Tailored endpoints: A proposal for design of future clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13058-e13058
Author(s):  
Caterina Fontanella ◽  
Marta Bonotto ◽  
Pamela Driol ◽  
Francesca Valent ◽  
Lorenzo Gerratana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
First Line ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B

e13058 Background: Widespread access to active agents against MBC has produced significant improvements in survival, even though few phase III trials are powered to detect overall survival (OS) effects. However, regulatory agencies hold OS as gold standard for approval of new drugs. OS can be portioned into the sum of progression-free survival (PFS) and survival post-progression (SPP). Recent data suggest that OS is a reasonable primary endpoint only when median SPP is short. On the other hand, patients enrolled in first-line trials could have a long life-expectancy. Aim of this study was to evaluate PFS, OS and SPP in a consecutive series of patients with MBC in order to obtain information as a basis for design of future clinical trials. Methods: Four hundred patients with MBC diagnosed from January 2004 to February 2011 at University Hospital of Udine, Italy, were included in the study. We examined the role of potential of disease and patients’ characteristics in influencing the different measures of outcome. Results: Median OS was 33.71 months (mo), in line with the best literature. Median PFS at first-line (PFS1) was 9.33 mo, with linear decrease at second (5.06), third (3.58), and fourth (3.19) line, respectively. Median SPP after first-line (SPP1) was 18.69 mo. Interestingly, differences in outcome were noticed according to immunophenotype. The best prognosis was observed in luminal A disease (OS= 46.72 mo, PFS1= 15.61 mo, SPP1= 25.43 mo). In luminal B disease, median OS was 27.66 mo, PFS1 8.94 mo, and SPP1 13.21 mo, respectively. In patients with HER2-positive disease, mainly treated with anti-HER2 therapy, outcome approached that of luminal A disease (OS= 41.10 mo, PFS= 9.89 mo, SPP1 18.69 mo). Patients with triple negative disease (TNBC) experienced the worst prognosis (OS= 8.54 mo, PFS1= 4.04 mo, SPP1= 2.83 mo). Conclusions: The study demonstrated different results in the measures of outcome according to the line of treatment and specific disease characteristics. As a consequence, endpoints of clinical trials should be tailored taking into consideration prognostic/predictive factors as well as the line of treatment.

scholarly journals Real-world, single-centre prospective data of age at breast cancer onset: focus on survival and reproductive history

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e041706
Author(s):  
Peeter Karihtala ◽  
Anniina Jääskeläinen ◽  
Nelli Roininen ◽  
Arja Jukkola
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B

ObjectivesBeing either young or old at the time of breast cancer diagnosis has been suggested as an indicator of a poor prognosis. We studied the effect of age at breast cancer onset in relation to survival, focusing in particular on biological subtypes and reproductive anamnesis.Design, setting and participantsPatients with early breast cancer (n=594) treated in a Finnish University Hospital during 2003–2013 were prospectively collected and followed in median 102 months.ResultsPatients with luminal A-like breast cancer were older than the patients with luminal B-like (HER2-positive) (p=0.045) or patients with the HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtype (p=0.029). Patients ≥70 years received substantially less adjuvant chemotherapy (p=1.5×10−9) and radiotherapy (p=5.9×10−7) than younger women. Nevertheless, the estimated 10-year breast cancer-specific rates of survival were 84.2%, 92.9% and 87.0% in age groups <41 years, 41–69 years and ≥70 years, respectively, with no statistical difference (p=0.115). Survival rates were also comparable between the three age groups when assessed separately in different biological subtypes, and for patients with metastatic breast cancer there was similarly no difference between the age groups. Later menarche (p=5.7×10−8) and high parity (p=0.000078) correlated with increased age at breast cancer diagnosis, but, according to the patients’ oestrogen receptor (ER) status, only among ER-positive patients.ConclusionsDespite the suggested undertreatment of older patients, we report excellent long-term outcomes in all age groups in this prospective cohort. Later endogenous endocrine exposure may cause delay in breast cancer onset, but the exact biology behind this phenomenon is so far unclear.

scholarly journals Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Group (BOOG)

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. 61-79
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
List Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Study

This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Dutch breast cancer trialists' group (BOOG). Clinical trials include:An open label randomized (inter)national multicenter comparative trial of 5 years adjuvant endocrine therapy with an LHRH agonist plus an aromatase inhibitor (goserelin + anastrozole) versus five courses FE90C chemotherapy followed by the same endocrine therapy in pre- or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer (PRemenopausal Optimal Management IS Endocrine therapy). BOOG 2002-01/PROMISE. ISRCTN23561723Open label, comparative, randomized, multicenter, study of trastuzumab (Herceptin) given with docetaxel (Taxotere) versus sequential single agent therapy with trastuzumab followed by docetaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with HER2neu overexpression. BOOG 2002-02/HERTAX ISRCTN13770586Micro-metastases and Isolated tumour cells: Robust and Relevant Or Rubbish? The MIRROR study in BREAST CANCER. BOOG 2003-03/ZonMW 3214Radiation dose intensity study in breast cancer in young women: a randomized phase III trial of additional dose to the tumor bed. BOOG 2004-01/Young Boost SRCTN45066831Microarray analysis in breast cancer to Tailor Adjuvant Drugs Or Regimens, a randomized phase III study. MATADOR, BOOG 2005-02, CKTO 2004-04 ISRCTN61893718A prospective randomised, open, multicentre, phase III study to assess different Durations of Anastrozole therapy after 2–3 years Tamoxifen as Adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. 2006-01/DATAA randomized, open-label phase III study of first line chemotherapy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients, comparing intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with oral capecitabine; and the incorporation of a complete geriatric assessment. 2006-02/OMEGABOOG participation in International studies:. BOOG 2001-01/TEAM trial. BOOG 2001-02/AMAROS (EORTC 10981/22023). BOOG 2002-04/HERA (BIG 1-01/EORTC 10011/BO16348B). BOOG 2003-02 (BIG 1-02/IBCSG 27-02). BOOG 2003-04 (GBG 29). BOOG 2004-02/TBP (GBG 26, BIG 3-05). BOOG 2005-01/CASA (IBCSG 32-05/BIG 1-05). BOOG 2005-03/MINDACT (EORTC 10041, BIG 3-04). BOOG 2006-03/SUPREMO (BIG 2-04). BOOG 2006-04/Adjuvant lapatinib study (BIG 2-06/EGF106708)

BCIRG 007: Randomized phase III trial of trastuzumab plus docetaxel with or without carboplatin first line in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA516-LBA516 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Forbes ◽  
T. Pienkowski ◽  
V. Valero ◽  
W. Eiermann ◽  
G. Von Minckwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Taxane Chemotherapy

LBA516 Background: Based on preclinical synergism between docetaxel (T), carboplatin (C) and trastuzumab (H), BCIRG conducted a phase III trial for women with HER2+ MBC to evaluate efficacy and safety of H in combination with T or TC. Methods: 263 patients (pts) with HER2 FISH+ MBC were randomized to TH, (H with T 100 mg/m2) or TCH, (H with T 75 mg/m2 and C AUC=6). Chemo was given q3 wks for 8 cycles with wkly H at 2 mg/kg (loading dose of 4 mg/kg), followed by H q3 wks at 6 mg/kg until progression. Pts were stratified by centre and prior (neo) adjuvant taxane chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was TTP with 80% power (0.05 significance) to detect a 50% improvement in median TTP between the 2 arms. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, response rate, duration of response (DR), clinical benefit (CB) and safety. Results: 131 pts were treated in each arm. Pt characteristics were well balanced in both groups. Importantly, only 52% of pts received C at the protocol specified dose (RDI > 0.9). Efficacy analysis was conducted at 204 events. There was no significant difference between TH and TCH in median TTP (11.1 vs 10.4 mos, p = 0.57), ORR (73% in both arms), DR (10.7 vs 9.4 mos) and CB (67% in both arms). The most common gr 3/4 toxicities were: infection (44% vs 30%), neutropenic infection (22% vs 12%), thrombocytopenia (2% vs 15%), febrile neutropenia (12% vs 13%) asthenia (5% vs 12%), anemia (5% vs 11%), and diarrhea (2% vs 9%). Two pts died (1.5%) due to sepsis in TCH. Absolute LVEF decline > 15% were seen in 5.5% vs 6.7% of pts. One pt (0.8%) had a symptomatic CHF in TH arm Conclusions: The already effective TH regimen does not benefit from the addition of C, when the T dose in TH is 100 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2 in TCH, in women with HER2+ MBC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Progression-free survival (PFS) as surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in clinical trials of HER2-targeted agents in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC): An individual patient data (IPD) analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 610-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Michiels ◽  
Lina Pugliano ◽  
Delphine Grun ◽  
Jana Barinoff ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
The Individual

610 Background: The gold standard endpoint in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in MBC is OS, which has the disadvantage of requiring extended follow-up and being confounded by subsequent anti-cancer therapies. Although therapeutics have been approved based on PFS, its use as a primary endpoint is controversial. This study, the first IPD meta-analysis of targeted agents in MBC, aimed to collect data from RCTs of HER2-targeted agents in HER2+ MBC, assessing to what extent PFS correlates with, and may be used as, a surrogate for OS. Methods: A search was conducted in April 2011. Eligible RCTs accrued HER2+ MBC patients (pts) in 1992-2008. Collaboration was obtained from industrial partners (Roche, GSK) for industry-led studies. Investigator-assessed PFS was defined as the time from randomization to clinical or radiological progression, or death. A correlation approach was used: at the individual level, to estimate the association between PFS and OS using a bivariate survival model and at the trial level, to estimate the association between treatment effects on PFS and OS. Squared correlation values close to 1.0 would indicate strong surrogacy. Results: The search strategy resulted in 2137 eligible pts in 13 RCTs testing trastuzumab or lapatinib. We collected IPD data from 1963 pts in 9 RCTs. One phase II RCT did not have sufficient follow-up data so that 1839 pts in 8 RCTs were retained (5 evaluating trastuzumab, 3 lapatinib); 6 out of 8 RCTs were first-line. At the individual level, the Spearman rank correlation using Hougaard copula was equal to r=0.66 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.66) corresponding to an r2 of 0.42. At the trial level, the squared correlation between treatment effects on PFS and OS was provided by R2=0.33 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.86) using Hougaard copula and R2=0.53 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.83) using log hazard ratios from Cox models. Conclusions: In RCTs of HER2-targeted agents in HER2+ MBC, PFS is moderately correlated with OS and treatment effects on PFS are modestly correlated with treatment effects on OS, similarly to first-line chemotherapy in MBC (Burzykowski et al JCO 2008). PFS does not completely substitute for OS.

AVEREL: A Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Bevacizumab in Combination With Docetaxel and Trastuzumab As First-Line Therapy for HER2-Positive Locally Recurrent/Metastatic Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (14) ◽  
pp. 1719-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Gianni ◽  
Gilles H. Romieu ◽  
Michail Lichinitser ◽  
Sergio V. Serrano ◽  
Mauro Mansutti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Locally Recurrent

Purpose The AVEREL trial [A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab)/Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer] evaluated first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC). Patients and Methods Patients with measurable/evaluable HER2-positive LR/MBC who had not received trastuzumab or chemotherapy for LR/MBC were stratified by prior adjuvant trastuzumab, prior (neo)adjuvant taxane, hormone receptor status, and measurable disease and were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m2 plus trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg either with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or without bevacizumab, all administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included overall survival, response rate (RR), safety, quality of life, and translational research. Results Baseline characteristics of the 424 patients were balanced between treatment arms. Most patients had visceral metastases, 43% had a disease-free interval less than 12 months, and 85% had measurable disease. Median follow-up was 26 months. The hazard ratio for investigator-assessed PFS was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P = .0775; median PFS, 13.7 v 16.5 months in the non-bevacizumab and bevacizumab arms, respectively; PFS events in 72%). The Independent Review Committee–assessed PFS hazard ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.94; P = .0162; median PFS, 13.9 v 16.8 months, respectively; PFS events in 53%). The RR was 70% versus 74%, respectively (P = .3492). Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia and hypertension were more common with bevacizumab-containing therapy. High baseline plasma vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) concentrations were associated with greater bevacizumab benefit (not statistically significant). Conclusion Combining bevacizumab with docetaxel and trastuzumab did not significantly improve investigator-assessed PFS. The potential predictive value of plasma VEGF-A is consistent with findings in HER2-negative LR/MBC, warranting prospective evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document