A phase II study of foretinib in triple-negative, recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: NCIC CTG trial IND.197 (NCT01147484).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1036-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Rayson ◽  
Sasha M. Lupichuk ◽  
Stephen K. L. Chia ◽  
Kylea R. Potvin ◽  
Susan Dent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Luminal Breast Cancer ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
Grade 3

1036 Background: Met, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is preferentially expressed in basal-like compared to luminal breast cancer. In murine models, overexpression of the oncogenic Met receptor transgene induces tumors with human basal gene expression characteristics supporting Met inhibition as a treatment strategy for triple negative (TN) breast cancer. Foretinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor of Met, RON, AXL, TIE-2 and VEGF receptors with anti-tumor activity in advanced HCC and papillary renal cell cancer. Methods: Patients (pts) with TN breast cancer and 0-1 prior regimens for metastatic disease received daily foretinib 60 mg po in a 2-stage single arm trial. Primary endpoints were objective response and early progression rates per RECIST 1.1. Tumor samples were centrally reviewed to confirm ER/PR/HER2 status and for correlative studies including Met, PTEN and EGFR expression. Stage 1 accrual required 23 response-evaluable Met unselected patients with accrual continuing if >/= 1 response or < 17 early progressions (PD <= 8 weeks on study) were observed. Results: Accrual is 29 pts to date; 24 are eligible, 22 evaluable for toxicity and 15 for response. Median age is 56 y (43-81), ECOG PS 0-1 in 23/24. Grade 3 laboratory adverse events were: lymphopenia (9%), elevations in ALT (5%), GGT (5%) and INR (5%). Treatment-related non-hematologic toxicities included (all/grade 3-4) fatigue (64%/5%), nausea (55%/5%), diarrhea (41%/5%), hypertension (32%/14%), vomiting (27%/0%), anorexia (23%/5%) and rash (14%/0%). Three SAEs possibly related to foretinib included; asymptomatic pulmonary embolism, reversible CHF and pleural effusion with QTc prolongation. One PR (7%), 8 early PD (53%) and 6 SD (40%) have been observed to date with median SD duration of 5.4 months (range 2.7-5.5). Preliminary correlative results (IHC): 5/8 (62.5%) evaluable Met positive cases had SD and 4/5 (80%) Met negative cases had PD as best response. Met IHC was negative in the pt with PR. Conclusions: Foretinib shows preliminary evidence of activity and tolerability in metastatic, TN breast cancer. Stage 2 of accrual will include 15 pts with pre-treatment biopsies of metastases and circulating tumor cell collection.

A phase Ib study of TQB2450 plus anlotinib in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1074-1074
Author(s):  
Jiayu Wang ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Tao Sun ◽  
Quchang Ouyang ◽  
Yiqun Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Qt Interval Prolongation ◽  
Grade 3

1074 Background: TQB2450 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Anlotinib is an antiangiogenic small molecule, multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has improved clinical outcomes in various solid tumors. This phase 1b study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TQB2450 plus anlotinib for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) after the failure of standard therapy. Methods: This ongoing study included a dose-escalation phase and an expansion phase. Advanced TNBC patients with prior anthracyclines and/or taxanes treatment and failed at least first-line therapy were enrolled. In the dose-escalation phase, eligible patients received anlotinib (8mg, 10mg, and 12mg, qd, days 1-14; 21 days per cycle) plus TQB2450 (1200mg, day 1; 21 days per cycle) following the conventional 3+3 design. If the starting dose of 10mg anlotinib led to ≥2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), 8mg anlotinib would be administered. After the dose-escalating phase, eligible patients were enrolled into the expansion cohort. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: Between May 29, 2019, and December 31, 2020, in the dose-escalation phase, three patients receiving 10mg anlotinib plus 1200mg TQB2450 had no DLTs in the first cycle, neither did three patients with 12mg anlotinib plus TQB2450. Next, 28 patients with advanced TNBC received 12 mg anlotinib plus TQB2450 in the expansion phase. Finally, a total of 34 patients were included with median age of 49.5 (32-70) and median prior lines of 2 (1-6). Numbers of patients with prior platinum therapy: 16, prior anthracycline therapy: 32. The ORR was 26.47% (9/34) and DCR was 82.35% (28/34). The median PFS was 8.57 months. Seventeen patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). Most frequently occurring (>5%) grade 3 TRAEs were QT interval prolongation (17.65%), hypertension (14.71%), diarrhea (8.82%), hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (8.82%), and hypertriglyceridemia (5.88%). Conclusions: TQB2450 plus anlotinib showed an acceptable safety profile with promising activity for previously anthracyclines and/or taxanes-treated advanced TNBC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03855358 .[Table: see text]

A multicenter phase I-II trial of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab in women with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1045-1045
Author(s):  
Emmanouil S. Saloustros ◽  
Aristidis Polyzos ◽  
Charalampos Christophyllakis ◽  
Nikolaos K. Kentepozidis ◽  
Lampros Vamvakas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Grade 3

1045 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer cells are unable to repair double stranded DNA breaks and hence have sensitivity to platinum agents. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered weekly is active and well tolerated. Bevacizumab when added to paclitaxel prolonged progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We investigated the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab in triple-negative MBC. Methods: The study’s primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate [complete (CR) + partial remission (PR)] and toxicity of the combination in women with triple negative MBC who had no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The study followed the Simon's two-stage optimal design with 16 patients initially evaluated for response and toxicity and then expanding to a total of 46 patients. The null hypothesis that the objective response rate is ≤40% could be rejected if the number of CR/PR was ≥23. Paclitaxel 90mg/m2and Carboplatin AUC 2 were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks, preceded by bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Results: 45 women with triple negative MBC have been recruited thus far. Of them, 12 were premenopausal and 27 had prior (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy. The median cycles administered were 5 (range 1-8). Of 38 evaluable patients we observed 7 CR, 22 PR’s for an objective response rate 76%. Seven patients achieved stable disease, while two had disease progression. Median duration of response was 8.1 months with median time to progression 9.2 months. Neutropenia grade 3 and 4 was experienced by 13 and 6 patients, respectively, with one toxic death due to febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3 toxicities included anemia/neurotoxicity (n=2), thrombocytopenia/diarrhea (n=1). Conclusions: Although still ongoingthe study has achieved the primary objective of demonstrating clinical activity for weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with bevacizumab in triple negative MBC. We believe that this triplet combination merits further evaluation in this patient population for whom there is no standard treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT00691379.

Preliminary efficacy data of triple-negative breast cancer cohort of NCI 9881 study: A phase II study of cediranib in combination with olaparib in advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1077-1077
Author(s):  
Navid Hafez ◽  
Hatem Hussein Soliman ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
Karen A. Gelmon ◽  
Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast

1077 Background: Cediranib, a pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51 and increases sensitivity of tumors to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in vitro. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, demonstrates clinical efficacy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. We therefore tested the anti-tumor activity of the combination of cediranib and olaparib in patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: This multi-institutional, two-stage, phase II study enrolled patients with metastatic TNBC previously treated with a minimum of one prior line of systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients were treated with cediranib 30mg po daily plus olaparib 200mg po BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Baseline tumor biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 37pts enrolled are summarized below. The overall objective response rate was 14% (95% CI: 0.025, 0.2453). Median duration of response was 2.0 months (mos) with a range of 1.8 to 6.3 mos. Disease control rate ((# of pts with CR, PR or SD)/(# of evaluable pts)) was 81% (95% CI: 0.6846, 0.937). Median PFS was 3.7 mos (95% CI: 2.1, 4.3). Grade 3/4 adverse events (G3/4 AEs), irrespective of attribution, occurred in 25 of 38 (66%).G3/4 AEs occurring in > 5% of pts were hypertension (24%) and dyspnea (11%), diarrhea (8%) vomiting (8%). Conclusions: The cediranib/olaparib combination resulted in promising objective responses in 14% of biomarker-unselected patients with heavily pre-treated, metastatic TNBC. The regimen required prompt initiation of antihypertensives, but AEs were overall manageable. Analyses of mutation status in homologous recombination DNA repair genes are ongoing and will be correlated with clinical outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02498613 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Weekly Paclitaxel given concurrently with Durvalumab has a favorable safety profile in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem Ghebeh ◽  
Adher Al-Sayed ◽  
Riham Eiada ◽  
Leilani Cabangon ◽  
Dahish Ajarim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

AbstractTherapeutic anti-PD-L1 antibodies are safe as a monotherapy, albeit with minimal efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This trial aimed to test the safety and efficacy of Durvalumab and Paclitaxel in metastatic TNBC. In this open-label, one-arm trial, five cycles of weekly paclitaxel were delivered intravenously (IV) concurrent with Durvalumab that was given IV every 2 weeks. The combination was preceded by one cycle of paclitaxel alone, for immunological priming, followed by Durvalumab solo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Between 2017 and 2019, 14 patients received at least one cycle of the combination therapy. The therapy was safe with no-dose limiting toxicity, except one case of skin lesions. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 71% of patients, and there was no death due to the combination therapy. Regardless of grade, the most common AEs were headache and peripheral neuropathy, as each happened in four patients (29%), followed by fatigue and skin rash in three patients (21%) each. Grade 3/4 AEs were experienced by three patients (21%), with the most common being headache and anemia, which happened in two patients (14%). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was observed in five patients with a median duration of 10.0 months. Median Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 and 20.7 months, respectively. The combination of Durvalumab and Paclitaxel is safe, leaving room for additional agents. This is the first report on the combination of Durvalumab and Paclitaxel in the treatment of TNBC (NCT02628132).

scholarly journals Observational study of clinical outcomes of eribulin mesylate in metastatic breast cancer after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (34) ◽  
pp. 3935-3944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S Mougalian ◽  
Bruce A Feinberg ◽  
Edward Wang ◽  
Karenza Alexis ◽  
Debanjana Chatterjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Eribulin Mesylate ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: To examine the effectiveness of eribulin mesylate for metastatic breast cancer post cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKi) 4/6 therapy. Materials & methods: US community oncologists reviewed charts of patients who had received eriublin from 3 February 2015 to 31 December 2017 after prior CDKi 4/6 therapy and detailed their clinical/treatment history, clinical outcomes (lesion measurements, progression, death) and toxicity. Results: Four patient cohorts were created according to eribulin line of therapy: second line, third line, per US label and fourth line with objective response rates/clinical benefit rates of 42.2%/58.7%, 26.1%/42.3%, 26.7%/54.1% and 17.9%/46.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival/6-month progression-free survival (79.5% of all patients censored) by cohort was: 9.7 months/77.3%, 10.3 months/71.3%, not reached/70.4% and 4.0 months/0.0%, respectively. Overall occurrence of neutropenia = 23.5%, febrile neutropenia = 1.3%, peripheral neuropathy = 10.1% and diarrhea = 11.1%. Conclusion: Clinical outcome and adverse event rates were similar to those in clinical trials and other observational studies. Longer follow-up is required to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With ≥ 2 HER2-Directed Regimens: Phase III NALA Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3138-3149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Yin-Hsun Feng ◽  
Ming-Shen Dai ◽  
Shang-Wen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
End Points ◽  
Cns Disease

PURPOSE NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808573 ) is a randomized, active-controlled, phase III trial comparing neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), plus capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib, a reversible dual TKI, plus capecitabine (L+C) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed MBC regimens. METHODS Patients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1:1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS A total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+C, n = 307; L+C, n = 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P = .0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = .2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+C versus L+C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P = .043). ORRs were N+C 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+C 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P = .1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P = .0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+C 83% v L+C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups. CONCLUSION N+C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+C. No new N+C safety signals were observed.

Multicenter study of weekly trastuzumab, paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by a week of rest every 28 days in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1083-1083
Author(s):  
M. Ruiz ◽  
J. Salvador ◽  
J. Bayo ◽  
M. Lomas ◽  
A. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Growth Control ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

1083 Background: The addition of Carboplatin to Trastuzumab and Paclitaxel improves the efficacy in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We have conducted a multicenter Phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of this combination given weekly × 3 followed by 1 week of rest. Primary endpoint was objective response rate and secondary endpoints were time to progression, overall survival and to study the toxicity profile of the combination. Methods: Between August 2003 and April 2006, 40 patients with HER2+ MBC (IHC 3+ or FISH+) have been included in the study. Pats received Trastuzumab (loading dose of 4 mg/kg/wk and 2 mg/kg/d following wks), Paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and Carboplatin (AUC 2) all given weekly × 3 followed by 1 week of rest. Treatment was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 40 pats had baseline data available. Median age was 54 yrs (range 29–75). 38 (95%) pats received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. 11 (27,5%) pats have received one prior CT line for metastatic disease. 87,5% pats had PS 0 or 1 at study entry. Disease sites were liver 16 (40%), bone 12 (30%), lymph nodes 13 (32,5%) and lung 8 (20%). 19 (47,5%) had = 2 lesions. 97,5% had measurable disease. 36 pats have been evaluated for response: 11 CR (31%, 95% CI: 15–46%), 11 PR (31%, 15- 36%), 9 SD (25%, 9–36%), 5 PD (14%, 2–26%) and 4 NE resulting in an ORR of 61% (95% CI: 45–77%) and tumor growth control rate (RR+SD) of 86% of patients (95% CI: 75–97%). Median TTP was 12.1 mo (95% CI: 8.8–19.9 mo) and median duration of response and OS have not been reached yet. For a time of observation of 35 mo, the OS is 80,6%. 37 patients have received 194 cycles with a median of 5 cycles. Grade 3–4 toxicities/pats were: 3(7.5%) anaemia, 2 (5%) leucopenia, 8(20%) neutropenia, 1 (2,5%) febrile neutropenia, 1 (2,5%) trombopenia, 2(5%) asthenia, 2(5%) diarrhea, 3(7.5%) nausea, 2(5%) vomiting, 3(7.5%) mucositis Conclusions: This interim analysis shows an interesting activity with this regimen. One week of rest may be of better convenience for the patient and hospital but also may improve the tolerability profile and efficacy of the combination. Further results would be available for presentation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: Results after completion of stage I: A trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Grade 3

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Real world experience of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18094-e18094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faizan Malik ◽  
Naveed Ali ◽  
Syed Imran Mustafa Jafri ◽  
Mark L. Sundermeyer ◽  
Michael Jeffrey Seidman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Grade 3

e18094 Background: Palbociclib has been approved as a first line therapy in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) and HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC) manifesting significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS). We studied this drug in a community setting. The endpoints were estimated PFS, objective response, toxicities and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of HR+MBC patients receiving palbociclib after its FDA approval. 22 patients were selected Results: A total of 22 patients were included (Male = 2, Female = 20). Median age was 60-years (range, 49-84). About 90% patients had received at least one previous therapy and the median number was 1.5. 13% patients were on fulvestrant, 86% on letrozole and 4.5% on exemestane. About 64% of patients had ECOG status of ≥ 1. Median duration of palbociclib treatment was 5-months, therefore, an estimated PFS at 18-months was 50%. 4.5% patients attained complete response. 22% patients achieved partial response, 22% had stable disease and 50% patients demonstrated disease progression. 72% patients had neutropenia, of which 45% were grade ≥ 3. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were common (63% and 58%, respectively) but grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia or anemia was not observed. 50% patients required dose reductions and 18% required drug cessation owing to side effects. Conclusions: PFS was much lower as compared to actual trials in our real-world experience. Despite, several interesting observations were good objective response rates in males and HER-2+ patients underscoring its potential clinical efficacy in these subsets. Furthermore, apart from myelosuppressive side effects, pneumonitis was observed in one patient necessitating vigilance in clinical practice

Phase II study of apatinib plus vinorelbine, a novel combination of all-oral regimen in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1123-TPS1123
Author(s):  
Anjie Zhu ◽  
Peng Yuan ◽  
Jiayu Wang ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Yang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

TPS1123 Background: Antiangiogenic therapy in combination with chemotherapy is effective in control advanced breast cancer(ABC). Apatinib is an oral, highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2(VEGFR-2). Phase II clinical trials of Apatinib single agent had presented objective response and manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated, metastatic breast cancer. The median progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of single agent in both triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer were 3.3-4.0 months and 10.3-10.6 months, respectively. The overall response rate and disease control rate (DCR) reached 16.7% and 66.7%, respectively. This all-oral phase II study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the oral vinorelbine-Apatinib combination in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer(MBC). Methods: This single arm prospective study enrolled patients with HER2(Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 ) negative advanced breast cancer, pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes, and who failed in the metastatic setting at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. The estimated Enrollment was 40 patients.The primary end point of this study was PFS. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), DCR, OS and safety. Patients were treated with apatinib 500/425mg daily plus oral vinorelbine 60-80 mg/m2 day1,8,15 every 3 weeks/cycle. Starting doses of Apatinib were chosen according to age, weight and patient status. Patients eligible were evaluated by CT or MRI scan at baseline and every 2 cycles (6 weeks) there after until disease progressed. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and graded in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 4.0. Clinical trial information: NCT02768415.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document