Treatment of glioblastoma in Venezuela: Limitations using the current standard of care

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13036-e13036
Author(s):  
E. I. Arbona-Roche ◽  
C. Sucre ◽  
R. Vera-Gimón ◽  
A. Vera-Gimón ◽  
R. Vera-Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Grade 3

e13036 Background: The EORTC/NCIC phase III clinical trial using chemoirradiation with temozolomide (TMZ) 75 mg m-2 x 42d, followed by adyuvant TMZ 150–200 mg m-2 daily x 5d q28d x six cycles set a new standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The applicability of this regimen in developing countries can be problematic. Objectives: To review our experience in Venezuela, contrasting overall survival (OS), 6-month progression-free survival (6PFS), and toxicity in our patients with corresponding outcomes from the EORTC/NCIC trial. Methods: We treated 30 patients with this regimen from March 2001 through July 2004. Results: The median age was 51 years; 17 (60%) were men; 27 (90%) had biopsy or partial resection; 27 (90%) took prophylactic anticonvulsants; and 23 (77%) had prophylaxis against P. jiroveci. Most patients (83%) took the full TMZ treatment during radiation, 7% interrupted TMZ during RT, and 10% could not afford the drug. One patient had Stevens-Johnson syndrome and did not complete RT. Twelve (40%) patients had stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent disease during the adjuvant phase. The 24-month OS was 30%, median OS was 7.5 months, median PFS was 5 months, and 6PFS was 41%. SRS did not have any effect on OS (p = 0.17, logrank). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity was seen in two patients (7%). Conclusions: Except for differences in median OS (7.1 mo) and in 6-PFS (12.6 percentage points) all other measures were reasonably close to the EORTC/NCIC trial. Of concern is the high rate of anticonvulsant prophylaxis using enzyme-inducing drugs and the difficult access to TMZ. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

RTID-05. THE MULTI-ARM GLIOBLASTOMA AUSTRALASIA (MAGMA) TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi193-vi194
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kong ◽  
Hao-Wen Sim ◽  
Eng-Siew Koh ◽  
Hui Gan ◽  
Elizabeth H Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Multiple Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND Survival outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma have not changed significantly since the introduction of concurrent temozolomide with post-surgical radiation followed by adjuvant temozolomide. METHODS Multi-Arm Glioblastoma Australasia (MAGMA) is a recently initiated phase III multi-arm, multi-centre randomized trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, led by the Australian Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO), that will concurrently test multiple treatment questions. Initially, a partial factorial design will be implemented to compare the current standard of care with either or both of (1) neoadjuvant temozolomide and (2) aduvant temozolomide continued beyond six months until progression. MAGMA will transition to a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design as additional tratment question are introduced. Treatment allocation to each question will be balanced (1:1) using minimisation over several stratification factors, including study site, age, IDH-mutation status, surgical extent and randomization to the prior treatment question(s). The primary outcome is overall survival. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival (measured by mRANO), time to first non-temozolomide systemic treatment, clinically significant toxicity as measured by Grade 2/4 adverse events, and health-related quality of life measures. Parsimonious data collection and a streamlined assessment schedule have been incorporated to mitigate the burden of data collection (such as low grade toxicity from temozolomide), and to encourage participation in regional and rural settings. A consortium model has been adopted to foster neuro-oncology expertise and infrastructure and share academic credit and future design opportunities. PROGRESS Recruitment commenced in September 2020. To date, 60 patients have been recruited from an initial sample size target of 250 patients for each of these initial two treatment questions. Of these 60 patients, 45 have been randomized in Question 1 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) whilst 50 randomized in Question 2 (prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy). To date, 14 of the 27 intended sites are open to recruitment.

scholarly journals Characterizing benefit from temozolomide in MGMT promoter unmethylated and methylated glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iyad Alnahhas ◽  
Mouaz Alsawas ◽  
Appaji Rayi ◽  
Joshua D Palmer ◽  
Raju Raval ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract Background The current standard of care for the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). While it is well established that TMZ has better efficacy in patients with MGMT promoter methylation, it remains an area of debate whether TMZ should be omitted when treating GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide separate estimates of median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with methylated and unmethylated GBM treated with RT with or without TMZ. We searched multiple databases from inception to January 13, 2020. Results The median OS for patients with unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ pooled from 5 phase III studies (N = 655) was 14.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.18–15.04) with a median PFS of 4.99 months (95% CI, 4.25–5.72). In contrast, the median OS for patients with methylated GBM pooled from 6 studies (N = 753) was 24.59 months (95% CI, 22.19–26.99) with a median PFS pooled from 7 studies (N = 805) of 9.51 months (95% CI, 7.41–11.61). There is a paucity of prospective data pertaining to OS/PFS in unmethylated patients treated with RT only and therefore a direct comparison was not possible. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides estimates of survival for patients with MGMT methylated or unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ. Further research is needed to delineate whether TMZ should be withheld for patients with unmethylated GBM outside of the setting of clinical trials.

Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study Comparing Concurrent Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Radiation Followed by Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiation in Patients With Stage IIB to IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1678-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Dueñas-González ◽  
Juan J. Zarbá ◽  
Firuza Patel ◽  
Juan C. Alcedo ◽  
Semir Beslija ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To determine whether addition of gemcitabine to concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy and as adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin improves progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years compared with current standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients and Methods Eligible chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naive patients with stage IIB to IVA disease and Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 were randomly assigned to arm A (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 125 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy [XRT] 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, followed by brachytherapy [BCT] 30 to 35 Gy in 96 hours, and then two adjuvant 21-day cycles of cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 on day 1, plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or to arm B (cisplatin and concurrent XRT followed by BCT only; dosing same as for arm A). Results Between May 2002 and March 2004, 515 patients were enrolled (arm A, n = 259; arm B, n = 256). PFS at 3 years was significantly improved in arm A versus arm B (74.4% v 65.0%, respectively; P = .029), as were overall PFS (log-rank P = .0227; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), overall survival (log-rank P = .0224; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), and time to progressive disease (log-rank P = .0012; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in arm A than in arm B (86.5% v 46.3%, respectively; P < .001), including two deaths possibly related to treatment toxicity in arm A. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy followed by BCT and adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy improved survival outcomes with increased but clinically manageable toxicity when compared with standard treatment.

Safety and efficacy of trabectedin when administered in the inpatient vs. outpatient setting in a subset analysis of a phase III randomized clinical trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22516-e22516
Author(s):  
Robin Lewis Jones ◽  
Robert G Maki ◽  
Shreyaskumar Patel ◽  
George C. Wang ◽  
Chu Ri Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Site Preference ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Md Anderson

e22516 Background: Trabectedin (T) has been shown to improve progression free survival (PFS) (4.2 vs 1.5 months, HR 0.55, p < 0.0001) in comparison to dacarbazine (D) in patients (pts) with advanced leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma following failure of prior chemotherapy. Pts randomized to T in this phase III trial (ET743-SAR 3007) received T as a 24 hr IV infusion in either an inpatient (InP) or outpatient (OP) setting, based upon site preference. Here we report the safety, efficacy, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) of pts based on first infusion site of care. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive T (1.5 mg/m2) or D (1 g/m2 over 20-120 min). Site of T infusion was based on institutional preference/standard of care. The site of T administration (InP vs OP) was collected for the first infusion with the assumption that site of care was unchanged for subsequent doses. Results: Of 378 pts treated with T, 100 (27%) and 277 (73%) pts received T as InP or OP, respectively. No differences were observed in PFS or overall survival (OS) by site of care (InP vs OP): Median PFS of 4.1 vs 4.2 months; HR 0.90, p = 0.49 and median OS of 14.3 vs 13.7 months; HR 0.89, p = 0.40. No difference in other efficacy endpoints between InP vs OP were observed: disease control rate (CR+PR+(SD≥18wks)) (38% vs 33%; Odds Ratio [OR] 1.22; p = 0.44) and Overall Response Rate (14% vs 8%; OR 1.76; p = 0.15)). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 87% InP vs 79% OP pts and grade 3-4 SAEs occurred in 43% InP vs 33% OP. The most common grade 3-4 AEs in both groups were increased ALT/AST, hematologic toxicity, nausea and fatigue. The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was similar in both groups at 5.0% InP vs 4.7% OP, as was increased blood creatine phosphokinase at 5.0% InP vs 6.1% OP, and catheter related complications of any grade at 16% InP vs 15% OP. No clinically meaningful differences were observed in PROs measured by MD Anderson Symptom Inventory scores. Conclusions: The majority of patients randomized to the trabectedin arm of the ET743-SAR-3007 Phase III study received trabectedin in the OP setting. Treatment outcomes with trabectedin suggest equivalent efficacy and safety when administered in the InP or OP setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01343277.

P14.90 Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide - real-world study

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii55-ii55
Author(s):  
M J Sousa ◽  
J Magalhães ◽  
R Basto ◽  
C Costa ◽  
A Pego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Adjuvant Temozolomide ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumour in adults. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM is maximal surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes and identify predictors of survival among these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a single-centre retrospective analysis of GBM patients treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant TMZ from 2013 to 2020. The analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), each one evaluated starting from initial diagnosis, were performed. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan- Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were identified. The median age was 61 years (range 18- 80), 51 (88%) patients were in ECOG-PS 0–1, 6 (10%) patients had isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 53 (91%) of patients had undergone debulking surgery. At a median follow-up of 21 months, median OS was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7–15.9), whereas median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.5–10.5). The 1-year survival rate was 42% and the 2-year survival rate was 10%. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 11 (19%) patients. Twenty-five (42%) patients completed at least 6 cycles of TMZ monotherapy with statistically significant differences between this sub-group and those who weren’t able to continue TMZ monotherapy [median OS 19.3 months (95% CI 14.4–24.2) vs 10.6 months (95% CI 7.8–13.4) p&lt;0.001]. ECOG-PS = 0 [median OS 16.7 months (95% CI 13.4–20.0, p=0.001)] and patients under 65 years of age [median OS 15.6 months (95% CI 12.3–18.9, p=0.02) were associated with significantly better median OS. CONCLUSION The current standard of care treatment for GBM remains poor. An important factor predictor of survival is the completion of the 6 maintenance cycles of TMZ. At baseline, ECOG PS and the patient’s age could be used to define patient prognosis.

An international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study (MONET1) of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7512-LBA7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Scagliotti ◽  
I. Vynnychenko ◽  
Y. Ichinose ◽  
K. Park ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Model ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc

LBA7512 Background: This study evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2 and 3; PDGFR and Kit) plus C/P improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo + C/P in patients (pts) with nonsquamous NSCLC and in a subset of pts with adenocarcinoma. Methods: Pts had stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC. The study initially enrolled all histologies but was amended to exclude pts with squamous NSCLC owing to a high rate of hemoptysis. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive up to six 3-wk cycles of C (AUC 6 mg/mL·min) and P (200 mg/m2) with either motesanib 125 mg QD (Arm A) or placebo QD (Arm B) orally continuously. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR) and association between placental growth factor (PLGF) change and OS. OS was evaluated using a stratified Cox model and 2-sided log-rank test (α=0.03 for nonsquamous pts and α=0.02 for adenocarcinoma pts). Results: 1090 pts with nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized (Arm A/B, n=541/549); 890 had adenocarcinoma (n=448/442). 61% were men; median age was 60 years (range 21–87); 83% had stage IV disease. At the time of analysis, 753 pts had died (608 pts with adenocarcinoma). Median follow-up was 10.6 mo. OS was not significantly improved in Arm A compared with Arm B (Table). In Arm A, PLGF analysis did not show an association with OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs in Arms A/B was 73/59%. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than B included neutropenia (22/15%), diarrhea (9/1%), hypertension (7/1%) and cholecystitis (3/0%). The incidence of grade 5 AEs was 14/9% in Arms A/B. Conclusions: In pts with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, treatment with motesanib + C/P did not significantly improve OS compared with C/P alone. [Table: see text]

Comparison of two doses of cabazitaxel plus prednisone in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a docetaxel (D)-containing regimen.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4692-TPS4692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario A. Eisenberger ◽  
Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard ◽  
Loic Mourey ◽  
Paul N. Mainwaring ◽  
Daniel Ford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

TPS4692^ Background: The phase III TROPIC study (NCT00417079) reported a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for cabazitaxel (Cbz) + prednisone (P;CbzP) (25 mg/m2 IV Q3W/10 mg PO QD) vs mitoxantrone (M) + P (MP) (median OS 15.1 vs 12.7 mos; HR 0.70; P < 0.0001) in pts with mCRPC (also known as hormone-refractory prostate cancer) previously treated with a D-containing regimen. CbzP is approved by the FDA, EMA and other health authorities for the treatment of pts with mCRPC that has progressed after a D-containing regimen. Cbz toxicity is consistent with other taxanes; compared with M, more hematologic toxicities are reported (primarily Grade 3–4 neutropenia). Phase I/II studies identified 20 and 25 mg/m2 as recommended doses; 25 mg/m2 was selected for the phase III TROPIC study. As pooled data show Grade 3–4 neutropenia incidence is lower with Cbz < 25 mg/m2 (61%) vs ≥ 25 mg/m2 (74%), it is of interest to assess if reducing the Cbz approved dose in mCRPC lessens hematologic toxicity and is non-inferior in terms of efficacy. Methods: PROSELICA (NCT01308580) is a randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III study comparing 20 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 Cbz for efficacy and tolerability. Pts with a life expectancy > 6 mos, ECOG PS ≤ 2, histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma resistant to hormone therapy and previously treated with a D-containing regimen are eligible. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive Cbz 20 mg/m² or 25 mg/m² IV Q3W + P 10 mg PO QD, treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent (max 10 cycles), and stratified according to ECOG PS, measurable disease (yes/no) and region. The primary endpoint is OS (non-inferiority design). Secondary endpoints include safety, progression-free survival (PCWG2 criteria), PSA and pain progression and response, tumor response in pts with measurable disease and health-related quality of life. Cbz PK and pharmacogenomics will be assessed in pt subgroups. Planned enrollment is 1,200 pts. Study start was in May 2011; as of Jan 2012, 270 pts had been enrolled. The first DMC meeting recommended continuing the study without change.

First-line use of cabazitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A three-arm study in comparison with docetaxel.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4696-TPS4696
Author(s):  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Lisa Sengelov ◽  
Paul N. Mainwaring ◽  
Antoine Thiery- Vuillemin ◽  
Christine Theodore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Ecog Ps

TPS4696^ Background: Docetaxel (D) in combination with prednisone (P) as first-line (1L) chemotherapy in patients (pts) with mCRPC is the current standard of care. However, treatment is not curative and D-resistant disease typically develops. Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is a novel taxane active in D-sensitive and -resistant tumor models. Clinical activity of Cbz plus P (CbzP) was demonstrated in the Phase III TROPIC study in mCRPC pts previously treated with a D-containing regimen; CbzP showed a significant overall survival (OS) benefit vs mitoxantrone plus prednisone (median OS 15.1 vs 12.7 months; HR 0.70; P < 0.0001). Therefore, it is of interest to determine if CbzP provides an OS advantage vs DP in 1L mCRPC pts. Methods: The phase III FIRSTANA study (NCT01308567) is a randomized, open-label, multinational trial in 1L mCRPC pts, designed to compare the efficacy of Cbz 25 mg/m² IV Q3W (Arm A) and Cbz 20 mg/m² IV Q3W (Arm B) vs D 75 mg/m2 IV Q3W (Arm C). P 10 mg PO QD is to be given concomitantly. Pts are stratified by ECOG PS (0–1 vs 2), measurable disease (yes/no) and region (depending on availability of Cbz as 2L). Pts with ECOG PS ≤ 2, histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, with no prior chemotherapy and with disease progression following medical or surgical castration are eligible. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) (PCWG2 criteria), radiologic PFS, tumor response in measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), PSA response and PSA PFS, pain response and pain PFS, time to occurrence of any skeletal-related events, safety profile and health-related quality of life. Cbz pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics will be assessed in pt subgroups. Pts will be treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity or pt request. Planned enrollment is 1,170 pts; study size was calculated to achieve 90% power for OS. Study start was in May 2011; at January 2012, 219 pts were enrolled. The first DMC meeting recommended continuing the study without change.

FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer patients age 75 years or older.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 362-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Mizrahi ◽  
Jane Rogers ◽  
Kenneth R. Hess ◽  
Robert A. Wolff ◽  
Gauri Rajani Varadhachary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Md Anderson ◽  
Number Of Cycles

362 Background: Although FOLFIRINOX (5-Fluorouracil + leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin) is now the standard of care for patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) based on the 2011 study by Conroy et al. which demonstrated improved median overall survival (mOS) (11.1 vs 6.8 months [m] with gemcitabine, P < 0.001), pts > 75 yrs old were excluded from this study. As per SEER 2011-2015 data, 38% of new PC cases are diagnosed in pts age > 75. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in this group of pts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed unresectable PC pts, age ≥ 75, treated with FOLFIRINOX at MD Anderson since 2011. Data obtained include demographics, line of treatment (tx), starting dose, progression free survival (PFS), OS and toxicities. Response was determined by chart documentation. Primary outcomes were mOS and rates of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity (HT). Results: A total of 24 pts (19 male) were included with median age of 76 (range 75 to 84). 18 had metastatic disease, and FOLFIRINOX was the 1st line of tx for 18 of the 24 pts. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range 1 to 12). The most frequent starting doses of infusional 5-FU, irinotecan and oxaliplatin were 2400, 150 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. Bolus 5-FU and leucovorin were omitted in all but 3 pts. Median PFS was 3.7 m (95% CI: 3.0-5.7) with mOS of 11.6 m (95% CI: 6.14-15.7). 16 pts (67%) experienced disease control (response to tx or stable disease). Grade 3 or 4 HT occurred in 11 pts (46%), and 9 (38%) were supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor at some point during tx. 6 pts (25%) required hospital admission for any toxicity, most commonly infection (3 pts), and 10 (42%) stopped FOLFIRINOX due to toxicity, most commonly fatigue (6 pts). Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective analysis of 24 unresectable PC pts age 75 or older given FOLFIRINOX, OS outcomes were similar to those reported by Conroy et al in the original trial which excluded pts older than 75. In our review, toxicities including incidences of grade 3 or 4 HT were similar to those reported in the initial study. These data indicate that the use of modified dosing FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC pts older than 75 appears to maintain similar efficacy and toxicity when compared to younger pts.

Efficacy of concurrent cetuximab (CTX) and nivolumab (NIVO) in previously untreated recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6017-6017
Author(s):  
Christine H. Chung ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Conor Ernst Steuer ◽  
Jiannong Li ◽  
Priyanka Bhateja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

6017 Background: Current standard of care for patients (pts) with previously untreated R/M HNSCC that are incurable is either pembrolizumab (pembro) with/without chemotherapy depending on the Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS). We evaluated the combination of CTX and NIVO for its efficacy. Methods: Pts were treated with CTX 500 mg/m2 IV on Day (D) -14 as a lead-in followed by CTX 500 mg/m2 IV and NIVO 240 mg/m2 IV on D1 and D15 every 28-D cycle (C). Pts with CTX infusion reaction or who did not receive C1D1 for any reason were non-evaluable and replaced. NIVO dose reduction was not allowed. Results: Fifty-four evaluable pts were analyzed. Median age was 62 (42-85). ECOG performance status at baseline was 0 (20, 37%), 1 (30, 56%), and 2 (4, 7%). Primary sites were oral cavity 19 (35%), oropharynx 22 (41%), hypopharynx 3 (6%), larynx 9 (17%), and unknown primary 1 (2%). p16 status is positive 22 (41%), negative 29 (54%), and unknown 3 (6%). PD-L1 CPS is < 1 in 6 (11%), >1 in 26 (48%), and unknown 22 (41%). Median follow up time for overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in ≥2 pts were hypomagnesemia 2 (4%), hypophosphatemia 2 (4%), fatigue 4 (7%), and rash-acneiform 4 (7%). The only grade 4 TRAEs were hypomagnesemia in 1 (2%) and CTX infusion reaction in 1 (2%). The most common grade 3 immune-related adverse event (IRAE) occurring in ≥2 was fatigue 2 (4%). No grade 4 IRAEs is observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 7.8 and 14.5 months, while 1-year PFS and 1-year OS were 39% and 61%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either PFS and OS based on tumor p16 or PD-L1 status. Conclusions: The clinical trial met its primary endpoint of 1-year OS. Our data indicate the combination of CTX and NIVO is safe and effective in pts with previously untreated incurable R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03370276.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document