Perceptions of benefits and harms of alcohol consumption as predictors of alcohol cessation in adult cancer survivors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9595-9595
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Liu ◽  
Dan Pringle ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Chongya Niu ◽  
Mary Mahler ◽  
...  

9595 Background: Survivorship programs are being developed at many cancer centers, addressing secondary prevention and healthy lifestyle issues. We evaluated whether perceptions regarding the harms and benefits of alcohol use influenced alcohol cessation or recidivism in adult cancer survivors. Methods: 531 cancer patients of all subtypes were surveyed at a comprehensive cancer center for their alcohol habits before and after cancer diagnosis and their perception of benefits/harms for continued drinking. Multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the association of each variable with change in alcohol consumption after diagnosis adjusted for significant socio-demographic and clinico-pathological covariates. Results: Among 325 current drinkers at diagnosis, 55% quit or cut down their alcohol consumption 1 year after diagnosis, while 16% of 95 ex-drinkers at diagnosis restarted drinking at 1 year. Negative perceptions of the effects of alcohol on the individual patient were strongly associated with cessation: the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of quitting were significant for a perceived negative effect on quality of life (aOR=2.2, p=0.006), survival (aOR=3.8, p=1.3E-5), fatigue (aOR=3.1, p=4.6E-5) or an increased chance in self-harm (aOR=2.6, p=0.01). Perceptions of how alcohol affected the average cancer patient had similar associations. While perceptions did not influence alcohol recidivism rates, receiving chemotherapy was the only variable associated with continued abstinence (aOR=5.5, p=0.007). Although only 8% of patients received alcohol cessation information from an oncologist, it had the greatest impact on cessation (aOR=6.6, p=0.006), an association not seen with other information sources or other healthcare providers. Conclusions: Perception to the negative effects of alcohol use on their health in cancer survivors strongly predicted for alcohol cessation. The oncologist had a most significant counselling role for alcohol cessation.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9551-9551
Author(s):  
Chongya Niu ◽  
Lawson Eng ◽  
Xin Qiu ◽  
Xiaowei Shen ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
...  

9551 Background: In developing a cancer survivorship program at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Canada), cancer survivors were surveyed on modifiable behaviours: smoking/alcohol intake and physical activity. We evaluated whether special considerations should be given to elderly cancer survivors (age 65 years or higher), where few data currently exists. Methods: 616 adult cancer survivors of all disease sites were asked about their smoking, alcohol, and physical activity habits, and their attitudes and knowledge about effects of these habits on cancer outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the effect of age on these factors. Results: 23% were elderly; 53% female; 15% breast, 20% gastrointestinal/gynecologic, 24% hematologic, 19% thoracic/head and neck, and 13% genitourinary cancers. Median follow up was 24 months. Elderly survivors were more likely to be ever smokers (OR=1.69, 95% CI [1.12-2.53]) and ex-smokers than current (OR=4.11 [2.02-8.33]), but less likely to know how smoking could affect cancer treatment (OR=1.72 [1.09-2.69]) or outcome (OR=1.66 [1.07-2.60]). Elderly patients were less likely to binge drink (OR=2.07 [1.34-3.19]), but more likely to perceive alcohol as improving quality of life (OR=1.98 [1.11-3.56]) and overall survival (OR=2.32 [1.22-4.41]) in their own situation. Elderly survivors were less likely to receive information about alcohol use (OR=2.89 [1.29-6.49]). Meeting exercise guidelines at diagnosis (OR=1.76 [1.16-2.67]) and improving/maintaining them after treatment (OR=2.02 [1.12-2.93]) was substantially lower in elderly survivors, but perceived benefits/harms of exercise did not differ with age. Conclusions: Elderly patients know less about the impact of smoking on their overall health, despite having higher rates of cumulative exposure. A lower proportion received information on alcohol use. Elderly patients are less able to achieve the same exercise goals as younger patients. Survivorship programs may need to tailor counselling on modifiable behaviours by age group. CN, LE, SMHA, and GL contributed equally.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayah M. Liska ◽  
Angie Kolen

Abstract Purpose: As a result of a cancer diagnosis and treatment, many cancer survivors experience persistent physical, mental, and emotional symptoms that affect their quality of life. Physical activity has been identified as an intervention that may help to manage the side effects of a cancer diagnosis and its treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of physical activity on overall quality of life in adult cancer survivors. Methods: One-on-one semi structured interviews were conducted in person or via telephone with 13 adult (≥18 yrs) cancer survivors who had completed cancer treatment. Results: These cancer survivors described their physical activity as improving their physical functioning and mental health, as a means of positive social engagement, and adding positivity to their daily life. Conclusion: These results support the role of physical activity to enhance cancer survivors’ quality of life regardless of the individuals’ treatment(s) type, duration, or time since the end of active cancer treatment. Further research is warranted to (a) expand this research with a larger sample, (b) examine healthcare providers’ knowledge and application of exercise guidelines to cancer survivors in cancer care, and (c) explore implementation strategies for greater advocacy for healthcare providers to share the exercise recommendations with cancer survivors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
pp. 7123-7132
Author(s):  
Karina I. Halilova ◽  
Maria Pisu ◽  
Andres Azuero ◽  
Courtney P. Williams ◽  
Kelly M. Kenzik ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A Griffith ◽  
Renee Royak-Schaler ◽  
Kim Nesbitt ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
Adriane Kozlovsky ◽  
...  

Breast cancer survival rates are lower in African Americans (AAs) than in Caucasians, owing in part to a higher prevalence of obesity in the former, which increases the risk of recurrence and mortality. The Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) found that Caucasian women who followed a low-fat eating plan experienced a lower rate of cancer recurrence than women who maintained their usual diets. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of a WINS plan tailored to the cultural needs of AA breast cancer survivors. This feasibility pilot study was conducted at a university National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center outpatient clinic with AA breast cancer survivors. The culturally specific WINS (WINS-c) plan included eight individual counseling sessions, five educational group meetings, and follow-up telephone calls over a 1-year period. Outcome measures included dietary fat, triglyceride, insulin and glucose levels, and fruit and vegetable intake. Participants ( n = 8) had a mean age of 61.1 years (standard error of the mean (SEM) 3.1 years) and a mean BMI of 32 kg/m2 (SEM 4.25 kg/m)2. Baseline daily fat consumption decreased from 64.6 g (range 36.8–119.6g) to 44.0 g (21.6–73.4g) at 52 weeks ( p = 0.07). Mean daily consumption of fruits and vegetables increased by 36% and 15%, respectively. Mean triglyceride levels decreased at 12 months ( p < 0.05). Sustained hyperinsulinemia was noted in most participants, including those without diabetes. Mean calcium and vitamin D consumption decreased over the 1-year study period. In AA breast cancer survivors, the WINS-c program resulted in a trend toward reduced fat consumption and may represent a sustainable approach in this population for improvement of diet quality after breast cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19625-e19625
Author(s):  
Guadalupe R. Palos ◽  
Fran Zandstra ◽  
Ludivine Russell ◽  
Jacklyn J Flores ◽  
Yvette DeJesus ◽  
...  

e19625 Background: Clinical practice algorithms provide a framework to guide providers’ practice in delivering care to long-term cancer survivors. Here we describe how algorithms were developed in a comprehensive cancer center and types of metrics used to evaluate their feasibility. Methods: Survivorship practice algorithms were based on a multidisciplinary care approach successfully used to build screening and treatment algorithms. This model consisted of four phases: development, adoption, implementation, and evaluation of algorithms. Phase 1, expert clinicians and researchers identified and agreed upon a specific cancer site. Group-consensus and literature reviews/syntheses were used to determine eligibility criteria to transition patients to survivorship care. Phase 2, reviews and approval processes were conducted by credentialing and regulatory committees to ensure adoption of the algorithms into clinical practice. Phase 3, pilot programs were conducted to implement the algorithm(s) in disease-specific survivorship clinics. Phase 4, metrics to evaluate progress included the number of algorithms and providers’ use of and adherence to the algorithms. Results: Between 09/2008 – 12/2011, nine multidisciplinary disease-specific survivorship clinics were operationalized. Thirty-seven practice algorithms were developed to provide survivorship care based on each survivor’s specific needs. The algorithms’ framework included: 1) surveillance for recurrent or new primary malignancies; 2) primary and secondary cancer prevention recommendations; 3) management of toxicities and latent treatment effects; and 4) assessment of psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Practice algorithms provide an organized plan to deliver comprehensive and holistic care to long-term survivors. Given the projected increase in cancer survivors, further research is needed to determine how practice algorithms impact providers’ practice and survivors’ outcomes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20523-e20523
Author(s):  
Debra L. Friedman ◽  
Maureen Sanderson ◽  
Pamela Hull ◽  
Debra Wujcik ◽  
Dira R Ashworth ◽  
...  

e20523 Background: Cancer health disparities are well described for incidence, diagnosis and treatment. Little is known about disparities among long-term survivors. Methods: At Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC), an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center and Meharry Medical College (MMC), minority serving institutional partner, we evaluated quality of life (QOL) using the FACT-G, FACT-B, FACT-L, and FACT-P; posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) using the PTSD Checklist (PCL); and posttraumatic growth (PTG) using the PTG Inventory (PTGI) among breast, lung or prostate cancer survivors. We used linear regression to compare the scale mean values by institution while adjusting for confounding variables. Results: Among 111 breast, 53 lung and 68 prostate cancer survivors, mean age was 62 years, 61% were female, 33% were black, 65% were married, 22% and 67% respectively had a high school degree or some college/higher education, 36% were employed and 94% were insured. MMC survivors were younger (p = 0.0005), more likely to be black (p <0.0001), less likely to be married (p < 0.0001), less educated (p<0.0001) and more likely to be uninsured (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for race, insurance status and educational level, there were no significant differences in cancer-related QOL between VICC and MMC survivors. MMC survivors did score significantly higher than VICC survivors on the PCL (33.9 vs. 28.3; p = 0.01) and the PTGI (75.9 vs. 62.5; p = 0.002). A total of 19 (8.3%) survivors met criteria for PTSD with a score of 50 or more (18.1% MMC, 3.8% VICC, p =0.003). Scores were significantly increased for MMC survivors relative to VICC survivors on all PTG subscales, especially the appreciation for life subscale (p = 0.0005). Conclusions: Cancer health disparities extend into the survivorship period. Although overall QOL did not differ, survivors treated at an underserved institution had significantly higher PTSD than those treated at a comprehensive cancer center. Underserved survivors also exhibited higher degrees of PTG. Further evaluation will identify the most significant sources of stress and resilience in order to design interventions to improve psychosocial wellbeing and decrease disparities.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9536-9536
Author(s):  
Lawson Eng ◽  
Dan Pringle ◽  
Xin Qiu ◽  
Xiaowei Shen ◽  
Chongya Niu ◽  
...  

9536 Background: We previously described a strong inverse relationship between social smoking exposures (at home, spousal and with peers) and smoking cessation in lung cancer, with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of 3-8 (Eng et al, ASCO 2012, abst 9032). In the current analysis, we evaluated whether these associations hold true in adult cancers in general, particularly cancers not traditionally known to have smoking as a risk factor. Methods: 616 cancer survivors across multiple cancer sites were surveyed on their smoking, alcohol, and physical activity habits before and at various times after cancer diagnosis. Social smoking exposures were documented. Multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the association of each variable with change in each habit after diagnosis adjusted for significant socio-demographic and clinico-pathological covariates. Results: Median follow-up after diagnosis was 26 months. 15% had breast cancers; 15% gastrointestinal; 20% genitourinary-gynecological; 24% haematological; 36% other. Among current smokers at diagnosis, 56% quit after diagnosis; no ex- or never-smoker restarted. Patients without secondary home smoking exposure were significantly more likely to quit smoking than those with home exposures (aOR=9.5, 95% CI [2.4-37.8]). Similar results were seen in patients with non-smoking spouses versus smoking spouses (aOR=3.7 [1.0-13.4]), and with lack of peer smoke exposure (aOR=3.7 [1.3-10.7]). 63% patients who quit did so in the 1 year period surrounding the diagnosis date (6-months pre or post diagnosis). In comparison, first and second-hand smoking exposures did not affect other modifiable behaviours such as alcohol or physical activity. Patient awareness of quality of life and survival benefits of smoking cessation and receiving smoking cessation counselling were not associated with improved smoking cessation. Conclusions: Secondary smoking exposures are associated with lack of smoking cessation in adult cancer survivors, even in cancers not traditionally linked to smoking. Being diagnosed with cancer may be an important `teachable moment` to help patients quit, but results are strongly influenced by the surrounding social exposure to smoking. PS and GL contributed equally.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8884-8893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith M. Bellizzi ◽  
Julia H. Rowland ◽  
Diana D. Jeffery ◽  
Timothy McNeel

PurposeA population-based investigation was conducted to examine the prevalence of health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, and cancer screening) of cancer survivors by age, time since diagnosis, and cancer site. Understanding health behaviors of survivors is imperative, as many survivors are living longer and are at risk for cancer recurrence, second cancers, and complications from treatment.MethodsUsing the National Health Interview Survey, this study examined the prevalence of smoking and alcohol use as well as whether cancer survivors (n = 7,384) are meeting current recommendations for physical activity and cancer screening compared with noncancer controls (n = 121,347).ResultsCancer survivors are similar to controls with respect to smoking status and alcohol consumption after adjusting for group differences. However, younger survivors (18 to 40 years) are at greater risk for continued smoking than controls. Survivors are 9% more likely to meet physical activity recommendations compared with controls. χ2tests indicate no significant differences in smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity by time since diagnosis, but differences by cancer site exist. Female cancer survivors are 34% and 36% more likely to meet mammogram and Papanicolaou smear screening recommendations, respectively, compared with controls. Similar screening patterns were found for prostate-specific antigen screening in men.ConclusionThis study provides benchmark approximations of the prevalence of risky health behaviors of survivors by time since diagnosis and cancer site. As part of the collective effort to reduce late effects of cancer treatment, oncologists may be in the best position to offer initial guidance for promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors among cancer survivors.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 895-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Selove ◽  
Maya Foster ◽  
Debra Wujcik ◽  
Maureen Sanderson ◽  
Pamela C. Hull ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document