Temozolomide metronomic schedule with weekly of cisplatin in metastaticsoft tissue sarcoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21519-e21519
Author(s):  
Tanweer Shahid ◽  
Vikash Agarwal ◽  
Saumen Basu ◽  
Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Oral Route ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metronomic Administration

e21519 Background: Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the standard treatment for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a potentially attractive chemotherapeutic agent for this disease because of the oral route of administration and efficacy similar to that of dacarbazine but potential for resistance exist. Metronomic administration of TMZ might be a way to overcome resistance. Cisplatin is active against melanoma and might counteract mechanisms of resistance to TMZ. Methods: We reviewed data of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at our Institutions with cisplatin (25 mg/m2 every 7 days for 3 out of 4 weeks) plus TMZ (50 mg/m2/day from day 2 for 27days). Our practice included such scheme for patients younger than 75 years, with a performance status not worse than 2, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Assessment of response was done every 3 cycles. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC. Results: From August 2007 to September 2008, 33 patients were treated with a median age of 44 years (18–74); most frequent sites of metastases were lung (18 cases), brain and lymph nodes (11 cases each); 29 patients were treated as first-line and 4 as second-line. The median number of delivered cycles was 4 (range 2- 8). Toxicity was mild, with no grade 4 event reported. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent and severe toxic effects: grade 3 in 2 cases and grade 2 in 10 cases, respectively. Other toxicities included thrombocytopenia (1 case grade 3 and 2 cases grade 2), anemia (1 grade 3 and 2 grade 2), neutropenia, and fatigue (1 grade 3 each). Overall, 9 patients had a partial response (27.3%; 95% exact CI: 7.0–35.5) and 8 (24%) had a disease stabilization. With a median follow-up of 20 weeks (95% CI: 19–57), there were 19 progressions and a median progression-free survival of 24 weeks (95% CI: 16-nr); 9 patients died with a median survival of 50 weeks (95% CI 43-nr). Conclusions: Results obtained in clinical practice with metronomic temozolomide plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma are encouraging, in light of the negative prognostic features of treated patients.

Metronomic schedule of temozolomide with conventional dose of cisplatin in metastatic melanoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20009-e20009
Author(s):  
E. Simeone ◽  
A. Daponte ◽  
G. De Feo ◽  
V. Montesarchio ◽  
V. Chiarion-Sileni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Melanoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Oral Route ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Conventional Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metronomic Administration

e20009 Background: Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the standard treatment for metastatic melanoma. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a potentially attractive chemotherapeutic agent for this disease because of the oral route of administration and efficacy similar to that of dacarbazine. Cisplatin is active against melanoma and might counteract mechanisms of resistance to TMZ. Metronomic administration of TMZ might be another way to overcome resistance. Patients and Methods: We reviewed data of metastatic melanoma patients treated at our Institutions with cisplatin (75 mg/m2 every 28 days) plus TMZ (75 mg/m2/die from day 2 for 21 days). Our practice included such scheme for patients younger than 75 years, with a performance status not worse than 2, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Assessment of response was done every 3 cycles. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC. Results: From August 2007 to September 2008, 33 patients were treated with a median age of 44 years (18–74); primary melanoma was ulcerated in 19 cases (58%); most frequent sites of metastases were lung (18 cases), brain and lymph nodes (11 cases each); 29 patients were treated as first-line and 4 as second-line. The median number of delivered cycles was 4 (range 2- 8). Toxicity was mild, with no grade 4 event reported. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent and severe toxic effects: grade 3 in 2 cases each and grade 2 in 16 and 9 cases, respectively. Other toxicities included thrombocytopenia (2 case grade 3 and 3 cases grade 2), anemia (1 grade 3 and 4 grade 2), neutropenia, and fatigue (1 grade 3 each). Overall, 6 patients had a partial response (18.2%; 95% exact CI: 7.0–35.5) and 8 (24%) had a disease stabilization. With a median follow-up of 20 weeks (95% CI: 19–57), there were 19 progressions and a median progression-free survival of 24 weeks (95% CI:16-nr); 9 patients died with a median survival of 50 weeks (95% CI 43-nr). Conclusions: Results obtained in clinical practice with metronomic temozolomide plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma are encouraging, in light of the negative prognostic features of treated patients. We are now planning a formal phase II study. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the clinical data and evidence of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare.Methods: The data of 17 patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the median progression-free survival (m-PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) in these patients.Results: The m-PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months), ORR was 41.2% and DCR was 70.6%. The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. While the majority of the treatment patients experienced grade 1 or 2 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs were not common, but included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Average Diameter ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the evidence and clinical data of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare. Methods: The clinical data of metastatic STS patients who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively analysed. All these patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in these patients. Results: A total of 17 patients treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine were enrolled in this study. 1 patient with angiosarcoma achieved complete response, 6 patients had partial response, 5 patients achieved stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. The average diameter change in target lesion from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. And median progression free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months). Grade 3 / 4 adverse events were not common, included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the clinical data and evidence of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare.Methods: The data of 17 patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the median progression-free survival (m-PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) in these patients. Results: The m-PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months), ORR was 41.2% and DCR was 70.6%. The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. While the majority of the treatment patients experienced grade 1 or 2 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs were not common, but included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the clinical data and evidence of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare.Methods: The data of 17 patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the median progression-free survival (m-PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) in these patients. Results: The m-PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months), ORR was 41.2% and DCR was 70.6%. The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. While the majority of the treatment patients experienced grade 1 or 2 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs were not common, but included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

Postmarketing observational study of pazopanib in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in Japan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasutomo Teshima ◽  
Satoshi Nomura ◽  
Nobuaki Fukasawa
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of pazopanib in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in routine clinical use in Japan. Methods It was a multicentre, centrally registered and uncontrolled observational study in patients who received pazopanib for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, with an observation period of 1 year after the start of drug administration. The study was conducted at 378 investigational sites in Japan from September 2012 to September 2019. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the efficacy endpoints of the study. Results A total of 1970 patients were enrolled. Of these, 680 with finalized study forms were included in the analysis. Overall, 649 patients were included in the safety analysis set, and 569 were included in the efficacy analysis set. Most of the patients (81.97%) experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR); 22.34% of patients reported serious ADRs and 34.98% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 ADRs in the safety set. Hypertension (40.37%) and hepatic dysfunction (26.50%) were the two most common ADRs. A total of 262 deaths were reported, of which 12 were due to ADRs. The median PFS was 3.09 months, whereas the median OS was not reached at the end of the 1-year observation period. Conclusions The safety and efficacy profiles in this postmarketing observational study were consistent with prior data and registration clinical trials. No new safety signals were observed while treating patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with pazopanib.

scholarly journals Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic and Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyao Feng ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Aomei Li ◽  
Han Zhou ◽  
Xixu Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematogenous Metastasis ◽  
Invasive Growth ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Transformation

Abstract BackgroundSoft tissue sarcoma（STS） is a malignant tumor of highly heterogeneous mesenchymal origin. STS has a biologic pattern and clinical transformation with localized invasive growth and susceptibility to hematogenous metastasis. Metastatic and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma may be treated by local therapeutic options, including surgery and radiation therapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT for metastatic and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 37 STS patients with 58 lesions treated with SBRT from 2009-2019 at our institution. We analyze the local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity rates of the patients.ResultThe median follow-up was 20 months（range 2 to 120 months）. One and two year LC rates were 75.3% and 55.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 20–25 months]. Median OS was 24 months and the survival rates were 66.6%, 45% and 26.6% at 1, 2 and 3-year after SBRT. Median PFS were 11months (95% CI 8–18 months). No acute or chronic grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed.ConclusionsIn patients with metastatic and recurrent STS, LC, OS and PFS were higher than expected. SBRT should be a proper treatment option for STS.

Phase II Study of ET-743 in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Le Cesne ◽  
J.Y. Blay ◽  
I. Judson ◽  
A. Van Oosterom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose This nonrandomized multicenter phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and safety of Ecteinascidin (ET-743) administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Patients and Methods Patients with documented progressive advanced soft tissue sarcoma received ET-743 as second- or third-line chemotherapy. Antitumor activity was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression, excessive toxicity, or patient refusal. Results One hundred four patients from eight European institutions were included in the study (March 1999 to November 2000). A total of 410 cycles were administered in 99 assessable patients. Toxicity mainly involved reversible grade 3 to 4 asymptomatic elevation of transaminases in 40% of patients, and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 52% of patients. There were eight partial responses (PR; objective regression rate, 8%), 45 no change (NC; > 6 months in 26% of patients), and 39 progressive disease. A progression arrest rate (PR + NC) of 56% was observed in leiomyosarcoma and 61% in synovialosarcoma. The median duration of the time to progression was 105 days, and the 6-month progression-free survival was 29%. The median duration of survival was 9.2 months. Conclusion ET-743 seems to be a promising active agent in advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with no cumulative toxicities. The 6-months progression-free survival observed in advanced soft tissue sarcoma compares favorably with those obtained with other active drugs tested in second-line chemotherapy in previous European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer trials. The median overall survival was unusually long in these heavily pretreated patients mainly due to the high number of patients who benefit from the drug in terms of tumor control.

Phase II study of pazopanib with weekly paclitaxel in refractory urothelial cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 294-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sujata Narayanan ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Russell Kent Pachynski ◽  
Anthony P. Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

294 Background: Currently, there are no standard treatments for relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). Discouraging results have been observed in trials evaluating established chemotherapeutics as single agents or in combination regimens. Paclitaxel has moderate activity when used alone and in combination in UC. Pazopanib is active in other solid tumors secondary to its potent anti-angiogenic effects. We report the results of a multi-center phase II study evaluating the combination of paclitaxel with pazopanib in refractory UC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had histologically confirmed UC, with disease that progressed on upto 2 chemotherapeutic regimens. Pazopanib (800 mg) was administered daily, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) for 3 weeks in a 28 day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the study was response-rate (RR) based on RECISTv 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety, and progression free-survival (PFS). Results: From April 2010 to September 2014, 32 patients were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (29-89) and median ECOG performance status was 1 (0-2). 17 pts (54%) had UC of the upper urinary tract disease and 15(47%) had primary bladder tumors. All pts had multiple metastatic sites, including 9 (28%) with liver metastases. Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens was 2, and 50% were considered cisplatin responsive. Objective responses were observed in 58% with 3 (12%) complete responses (CR), and 12 pts (46%) with partial responses (PR). Another 9 (35%) acheived stable disease (SD). High grade toxicities included grade 3 hypertension (n=2), grade 3 fatigue (n=4), grade 3 thrombosis (n=2) and grade 4 neutropenia (n=2). Nearly half of the patients( n= 14 ) required growth factor support. Conclusions: Our phase II study combining paclitaxel and pazopanib demonstratedsignificant anti-tumor activity in relapsed/refractory UC. This combination is safe, effective and is worthy of evaluation in randomized phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01108055.

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial assessing the activity and safety of regorafenib (REG) in patients (pts) with nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) previously treated with pazopanib (PAZ).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11021-11021
Author(s):  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Jennifer Wallet ◽  
Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Previously Treated

11021 Background: After we demonstrated the activity of REG in pts with advanced non-adipocytic STS (MirTLO 2016), we conducted a dedicated study in pts previously treated with PAZ+chemo. Methods: We report here the 5th cohort of a double-blind randomized phase 2 trial (NCT01900743). Pts were treated with regorafenib (160mg/d, 21/28d) or placebo (PB). Pts receiving placebo were offered optional cross-over in case of centrally confirmed disease progression. The primary endpoint was centrally-reviewed RECIST-based progression-free survival (PFS), evaluated on the intent-to-treat dataset. A total of 24 events was required to ensure a 90%-power for HR = 0.33 (median PFS, 3·6 vs 1·2 months), with a 1-sided α = 0·1. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: From 12/2015 to 10/2017, 37 pts were randomized (18 REG vs 19 PB) and included in the final analysis. The median age was 60 (36-76). There were 28 women (76%). All pts had a performance status 0 or 1. Histological subtypes included 24 leiomyosarcoma (11 vs 13, in REG and PB, respectively), 1 synovial sarcoma (REG), 12 other sarcoma (7 vs 5). All pts had previously been treated with PAZ +chemo (including doxorubicin: 19 vs 17; ifosfamide: 11 vs 3; trabectedin: 11 vs 9; and dacarbazine: 7 vs 6), with 2-6 prior lines. The median relative dose intensity of REG was 0·86, range 0·41-1. Out of 19 pts assigned to placebo, 13 switched to REG after progression. There was no reported objective response. We observed a significant benefit of REG compared to PB in terms of PFS (HR = 0·38; 95%CI, 0·19-0·76; p = 0·007; median PFS = 2·1 vs 1·1 months, respectively), and OS despite the cross-over (HR = 0·41; 95%CI, 0·17-0·98; p = 0·04; median OS = 18·6 vs 8·2 months). Before cross-over, the most common clinically significant grade 3 or higher adverse events were diarrhea (4 vs 0), dyspnea (3 vs 1), arterial hypertension (2 vs 0), hand-foot skin reaction (2 vs 0). Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that regorafenib has a clinically meaningful anti-tumor activity in pts with non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma pretreated by both chemotherapy and pazopanib, improving PFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01900743.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document