First-line dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7530-7530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark G. Kris ◽  
Tony Mok ◽  
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou ◽  
Renato Martins ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Exon 19

7530 Background: Dacomitinib irreversibly inhibits EGFR, HER2 and HER4, and showed superior activity vs. reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer models, including resistant forms. This open-label Phase II study evaluates dacomitinib as 1st-line treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with lung cancers. Pts with sensitizing EGFR deletions/mutations in exons 19 or 21 are reported here. Methods: Pts had stage IIIB/IV adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic tx, had smoked <10 pack years (none within 15 years of enrollment) or had known EGFR mutation. Pts received dacomitinib orally once daily continuously at 45 mg, or 30 mg with the option to escalate to 45 mg; evaluation was every 28 days. Endpoints included progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS at 4M, primary); PFS, and partial response (PR) rate. Results: 92 pts enrolled; 47 had EGFR mutation in exons 19 (n=25) or 21 (n=22), 33 were female and 27 Asian. 34/46 evaluable pts with EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutations had a PR (PR rate = 74%; 95% CI: 59–86; exon 19 = 72%; exon 21 = 76%). PR rates and preliminary PFS were not significantly different for exons 19 and 21. Preliminary PFS at 4M was 96% (95% CI: 84–99), preliminary PFS rate at 1 year was 77% (95% CI: 61–87) and preliminary median PFS was 17 months (95% CI: 13–24). Median tx duration was 13.1 months. For pts with EGFR wild-type lung cancers, PR and PFS at 4M rates were 7% (n=14; 95% CI: 0–34) and 33% (n=14; 95% CI: 11–58), respectively, and for pts with EGFR unknown lung cancers, 46% (n=22; 95% CI: 24–68) and 68% (n=24; 95% CI: 45– 83), respectively. 7 pts had lung cancers with non-sensitizing EGFR mutations; 2 had a PR and 3 SD. For all 92 pts, common side effects included dermatitis acneiform (grade 3/4 = 17%/0) and diarrhea (14%/0). 3/46 pts with EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutations discontinued tx due to drug-related toxicity. Conclusions: 74% of pts in this cohort with EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutant lung cancers experienced PRs with 1st-line dacomitinib; preliminary PFS rate was 77% at 1 year; preliminary median PFS was 17 months; further research is planned in this pt population. As dacomitinib is well tolerated, with preclinical activity against HER2, a cohort of pts with HER2 mutant lung cancers is recruiting.

scholarly journals Clinical activity of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib in EGFR-mutant glioblastoma

CNS Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. CNS43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Makhlin ◽  
Ryan D Salinas ◽  
Daniel Zhang ◽  
Fadi Jacob ◽  
Gou-li Ming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Molecular Heterogeneity ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Egfr Mutant

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults and carries a dismal prognosis. The EGFR gene is among the most commonly deranged genes in GBM and thus an important therapeutic target. We report the case of a young female with heavily pretreated EGFR-mutated GBM, for whom we initiated osimertinib, an oral, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that irreversibly inhibits EGFR and has significant brain penetration. We then review some of the main challenges in targeting EGFR, including lack of central nervous system penetration with most tyrosine kinase inhibitors, molecular heterogeneity of GBM and the need for enhanced specificity for the EGFR mutations relevant in GBM.

EGFR mutation analysis and treatment outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutants: The Manchester Lung Cancer Group Experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18095-e18095
Author(s):  
Rahul Peck ◽  
Elizabeth Connolly ◽  
Paul Taylor ◽  
Corinne Faivre-Finn ◽  
Fiona Hellen Blackhall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Duration Of Treatment

e18095 Background: The presence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) activating mutations in patients with NSCLC was first described in 2005. Tumours exhibiting these mutations show sensitivity to treatment with an oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor. Testing for EGFR mutations in patients with non-squamous NSCLC began in the Greater Manchester and Cheshire network in the last quarter of 2009. Methods: We audited the notes of consecutive patients who were identified with an activating EGFR mutation by the Central Manchester Genetics Laboratory between November 2009 and October 2011. Results: A total of 110 mutations were identified in tumour tissue from 98 patients. 13.6% were in exon 18, 38.2% in exon 19, 15.4% in exon 20 and 32.8% in exon 21. 65% of patients were female. The median age was 69 years (36-89). Notes were available for 85 patients, 59 of whom received treatment with an EGFR TKi. 7 had previously received radical treatment and 19 never received treatment. 7% were current smokers, 40% were ex-smokers, 30.6% had never smoked and smoking history was not documented in 22.4%. An initial response to treatment was seen in 55%, with stable disease in 15%.The mean duration of treatment was 7.6 months (2 weeks – 23 months), with 24 patients still receiving a TKi at the time of data analysis. The most commonly seen toxicities were diarrhoea and rash. Only 1 patient had no documented toxicity from their TKi. 17 patients (29%) had treatment discontinued or interrupted because of toxicity. In 8 of these, treatment was re-introduced at a reduced dose, and 3 patients went back to full dose. Conclusions: Our results confirm that treatment with a TKi is effective for those patients whose tumours harbour EGFR mutations, with a side effect profile consistent with published data.

Lung cancers with mutations in EGFR exon 18: Molecular characterization and clinical outcomes in response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9029-9029
Author(s):  
Wei-Chu Victoria Lai ◽  
Ai Ni ◽  
Maria E. Arcila ◽  
James Huang ◽  
Joshua K. Sabari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Egfr Tkis

9029 Background: Little data is available to guide clinical management of individuals with less common oncogenic drivers such as exon 18 mutations (ex18m) in EGFR. To better understand the impact of these rare mutations on treatment outcomes, we reviewed clinicopathologic data in patients (pts) with ex18m treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Methods: Pts with EGFR ex18m were detected via molecular diagnostics using Sequenom™, FoundationOne™ or MSK IMPACT™ NGS testing from 2003-2016. We reviewed their clinical data for molecular alterations in EGFR, treatment outcomes in response to TKI (time on treatment) and median overall survival (OS). Results: We identified mutations in EGFR ex18m in 63 pts. Median age at diagnosis was 68; 63% were women; 29% never smokers. Overall, 74 ex18m were found in 63 pts, including: G719A = 38, G719S = 11, G719C = 8, E709K = 6, E709_T710delinsD = 6, E709A = 3, G719D = 2. E709 and G719 co-mutations in ex18 were found in 9 pts, and 1 pt was found to have 3 separate tumors, each with a distinct ex18m. 29/63 (46%) patients with ex18m had a co-occurring EGFR mutation: 9 with another ex18m; 20 with ex19-21m. Using our IMPACT NGS, the median number of co-mutations was 8 (range 1-17). Two out of 63 pts had a pre-treatment T790M mutation. The 25 pts with non-metastatic disease presented in the following stages: IA = 19; IB = 3; IIB = 1; IIIA = 2; IIIB = 2. 34/38 pts with metastatic disease were treated with the following first-line EGFR-TKIs: erlotinib = 28, afatinib = 5, osimertinib = 1. Median duration on TKI treatment in months was: erlotinib = 10 mo, (range 1-25), afatinib = 3 mo (range 2-9), osimertinib = 4 mo. Median OS from the date of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 22 months (95% CI 18-29). In comparison, a similar cohort of pts with sensitizing EGFR exon19del/L858R mutations had a median OS of 31 months (95% CI 28-33) (Naidoo Cancer2015). Conclusions: Almost half of ex18m occur concurrently with another EGFR mutation. Overall, ex18m pts have a shorter median OS when compared to similar patient cohorts. EGFR-TKIs appear to be an effective treatment for pts with ex18m in EGFR-mutant lung cancers.

scholarly journals Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1461-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Donald Harvey ◽  
Val R Adams ◽  
Tyler Beardslee ◽  
Patrick Medina
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Egfr Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Egfr Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with EGFR mutation-positive ( EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for use in the first-line or later settings in NSCLC warrants an in-depth understanding of the pharmacological properties of, and clinical data supporting, these agents. The second-generation, irreversible ErbB-family blocker, afatinib, has been extensively studied in the context of EGFRm+ NSCLC. Results from the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 studies showed that afatinib was more active and better tolerated than chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations. Subanalysis of these trials, along with real-world data, indicates that afatinib is active in patients with certain uncommon EGFR mutations (S768I/G719X/L861Q) as well as common mutations (Del19/L858R), and in patients with active brain metastases. In LUX-Lung 7, a head-to-head phase IIb trial, afatinib improved progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure versus the first-generation reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, albeit with a higher incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Nevertheless, afatinib is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are manageable through supportive care and a well-defined tolerability-guided dose adjustment scheme. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib, discuss treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms, and shed light on the economic impact of afatinib. We also provide a comparison of afatinib with the available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discuss its position within treatment strategies for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Incidence, characteristics, and survival of patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers with EGFR T790M at diagnosis identified in the lung cancer mutation consortium (LCMC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8085-8085
Author(s):  
Mark G. Kris ◽  
Geoffrey R. Oxnard ◽  
Bruce E. Johnson ◽  
Lynne D Berry ◽  
Heidi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr T790m ◽  
Exon 19

8085 Background: Somatic T790M mutations are detected in 62% of EGFR-mutant lung cancers with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs, and have rarely been identified in the tumor at diagnosis and/or within the germline DNA. Multiplexed genotyping by the LCMC permitted us to evaluate the incidence of T790M at diagnosis, co-mutations, and survival of patients with this driver. Methods: The 14 member LCMC prospectively tested tumors of patients with lung adenocarcinomas in CLIA laboratories for mutations in EGFR and 9 other genes. We assayed T790Mby Sequenom, Snapshot, or Sanger sequencing. Germline DNA was not collected. Results: In the 987 tumors tested, 209 had mutations in EGFR alone: 25 T790M (2.5%) , 157 sensitizing EGFR mutations (exon 19 del, L858R, L861Q, G719X) without T790M, 23 exon 20 ins, 4 other mutations. 13 additional cases harbored mutations in EGFR and another driver; 2 with both T790M and PIK3CA. In each of the 27 EGFR-mutant cases with T790M, a coincident EGFR mutation was detected (18 exon 19 del, 9 L858R, 1 exon 20 ins). EGFR T790M was found more often than EGFR exon 20 ins or mutations in HER2 (1.9%), BRAF (1.6%), or PIK3CA (0.7%). Patients with T790M: 77% women, 81% never smokers, median age 55 (range 38-79), stage IV at diagnosis 81%, PS 0/1 100%. Characteristics did not differ from persons with sensitizing mutations and no T790M. Median survival from the diagnosis of metastatic disease for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers was 3.5 yrs with T790Mand 4.0 yrs without (p=0.926). Conclusions: T790M mutations were detected at diagnosis in 3% of adenocarcinomas and always coincident with another EGFR mutation. Cases with T790M represent 13% of all cases of EGFR- mutant lung cancer. Characteristics and survival for patients with EGFR- mutant lung cancers with T790M at diagnosis were similar to individuals with sensitizing mutations and no T790M. The observed incidence of T790M exceeded that of the other actionable targets HER2, BRAF, and PIK3CA. Trials should study this unique population identified by routine multiplexed genotyping. Supported by 1RC2CA148394-01 and the National Lung Cancer Partnership. Clinical trial information: NCT01014286.

Surgery of locally advanced and metastatic kidney cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy: single institute experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-393
Author(s):  
Alberto De Gobbi ◽  
Davide Biasoni ◽  
Mario Catanzaro ◽  
Nicola Nicolai ◽  
Luigi Piva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Tnm Classification ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Grade Ii

Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common tumor of the kidney. Considering the TNM classification of 2009, locally advanced and metastatic diseases are included in the groups stage III and IV. The surgical treatment of these tumors could be divided into 3 categories: (1) curative (nephrectomy and/or metastasectomy), (2) cytoreductive, and (3) palliative. Targeted agents showed impressive antitumor efficacy and prolongation of progression-free survival. The integration between target therapy and surgery in patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC has sometimes facilitated surgery. We aimed to evaluate patients’ response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and the feasibility of surgery after that and to observe complications related to surgery. Methods: From February 2007 to September 2014 in the Istituto Tumori of Milan, IRCCS, we selected patients with locally advanced or metastatic diseases, treated with target therapy before surgery (which comprised nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, cytoreductive surgery, and metastasectomy) and cryoablation. Results: We selected 33 patients who underwent surgery after TKI therapy. As for response to TKIs, 20 patients (60%) had stable disease, 9 patients (28%) had a partial response, and 4 patients (12%) had progressive disease. A total of 17 patients (51%) presented complications directly or indirectly related to surgery and most of those were classified as grade II Clavien-Dindo score. Conclusions: The association between TKI and surgery seems to have no contraindications. Our dataset provides an example of how surgery after TKI is possible in locally advanced metastatic tumor and does not have an excessive rate of postoperative complications.

Primary and secondary resistance mechanisms in first, second and third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21142-e21142
Author(s):  
Moushumi Suryavanshi ◽  
Sakshi Mattoo ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma ◽  
Anurag Mehta ◽  
Ullas Batra
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Egfr Amplification ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Met Amplification ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Exon 19

e21142 Background: Different molecular mechanisms of on target and off target primary and secondary resistance have been observed in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients after first(1st), second(2nd) and third (3rd) generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs). Next generation sequencing(NGS) offers a comprehensive method of detecting these mechanisms to decide next line of treatment. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 430 samples of NSCLC for primary and secondary resistance to 1st, 2nd and 3rd TKIs. NGS was performed using thermofischer Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus 52 gene Assay. These cases were divided into 4 groups.1)Primary resistance to first and second generation TKIs 2)Primary resistance to 3rd generation TKI 3)Secondary resistance to 1st and 2nd generation TKI 4) Secondary resistance to 3rd generation TKI.Last group was further subgrouped into A when 3rd generation TKI was offered as second line after 1st or 2nd generation TKIs on detection of T790M and subgroup B when it was given as first line. Results: Group1 had 13 cases. There were 2 cases of complex EGFR exon 19 mutation p.Glu746_Leu747delinsValPro, 4 cases of EGFR exon 20 insertion, 1 case of dual EGFR L833V & H835L mutation, 2 cases with EGFR amplification with EGFR exon 19 del and PIK3CA C420_P421del along with EGFR exon 19 del. Four cases had no additional abnormality. Group 2 had 5 cases:1 case had L858R and E709A dual mutation, 2 cases had KRAS G13C and KRAS G12V along with EGFR exon 19 del. One case had EGFR amplification and one case had MET amplification along with EGFR exon 19 del respectively.Group 3 had 34 cases including 10 cases of EGFR L858R and 24 cases of exon 19 deletion.T790M mutation was detected in 8 patients, MET amplification in 7 cases,one case had both T790M and MET amplification. One case lost the primary EGFR exon 19 del. Others mutations detected were KRAS G13C, PIK3CA H1047R, TP53 R213Q and TP53 C242fs. Group3 had 15 cases with 7 cases in subgroup A and 9 cases in subgroup B. In subgroup A T790M mutation was lost in 6 out of 7 cases.One case which lost T790M developed ALK translocation.One case of EGFR exon 19 del retained EGFR T790M with EGFR C797S in cis allele. Other mutations detected were PIK3CA E542K and KRAS G12C. In subgroup B one case showed EGFR C797S(both cis and trans) besides the primary EGFR exon 19 del. One case showed BRAF G469A along with EGFR exon 19 del. Other mutations detected were CTNNB1 D32N, KRAS G12V, and PIK3CA E542K. Conclusions: Primary and secondary acquired resistance is unavoidable in EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC on any generation of TKIs. NGS offers an advantage in diagnosing mechanism of resistance for further choice of therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document