The use of a palliative care tool in a community private practice.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Tallat Mahmood ◽  
Helen Shock ◽  
Jane Severson ◽  
Douglas W. Blayney ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Individual Patient Level ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
The Individual

95 Background: Although symptom assessment is a routine part of oncology care, data from the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC) showed variation in individual practice (Health Affairs 31:718, 2012). As part of the MOQC Palliative Care Demonstration Project, we implemented the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System(ESAS) in a private oncology clinic. ESAS is a valid and reliable assessment tool that evaluates nine common symptoms experienced by cancer patients. Our target population was patients with active cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: Initial implementation focused on patients of only one of the practice’s physicians. Symptoms rated >3 were considered symptomatic and were addressed by the physician. To monitor overall performance, a practice profile was compiled from the individual ESAS results. For symptoms with the greatest severity and incidence, targeted resources were developed and integrated in new electronic medical record templates and educational sessions with patients. Results: Managing change incrementally with weekly reassessment of implementation problems was effective. Use of the ESAS tool allowed for a focused discussion of the patient symptomatology and lead to better efficiency for the physician. Understanding the symptom burden of the patient population and implementing practice wide interventions helped to reduce the symptom burden at an individual patient level. Conclusions: The ease of use of the ESAS tool makes it highly successful in the private oncology practice setting. Profiling the symptom burden at a practice level facilitates targeted improvements and monitoring of performance over time. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prescreening of Patient-reported Symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Outpatient Palliative Cancer Care

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garden Lee ◽  
Han Sang Kim ◽  
Si Won Lee ◽  
Eun Hwa Kim ◽  
Bori Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Severe Symptom ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: Although early palliative care is associated with a better quality of life and improved outcomes in end-of-life cancer care, the criteria of palliative care referral are still elusive. Methods: We collected patient-reported symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at the baseline, first, and second follow-up visit. The ESAS evaluates ten symptoms: pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, dyspnea, sleep disorder, appetite, and wellbeing. A total of 71 patients were evaluable, with a median age of 65 years, male (62%), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status distribution of 1/2/3 (28%/39%/33%), respectively. Results: Twenty (28%) patients had moderate/severe symptom burden with the mean ESAS ≥5. Interestingly, most of the patients with moderate/severe symptom burdens (ESAS ≥5) had globally elevated symptom expression. While the mean ESAS score was maintained in patients with mild symptom burden (ESAS<5; 2.7 at the baseline; 3.4 at the first follow-up; 3.0 at the second follow-up; P =0.117), there was significant symptom improvement in patients with moderate/severe symptom burden (ESAS≥5; 6.5 at the baseline; 4.5 at the first follow-up; 3.6 at the second follow-up; P <0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients with ESAS ≥5 may benefit from outpatient palliative cancer care. Prescreening of patient-reported symptoms using ESAS can be useful for identifying unmet palliative care needs in advanced cancer patients.

scholarly journals Integrating Palliative Care Services in Ambulatory Oncology: An Application of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e401-e407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherri L. Rauenzahn ◽  
Susanne Schmidt ◽  
Ifeoma O. Aduba ◽  
Jessica T. Jones ◽  
Nazneen Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Referral System ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Ambulatory Oncology ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

Purpose: Research in palliative care demonstrates improvements in overall survival, quality of life, symptom management, and reductions in the cost of care. Despite the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendation for early concurrent palliative care in patients with advanced cancer and high symptom burden, integrating palliative services is challenging. Our aims were to quantitatively describe the palliative referral rates and symptom burden in a South Texas cancer center and establish a palliative referral system by implementing the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Methods: As part of our Plan-Do-Study-Act process, all staff received an educational overview of the ESAS tool and consultation ordering process. The ESAS form was then implemented across five ambulatory oncology clinics to assess symptom burden and changes therein longitudinally. Referral rates and symptom assessment scores were tracked as metrics for quality improvement. Results: On average, one patient per month was referred before implementation of the intervention compared with 10 patients per month after implementation across all clinics. In five sample clinics, 607 patients completed the initial assessment, and 430 follow-up forms were collected over 5 months, resulting in a total of 1,037 scores collected in REDCap. The mean ESAS score for initial patient visits was 20.0 (standard deviation, 18.1), and referred patients had an initial mean score of 39.0 (standard deviation, 19.0). Conclusion: This project highlights the low palliative care consultation rate, high symptom burden of oncology patients, and underuse of services by oncologists despite improvements with the introduction of a symptom assessment form and referral system.

Symptom burden and characteristics of patients who die in the acute palliative care unit of a tertiary cancer center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
YuJung Kim ◽  
Grace S. Ahn ◽  
Hak Ro Kim ◽  
Beodeul Kang ◽  
Sung Soun Hur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Tertiary Cancer Center

53 Background: Acute Palliative Care Units (ACPUs) are novel inpatient programs in tertiary care centers that provide aggressive symptom management and assist transition to hospice. However, patients often die in the APCU before successfully transferring to hospice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the symptom burden and characteristics of advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all advanced cancer patients admitted to the APCU between April, 2015 and March, 2016 at a tertiary cancer center in Korea. Basic characteristics and symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were obtained from consultation upon APCU admission. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare patients who died in the APCU with those who were discharged alive. Results: Of the 267 patients analyzed, 87 patients (33%) died in the APCU. The median age of patients was 66 (range, 23-97). Patients who died in the APCU had higher ESAS scores of drowsiness (6 vs 5, P = 0.002), dyspnea (4 vs 2, P = 0.001), anorexia (8 vs 6, P = 0.014) and insomnia (6 vs 4, P = 0.001) compared to patients who discharged alive. Total symptom distress scores (SDS) were also significantly higher (47 vs 40, P = 0.001). Patients who died in the APCU were more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] for female patients 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.67, P < 0.001) and have higher ESAS scores of drowsiness (OR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.08-3.99, P = 0.029) and dyspnea (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.26-3.80, P = 0.005). These patients showed significantly shorter survival after APCU admission (7 days vs 31 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU are more likely to be male and have significantly higher symptom burden that include drowsiness and dyspnea. These patients show rapid clinical deterioration after APCU admission. More proactive and timely end-of-life care is needed for these patients.

Psychosocial Risk, Symptom Burden, and Concerns in Families Affected by Childhood Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Brooke Russell ◽  
Michaela Patton ◽  
Courtney Tromburg ◽  
Hailey Zwicker ◽  
Gregory M. T. Guilcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Psychosocial Risk ◽  
Psychosocial Assessment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Risk Symptom

Abstract PURPOSE: The revised Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PATrev) is a common family-level risk-based screening tool for pediatric oncology that has gained support for its ability to predict, at diagnosis, the degree of psychosocial support a family may require throughout the treatment trajectory. However, ongoing screening for symptoms and concerns (e.g., feeling alone, understanding treatment) remain underutilized. Resource limitations necessitate triaging and intervention based on need and risk. Given the widespread use of the PATrev, we sought to explore the association between family psychosocial risk, symptom burden (as measured by the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System; ESAS-r), and concerns (as measured by the Canadian Problem Checklist; CPC). METHODS: Families (n = 85) with children between 2–18 years of age (M = 11.98, male: 62.4%) on or off treatment for cancer were recruited from the Alberta Children’s Hospital. One parent from each family completed the PATrev and the CPC. Participants 8–18 years of age completed the ESAS-r. RESULTS: Risk category (unviersal/low risk = 67.1%, targeted/intermediate risk = 21.1%, clinical/high risk = 5.9%), predicted symptom burden (F[2, 63.07] = 4.57, p = .014) and concerns (F[2, 80.08] = 16.34, p < .001), such that universal risk was associated with significantly lower symptom burden and fewer concerns. CONCLUSION: Family psychosocial risk is associated with cross-sectionally identified concerns and symptom burden, suggesting that resources might be prioritized for families with the greatest predicted need. Future research should evaluate the predictive validity of the PATrev to identify longitudinal concerns and symptom burden throughout the cancer trajectory.

scholarly journals Prevalence and characteristics of patients with heart failure needing palliative care

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Fernanda Arenas Ochoa ◽  
Valentina González-Jaramillo ◽  
Clara Saldarriaga ◽  
Mariantonia Lemos ◽  
Alicia Krikorian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Kansas City ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Psychosocial Problems ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background Few hospitals and heart failure (HF) clinics offer concurrent palliative care (PC) together with life-prolonging therapies. To know the prevalence of patients in HF clinics needing PC and useful tools to recognize them are the first steps to extending PC in those settings. However, it is still unknown whether tools commonly used to identify patients with HF needing PC can correctly distinguish them. Two systematic reviews found that the NECesidades PALiativas (NECPAL) tool was one of the two most commonly used tools to asses PC needs in HF patients. Therefore, we assessed 1) the prevalence of PC needs in HF clinics according to the NECPAL tool, and 2) the characteristics of the patients identified as having PC; mainly, their quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, and psychosocial problems. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at two HF clinics in Colombia. We assessed the prevalence of PC in the overall sample and in subgroups according to clinical and demographic variables. We assessed QoL, symptom burden, and psychosocial problems using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). We compared the results of these tools between patients identified as having PC needs (+NECPAL) and patients identified as not having PC needs (–NECPAL). Results Among the 178 patients, 78 (44%) had PC needs. The prevalence of PC needs was twice as nigh in patients NYHA III/IV as in patients NYHA I/II and almost twice as high in patients older than 70 years as in patients younger than 70 years. Compared to –NECPAL patients, +NECPAL patients had worse QoL, more severe shortness of breath, tiredness, drowsiness, and pain, and more psychosocial problems. Conclusion The prevalence of PC needs in outpatient HF clinics is high and is even higher in older patients and in patients at more advanced NYHA stages. Compared to patients identified as not having PC needs, patients identified as having PC needs have worse QoL, more severe symptoms, and greater psychosocial problems. Including a PC provider in the multidisciplinary team of HF clinics may help to assess and cover these needs.

ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) as An Effective Outpatient Serial-Longitudinal Symptom Assessment Tool In Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3798-3798
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Darla K Liles ◽  
Charles L Knupp
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

Abstract Abstract 3798 Purpose: Our goal is to implement an ongoing symptom assessment strategy using a validated palliative care tool in the outpatient management of adult patients with sickle cell disease at a comprehensive sickle cell center. Methods: Sickle cell disease is a chronic lifetime illness with intermittent acute exacerbations to daily symptoms. The extension of palliative care symptom management strategies to patients with sickle cell disease has been proposed. Symptom assessment tools such as the ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), validated in the palliative care population, may have a role in sickle cell disease management. Ten symptoms are assessed, with the average 24 hour symptom score reported on a 0 to 10 numerical scale, 10 being the worst possible. In our study, 75 adult patients with sickle cell disease presenting for their outpatient visit at a comprehensive sickle cell center were enrolled; they were asked to complete the ESAS and a survey regarding their opinion of the ESAS at each clinic visit. Results: Study patients were 100% African American, 56% (42/75) female, ages 19–67, with disease types 71% (53/75) HgbSS, 19% (14/75) HgbSC, and 11% (8/75) HgbS/beta thal. At least 49% (37/75) of patients had one follow up visit after enrollment, for a total of 112 clinic visits. On the initial visit, 92% (65/71) agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “the ESAS is easy to complete”; 97% (71/73) reported instructions as clear; 96% (72/75) reported no words were difficult to understand; 83% (59/71) were satisfied or very satisfied with the ESAS as a way to report symptoms; 93% (68/73) would recommend the ESAS to other patients. 62% (45/73) of patients reported the ESAS helped them remember symptoms they were experiencing; 34% (25/73) were encouraged to discuss medical issues more openly with their health care provider. In a comparison of visit 1 (V1) and 2 (V2) in the 37 patient subset with a single follow up visit, 94% (33/35) on V1 and 94% (33/35) on V2 recommended the ESAS to other patients; 78% (28/36) on V1 and 86% (31/36) on V2 were satisfied or very satisfied with the ESAS. Including all 75 patients on their initial visit, the most intense symptoms (≥ 4 on ESAS scale) recorded were pain 4.6 (± 3.1) and sleep 4.1 (±3). In the 37 patient subset with follow up, V1 pain 4.7 (± 2.7) and V1 sleep 3.5 (± 2.5); V2 pain 4.4 (± 3.2) and V2 sleep 4.3 (± 2.6). Conclusion: The ESAS is an acceptable, brief, easy to understand symptom assessment tool which can be integrated into an outpatient sickle cell clinic as part of a serial-longitudinal symptom management strategy. Future studies should include measuring the impact of symptom-directed interventions on self-reported symptoms. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Symptom burden in hospitalized patients with curable and incurable cancers.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 190-190
Author(s):  
Lauren Waldman ◽  
Richard Newcomb ◽  
Ryan David Nipp ◽  
Ephraim P. Hochberg ◽  
Vicki Jackson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Care Utilization

190 Background: Inpatient supportive care interventions are targeted to patients with advanced solid tumors due to perceived higher symptom burden. Yet, few studies have characterized symptom prevalence in hospitalized patients with curable cancers. We aimed to describe and compare symptom burden and palliative care utilization in hospitalized patients with curable and incurable cancers to determine the allocation of such supportive care resources. Methods: We conducted a single center study of 1549 patients (238 curable hematologic, 239 curable solid, 123 incurable hematologic, 949 incurable solid cancers) who experienced an unplanned hospitalization between 9/14 - 4/17. On admission, we assessed patients’ physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) and psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 and Primary Care PTSD Screen). Results: The median number of moderate to severe symptoms reported by patients with curable hematologic, curable solid, incurable hematologic, and incurable solid cancers were 5 [3-6], 5 [3-7], 5 [4-6], and 6 [4-7], respectively. Most patients reported moderate to severe fatigue (83.6%, 82.9%, 81.3%, 86.9%). Table 1 depicts rates of psychological distress. In adjusted analyses patients with incurable solid cancers reported higher symptom burden (β = 7.6, p < 0.01), depression (β = 0.4, p = 0.01), and anxiety (β = 0.3, p = 0.03) symptoms, but no difference in PTSD symptoms. Among patients in top quartile of symptom burden, palliative care was consulted in 16.2%, 7.9%, 23.8%, and 49.6% (p < 0.01) of patients with curable hematologic, curable solid, incurable hematologic, and incurable solid cancers, respectively. Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with solid and hematologic cancers experience substantial physical and psychological symptoms regardless of the curability of their illness. Palliative care is rarely consulted for highly symptomatic patients with curable cancers. Inpatient supportive care interventions should target the needs of all highly symptomatic patients with cancer. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Impact of Palliative Care in Evaluating and Relieving Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer. The DEMETRA Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Corli ◽  
Giacomo Pellegrini ◽  
Cristina Bosetti ◽  
Luca Riva ◽  
Matteo Crippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Symptom Intensity ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Patients Experience

Abstract Background: Cancer patients experience a number of symptoms throughout the course of the disease. We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer at admission to specialist palliative care (PC) services and seven days later, to estimate the immediate impact of PC intervention.Patient and methods: The analysis was based on an observational, prospective, multicenter study (named DEMETRA) conducted in Italy to outline the profile of patients, families and PC services in different care settings (hospital, hospice and home care). The prevalence and intensity of symptoms were assessed using three tools, including the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS).Results: Five PC centers recruited 865 cancer patients. Thirty-three different symptoms were observed at baseline, the most frequent being asthenia (85%) and lack of appetite (71%). Two-thirds of patients experienced six to twelve simultaneous symptoms. The intensity of the most frequent symptoms according to ESAS varied from 5.5 for asthenia to 3.9 for nausea. The presence and intensity of physical symptoms increased with increasing levels of anxiety and depression. After seven days, prevalence decreased significantly only for nausea and breathlessness, while intensity diminished significantly for almost all symptoms. At admission we noted a correlation between patients' symptoms and the care setting. After one week, the symptom intensity was uniformly reduced in all settings.Conclusions: The study confirmed the considerable symptom burden of patients with advanced cancer. PC intervention significantly lessened the severity of symptoms, despite the patients’ advanced disease and short survival.

scholarly journals Impact of Palliative Care in Evaluating and Relieving Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Results from the DEMETRA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (22) ◽  
pp. 8429
Author(s):  
Oscar Corli ◽  
Giacomo Pellegrini ◽  
Cristina Bosetti ◽  
Luca Riva ◽  
Matteo Crippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Intervention Patient ◽  
Almost All

Background: Cancer patients experience multiple symptoms throughout the course of the disease. We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer at admission to specialist palliative care (PC) services and seven days later to estimate the immediate impact of PC intervention. Patient and methods: The analysis was based on an observational, prospective, multicenter study (named DEMETRA) conducted in Italy on new patients accessing network specialist PC centers during the period May 2017–November 2017. The prevalence and intensity of symptoms were assessed at baseline and after seven days using three tools including the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Results: Five PC centers recruited 865 cancer patients. Thirty-three different symptoms were observed at the baseline, the most frequent being asthenia (84.9%) and poor well-being (71%). The intensity of the most frequent symptoms according to ESAS ranged from 5.5 for asthenia to 3.9 for nausea. The presence and intensity of physical symptoms increased with increasing levels of anxiety and depression. After seven days, prevalence of nausea and breathlessness as well as intensity of almost all symptoms significantly decreased. Conclusions: The study confirmed the considerable symptom burden of patients with advanced cancer. PC intervention has significantly reduced the severity of symptoms, despite the patients’ advanced disease and short survival.

Integrating palliative care services in oncology clinics: An application of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 168-168
Author(s):  
Sherri L. Rauenzahn ◽  
Susanne Schmidt ◽  
Jessica Jones ◽  
Ifeoma Aduba ◽  
Laura LaNiel Tenner
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services

168 Background: Research inpalliative care has shown improvements in overall survival, quality of life, symptom management, care satisfaction and reductions in the cost of care. Therefore, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has recommended early concurrent palliative care in patients with advanced cancer and with high symptom burden. Despite this recommendation, integrating palliative services at our NCI-designated cancer center has been challenging. The aims of this project were to quantitatively describe the symptom burden of patients in ambulatory oncology clinics; facilitate the establishment of an effective referral system by detecting discrepancies between symptom burden and referral practices; and improve the integration of palliative care services by implementing the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) tool into 5 of our oncology clinics. Methods: ESAS forms consist of 10 questions assessing patient symptom burden and quality of life. Total scores range from 0 to 100. This tool was distributed to patients at two breast, two gastrointestinal and the thoracic clinics at each visit. The provider reviewed the forms and decided if a palliative care referral was appropriate based on patient responses. The forms as well as referral decisions were entered into REDCap. Over a 5 month period, 607 patients completed the initial assessment and 430 follow up forms were collected, resulting in a total of 1,037 scores collected. Results: The mean ESAS score for all patient visits was 20.7 (SD = 18.7). Only 3.5% (n = 21) of all patients were initially referred to palliative care and 2.6% (n = 11) of patients were referred on follow up visits. Those with an initial referral had an initial mean score of 39.0 (SD = 19.0) and a mean follow up score of 31.9 (SD = 19.5). Conclusions: This project highlights the low palliative care consultation rate and the under-utilization of services by most oncologists at the cancer center despite using the ESAS tool. However, those who received a referral had lower ESAS scores at follow-up. We propose utilizing a trigger that would capture a preset percentage of patients who indicated scores reflective of high symptom burden and distress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document