kok ◽  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Stage Distribution ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
The Impact

3531 Background: Population-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) aims to decrease incidence and mortality due to precancerous polyp removal, early detection and early treatment of CRC. In the Netherlands, phased introduction of a biennial fecal immunochemical hemoglobin test started in 2014 for individuals aged 55-75. This evaluation of the national data focuses on the initial effect of CRC screening on incidence and stage distribution and the impact on stage IV disease. Methods: All CRC patients diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Patients were linked to the Dutch national pathology registry (PALGA) to identify screen-detected tumors. Results: The NCR identified 137,717 CRC patients between 2009 and 2018. The incidence within screening age (55-75 yr) of all CRC stages showed an initial peak after introduction of screening in 2014, followed by a continuous decrease for all stages. CRC incidence outside the screening age did not show these explicit changes between 2009 and 2018. In 2018, the incidence of stage IV CRC within screening age was lower than the level at the start of the screening program. Stage distribution within screening age shifted towards earlier stages in the screening period (2014-2018) compared to the period before screening (2009-2012) (stage I: 31% vs. 18%, stage II: 22% vs. 26%, stage III: 29% vs. 31%, Stage IV: 18% vs. 25%, respectively). In the period 2014-2018 and within screening age, the ratio of screen-detected and symptom-detected tumors was highest in stage I (47%:53%) and lowest in stage IV (9%:91%). Screen-detected compared to symptom-detected stage IV patients diagnosed in the period 2014-2018 and within screening age had more frequently single organ metastases (74.5% vs 57.4%, p < 0.001), higher resection rate of the primary tumor (57.5% vs. 41.3%; p < 0.001) and higher local treatment rate of metastases (40.0% vs. 23.4% p < 0.001). The median overall survival of screen-detected stage IV patients was significantly longer than that of symptom-detected stage IV patients (31.0 months (95% CI: 27.7 – 34.3) vs. 15.0 months (95% CI: 14.5 – 15.5), p < 0.001). Conclusions: The initial results of the introduction of CRC screening in the Netherlands showed a favorable trend on CRC incidence and stage distribution. Screen-detected patients with stage IV disease had less extensive disease, resulting in better treatment options and improved survival.

scholarly journals The Effects of Radiation Therapy (RT) and Surgical Resection on Overall Survival in Gastric Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4415-4415
Author(s):  
Henry Vuong ◽  
Gurinder Sidhu ◽  
Vaibhav Verma
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Native American ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Gastric Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Asian Pacific Islander ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Asian Pacific

Abstract Introduction: Lymphoma of the stomach is an uncommon tumor. However, it is the most common extra-nodal manifestation of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Over the last few decades, preferred treatment for gastric lymphoma has shifted from surgical resection to non-surgical methods involving chemotherapy and RT. The current standard treatment is chemo-immunotherapy. The role of RT and surgery, if any, is unclear. Methods: We reviewed data which was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data registry for patients with gastric lymphoma from 1973 until 2011. The data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software. The SEER registry does not provide information about chemotherapy (CT) administered. Results: We analyzed 13,659 patients with the diagnosis of gastric lymphoma in the SEER database. The three most prevalent subtypes were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with 6,134 (44.9%) cases, extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) with 4,318 (31.6%) cases and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL/SLL) with 352 (2.5%) cases. In the DLBCL group, the median (range) age was 71 (4 – 105) years, of which 44.7% were female and 55.3% male. Of the group, 4,992 (81%) patients were White, 447 (7%) Black, and the remainder were Asian, Pacific Islander, or Native American. The median overall survival (OS) in patients who did and did not receive RT was 63 vs. 34 months (p<0.01). Analysis by stage shows median OS with and without RT was 108 vs. 65 months in Stage I disease (p<0.01), 71 vs. 62 months (p=0.41) in Stage II disease, 59 vs. 25 months in Stage III disease (p=0.52), and 8 vs. 8 months in Stage IV disease (p=0.46). The median OS in patients who underwent surgical resection, at least partial gastrectomy, is 76 months compared to 28 months in patients who did not undergo resection (p<0.01) (Fig.1). Analyzed by stage, the median OS in patients who did and who did not undergo surgery was 114 vs. 59 months in Stage I disease (p<0.01), 70 vs. 54 months in Stage II disease (p=0.03), 50 vs. 22 months in Stage III disease (p=0.63), and 10 vs. 8 months in Stage IV disease (p=0.85). Since widespread use of rituximab started in 2001, we analyzed patients treated before and after that year. Among patients with DLBCL, 2,719 (44%) were diagnosed prior to 2001 and 3,415 (56%) were diagnosed in 2001 or afterwards. Median OS with and without RT was 43 months vs. 31 months prior to 2001 and 97 months vs. 39 months after 2001 (p<0.01). The median OS with and without surgery is 81 vs. 12 months prior to 2001 (Fig. 2) and 57 vs. 51 months after 2001 (Fig. 3) (p<0.01). In the MZL group, the median (range) age was 68 (10 – 101) years of which 50.5% were female and 49.5% male. Of the group, 3,457 (80%) patients were White, 392 (9%) Black, and the remainder were Asian, Pacific Islander, or Native American. The median OS of patients with MZL who had surgery and who did not was 146 vs. 145 months (p=0.372). Analysis by stage shows no significance difference in OS either. The median OS of patients who did not undergo RT was 132 months and was not yet reached in patients who underwent RT (p<0.01). Analysis by stage shows RT significantly benefitted patients with Stage I and II disease but not stage III and IV disease. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that patients with DLBCL who undergo RT have improved median OS. The benefit is limited to Stage I disease. Improved median OS is seen in patients with DLBCL who undergo surgical resection which is contrary to recent data. The benefit of surgical resection is seen only in Stage I and II but not in Stage III and IV. The benefit of surgery was present prior to 2001 but not seen after 2001 - after the widespread use of rituximab. In MZL, surgical resection has no impact on median OS; whereas RT improves OS, particularly in Stage I and II disease. While our analysis is limited due to the lack of data regarding chemotherapy administered, this large population based analysis supports the benefit of RT and surgery in select disease stages. Prospective clinical trials may better address the benefits of each modality independently. Fig 1. KM Curve of DLBCL gastric lymphoma, all cases, who did and did not undergo surgery (p<0.01) Fig 1. KM Curve of DLBCL gastric lymphoma, all cases, who did and did not undergo surgery (p<0.01) Fig 2. KM Curve of DLBCL gastric lymphoma of cases diagnosed before 2001 (p<0.01) Fig 2. KM Curve of DLBCL gastric lymphoma of cases diagnosed before 2001 (p<0.01) Fig 3. KM Curve of DLBCL gastric lymphoma for cases diagnosed after 2001. Fig 3. KM Curve of DLBCL gastric lymphoma for cases diagnosed after 2001. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Which side is better? The impact of primary tumor side in early stage colorectal cancer (CRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15106-e15106
Author(s):  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Andrew Mackinlay ◽  
Christine Semira ◽  
Antonio Jose Jimeno ◽  
Belinda Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
The Impact

e15106 Background: Multiple studies have indicated the prognostic and potential predictive significance of primary tumor side in metastatic CRC. To date, the few studies examining its impact in early stage disease have either combined data across multiple stages or restricted analysis to overall survival (OS) data. A by stage analysis of the impact of tumor side on recurrence risk is critical if it is to impact adjuvant therapy decisions. Methods: We examined data from a multi-site Australian registry of consecutive patients diagnosed from 2003-2016. Tumors at and distal to the splenic flexure, including the rectum, were considered a left primary (LP). Rectal patients treated with initial chemoradiation were excluded. Clinico-pathologic and outcome data were examined. Data analysis was provided by the healthcare group at IBM Research Australia. Results: A total of 6123 patients were identified, of which 1046 (17.1%) had initial stage I, 1892 (30.9%) had stage II, 1708 (27.9%) had stage III, and 1477 (24.1%) had stage IV disease. Most patients were male (55.2%), and had a LP (n = 3818, 62.4%). Median age at diagnosis was 68.8 years, was higher in patients with a right primary (RP) (71.6 versus 67.0 years for LP, p < 0.001), with more females in the RP group (51.1% vs 41.0% for LP, p < 0.001). The proportion of RP varied by stage, highest in stage II (44.9%), lowest in stage IV (31.5%). For all stage IV disease, including metachronous cases, OS was worse with a RP (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.53). For early stage cases, distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) was similar for RP vs LP for stage I (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.23), better for stage II RP (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95) and worse for stage III RP disease (HR 1.22, 1.01-1.48). OS did not differ for RP vs LP for stage I or II disease, but was worse for stage III disease with a RP (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.13-1.70). Furthermore, post recurrence survival was poorer in stage III RP disease (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.96). Conclusions: Primary tumor side has potential as an important prognostic marker in early stage CRC. Our novel finding of a variable impact by stage indicate that an assessment of cohorts where recurrence data is available is critical to fully understanding the implications of tumor side for adjuvant therapy decision making.

The impact of nodal metastasis on survival in stage IV colon cancer: Analysis of National Cancer Database 2004-2014.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15042-e15042
Author(s):  
Sukamal Saha ◽  
Mohamed Elgamal ◽  
Meghan Cherry ◽  
Robin Buttar ◽  
David Wiese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Nodal Metastasis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
The Impact

e15042 Background: Lymph node (LN) metastasis (mets) is the strongest prognostic factor in colon cancer (CCa), however, its significance in Stage IV disease remains controversial. We analysed National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine the impact of nodal mets on survival in Stage IV CCa patients (pts). Methods: From 2004-2014, NCDB pts with pathologic Stage IV CCa were divided into groups based on LN status and No. of +ve LNs. Only Stage IV CCa pts who underwent surgical resection of their primary tumor with available pathologic data as well as chemotherapy data were included. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to compare 5-year overall survival. Results: A total of 33574 pts data met the criteria of the study. Adenocarcinoma represented 82.3% of the total pts. Majority of the pts (82.61%) had +ve LN status. Mean survival was 36.3 vs 24.2 months in -ve LN vs +ve LN pts respectively. Overall 5yr survival was better in LN -ve pts ( 23.4%) versus LN +ve pts ( 10.2%) Survival for all years was inversely related to the number of +ve LN ( Table). For LN +ve or LN -ve pts, receiving any form of chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival when compared to no chemotherapy. Conclusions: LN status and No. of +ve LNs impact the prognosis of CCa, even in stage IV. Receiving some form of chemotherapy improves the prognosis for both pts with +ve or -ve LN status. These findings suggest that separation of Stage IV LN negative versus positive patients may be warranted in staging and treatment. 5 year survival according to LN status and No. of positive LN. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-151
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Stahl ◽  
Elizabeth J. Olecki ◽  
Matthew E. Dixon ◽  
June S. Peng ◽  
Madeline B. Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Specific Guideline ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. The National Cancer Database was used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients from 2004–2016. Chi-square tests were used to examine subgroup differences between disease stages: Stage I, II/III and IV. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline concordant care. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess three-year overall survival. The final cohort included 108,150 patients: 23,584 Stage I, 40,216 Stage II/III, and 44,350 Stage IV. Stage specific guideline concordant care was received in only 73% of patients with Stage I disease and 51% of patients with Stage II/III disease. Patients who received guideline consistent care had significantly improved survival compared to those who did not. Overall, we found only moderate improvement in guideline adherence and three-year overall survival during the 13-year study time period. This study showed underutilization of stage specific guideline concordant care for stage I and II/III disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document