scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Average Diameter ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the evidence and clinical data of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare. Methods: The clinical data of metastatic STS patients who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively analysed. All these patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in these patients. Results: A total of 17 patients treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine were enrolled in this study. 1 patient with angiosarcoma achieved complete response, 6 patients had partial response, 5 patients achieved stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. The average diameter change in target lesion from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. And median progression free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months). Grade 3 / 4 adverse events were not common, included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the clinical data and evidence of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare.Methods: The data of 17 patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the median progression-free survival (m-PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) in these patients.Results: The m-PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months), ORR was 41.2% and DCR was 70.6%. The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. While the majority of the treatment patients experienced grade 1 or 2 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs were not common, but included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the clinical data and evidence of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare.Methods: The data of 17 patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the median progression-free survival (m-PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) in these patients. Results: The m-PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months), ORR was 41.2% and DCR was 70.6%. The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. While the majority of the treatment patients experienced grade 1 or 2 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs were not common, but included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the clinical data and evidence of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare.Methods: The data of 17 patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the median progression-free survival (m-PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) in these patients. Results: The m-PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months), ORR was 41.2% and DCR was 70.6%. The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. While the majority of the treatment patients experienced grade 1 or 2 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs were not common, but included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

Temozolomide metronomic schedule with weekly of cisplatin in metastaticsoft tissue sarcoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21519-e21519
Author(s):  
Tanweer Shahid ◽  
Vikash Agarwal ◽  
Saumen Basu ◽  
Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Oral Route ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metronomic Administration

e21519 Background: Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the standard treatment for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a potentially attractive chemotherapeutic agent for this disease because of the oral route of administration and efficacy similar to that of dacarbazine but potential for resistance exist. Metronomic administration of TMZ might be a way to overcome resistance. Cisplatin is active against melanoma and might counteract mechanisms of resistance to TMZ. Methods: We reviewed data of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at our Institutions with cisplatin (25 mg/m2 every 7 days for 3 out of 4 weeks) plus TMZ (50 mg/m2/day from day 2 for 27days). Our practice included such scheme for patients younger than 75 years, with a performance status not worse than 2, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Assessment of response was done every 3 cycles. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC. Results: From August 2007 to September 2008, 33 patients were treated with a median age of 44 years (18–74); most frequent sites of metastases were lung (18 cases), brain and lymph nodes (11 cases each); 29 patients were treated as first-line and 4 as second-line. The median number of delivered cycles was 4 (range 2- 8). Toxicity was mild, with no grade 4 event reported. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent and severe toxic effects: grade 3 in 2 cases and grade 2 in 10 cases, respectively. Other toxicities included thrombocytopenia (1 case grade 3 and 2 cases grade 2), anemia (1 grade 3 and 2 grade 2), neutropenia, and fatigue (1 grade 3 each). Overall, 9 patients had a partial response (27.3%; 95% exact CI: 7.0–35.5) and 8 (24%) had a disease stabilization. With a median follow-up of 20 weeks (95% CI: 19–57), there were 19 progressions and a median progression-free survival of 24 weeks (95% CI: 16-nr); 9 patients died with a median survival of 50 weeks (95% CI 43-nr). Conclusions: Results obtained in clinical practice with metronomic temozolomide plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma are encouraging, in light of the negative prognostic features of treated patients.

Postmarketing observational study of pazopanib in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in Japan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasutomo Teshima ◽  
Satoshi Nomura ◽  
Nobuaki Fukasawa
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of pazopanib in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in routine clinical use in Japan. Methods It was a multicentre, centrally registered and uncontrolled observational study in patients who received pazopanib for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, with an observation period of 1 year after the start of drug administration. The study was conducted at 378 investigational sites in Japan from September 2012 to September 2019. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the efficacy endpoints of the study. Results A total of 1970 patients were enrolled. Of these, 680 with finalized study forms were included in the analysis. Overall, 649 patients were included in the safety analysis set, and 569 were included in the efficacy analysis set. Most of the patients (81.97%) experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR); 22.34% of patients reported serious ADRs and 34.98% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 ADRs in the safety set. Hypertension (40.37%) and hepatic dysfunction (26.50%) were the two most common ADRs. A total of 262 deaths were reported, of which 12 were due to ADRs. The median PFS was 3.09 months, whereas the median OS was not reached at the end of the 1-year observation period. Conclusions The safety and efficacy profiles in this postmarketing observational study were consistent with prior data and registration clinical trials. No new safety signals were observed while treating patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with pazopanib.

scholarly journals Targeted treatment with pazopanib in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: Nearly complete response in two cases

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 400-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALI MURAT SEDEF ◽  
FATIH KÖSE ◽  
ÖZLEM DOĞAN ◽  
TARKAN ERGÜN ◽  
AHMET SEZER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Targeted Treatment ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

scholarly journals Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic and Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyao Feng ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Aomei Li ◽  
Han Zhou ◽  
Xixu Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematogenous Metastasis ◽  
Invasive Growth ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Transformation

Abstract BackgroundSoft tissue sarcoma（STS） is a malignant tumor of highly heterogeneous mesenchymal origin. STS has a biologic pattern and clinical transformation with localized invasive growth and susceptibility to hematogenous metastasis. Metastatic and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma may be treated by local therapeutic options, including surgery and radiation therapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT for metastatic and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 37 STS patients with 58 lesions treated with SBRT from 2009-2019 at our institution. We analyze the local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity rates of the patients.ResultThe median follow-up was 20 months（range 2 to 120 months）. One and two year LC rates were 75.3% and 55.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 20–25 months]. Median OS was 24 months and the survival rates were 66.6%, 45% and 26.6% at 1, 2 and 3-year after SBRT. Median PFS were 11months (95% CI 8–18 months). No acute or chronic grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed.ConclusionsIn patients with metastatic and recurrent STS, LC, OS and PFS were higher than expected. SBRT should be a proper treatment option for STS.

Phase II Study of ET-743 in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Le Cesne ◽  
J.Y. Blay ◽  
I. Judson ◽  
A. Van Oosterom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose This nonrandomized multicenter phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and safety of Ecteinascidin (ET-743) administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Patients and Methods Patients with documented progressive advanced soft tissue sarcoma received ET-743 as second- or third-line chemotherapy. Antitumor activity was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression, excessive toxicity, or patient refusal. Results One hundred four patients from eight European institutions were included in the study (March 1999 to November 2000). A total of 410 cycles were administered in 99 assessable patients. Toxicity mainly involved reversible grade 3 to 4 asymptomatic elevation of transaminases in 40% of patients, and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 52% of patients. There were eight partial responses (PR; objective regression rate, 8%), 45 no change (NC; > 6 months in 26% of patients), and 39 progressive disease. A progression arrest rate (PR + NC) of 56% was observed in leiomyosarcoma and 61% in synovialosarcoma. The median duration of the time to progression was 105 days, and the 6-month progression-free survival was 29%. The median duration of survival was 9.2 months. Conclusion ET-743 seems to be a promising active agent in advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with no cumulative toxicities. The 6-months progression-free survival observed in advanced soft tissue sarcoma compares favorably with those obtained with other active drugs tested in second-line chemotherapy in previous European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer trials. The median overall survival was unusually long in these heavily pretreated patients mainly due to the high number of patients who benefit from the drug in terms of tumor control.

Cancer immunotherapy using trabectedin and nivolumab in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: A retrospective analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlinda Maria Gordon ◽  
Kamalesh Kumar Sankhala ◽  
Nathan Stumpf ◽  
Joshua Ravicz ◽  
Suzan Arasheben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Myxoid Liposarcoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

40 Background: To restore innate tumor surveillance that is lost in cancer patients, a tumoricidal agent may have synergistic activity with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Herein, we report on a retrospective analysis of our clinical experience using trabectedin, an alkylating agent, and nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor in advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: Twenty previously treated STS patients received trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion, CIV, for 24 hours) every 3 weeks, and nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV over 30 minutes) every 2 weeks. Safety/toxicity was analyzed using the NIH/NCI CTCAE v.4.03. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1 and immune-related response criteria (irRECIST). Results: Histologic subtypes in 20 patients include undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS; n = 7), leiomyosarcoma (n = 5), synovial sarcoma (n = 2), myxoid liposarcoma (n = 4) and chondrosarcoma (n = 2). All patients had metastatic disease and a median of 4 lines of prior chemotherapy. Safety analysis (n = 20): Grade 3 treatment emergent adverse events include anemia (n = 2), fatigue (n = 1), decreased platelet count (n = 1), decreased granulocyte count (n = 1) and increased creatine kinase (n = 1). Efficacy analysis (n = 17): Seventeen patients were followed for at least 6 months and their results are reported here. There were 4 partial responses (UPS = 1, myxoid liposarcoma = 1, chondrosarcoma = 1, leiomyosarcoma = 1), 7 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease, with best overall response rate of 23.5%, median progression free survival (PFS) of > 11.6 months (range: 2.3- > 16.9 months), median overall survival (OS) of > 14.2 months (4.5- > 24.0 months), 6 month PFS rate of 64.7%, and 6 month OS rate of 94.1%. In a Phase 3 study, the median PFS was 4.2 months using trabectedin alone (Demetri et al., 2015). Conclusions: Taken together, the data suggest that paired administration of trabectedin and nivolumab is safe, and that this chemo-/immuno-therapy approach has synergistic activity.

Olaratumab plus anthracyline in advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: Data of real-world utilization in Austria.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22550-e22550
Author(s):  
Florian Kocher ◽  
Andreas Seeber ◽  
Lukas Weiss ◽  
Franz Romeder ◽  
Joanna Szkandera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Third Line

e22550 Background: Olaratumab is a humanized monoclonal anti platelet-derived growth factor receptor α antibody that has been approved in combination with doxorubicin for the treatment of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical efficacy in STS patients treated with olaratumab in a real-world setting in Austria. Methods: Retrospectively collected, longitudinal data from patients treated between November 2016 and September 2018 at 9 Austrian centers were obtained from respective medical charts. Eligible patients were all patients who received at least one dose of olaratumab. Parameters of most interest collected were response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Altogether 55 patients were included into analysis. Median age was 58 years. In total, 65.5% (n = 36), 21.8% (n = 12) and 12.7% (n = 7) received olaratumab as first-, second- or ≥ third-line treatment, respectively. Olaratumab was administered either in combination with doxorubicin (81.8%, n = 45) or liposomal doxorubicin (16.4%, n = 9); 1 patient received olaratumab as upfront monotherapy. Median PFS and OS were 2.6 and 11.4 months. The objective response rate was 11.4 % and the disease control rate was 40.9 %. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis outcome was less pronounced compared to the results of the Phase Ib/II approval trial ( Tap WD et al. Lancet 2016). Thus, the results of the ongoing phase III trial (NCT02451943) are urgently needed to confirm the efficacy of the combination of olaratumab and doxorubicin in STS patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document