Prognostic factors and survial of advanced renal cell carcinoma with predominant sarcomatoid histology.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 400-400
Author(s):  
I. Park ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
J. Ahn ◽  
D. Lee ◽  
C. Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Sarcomatoid Carcinoma ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Pathologic Features

400 Background: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) is known to have aggressive clinical course and poor response to treatment. Very limited data of clinical feature, prognostic factor, and survival are available for advanced disease with predominant sarcomatoid histology. We evaluated clinical features, response to treatment, and prognostic factors for survival. Methods: Between 2001 and 2010, 30 patients with metastatic or recurrent RCC with predominant sarcomatoid histology (sarcomatoid component 30% or more for resected kidney or exclusive sarcomatoid carcinoma on needle biopsy) were treated at our institution. We reviewed these patients' records to identify clinical and pathologic features which could affect survival. The role of nephrectomy and systemic therapy on patient outcome was also investigated. Results: There were 20 male and 10 female patients with a median age of 58 years (range, 43–83). Twenty patients had initially metastatic disease and 16 patients (53%) had ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–1. The most frequent metastatic site was lung (57%) followed by bone (43%) and distant lymph nodes (23%). Fourteen (70%) out of 20 patients with initially metastatic disease underwent primary nephrectomy and six patients also underwent metastasectomy. The median % of sarcomatoid component was 80% (range, 30–100%). All patients (N=10) who received immunotherapy had progressive disease as their best response and only one out of 5 patients treated with sunitinib or everolimus had a partial response. With a median follow-up duration of 22 months, the median survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 0∼7.5) with 6-month survival rate of 43%. Only ECOG PS had impact on survival (P<0.001: ECOG=0, 14.1 months; ECOG=1, 7.4 months; ECOG=2, 3.2 months, and ECOG=3, 1.64 months). Survivals for initially metastatic disease were not significantly different whether patients underwent nephrectomy or not (2.0 months vs. 3.4 months, HR=0.62, 95% CI, 0.16–2.44 after correcting for potential prognostic factors). Conclusions: Patients with SRCC have a fulminant clinical course and the majority of patients had disease progression irrespective of any treatment. Only performance status dose have impact on overall survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Interferon alfa-2a in advanced renal cell carcinoma: treatment results and survival in 159 patients with long-term follow-up.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1368-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
L M Minasian ◽  
R J Motzer ◽  
L Gluck ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
V Vlamis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Duration

PURPOSE Three trials were conducted to define the efficacy and toxicity of interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively, 159 patients were treated with interferon alfa-2a. In the first trial, 42 patients received 50 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly three times per week. In the second trial, 64 patients received gradually escalating doses of interferon alfa-2a from 3 to 36 x 10(6) U subcutaneously administered daily. The third trial was randomized; 25 patients received daily interferon alfa-2a alone and 28 were treated with daily interferon alfa-2a and 0.15 mg/kg vinblastine every 3 weeks. RESULTS The overall response proportion was 10% (two complete and 14 partial responses). The median response duration was 12.2 months. The median survival duration was 11.4 months, with 3% of patients alive at 5 or more years. A univariate statistical analysis showed that a Karnofsky performance status > or = 80, prior nephrectomy, and interval from diagnosis to treatment of longer than 365 days were significant prognostic factors for survival. In a multivariate analysis, only prior nephrectomy and Karnofsky performance status > or = 80 were shown to be independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION Interferon alfa-2a had minimal antitumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and long-term survival was achieved in a small proportion of patients. The need for continued investigation and the identification of more effective therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma is evident from the poor overall survival rate observed in these 159 patients. The investigation of new agents and of interferon alfa-2a in combination with other agents remains a priority.

Impact of pathologic tumor characteristics in patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 343-343
Author(s):  
B. Shuch ◽  
G. Bratslavsky ◽  
J. H. Shih ◽  
D. Finley ◽  
B. Castor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma

343 Background: Patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) are known to have a poor prognosis and response to therapy. We sought to determine the influence of pathologic tumor characteristics on outcome in order to aid clinical management. Methods: A single center database was reviewed from 1989-2009 to identify all patients with sRCC. Clinical and staging variables were collected and pathologic information including histology, necrosis, percentage of sarcomatoid features (PSF), and microvascular invasion (MVI) was recorded. Influence of clinicopathologic variables on outcome was assessed. Results: A total of 104 patients had confirmed sRCC. The median size of tumors was 9.5 cm (range 2.5-30), 65% of patients had areas of clear cell RCC, and 69.2% had metastatic disease at presentation. The PSF did not influence tumor size, stage, necrosis, MVI, nodes, or metastasis. A total of 85 patients (81.7%) died during the follow-up period with a median survival of 5.9 months. In the overall cohort poor performance status, metastatic disease, and MVI were independent predictors of poor survival. Increased PSF was associated with worse outcome, but it failed to reach significance on multivariate analysis. In a subset analysis of those with non-metastatic disease, MVI and non-clear histology influenced prognosis, but only PSF was the only predictor of outcome. Conclusions: The PSF has limited influence on pathologic characteristics. However, increased PSF amounts may impact survival, especially in those with non-metastatic disease. The presence of MVI is an independent predictor of poor outcome while carcinoma grade and subtype have limited impact on survival. When counseling patients or designing clinical trials for these patients, PSF and MVI, not carcinoma grade or subtype should be considered. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The Role of Radiotherapy for Adult Renal Cell Carcinoma

1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
S. Dal Fior ◽  
A. Bordin ◽  
T. Iannone
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Long Survival ◽  
Radiotherapy Techniques

In this paper the most important articles about the role of radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma (CPR) are reviewed. Both pre- and post-operative radiotherapy do not seem to improve the survival rates, nor perhaps the local control in comparison with surgery. But trials have been limited and with evident bias: patients were staged without stratification for prognostic factors (grading and lymphonode metastases in particular) and radiotherapy techniques were often incorrect because of too frequent early and late damage. The role of radiotherapy for treating the metastatic disease is undisputed Particularly for patients with a single metastasis, because of the possibility of long survival if adequately controlled.

scholarly journals PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

1996 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 1099-1104
Author(s):  
Hideshi Inomiya ◽  
Shigeo Isaka ◽  
Tatsuya Okano ◽  
Jun Shimazaki ◽  
Tatsuo Igarashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell

Randomized clinical trials and real life studies: Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients in oral target therapies for renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110055
Author(s):  
Ruggero Lasala ◽  
Fiorenzo Santoleri ◽  
Alessia Romagnoli ◽  
Felice Musicco ◽  
Paolo Abrate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Target Therapies ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Introduction Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) constitute scientific evidence in support of therapeutic choices when a drug is authorized in the market. In RCTs, patients are selected in a rigorous manner, in order to avoid bias that may influence efficacy assessments. Therefore, patients who take the drug in Real Life Studies (RLSs) are not the same as those participating in RCTs, which, in turn, leads to low data transferability from RCTs to RLS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between RCTs and RLS, in terms of patient baseline characteristics. Materials and Methods Our study includes all oral target therapies for RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma) marketed in Europe before March 31, 2019. For each treatment, we considered both RCTs and RLSs, the former gathered from Summary of Product Characteristics published on the European Medicine Agency (EMA) website, and the latter yielded by our search in relevant literature. For each drug considered, we then compared the baseline characteristics of patients included in the RCT samples with those of the samples included in the RLSs using the Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests. Results We considered six medicines, for a total of 9 pivotal RCTs and 31 RLSs. RCTs reported the same type of patient baseline characteristics, whereas RLSs are more varied in reporting. Some patient baseline characteristics (metastases, previous treatments, etc.) were significantly different between RCTs and RLs. Other characteristics, such as ECOG Performance Status, brain metastases, and comorbidities, liver and kidney failure, are comprised in exclusion criteria of RCTs, though are included in RLS. Discussion and Conclusion: While evaluating equal treatments for the same indications, RCTs and RLSs do not always assess patients with the same characteristics. It would be necessary to produce evidence from RLSs so as to have an idea of treatment effectiveness in patients groups that are not eligible or underrepresented in RCTs.

scholarly journals Tumor Biology and Prognostic Factors in Renal Cell Carcinoma

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (S2) ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Finley ◽  
Allan J. Pantuck ◽  
Arie S. Belldegrun
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Tumor Biology
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document