Heparin use and venous thromboembolism (VTE) among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with a prior history of VTE

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6616-6616
Author(s):  
G. Cherkowski ◽  
J. Dietrich ◽  
F. Chen ◽  
J. Fryzek ◽  
K. Bridges

6616 Background: Heparin is an effective treatment option for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients on chemotherapy. To date, information on the use of both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and non-LMWH in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy that have had a prior VTE is lacking. We evaluated heparin treatment patterns as well as the incidence of VTE in a cohort of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, who have had a VTE prior to their cancer diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a large claims database representing the U.S. commercially-insured population. The cohort included all patients 18–64 years old from 2000 to 2007 who were diagnosed with cancer, were on chemotherapy, and who had a VTE occurring up to 12 months before cancer (n=331). We defined a diagnosis of cancer as two ICD-9 claims 30 days apart or more. A combination of ICD-9, HCPCS, and CPT codes were used to capture chemotherapy treatment after cancer. A VTE was identified by a single ICD-9 claim of 415.1, 451.2, 451.81, 451.9, 453.1, 453.2, 453.8, or 453.9. VTE claims occurring within 6 months of the index claim were considered part of the same VTE event. A patient was considered to have a VTE after cancer if they had a VTE claim that occurred both after the cancer diagnosis and at least 6 months beyond the most recent pre-cancer index VTE date. Results: Fifty-one percent of cancer patients with a history of VTE were prescribed an anticoagulant (n = 171). Fewer patients took LMWH compared to non-LMWH (6.7% versus 27.8%) while a portion took both (17.2%). A VTE after cancer was experienced by 49.1% of those on any kind of anticoagulant, 45.4% of those taking LMWH, 43.5% of those taking non-LMWH, and 59.6% of those who had taken both types. Fewer VTEs were reported among those taking no anticoagulants (29.4%). Conclusions: Approximately half of all cancer patients receiving chemotherapy were receiving heparin, with a smaller proportion using only LMWH. Even with prophylaxis, VTE recurs in half of cancer patients with a VTE history who receive chemotherapy. Recurrent VTE is a serious risk despite heparin or LMWH prophylaxis. [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18636-e18636
Author(s):  
Cinduja Nathan

e18636 Background: Transitions of care are an important part of medical care, as they provide opportunities to address patient concerns, refine goals to match current needs and prevent unforeseen complications and comorbidities. One such common and prevalent comorbidity amongst cancer patients is venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. Common VTE events include the occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or both at the time of diagnosis or any time thereafter. It is estimated that approximately 4–20% of cancer patients will experience a VTE. Cancer patients developing VTE is a serious concern as it can adversely affect the patients’ quality of life and reduce overall survival rates and prognosis. Methods: This study is designed as a case control study. The subject group consists of 87 cancer patients who had one or several VTE events after their cancer diagnosis. Patients were selected from the UVM Medical Center electronic health record database. The goal of this project was to quantify and compare the average number of transitions of care in cancer patients with and without venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. This was achieved by reviewing the patients charts three months following a VTE event and evaluating whether these patients had a greater number of transitions compared to the three months prior to their VTE event. Transitions of care in our study were defined as office visits, ED visits, and inpatient admissions related to their VTE. Results: Initial evaluation of the results showed that there were more transitions of care amongst cancer patients with a VTE than without. Preliminary data of the 87 patients shows that patients who developed a VTE event after their cancer diagnosis had on average 1.3 more transitions of care within the three months following their VTE event compared to cancer patients without a VTE event. A t test will be used to determine whether the difference between the means (number of transitions of care) of the two groups (cancer patients with VTE and those without VTE) is significant. Conclusions: The implications of having greater transitions of care amongst cancer patients with VTE events are profound. Having more transitions of care exemplifies better implementation, patient care and involvement of health care teams given a history of VTE. Furthermore, the results of this study will provide further insight on ways to improve clinical outcomes and oncology patient care given a history of VTE.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Sargam Kapoor ◽  
Aman Opneja ◽  
Jahnavi Gollamudi ◽  
Lalitha V. Nayak

Introduction: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in patients with cancer and contributes to significant morbidity, treatment delays and mortality. The Khorana score is the most well-validated VTE risk prediction tool that guides use of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with cancer. The Khorana score includes cancer type, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin, platelet count and leukocyte count but not a prior history of VTE which may increase the risk of recurrent VTE. Scant published data have suggested that a personal history of VTE increases the risk of VTE recurrence by 2 to 7-fold after cancer diagnosis. In this study, we examine the impact of history of VTE on VTE recurrence in a large cohort of patients with cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cancer using aggregated de-identified data from electronic medical record of >300 major hospitals in US (IBM Watson Explorys). Patients with a personal history of VTE (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism) more than one year prior to the diagnosis of cancer were included. Within this cohort, patients who developed recurrent VTE within 180 days of diagnosis of cancer were identified. The primary end-point was the incidence of cancer associated VTE (CVTE) in patients with prior history of VTE as compared to patients without history of VTE. Baseline characteristics including age, race, gender, BMI, prothrombotic mutations (Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene 20210A mutation), antineoplastic agent use, cancer type and laboratory values (as included in Khorana risk score) were compared in all patients. Results: A total of 4,159,400 patients with a diagnosis of cancer were included. Of these, 138,820 patients (3.3%) had a history of VTE >1 year prior to being diagnosed with cancer. The incidence of CVTE at 180 days was 10-fold higher in those with prior history of VTE compared to those without (36.9% vs 3.66%; OR 15.4, 95% CI 15.22-15.6, P value <0.0001). While the inherent risk of CVTE varied based on cancer type (highest risk of 10.5% in pancreatic cancer), the risk of recurrent VTE in patients with prior VTE history is magnified to a similar degree across all cancer types as shown in Figure 1. Baseline characteristics including age, race, gender and cancer type distribution were similar in all groups, as shown in Table 1. Factor V Leiden mutation or activated protein C resistance (FVL/APC) was more prevalent in patients with prior history of VTE and subsequent CVTE (3%) as compared to all patients with CVTE regardless of history (1%), as shown in Table 1. A higher BMI was noted in patients with prior history of VTE (49% and 71% respectively in patients with and without CVTE) as compared to 41% in all patients with CVTE. Greater use of antineoplastic agents (41%) was noted in the group of patients with prior history of VTE and subsequent CVTE as compared to patients with prior VTE but no CVTE (36%). Conclusion: Our study highlights that a prior personal history of VTE >1 year before cancer diagnosis significantly increases the risk of cancer associated VTE independently, regardless of other established risk factors for VTE suggesting that this group of patients, especially those undergoing anti-cancer treatment may benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation. Increased incidence of FVL/ APC in patients with prior history of VTE and recurrent CVTE may reflect increased testing for prothrombotic mutations in this cohort. Our ongoing efforts include examining the effect of addition of history of VTE to the Khorana score. Finally, large prospective observational studies would be key to assess the impact of history of VTE on cancer thrombosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2005 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Johnston ◽  
Patrick Brill-Edwards ◽  
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg ◽  
Stephen G. Pauker ◽  
Mark H. Eckman

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 175-175
Author(s):  
Deborah M Siegal ◽  
Joshua O. Cerasuolo ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Peter L. Gross ◽  
Moira Kapral ◽  
...  

Abstract Cancer is a risk factor for thrombosis, but unlike venous thrombosis, its association with ischemic stroke, and its impact on stroke management and post-stroke outcomes are not well characterized. The primary objective of this study was to measure and compare the risk of ischemic stroke in individuals with a new diagnosis of cancer and those without a history of cancer in two separate matched cohorts based on the absence (Matched Cohort 1) or presence (Matched Cohort 2) of a prior diagnosis of ischemic stroke (Figure 1). Methods: We conducted a population-based matched cohort study of adults ≥18 years using linked clinical and administrative health databases in Ontario, Canada (2010 to 2019). Individuals with a new diagnosis of cancer were matched (1:1) to cancer-free controls by age and sex. Cancer diagnoses were determined using ICD-O-3 diagnostic codes (basal and squamous cell carcinoma and primary central nervous system tumors were excluded). For cancer patients, the index date was the diagnosis date and a corresponding dummy index date was assigned to the matched cancer-free control. The primary outcome was the incidence of ischemic stroke (time to ischemic stroke following index) determined using validated ICD-9 or -10 diagnostic codes from hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Analyses were conducted separately, in parallel, for each cohort. Standardized differences were used to compare the distributions of baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) curves were generated for ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality. Competing risk methods were used to calculate sub-distribution adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ischemic stroke, where death was treated as a competing event. Interactions with the timeline at 1.5 years after index were incorporated to assess if the hazard ratio for the main exposure (cancer vs cancer-free) varied before and after the 1.5-year mark. Regression analyses were adjusted using baseline characteristics for which there was imbalance between groups. Results: Matched Cohort 1 included 620,647 individuals with cancer and 620,647 controls. Matched Cohort 2 included 13,924 individuals with cancer and 13,924 controls. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced (Table 1). Use of antithrombotic medications (prior to index) among individuals ≥66 years was similar between the groups (data not shown). CIF curves for ischemic stroke and mortality are shown in Figure 2. In Matched Cohort 1 (no history of stroke), the risk of ischemic stroke was increased in cancer patients compared to cancer-free controls 1.5 years post-index (aHR 1.40, 95%CI 1.34-1.47). From 1.5 years to 5 years, the risk of ischemic stroke was lower in cancer patients compared to controls (aHR 0.72, 95%CI 0.69-0.74). In Matched Cohort 2 (prior history of ischemic stroke), the risk of ischemic stroke was similar at 1.5 years after the index date in individuals with and without cancer (aHR 1.00, 95%CI 0.88-1.14). From 1.5 to 5 years, the risk of ischemic stroke was reduced (aHR 0.53, 95%CI 0.46-0.62) in cancer patients compared to controls. Conclusions: Compared to cancer-free controls, the risk of ischemic stroke among individuals with a new cancer diagnosis depended on the presence or absence of prior history of ischemic stroke, a novel finding not previously reported. In individuals without a prior history of stroke, those with cancer had a 1.5-fold higher risk of ischemic stroke at 1.5 years compared to controls. In individuals with a prior history of stroke, those with cancer had a similar risk of stroke compared to controls. At 5 years post-index, the risk of ischemic stroke was lower in cancer patients in both cohorts which may reflect high early mortality rates and lower stroke risk among long-term survivors of cancer. The risk of death among cancer patients was highest during the first 1.5 years after the index date in both cohorts. However, the magnitude of the risk increase was higher in individuals without a prior history of stroke (10-fold) compared to those with a prior history of cancer (5-fold). Limitations include unknown causes of death and unavailability of some covariates (e.g. smoking and antithrombotic use in individuals aged <65 years). Future analyses will explore risk of ischemic stroke within common cancer subtypes (breast, prostate, colon, pancreas, lymphoma), and assess stroke risk factors, treatments and outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Siegal: BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Gross: Valeo: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18044-e18044
Author(s):  
Amit Arora ◽  
Tatjana Kolevska ◽  
Jose Jiminez

e18044 Background: Diagnosis of cancer creates an emotionally challenging time for patients. Waiting period between receiving diagnosis, and formal consultation with an Oncologist is associated with fear, shock, and uncertainty. Understanding patients’ preferences during this sensitive period is essential in providing high quality care. We hypothesized that receiving a call from an Oncologist, while waiting for a formal consultation, would help patients cope with cancer diagnosis. Methods: To assess our hypothesis, we surveyed 171 patients across five Kaiser Permanente medical centers. All patients received a call from an Oncology navigator to onboard them, and assure completion of necessary tests before in-person consultation with Oncologist. Of the 171 patients surveyed, 61 patients received an additional call from their assigned Oncologist before a formal in-person consultation. To understand the impact of the call made by the Oncologist, a survey was administered to patients within a few weeks of consultation. The remaining 110 patients who only received a call from an Oncology navigator were also surveyed to determine if a call from an Oncologist before their consultation could have helped them cope better with their cancer diagnosis. Results: Approximately 45 % of surveyed patients (n = 171) preferred a call from an Oncologist before the formal consultation. Conclusions: Brief telephone contact by Oncologist before in-person consultation supports newly diagnosed cancer patients with high-levels of uncertainty and shock. A substantial portion of newly diagnosed cancer patients prefers to speak with an Oncologists in the days after receiving a cancer diagnosis, and those who do receive an Oncologist call, find it beneficial in coping with their diagnosis.[Table: see text]


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e0128730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie Y. Jeon ◽  
Stephen J. Pandol ◽  
Bechien Wu ◽  
Galen Cook-Wiens ◽  
Roberta A. Gottlieb ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (09) ◽  
pp. 435-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Trujillo-Santos ◽  
José Nieto ◽  
Gregorio Tiberio ◽  
Andrea Piccioli ◽  
Pierpaolo Micco ◽  
...  

SummaryCancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) have an increased incidence of recurrences and bleeding complications while on anticoagulant therapy. Methods RIETE is an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with acute VTE. We tried to identify which cancer patients are at a higher risk for recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or major bleeding. Up to May 2007, 3, 805 cancer patients had been enrolled in RIETE. During the first three months of follow-up after the acute, index VTE event, 90 (2.4%) patients developed recurrent PE, 100 (2.6%) recurrent DVT, 156 (4.1%) had major bleeding. Forty patients (44%) died of the recurrent PE,46 (29%) of bleeding. On multivariate analysis, patients aged <65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9–4.9), with PE at entry (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2–3.1), or with <3 months from cancer diagnosis to VTE (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2–3.2) had an increased incidence of recurrent PE. Those aged <65 years (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0–2.4) or with <3 months from cancer diagnosis (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5–3.6) had an increased incidence of recurrent DVT. Finally, patients with immobility (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2–2.7), metastases (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1–2.3), recent bleeding (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1–5.1), or with creatinine clearance <30 ml/ min (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5–3.4), had an increased incidence of major bleeding. With some variables available at entry we may identify those cancer patients withVTE at a higher risk for recurrences or major bleeding.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stav Gazal ◽  
Eyal Lebel ◽  
Yosef Kalish ◽  
Chen Makranz ◽  
Moshe E. Gatt ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent, potentially lethal complication in individuals with cancer. Patients with brain tumors are at particularly high risk for VTE. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma, involving the craniospinal axis. The incidence of VTE in patients with PCNSL was reported as very high, occurring mostly in the early period of therapy. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout the treatment of PCNSL. <b><i>Patients:</i></b> All patients &#x3e;18 years of age diagnosed and treated for PCNSL at our institution in 2005–2017 were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 44 patients; mean age at diagnosis was 61.5 years. Three patients (6.8%) had a personal history of thrombosis, 11 (25%) had a history of diabetes or smoking, and 32 (72%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 at diagnosis. During treatment with LMWH, no VTE events were recorded; 2 (4.5%) patients experienced a minor bleeding event and 1 (2.3%) a major bleeding event. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among our 44 patients with PCNSL treated with prophylactic LMWH, no VTE events were recorded, and only 1 (asymptomatic) intracranial bleed was recorded. Within the limitations of a retrospective nonrandomized study, our findings suggest that VTE prophylaxis may be beneficial for individuals with PCNSL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document