A randomized phase III multi-institutional study of TNFerade biologic with 5-FU and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Final results

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4055-4055
Author(s):  
Aaron Tyler Wild ◽  
Dan Laheru ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Kenneth J. Chang ◽  
Gretchen Elizabeth Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Adenovirus Vector ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Grade 3

4055 Background: TNFerade biologic (TNF) is a novel means of selective delivery of TNF-α to tumor cells by gene transfer through intratumoral (IT) injection. TNF is a replication deficient adenovirus vector containing TNF-α cDNA ligated downstream from a radiation-inducible Egr-1 promoter, allowing spatiotemporal constraint of TNF-α production to the radiation field. Herein we report the final results of a multi-center, randomized, open-label, controlled phase III trial of TNF with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Methods: Pts with locally advanced PDA were randomized 1:2 to standard of care (SOC; 5-FU/RT followed by GEM) versus TNF + SOC. RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Concurrent 5-FU (200 mg/m2/day IV) started on day 1 of RT each wk. TNF was injected IT ~4 hrs prior to RT weekly by percutaneous (PTA) or endoscopic (EUS) approach. 4 wks after RT, GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV) was given until progression or toxicity. Results: Of 277 pts, 187 were randomized to TNF and 90 to SOC. Demographic/baseline characteristics were similar between arms (all NS), as was GEM received (67 vs. 68%; 7.0 vs. 7.6 total wks). Median f/up was 9.1 mos (range, 0.1-50.5). Median OS for TNF by ITT analysis was 10.1 mos (95% CI, 9.1-11.7) vs. 10.0 mos (95% CI, 7.6-11.2) for SOC (p=0.6). TNF delivery method did not affect OS (9.4 mos for PTA vs. 11.5 for EUS; p=0.7). Baseline CA19-9 > 1000 was found to impart independent risk to TNF pts (HR=1.7; p=0.02). Subgroup analysis (SGA) of 86 pts with T1-T3 disease showed an OS benefit for TNF compared to SOC (10.9 vs. 9.0 mos, respectively; p=0.04). TNF resulted in more grade 1-2 fever/chills (p<0.001) as well as grade 3 (p<0.001) and 4 (p=0.05) toxicities (commonly lymphopenia, hypo/hyperkalemia, abd/chest pain) than SOC. Use of PTA vs. EUS did not affect grade 3/4 toxicity rates. Conclusions: TNF + SOC did not prolong OS for locally advanced PDA. SGA reveals a possible OS benefit for early stage (T1-T3) tumors and CA19-9 < 1000. PTA and EUS injection achieved similar rates of efficacy and toxicity. Grade 1-2 toxicity typical of systemic exposure to TNF-α (pyrexia/hypotension/chills) was common, but grade 3-4 was minimal.

Multicenter randomized controlled phase III clinical trial using TNFerade (TNF) with chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): Interim analysis (IA) of overall survival (OS)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4605-4605
Author(s):  
K. J. Chang ◽  
W. Fisher ◽  
D. Kenady ◽  
J. Klapman ◽  
M. Posner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Human Tumor ◽  
Adenovirus Vector ◽  
Nonparametric Methods ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Cancer Trial

4605 Intro: Local control of LAPC with CRT has historically demonstrated survival benefit vs. RT alone. TNF is a nonreplicating adenovirus vector delivering human tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). Results from a phase II study with TNF in LAPC indicated a possible survival advantage. To confirm these findings, a randomized, open-label, controlled Pancreatic Cancer Trial with TNF (PACT) study was developed. Methods: The TNF arm received a 5 wk treatment of qw intratumoral inj of 4x1011 PU TNF, cont. iv 5-FU and 50.4Gy radiation. The standard of care (SOC) arm received CRT alone. Both groups received adjuvant gemcitabine(G) with the option of erlotinib(E). An IA of OS (primary efficacy endpoint) was planned after the first third (92) of the expected 276 total death events (from a total patient n=330). Nonparametric logrank of OS was planned; in addition, a lognormal model was used to account for an evident separation of the survival curves after the median. Results: 185 pts were available for OS analysis (117-TNF+SOC and 68-SOC). Survival in the TNF+SOC group demonstrated a HR of 0.753 (CI [0.494 - 1.15]) relative to SOC. Best fit parametric lognormal analysis indicated a median survival of 11.1 mo with TNF+SOC and 8.7 mo with SOC; nonparametric methods indicated a MS of 9.9 mo for both arms, with a pronounced “late effect” (75th percentile 19.4 mo with TNF+SOC and 11.8 mo with SOC). Prognostic information (G and E use, stage, etc) indicated equivalent distribution between groups. Conclusions: HR results of the OS IA indicate an encouraging trend in favor of the TNF treated group. Parametric medians may better reflect the true HR than nonparametric methods since the latter do not reflect the shape of the OS distribution. A second IA is planned after 2/3 total events. [Table: see text]

Results of conversion surgery after the triple combination chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 366-366
Author(s):  
Naoya Ikeda ◽  
Takahiro Akahori ◽  
Sohei Satoi ◽  
Hiroaki Yanagimoto ◽  
Minako Nagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Medical University

366 Background: Recent improvements in chemotherapy for initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UPDAC) occasionally show remarkable antitumor effect and lead to conversion surgery (CS). However, the optimal indication and clinical impact of CS remains unknown. We have recently developed a new regimen consisted of biweekly S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (SOXIRI). In this regimen, we used S-1 in alternate-day administration instead of 5-FU, that can be more feasible than FOLFIRINOX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of CS after SOXILI treatment for initially UPDAC. Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase II study that was carried out at Nara Medical University and Kansai Medical University in Japan. Patients with untreated metastatic and locally advanced PDAC were enrolled. They received 80 mg/m2 twice a day of S-1 for 2 weeks in alternate-day administration, 150 mg/m2 of irinotecan on day 1, and 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. Results: The 35 enrolled patients received a median of six (range: 2-15) treatment cycles. The RR was 22.8%; median OS, 17.7 months; and median PFS, 7.4 months. Major grade 3 or 4 toxicity included neutropenia (54%), anemia (17%), febrile neutropenia (11%), anorexia (9%), diarrhea (9%), and nausea (9%). Twenty-three out of 35 patients of UR-PDAC were unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPA). Seven out of 23 patients with UR-LAPA underwent CS. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection was performed in three patients, central pancreatectomy was performed in one patient. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in two patients, and PD with portal vein resection in one patient. Two out of seven patients had postoperative complications. One case had grade B pancreatic fistula, and the other case underwent cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis. The median OS in patients who received CS was 31.4 months. Conclusions: SOXIRI regimen has shown promising clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, it may be a potent first-line treatment when considering conversion surgery. Clinical trial information: UMIN000014339.

Prognostic impact of chemoradiation-related lymphopenia in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 439-439
Author(s):  
Daniel W Kim ◽  
Grace Lee ◽  
Colin D. Weekes ◽  
David P. Ryan ◽  
Aparna Raj Parikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Grade 3

439 Background: Chemoradiation (CRT) induced lymphopenia is common and associated with poorer survival in multiple solid malignancies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphopenia in patients with nonmetastatic, unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated by neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU]/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin) followed by CRT. We hypothesized that severe lymphopenia would correlate with worse survival. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this single-institution retrospective study were: 1) biopsy-proven diagnosis of unresectable PDAC, 2) absence of distant metastasis, 3) receipt of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by CRT, and 4) absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) available prior to and two months after initiating CRT. In general, CRT consisted of 5FU or capecitabine and RT with 58.8 Gy over 28 fractions. Lymphopenia was graded according to CTCAE v5.0. The primary variable of interest was lymphopenia at two months, dichotomized by ALC of < 0.5/μl (Grade 3 lymphopenia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox modeling and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to perform survival analyses. Results: A total of 138 patients were identified. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 16 months. Median age was 65. Fifty-six percent were female, 86% were Caucasian, and 97% had ECOG ≤1. Median tumor size was 3.8 cm. Tumor location was pancreatic head in 63%, body in 22%, tail in 8%, and neck in 7%. Median baseline ALC for the entire cohort was 1.5 k/ul. Two months after initiating CRT, 106 (77%) had severe (Grade 3 or worse) lymphopenia. While there were no significant differences in baseline patient or disease characteristics, patients with severe lymphopenia received higher doses of RT with longer duration of treatment compared to those without severe lymphopenia. On multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia at two months was significantly associated with increased hazards of death (HR = 4.00 [95% CI 2.03-7.89], p < 0.001). Greater number of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX cycles received prior to CRT was associated with lower hazards of death (HR = 0.84 [95% CI 0.77-0.92], p < 0.001). The 12-month OS was 73% vs. 90% in the cohort with vs. without severe lymphopenia, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treatment-related lymphopenia is common and severe lymphopenia may be a prognostic marker of poorer survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Closer observation in high-risk patients and minimization of RT dose and duration are potential approaches to mitigating CRT-related lymphopenia. Our findings also suggest an important role of the host immunity in pancreatic cancer outcomes, supporting the ongoing efforts of immunotherapy trials in pancreatic cancer.

LAPACT: An open-label, multicenter phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) in patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS477-TPS477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Jill Lacy ◽  
Scot D. Dowden ◽  
Javier Sastre ◽  
Venu Gopal Bathini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors

TPS477 Background: In pts with LAPC, more effective systemic therapies may be associated with improved local control, delay of metastasis, and overall survival (OS). The phase III MPACT trial in pts with metastatic PC demonstrated longer OS (median, 8.7 vs 6.6 mos; HR, 0.72; P < 0.001) and an ≈ 3-fold greater shrinkage of primary tumors with nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone (−22.15% vs −7.02%), raising the possibility of improved local PC control with nab-P + Gem. LAPACT will assess the efficacy and safety of nab-P + Gem in LAPC. Methods: LAPACT will enroll treatment-naive pts (planned n ≈ 110) in the United States, Canada, and Europe with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, confirmed unresectable LAPC, no distant metastases, and adequate organ function. Pts with mixed-origin tumors, any other malignancy within 5 years, peripheral neuropathy grade > 1, or clinically significant ascites are ineligible. Pts will receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Pts without progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity after 6 cycles will receive investigator’s choice of surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or continued nab-P + Gem. If a major response is observed, surgery may occur prior to completing 6 cycles of nab-P + Gem. The primary endpoint is time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first therapy dose to discontinuation due to PD, start of a new non–protocol-defined anti-cancer therapy, or death). The study design allows for 80% power at a 1-sided α of 0.05 to detect a 30% increase over the 5.1-month median TTF observed for nab-P + Gem in the MPACT study. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR) after 6 cycles, overall response rate, progression-free survival, OS, safety, and quality of life. The exploratory endpoint is correlation of changes in circulating nucleic acids with PD and treatment response. An interim DCR analysis will occur after all pts have completed 6 cycles of nab-P + Gem, discontinued therapy due to PD, died, or started a new non–protocol-defined therapy before completing 6 cycles of therapy. Enrollment is ongoing (first pt enrolled in April 2015). Clinical trial information: NCT02301143.

Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (33) ◽  
pp. 5513-5518 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cunningham ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
Deborah D. Stocken ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
David Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label

PurposeBoth gemcitabine (GEM) and fluoropyrimidines are valuable treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. This open-label study was designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients randomly assigned to GEM alone or GEM plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP).Patients and MethodsPatients with previously untreated histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas with a performance status ≤ 2 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to GEM or GEM-CAP. The primary outcome measure was survival. Meta-analysis of published studies was also conducted.ResultsBetween May 2002 and January 2005, 533 patients were randomly assigned to GEM (n = 266) and GEM-CAP (n = 267) arms. GEM-CAP significantly improved objective response rate (19.1% v 12.4%; P = .034) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P = .004) and was associated with a trend toward improved OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .08) compared with GEM alone. This trend for OS benefit for GEM-CAP was consistent across different prognostic subgroups according to baseline stratification factors (stage and performance status) and remained after adjusting for these stratification factors (P = .077). Moreover, the meta-analysis of two additional studies involving 935 patients showed a significant survival benefit in favor of GEM-CAP (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.98; P = .02) with no intertrial heterogeneity.ConclusionOn the basis of our trial and the meta-analysis, GEM-CAP should be considered as one of the standard first-line options in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

DeCIDE: A phase III randomized trial of docetaxel (D), cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (F) (TPF) induction chemotherapy (IC) in patients with N2/N3 locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5500-5500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra E. W. Cohen ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Chao H Huang ◽  
Mark Agulnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Grade 3

5500 Background: IC is associated with lower distant failure (DF) rates in SCCHN but an improvement in overall survival (OS) has not been validated. The goal of this trial was to determine whether IC prior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves survival compared to CRT alone. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label trial, subjects with pathologically confirmed SCCHN; N2/N3 disease without metastases; no prior therapy; KPS ³ 70%; and intact organ function were randomized to CRT alone (CRT arm) [5 days of D (25 mg/m2), F (600 mg/m2), hydroxyurea (500 mg BID), and RT (150 cGy BID) followed by a 9 day break] or to 2 cycles of IC [D (75 mg/m2), P (75 mg/m2), F (750 mg/m2 day 1-5)] followed by the same CRT (IC arm). Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included DF free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). 280 subjects provided 80% power to detect a hazard ratio HR=0.5 for OS (a=0.05). Results: 280 subjects were accrued from 2004-09 with minimum follow-up 24 months. Of 142 patients randomized to IC, 91% received 2 cycles and 87% continued to CRT. Treatment adherence during CRT was high for docetaxel and hydroxyurea, but fewer than 75% of the patients received target dose of 5FU in both arms. RT was delivered without major deviations in 94% and 95% of patients on IC and CRT arms, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (9%) and mucositis (8%), and during CRT (both arms combined) they were mucositis (45%), dermatitis (19%), and leukopenia (17%). Only grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia rates were significantly higher in IC (p=0.002 and p=0.02, respectively). Table shows efficacy. Conclusions: High survival rates were observed in both arms. Further analysis and follow-up may provide insight into why the significant decrease in DF did not translate into improved OS. [Table: see text]

Interim analysis of a phase II study of dose-modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) in locally advanced (LAPC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 256-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Samuel James ◽  
Xiaopan Yao ◽  
Xiangyu Cong ◽  
Stacey Stein ◽  
Kristin Kaley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Historical Data ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

256 Background: Although FOLFIRINOX is superior to gemcitabine in MPC, the regimen is associated with significant toxicities (Conroy et al. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1817). In our prior retrospective analysis, efficacy was not compromised by dose attenuations of FOLFIRINOX (Gunturu et al. Med Oncol 2013;30:361). Based on this analysis, we are conducting a prospective phase II open label study to evaluate the efficacy & tolerability of mFOLFIRINOX in pts with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: Previously untreated pts with MPC or LAPC received mFOLFIRINOX with 25% dose reductions of irinotecan & bolus 5-FU given every two wks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or surgical resection. All pts received prophylactic pegfilgrastim. FDG-PET scans were obtained at baseline & after 2 cycles. CAT scans were obtained after every 4 cycles. Toxicities & response rate (RR) were compared to historical data reported by Conroy. Results: 53 pts with ECOG PS ≤1 have been enrolled to date between 11/11 and 08/13, Pt characteristics: LAPC 22; MPC 31; median age 62 yrs (range 46-86); male 30. Median # of cycles was 8 (range 1-21). Grade 3/4 toxicities were: anemia, febrile neutropenia (FN) & peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) – 3.8% each; ALT increased & thromboembolism – 5.7% each; diarrhea 7.5%; fatigue 11.3%; neutropenia 17%; thrombopenia 11.3% & vomiting 1.9%. Anemia ( p< 0.04), FN (p<0.04), PSN (p<0.04) and vomiting (p<0.02) were significantly decreased compared to historical data (Conroy). Response by RECIST (CR+PR) in 26 evaluable pts with MPC was 29% (0 CR, 9 PR, 14 SD, 3 PD) & similar to historical data (31.6%; p 0.85). 6/13 evaluable pts with LAPC underwent resection (46%).13/36 pts evaluable for PET response had a >50% decrease in SUV(max)(36%). Evaluation for OS & PFS is ongoing. Conclusions: Findings from our interim analysis suggests that mFOLFIRINOX, given along with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is associated with a similar RR and improved tolerability compared to full dose FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC. In pts with LAPC, neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX appears to have substantial activity with 46% of evaluable pts undergoing resection. Accrual will continue to reach a goal of 70 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01523457.

PANOVA: A phase II study of TTFields (150 kHz) concomitant with standard chemotherapy for front-line therapy of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma—Updated efficacy results.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15790-e15790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Benavides ◽  
Carmen Guillen ◽  
Fernando Rivera ◽  
Javier Gallego ◽  
Jose A. Lopez-Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

e15790 Background: TTFields are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma by the FDA. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. PANOVA was the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients. Results from the first arm of the study, testing TTFields in combination with gemcitabine, have demonstrated superiority in efficacy compared to historical controls (Rivera F. et al, J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 4S; abstr 269). Methods: Twenty advanced pancreatic cancer patients were enrolled in the second arm of PANOVA and treated with TTFields in combination with gemcitabine concomitant to nab-paclitaxel. All patients had unresectable tumors, an ECOG performance score of 0-1 and no prior therapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: The median age was 68.2 (range – 58-81) and most patients (65%) had an ECOG score of 1. Twelve patients (60%) had distant metastases. Ten patients (50%) had serious AEs during the study period. Eleven patients (55%) had treatment-related skin toxicity, of which 5 had grade 3 toxicity. No TTFields-related serious AEs were reported. The median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI 5.4, NA): 9.3 months in patients with metastatic disease, and not reached in locally-advanced patients. PFS rate at 6 months was 65%: 50% in metastatic disease and 87.5% in locally advanced patients. Of the evaluable tumors, 40% had partial response and another 47% stable disease. The median OS was not reached, and the 1-year survival rate was 72% (62.5% in metastatic disease and 87.5% in locally advanced disease). Conclusions: TTFields concomitant to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel are safe for advanced pancreatic cancer patients, with promising clinical outcome which doubled historical data. A phase III trial is planned, testing the efficacy of TTFields combined with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in locally-advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01971281.

Phase I Study of Capecitabine With Concomitant Radiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Expression Analysis of Genes Related to Outcome

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8679-8687 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wasif Saif ◽  
Mohammaed A. Eloubeidi ◽  
Suzanne Russo ◽  
Adam Steg ◽  
Jennifer Thornton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Necrosis Factor Alpha ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To establish the feasibility of capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy (XRT) in patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer and evaluate the effect of XRT on thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Patients and Methods Fifteen patients with LA pancreatic cancer received three-dimensional conformal XRT to a dose of 50.4 Gy with capecitabine at escalating doses from 600 to 1,250 mg/m2 bid (Monday through Friday). Following chemo-XRT, stable and responding patients were treated with capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 orally bid for 14 days every 21 days. Tumor specimens were procured with endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration 1 week before and 2 weeks after chemo-XRT to evaluate TP, DPD, and TNF-α mRNA levels. Results Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea was observed in two of six patients treated at a capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m2 with XRT. Three patients (20%) achieved partial response. Mean percent difference in TP pre- and post-XRT was 119.2% (P = .1934). There was no significant differences in mean TNF-α, or DPD levels pre- and post-XRT (P = .1934 and .4922, respectively). TP and TNF-α levels were not significantly correlated both at pre- and post-XRT (P = .670 and P < .154, respectively). Median value of TP:DPD ratios at baseline was 2.65 (range, 0.36 to 11.08). No association between TP:DPD ratio and efficacy of capecitabine or severity of toxicities was identified. Conclusion The recommended dose for phase II evaluation is capecitabine 800 mg/m2 bid (Monday through Friday) with concurrent XRT. This approach offers an easy alternative to intravenous fluorouracil as a radiosensitizer in these patients. Role of TP and TP:DPD ratio warrants further investigation in a larger clinical trial.

scholarly journals Combination of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and S-1(GAS) as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: study protocol for an open-label, single-arm phase I study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chang ◽  
Xiaofen Li ◽  
Dan Cao
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Systemic Treatments

Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still a highly fatal malignancy among the most common cancers. More powerful treatments are expecting to bring hope for patients. Biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) was proved safe and effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer in Japan. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of GAS (repeated every 3 weeks) in the treatment of locally advanced or advanced pancreatic cancer and determine the recommended dose of S-1 in this combination. Methods This is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase I trial. Patients who have been diagnosed with locally advanced or advanced PDAC pathologically without previous systemic treatments will be enrolled and be treated with GAS chemotherapy every 3 weeks (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2, ivgtt, day1, 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, day1, 8; different doses of S-1 within a dose escalation scheme) until the presence of disease progression (PD), intolerable adverse events (AEs), or requirement of patients and researchers. The primary endpoints are maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The secondary endpoints include safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Discussion This trial will adjust the administration of GAS to make it more effective for Chinese patients, while exploring the toxicity and feasibility of this adjustment. Trial registration ChiCTR, (ChiCTR1900027833). Registered 30 November 2019.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document