Locally advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
U. Pluschnig ◽  
J. Zacherl ◽  
S. Schoppmann ◽  
M. Raderer ◽  
G. Prager ◽  
...  

136 Background: Gastric cancer is a worldwide common malignant disease with a high mortality rate. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not result in a survival advantage in Caucasian populations. Therapeutic chemotherapy options consist of either monotherapy or of polychemotherapy and have been applied as neoadjuvant chemotherapy with combinations of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine as well as cisplatin or oxaliplatin. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the use of the EOX regimen in the neoadjuvant setting which had shown activity in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 23 patients (pts) (median age: 70, range 36-85, years; 16 pts >65 years) with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the upper GI-tract received 3 courses of preoperative chemotherapy with epirubicin 50 mg/m2, day1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, day 1, and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2, days 1-14, of a 3-week cycle. Toxicity was assessed by CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) after every cycle. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from surgery to disease progression assessed by PET-CT which was performed at diagnosis and after 3 cycles chemotherapy. Results: 20 pts completed all three planned cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, 2 pts received only 1 cycle because of rapid tumor progression and 1 pt. is currently still on treatment. 16 pts. underwent surgery with curative resection with 2 pCRs on pathological review. 6 pts. remained inoperable despite chemotherapy and 1 pt is currently scheduled for surgery. After surgery, 2 pts. died after a median of 9 months (8-10). 4 pts. died without surgery due to disease progression. After a median follow-up of eight months (range 5-26), median PFS and overall survival was not reached yet. In 2 pts., grade 3-4 toxicities including nausea, diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome and one non-life-threatening pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusions: In summary, EOX is a well tolerated, safe, and efficacious neoadjuvant treatment in also elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the upper GI-tract. However, more studies with a larger population are needed to corroborate the current results of this promising treatment schedule. [Table: see text]

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (35) ◽  
pp. 5210-5218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schuhmacher ◽  
Stephan Gretschel ◽  
Florian Lordick ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  

PurposePatients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from combined pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, although fewer than 50% could receive postoperative chemotherapy. We examined the value of purely preoperative chemotherapy in a phase III trial with strict preoperative staging and surgical resection guidelines.Patients and MethodsPatients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (AEG II and III) were randomly assigned to preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery or to surgery alone. To detect with 80% power an improvement in median survival from 17 months with surgery alone to 24 months with neoadjuvant, 282 events were required.ResultsThis trial was stopped for poor accrual after 144 patients were randomly assigned (72:72); 52.8% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach, including AEG type II and III. The International Union Against Cancer R0 resection rate was 81.9% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared with 66.7% with surgery alone (P = .036). The surgery-only group had more lymph node metastases than the neoadjuvant group (76.5% v 61.4%; P = .018). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant arm (27.1% v 16.2%; P = .09). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years and 67 deaths, a survival benefit could not be shown (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35; P = .466).ConclusionThis trial showed a significantly increased R0 resection rate but failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Possible explanations are low statistical power, a high rate of proximal gastric cancer including AEG and/or a better outcome than expected after radical surgery alone due to the high quality of surgery with resections of regional lymph nodes outside the perigastic area (celiac trunc, hepatic ligament, lymph node at a. lienalis; D2).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document