Updated analysis of the phase III, double-blind, randomized, multinational study of radium-223 chloride in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with bone metastases (ALSYMPCA).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4512-LBA4512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Parker ◽  
Sten Nilsson ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Joe M. O'Sullivan ◽  
Sophie D. Fossa ◽  
...  

LBA4512 Background: Radium-223 chloride (Ra-223), a targeted alpha-emitter, targets bone metastases (mets) with high-energy alpha-particles of short range (<100 µm). ALSYMPCA, a phase III double-blind, randomized, multinational study, compared Ra-223 plus best standard of care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC in CRPC patients (pts) with bone mets. In a planned interim analysis (n = 809), based on 314 events, Ra-223 significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs placebo (median 14.0 mo vs 11.2 mo, respectively; HR = .695; 95% CI, .552-.875; 2-sided p = .00185). Secondary endpoints were met and Ra-223 safety was favorable. An updated analysis was conducted prior to the crossover to further assess the effect of Ra-223 on the primary endpoint (OS), secondary endpoints including skeletal-related events (SREs), and safety. Methods: Eligible pts had confirmed symptomatic CRPC with ≥ 2 bone mets; no known visceral mets; and were post-docetaxel, unfit for docetaxel, or had declined docetaxel. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive 6 injections of Ra-223 (50 kBq/kg IV) q4wks or matching placebo. An updated descriptive analysis of OS, based on 528 events, was performed including data from all randomized pts prior to implementing crossover to Ra-223 for placebo pts. Results: 921 pts (Ra-223, n = 614; placebo, n = 307) were randomized from 6/2008-2/2011. Ra‑223 significantly improved OS vs placebo (median 14.9 mo vs 11.3 mo, respectively; HR = .695; 95% CI, .581-.832; p = 0.00007), and time to first SRE was significantly prolonged (median 15.6 mo vs 9.8 mo, respectively; HR = 0.658; 95% CI, 0.522-0.830; p = 0.00037). Safety and tolerability of Ra-223 remained favorable, with low myelosuppression (e.g., gr 3/4 neutropenia in 2.2% and 0.7% and gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 6.3% and 2% of the Ra-223 and placebo groups, respectively). Conclusions: On updated analysis, the median OS benefit for Ra-223 increased from 2.8 to 3.6 months, with a hazard ratio of 0.695 (i.e., 30.5% reduction in risk of death). Ra-223 is an effective therapy that improves OS and time to first SRE with a highly favorable safety profile, and may provide a new standard of care for CRPC pts with bone mets.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Svein Inge Helle ◽  
Joe M. O'Sullivan ◽  
Sophie D. Fossa ◽  
...  

9 Background: Radium-223 chloride (Ra-223) is a 1st-in-class alpha-pharmaceutical targeting bone metastases (mets) with high-energy alpha-particles of short range (<100 μm). ALSYMPCA, a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multinational study, compared Ra-223 plus best standard of care (BSC) vs placebo (pbo) plus BSC in patients (pts) with bone mets in CRPC. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included skeletal-related events (SREs). Methods: Eligible pts had progressive, symptomatic CRPC with ≥ 2 bone mets on scintigraphy and no known visceral mets; were receiving BSC; and either previously received docetaxel, were docetaxel ineligible, or refused docetaxel. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive 6 injections of Ra‐223 (50 kBq/kg IV) q4 wks or matching pbo and stratified by prior docetaxel use, baseline alkaline phosphatase level, and current bisphosphonate use. Results: 922 pts (Ra-223, n = 615; pbo, n = 307) were randomized from 6/2008-2/2011. Based on data from a planned interim analysis (n = 809), unblinded June 2011, Ra-223 significantly improved OS in pts with CRPC with bone mets vs pbo (median OS 14.0 vs 11.2 mo, respectively; two-sided P = 0.00185; HR = 0.695; 95% CI, 0.552-0.875). SREs were lower in the Ra-223 vs pbo group, and time to 1st SRE was significantly delayed (median time to SRE 13.6 mo vs 8.4 mo, respectively; P = .00046; HR = .610; 95% CI, .461-.807). Conclusions: Ra-223 significantly delayed time to 1st SRE and SRE components, except surgical intervention. These reductions in SREs, particularly SCC, are noteworthy. Ra-223 is an effective therapy with a highly favorable safety profile and may provide a new standard of care for treatment of CRPC pts with bone mets. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4551-4551 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Joe M. O'Sullivan ◽  
Sophie D. Fossa ◽  
Ales Chodacki ◽  
...  

4551 Background: Ra-223, a 1st-in-class alpha-pharmaceutical, targets bone metastases (mets) with high-energy alpha-particles of short range (<100 μm). ALSYMPCA, a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multinational study, compared Ra-223 plus best standard of care (BSC) v placebo (pbo) plus BSC in patients (pts) with bone mets in CRPC. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included SREs and ECOG PS. Methods: Eligible pts had progressive, symptomatic CRPC with ≥ 2 bone mets on scintigraphy and no known visceral mets; were receiving BSC; and either previously received docetaxel, were docetaxel ineligible, or refused docetaxel. Pts were randomized 2:1 to 6 injections of Ra‑223 (50 kBq/kg IV) q4 wks or matching pbo and stratified by prior docetaxel use, baseline ALP level, and current bisphosphonate use. Results: 921 pts were randomized from 6/2008-2/2011. In a planned interim analysis (n = 809), Ra-223 significantly improved OS v pbo (median OS 14.0 v 11.2 mo, respectively; two-sided P = .00185; HR = .695; 95% CI, .552-.875).SREs were lower in the Ra-223 v pbo group, and time to 1st SRE was significantly delayed (median time to SRE 13.6 mo v 8.4 mo, respectively; P = .00046; HR = .610; 95% CI, .461-.807). The proportion of pts with ECOG PS deterioration (≥ 2 points) was less in Ra-223 v pbo group at Wk 12 and Wk 24 (4%, 15/389 v 9%, 16/180 and 7%, 16/236 v 12%, 10/83, respectively). Time to ECOG PS deterioration (≥ 2 points) was significantly delayed by Ra-223 v pbo (P = .003; HR = .62; 95% CI, .46-.85). Conclusions: Ra-233 significantly delayed time to 1st SRE and SRE components, notably SCC. Fewer pts in the Ra-223 group had ECOG PS deterioration. Ra-223 improves OS with excellent safety and may provide a new standard of care for CRPC pts with bone mets. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Vogelzang ◽  
Chris Parker ◽  
Sten Nilsson ◽  
Robert Edward Coleman ◽  
C. Gillies O'Bryan-Tear ◽  
...  

11 Background: Ra-223 is a first-in-class alpha-pharmaceutical targeting bone metastases (mets) with high-energy, short-range (< 100 μm) alpha-particles. In the phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multinational ALSYMPCA study, Ra-223 significantly improved OS in CRPC patients (pts) with bone mets by a median increase of 3.6 months compared with placebo (median OS: 14.9 vs 11.3 mo; P < 0.001; HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.58-0.83). An updated analysis of the SRE secondary endpoint is presented. Methods: Eligible pts had progressive, symptomatic CRPC with ≥ 2 bone mets on scintigraphy and no known visceral mets; were receiving best standard of care (BSoC); and either previously received docetaxel, or did not because they were docetaxel ineligible, or refused docetaxel. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive 6 injections of Ra‑223 (50 kBq/kg IV) q4wk or matching placebo and stratified by prior docetaxel use, baseline alkaline phosphatase level, and current bisphosphonate use. Results: 921 pts were randomized (Ra-223, n = 614; placebo, n = 307); 40% had >20 mets. Ra-223 significantly delayed time to first SRE versus placebo by a median increase of 5.8 months (median time to SRE: 15.6 vs 9.8 mo; P < 0.001; HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.52-0.83). Ra-223 also reduced the risk of time to first event for all 4 SRE components versus placebo. Conclusions: Ra-223 significantly delayed time to first SRE with a reduction in risk observed for all 4 SRE components. Despite the longer time at risk, Ra-223 patients had an approximately 50% reduction in risk for SCC. Ra-223 is an effective therapy with a highly favorable safety profile and may provide a new standard of care for treatment of CRPC pts with bone mets. Clinical trial information: NCT00699751. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Parker ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Joe M. O'Sullivan ◽  
Sophie D. Fossa ◽  
Ales Chodacki ◽  
...  

8 Background: Radium-223 chloride (Ra-223) is a first-in-class alpha-pharmaceutical targeting bone metastases (mets) with high-energy alpha-particles of extremely short range (<100 μm). ALSYMPCA, a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multinational study, compared efficacy, in terms of overall survival (OS), and safety of Ra-223 plus best standard of care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC in patients (pts) with bone mets in CRPC. Methods: Eligible pts had progressive, symptomatic CRPC with ≥ 2 bone mets on scintigraphy and no known visceral mets; were receiving BSC; and either previously received docetaxel, were docetaxel ineligible, or refused docetaxel. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive 6 injections of Ra‐223 (50 kBq/kg IV) q4 wks or matching placebo and stratified by prior docetaxel use, baseline alkaline phosphatase level, and current bisphosphonate use. A planned interim analysis (IA) was conducted to assess the effect of Ra-223 on the primary endpoint (OS) using a predefined threshold. Survival data were compared using a stratified log-rank test. Results: 922 pts (Ra-223, n = 615; placebo, n = 307) were randomized from 6/2008-2/2011. 445 (58%) of 809 pts in the IA data set received prior treatment with docetaxel. Ra-223 significantly improved OS in pts with CRPC with bone mets vs placebo (two-sided P = 0.00185; HR = 0.695; 95% CI, 0.552-0.875; median OS 14.0 mo vs 11.2 mo, respectively). Safety and tolerability of Ra-223 were highly favorable and showed low incidence of myelosuppression (eg, grades 3/4 neutropenia in 1.8% and 0.8% and thrombocytopenia in 4% and 2% of the Ra-223 and placebo groups, respectively). Conclusions: Ra-223 is an effective therapy that improved OS with a highly favorable safety profile, and may provide a new standard of care for the treatment of CRPC pts with bone mets. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Sten Nilsson

Bone metastases, which are commonly seen in patients with advanced cancers, are a major cause of skeletal events, disability, and death. Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223; Xofigo, formerly Alpharadin), a first-in-class, alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical that selectively targets bone metastases with high-energy short-range alpha-particles, has been approved for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastases. Approval is based on results of the randomized phase III trial Alpharadin in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer (ALSYMPCA), in which radium-223 prolonged overall survival and time to first symptomatic skeletal event versus placebo among patients with CRPC with symptomatic bone metastases and was generally well tolerated, with low myelosuppression rates and manageable gastrointestinal adverse events. Long-term follow-up of the ALSYMPCA safety population showed that the incidence of myelosuppression remained low among patients treated with radium-223, with no additional safety issues of acute myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anemia, or primary bone cancer within approximately 1.5 years after treatment. The radium-223 overall survival benefit and low toxicity make it an effective, well-tolerated, and novel treatment option for CRPC and symptomatic bone metastases and opens the possibility of exploring radium-223 in the treatment of bone metastases from other cancers. A phase I clinical trial of patients with breast and prostate cancer with skeletal metastases demonstrated that radium-223 was safe and well tolerated at all therapeutically relevant dosages. Moreover, a phase IIa trial of patients with advanced breast cancer and progressive bone-dominant disease demonstrated that radium-223 targeted areas of increased bone metabolism and showed biologic activity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 49-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Parker ◽  
C. G. O'Bryan-Tear ◽  
B. Bolstad ◽  
A. Lokna ◽  
S. Nilsson

49 Background: Radium-223 (Alpharadin) is a first-in-class alpha-pharmaceutical. It targets bone metastases with high-energy alpha-radiation of extremely short range that spares bone marrow. Radium-223 has a profound effect on serum markers of bone metabolism, including ALP, in patients with bone metastases from CRPC. In an exploratory analysis, we studied whether this effect is associated with a meaningful clinical benefit. Methods: Patients with CRPC and bone metastases were treated in 2 randomized phase II studies. BC1-02 was a placebo-controlled study of radium-223 (50 kBq/kg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. BC1-04 evaluated radium-223 (25, 50, or 80 kBq/kg) every 6 weeks for 12 weeks. Baseline total ALP values > 128 U/L were considered elevated; those decreasing to below 128 U/L during treatment with radium-223 were defined as normalized, and those remaining above that value as non-normalized. Results: In BC1-02, ALP normalization was seen in 12/26 (46%) patients treated with radium-223. Median survivals of those with and without ALP normalization were 102 weeks and 42 weeks, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). In BC1-04, ALP normalization was seen in 25/75 (33%) cases: 5/29 (17%) in the 25 kBq/kg group, 10/25 (40%) with 50 kBq/kg, and 10/21 (48%) with 80 kBq/kg, indicating a dose-response relationship. Median survivals for the 25 patients with, and the 50 patients without, ALP normalization were 102 weeks and 58 weeks, respectively (log-rank P = 0.0086). Conclusions: Inpatients with metastatic CRPC and bone metastases treated with radium-223, ALP normalization was associated with significantly better overall survival. These data support the rationale for the ongoing ALSYMPCA phase III trial of radium-223. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4512-LBA4512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Parker ◽  
Sten Nilsson ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Joe M. O'Sullivan ◽  
Sophie D. Fossa ◽  
...  

LBA4512 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Monday, June 4, 2012, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4-LBA4
Author(s):  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Kim N. Chi ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Ken Herrmann ◽  
...  

LBA4 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advances, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains invariably fatal. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in mCRPC lesions. 177Lu-PSMA-617 is a targeted radioligand therapy that delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and surrounding microenvironment. Method: VISION was an international, randomized, open-label phase III study evaluating 177Lu-PSMA-617 in men with PSMA-positive mCRPC previously treated with next-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibition and 1–2 taxane regimens. PSMA positivity (threshold greater than liver) was determined by central review of 68Ga-PSMA-11 scans. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks x 6 cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone. SOC was investigator determined but excluded cytotoxic chemotherapy and radium-223. The alternate primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) using PCWG3 criteria by independent central review (ICR) and overall survival (OS). Under the null hypothesis, median rPFS was assumed to be 4 months and OS 10 months for 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC for a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.00. Under the alternative hypothesis, median rPFS was assumed to be 6 months for a HR of 0.67 and median OS was assumed to be 13.7 months for a HR of 0.7306. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), disease control rate (DCR), and time to first symptomatic skeletal event (SSE). Results: Between 4 June 2018 and 23 October 2019, 831 of 1179 screened patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC (n = 551) or SOC only (n = 280). Median study follow-up was 20.9 months at the data cut-off (27 January 2021). Treatment groups were balanced in terms of demographics and baseline characteristics. 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC significantly improved rPFS versus SOC alone (median rPFS, 8.7 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.40 [99.2% CI: 0.29, 0.57]; p < 0.001, one-sided). The alternate primary endpoint of OS was also significantly improved versus SOC alone (median OS, 15.3 vs 11.3 months; HR, 0.62 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.74]; p < 0.001, one-sided). All key secondary endpoints were statistically significant between the treatment arms in favor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 + SOC, including ICR-determined ORR (29.8% vs 1.7%), ICR-determined DCR (89.0% vs 66.7%) and time to first SSE (median time, 11.5 vs 6.8 months; HR, 0.50). While a higher rate of high-grade treatment-emergent adverse events was observed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 (52.7% vs 38.0%), therapy was well tolerated. Conclusions: 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC treatment is a well-tolerated regimen that improves rPFS and prolongs OS compared with SOC alone in men with advanced-stage PSMA-positive mCRPC, supporting its adoption as a standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT03511664.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 240-240
Author(s):  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Teuvo Tammela ◽  
Murilo Luz ◽  
Manuel Philco Salas ◽  
...  

240 Background: DARO is a structurally distinct androgen receptor inhibitor approved for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) based on significantly prolonged metastasis-free survival compared with PBO (median 40.4 vs 18.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.50; P < 0.0001) and a favorable safety profile in the phase III ARAMIS trial. Following unblinding at the primary analysis, crossover from PBO to DARO was permitted for the subsequent open-label treatment phase. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of PBO–DARO crossover on OS benefit. Methods: Patients (pts) with nmCRPC receiving androgen deprivation therapy were randomized 2:1 to DARO (n = 955) or PBO (n = 554). In addition to OS, secondary endpoints included times to pain progression, first cytotoxic chemotherapy, first symptomatic skeletal event, and safety. The OS analysis was planned to occur after approximately 240 deaths, and secondary endpoints were evaluated in a hierarchical order. Iterative parameter estimation (IPE) and rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) analyses were performed as pre-planned sensitivity analyses to adjust for the treatment effect of PBO–DARO crossover. The IPE method used a parametric model for the survival times and iteratively determined the model parameter describing the magnitude of the treatment effect, whereas a grid search and non-parametric log-rank test were used for the RPSFT analysis. The IPE and RPSFT analyses both generated a Kaplan–Meier curve for the PBO arm that predicts what would have been observed in the absence of PBO–DARO crossover. Results: After unblinding, 170 pts (30.7% of those randomized to PBO) crossed over from PBO to DARO; median treatment duration from unblinding to the final data cut-off was 11 months. Final analysis of the combined double-blind and open label periods was conducted after 254 deaths (15.5% of DARO and 19.1% of PBO pts) and showed a statistically significant OS benefit for DARO vs PBO (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.88; P = 0.003). Results from the IPE (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51–0.84; P < 0.001) and RPSFT (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51–0.90; P = 0.007) analyses were similar to those from the intention-to-treat population, showing that the impact of PBO–DARO crossover was small. Additional analyses accounting for the effect of PBO–DARO crossover will be presented. The safety profile of DARO continued to be favorable at the final analysis, and discontinuation rates at the end of the double-blind period remained unchanged from the primary analysis (8.9% with DARO and 8.7% with PBO). Conclusions: Early treatment with DARO in men with nmCRPC is associated with significant improvement in OS regardless of pts crossing over from PBO to DARO. The safety profile of DARO remained favorable at the final analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT02200614.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12099-12099
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa Shiraishi ◽  
Akito Hata ◽  
Naoki Inui ◽  
Morihito Okada ◽  
Masahiro Morise ◽  
...  

12099 Background: Fosnetupitant (FN) is a phosphorylated pro-drug of netupitant that has high binding affinity for the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor and a long half-life of 70 h. This phase 3 study is the first head-to-head study to compare two NK-1 receptor antagonists, FN and fosaprepitant (FA), in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (JapicCTI-194611). Methods: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2) -based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive FN 235 mg or FA 150 mg, in combination with palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone (9.9 mg on day 1, 6.6 mg on days 2-4). The stratification factors were sex, age category (<55 vs. ≥55 years), and site. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR; no emetic events and no rescue medication) rate, stratified by sex and age category, during the overall phase (0-120 h) to show the non-inferiority (margin, -10%) of FN to FA. The secondary endpoints were: CR rate, complete protection rate, total control rate, no nausea rate, no emetic events rate in each period [i.e., acute (0-24 h), delayed (24-120 h), overall, 0-168 h and 120-168 h], time to treatment failure, and safety, including injection site reactions (ISRs). Assessment of efficacy was continued until 168 h after the initiation of cisplatin. Some eligible patients were evaluated for safety and efficacy of FN for up to four cycles. Results: Between February 2019 and March 2020, total 795 patients were enrolled in the study. The study drug was administered to 785 patients (n=392 in FN vs. n=393 in FA), and all of them were evaluated for efficacy and safety. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two groups. The adjusted overall CR rate was 75.2% in FN vs. 71.0% in FA [MH common risk difference, 4.1%; 95% CI, -2.1% to 10.3%), thus demonstrating non-inferiority of FN to FA. Regarding the other secondary endpoints of efficacy until 168 h, FN was favorable against FA, especially the CR rate during 0-168 h (73.2% in FN vs. 66.9% in FA) (Table). The incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events were 22.2% in FN vs. 25.4% in FA, whereas those of ISRs with any cause or with treatment-related were 11.0% or 0.3% in FN vs 20.6% or 3.6% in FA, respectively ( p<0.001). Conclusions: FN demonstrated non-inferiority to FA, with a favorable safety profile and lower risk for ISRs. For the period beyond 120 h after initiation of chemotherapy, FN may have the potential to improve the prevention of “beyond delayed” CINV. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-194611. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document