Resource use and costs in the last year of life among Medicare beneficiaries who died from prostate cancer versus with the disease between 2000 and 2007.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6631-6631
Author(s):  
Shelby D. Reed ◽  
Michaela A Dinan ◽  
Yanhong Li ◽  
Yinghong Zhang ◽  
Lesley H Curtis ◽  
...  

6631 Background: Prostate cancer is one of the leading sources of overall cancer care costs among men in the United States. Medical resource use and costs associated with prostate cancer care at the end of life, remain poorly understood. Methods: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare data was used to characterize changes in resource utilization and health care costs to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who died of prostate cancer vs. non-prostate causes between 2000 and 2007. Results: A total of 34,727 patients with prostate cancer met study criteria. Patients who died of prostate cancer were significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with incident distant metastatic disease (27% vs. 4%) and had fewer comorbid conditions than patients who died of other causes. In the year prior to death, men who died of prostate cancer had lower mean inpatient costs ($20,769 vs. $29,851), resulting from fewer hospitalizations (1.8 vs. 2.1) and fewer days spent in the hospital (12.2 vs. 15.7) and the ICU (1.4 vs. 3.4) as compared to men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer but died of some other cause (all P< 0.001). Men who died of prostate cancer also had lower rates of SNF utilization (32.8% vs 36.2%) and spent fewer days in SNF institutions (11.7 vs 14.7) (both P< 0.001). Conversely, men who died of prostate cancer were more likely to have enrolled in hospice (62% vs. 28%) with higher mean hospice costs ($5,117 vs. $1,981) (both P< 0.001). The substitution of more hospice care relative to inpatient care for men who died of prostate cancer resulted in lower total health care costs ($42,572 vs. $45,830; P< 0.001) relative to men who died from non-prostate cancer causes. Conclusions: Among men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who died between 2000 and 2007, those with prostate cancer-specific mortality had lower overall health care costs than those who died from other causes. Less aggressive inpatient care near the end of life may explain the differences in cost. Ongoing investigation of care at the end of life is warranted given recent changes in the treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (22) ◽  
pp. 1935-1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle B. Rocque ◽  
Courtney P. Williams ◽  
Harold D. Miller ◽  
Andres Azuero ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
...  

PURPOSEMany community cancer clinics closed between 2008 and 2016, with additional closings potentially expected. Limited data exist on the impact of travel time on health care costs and resource use.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study (2012 to 2015) evaluated travel time to cancer care site for Medicare beneficiaries age 65 years or older in the southeastern United States. The primary outcome was Medicare spending by phase of care (ie, initial, survivorship, end of life). Secondary outcomes included patient cost responsibility and resource use measured by hospitalization rates, intensive care unit admissions, and chemotherapy-related hospitalization rates. Hierarchical linear models with patients clustered within cancer care site (CCS) were used to determine the effects of travel time on average monthly phase-specific Medicare spending and patient cost responsibility.RESULTSMedian travel time was 32 (interquartile range, 18-59) minutes for the 23,382 included Medicare beneficiaries, with 24% of patients traveling longer than 1 hour to their CCS. During the initial phase of care, Medicare spending was 14% higher and patient cost responsibility was 10% higher for patients traveling longer than 1 hour than those traveling 30 minutes or less. Hospitalization rates were 4% to 13% higher for patients traveling longer than 1 hour versus 30 minutes or less in the initial (61 v 54), survivorship (27 v 26), and end-of-life (310 v 286) phases of care (all P < .05). Most patients traveling longer than 1 hour were hospitalized at a local hospital rather than at their CCS, whereas the converse was true for patients traveling 30 minutes or less.CONCLUSIONAs health care locations close, patients living farther from treatment sites may experience more limited access to care, and health care spending could increase for patients and Medicare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. A507
Author(s):  
K Faes ◽  
V De Frène ◽  
J Cohen ◽  
L Annemans

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 927-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Bartsch ◽  
Marie C. Ferguson ◽  
James A. McKinnell ◽  
Kelly J. O'Shea ◽  
Patrick T. Wedlock ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greer Donley ◽  
Marion Danis

The cost of health care at the end of life accounts for a high proportion of total health care costs in the United States. The percentage of Medicare payments attributable to patients in their last year of life was 28.3% in 1978 and has remained substantially the same at 25.1% in 2006. This indicates how little progress has been made in containing these costs, though doing so will be important to promote a financially sustainable health care system. These expenditures also highlight the prospect that efforts to reduce health care costs overall are likely to disproportionately affect the care patients receive at the end of life.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristof Faes ◽  
Veerle De Frène ◽  
Joachim Cohen ◽  
Lieven Annemans

Author(s):  
John F. Newman ◽  
William B. Elliott ◽  
James O. Gibbs ◽  
Helen C. Gift

2020 ◽  
Vol 174 (2) ◽  
pp. 200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea E. Strahan ◽  
Gery P. Guy ◽  
Michele Bohm ◽  
Meghan Frey ◽  
Jean Y. Ko

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document