GAIN-2: Neo-/adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense chemotherapy (CT) to tailored dose-dense CT in patients (pts) with high risk early breast cancer (EBC): Results on safety and interim invasive disease-free survival (iDFS).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Hans-Joachim Lueck ◽  
Ekkehart Ladda ◽  
Peter Klare ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cranial Nerves ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

516 Background: GAIN-2 (NCT01690702) compared efficacy and safety of intense, dose-dense epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) vs dose-dense, dose-tailored epirubicin/ cyclophosphamide followed by dose-dense, dose-tailored docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant or neoadjuvant CT for node-positive or high risk node-negative EBC. Here, we report safety results and interim analysis (IA) of the primary endpoint iDFS. Methods: Pts (luminal A ≥N2; luminal B N+; HER2+ and TNBC) were randomized between iddEnPC (E 150 mg/m2, nP 330 mg/m2, C 2000 mg/m2, all q2w x 3) or dtEC-dtD (dtEC q2w x 4 followed after 1 week rest by dtD q2w x 4). Primary objective was to compare iDFS. 797 events are needed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.819 with a 2-sided log-rank-test with 80% power and α=0.05. The IA of iDFS was planned after 50% of the events have occurred. Safety and compliance were secondary objectives. Results: Between 10/2012 and 09/2018, 2887 pts were randomized and 2857 started treatment (iddEnPC 1429; dtEC-dtD 1428). Median age was 51 (range 18-75) years. Overall, 18.1% were luminal A, 31.5% luminal B/HER2-, 18.8% hormone-receptor (HR)+/HER2+, 8.5% HR-/HER2+ and 23.2% TNBC. Overall, 88.1% of pts completed all treatment in both arms. 66.8% with iddEnPC vs 58.8% with dtEC-dtD delayed CT dose (p<0.001). Grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with iddEnPC (iddEnPC 50.8% vs dtEC-dtD 45.1%, p=0.002). Grade 3-4 leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, arthralgia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy were significantly higher with iddEnPC. There were 1464 serious AEs (iddEnPC 870 vs dtEC-dtD 594) and 26 (9 vs 17) predefined AEs of special interest (anaphylaxis, any AE affecting cranial nerves, macula edema). Two deaths occurred during dtEC-dtD. After a median follow-up of 45.8 months, there was no difference in iDFS between arms (log-rank p=0.9102, hazard ratio iddEnPC vs dtEC-dtD 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.23). Conclusions: No new safety concerns were observed. Use of both iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD appears feasible in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of high risk EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702 .

Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense adjuvant treatment with EnPC to dose dense, tailored therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk early breast cancer (GAIN-2).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1137-TPS1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Helmut Forstbauer ◽  
Grischa Wachsmann ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Angelika Ober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Dose Dense

TPS1137 Background: Intense dose-dense (idd) chemotherapy (CT) significantly improves overall survival in breast cancer patients. Two preceding trials explored iddETC vs a dd combination of EC-TX (GAIN) and dtEC-dtD vs conventional dosed FEC-D (Panther). Nab-paclitaxel (nP) provides a better toxicity profile and higher efficacy compared to solvent based taxanes and might be preferred in an idd regimen. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase III trial comparing iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD as adjuvant CT. Pts with uni- or bilateral primary high risk node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) and centrally confirmed ER/PR/HER2 and Ki-67 status can be included. Luminal A pts are only recruited with N+ ≥4. Randomization to iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD will be stratified by biological subtype defined by hormone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67. The iddEnPC arm will receive epirubicin (150mg/m2) q2w x3 followed by nP (260-330mg/m2, dose to be determined in run-in phase) q2w x3, followed by cyclophosphamide (2g/m2) q2w x3. The dtEC-dtD arm will receive EC (38-120/450-1200 mg/m2) q2w x4 followed after 1 wk rest by docetaxel (60-100mg/m2) q2w x4. GAIN-2 will compare toxicity and efficacy of an idd regimen (EnPC) vs a dd regimen with modification of single doses depending on individual hematological and non-hematological toxicities. Primary objective is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Secondary objectives are survival by other definitions, compliance, safety, side effects of taxanes and subgroup analyses (by 0-3, 4-9 or 10+ involved nodes and Ki-67). Efficacy analyses are planned 60 mths after end of accrual, safety interim analyses after 200 and 900 pts have completed CT. It was assumed that dtEC-dtD will achieve a 5-yr IDFS of 75% and ddEnPC will improve IDFS to 79% (HR 0.819) with a power of 80% (α=0.05, ß= 0.2).GAIN-2 is registered under NCT01690702 Results: 75pts were recruited since 1stOct 2012. Recruitment (in total 2886 pts) is planned for 36 mths in 80-100 sites in Germany. Run-in safety data to be presented. Conclusion: GAIN-2 will compare the efficacy of adjuvant iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD in pts with early N+ BC. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702.

Molecular subtyping using MammaPrint and BluePrint as an outcome predictor in U.S. breast cancer (BC) patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Katharine Yao ◽  
Mary Turk ◽  
Karen Kaul ◽  
JoEllen Weaver ◽  
Femke De Snoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Molecular Subtyping ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Luminal Type ◽  
Basal Type

9 Background: Combined use of MammaPrint and a molecular subtyping profile (BluePrint) identifies disease subgroups with marked differences in long-term outcome and response to neo-adjuvant therapy (Glück SABCS2011). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of Molecular Subtyping using MammaPrint and BluePrint in women with early stage BC treated at U.S. institutions following National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) standard guidelines. Methods: Frozen tumor samples from 180 BC patients (TI-III, N0-Ib) median age 57 years at diagnosis (range 28-89) were suitable for hybridization on full genome array. MammaPrint and BluePrint Molecular Subtypes were determined and survival for Luminal A (MammaPrint Low Risk), Luminal B (MammaPrint High Risk), HER2-type and Basal-type patients was assessed. Patients were treated either with breast conserving therapy or mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection between 1992 and 2005. The median follow-up is 12.7 years. 71% was ER positive and 20% Her2 positive by IHC/FISH. 58% received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) (excluding 13 patients unknown treatment), 64% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) (excluding 12 patients unknown treatment) and 33% received both. Results: 61 (34%) Patients with MammaPrint Low Risk/Luminal-type (Luminal A) showed 5-year DFS of 97% (34% received CT and 69% ET) and 50 (28%) patients with MammaPrint High Risk/Luminal-type (Luminal B) had a 5-year DFS of 98% (60% received CT and 68% ET). Patients with BluePrint Basal-type tumors (46 (26%)) had a 5-year DFS of 80% (78% received CT); HER2-type (23 (13%)) had a 5-year DFS of 78% (87% received CT without HER2 targeted therapy). Conclusions: In this retrospective study evaluating 180 US patients with early BC treated according to standard guidelines we showed how combining BluePrint with MammaPrint can detect molecularly defined subgroups of patients who are at high risk of recurrence (HER2 and Basal-type). Furthermore, we confirmed that molecularly defined Luminal type disease is associated with excellent disease-free survival. MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular and prognostic stratification should be prospectively evaluated for therapeutic selection.

Randomized phase III trial of standard D2 versus D2 + para-aortic lymph node (PAN) dissection (D) for clinically M0 advanced gastric cancer: JCOG9501

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4015-LBA4015 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sasako ◽  
T. Sano ◽  
S. Yamamoto ◽  
A. Nashimoto ◽  
A. Kurita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Curative Intent

LBA4015 Background: The INT-0116 study proved the efficacy of radiochemotherapy after R0 resection for gastric cancer and thus the importance of the local control and the insufficiency of D0/1 surgery. Recently D2 surgery was for the first time proven to improve the survival compared with D1 in a Taiwanese RCT (Lancet Oncol 2006). In our study, D2+PAND was compared with D2 in a RCT. Low operative mortality has been reported (Sano et al. J Clin Oncol 2004) and we now present the survival results. Methods: Eligibility criteria included; histologically proven adenocarcinoma, cT2b-T4, cM0, no macroscopic metastasis to the PAN, negative lavage cytology, adequate organ function, and age <76. Linitis plastica was excluded. Eligible pts were randomly assigned to D2 with or without PAND during surgery. All patients were followed without adjuvant therapy until recurrence. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) to be compared by stratified log-rank test. Assuming 256 eligible pts in each arm, the study had 75% power to detect 0.73 hazard ratio for D2+PAND to D2 in OS at 0.05 one-sided alpha. Results: Between 07/1995 and 04/2001, 523 pts were randomized (263 to D2 and 260 to D2+PAND). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. At the time of the final analysis on 23/03/06, 191 (96 and 95, in D2 and D2+PAND, respectively) had died. The 3- and 5-year OS were 76% and 69% in D2 and 76% and 70% in D2+PAND, respectively (p = 0.57, Hazard ratio was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.77–1.37)). Disease free survival did not show any difference between the groups as well. Median operation time was 63 minutes longer and median blood loss was 230 ml larger in D2+PAND than in D2. There was no difference in the incidence of major surgical complications and hospital mortality (0.8% in both arms). Conclusions: D2 or D2+PAND could be carried out safely and showed excellent survival for advanced gastric cancer treated with curative intent. PAND could not improve the survival achieved by D2. General use of PAND should be avoided. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Phase III trial of adjuvant sunitinib in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: Exploratory pharmacogenomic analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 576-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. George ◽  
Jean-Francois Martini ◽  
Michael D. Staehler ◽  
Yen-Hwa Chang ◽  
Jan Breza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Comparison Results

576 Background: In the phase III S-TRAC trial, adjuvant sunitinib (SU) prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) vs placebo (PBO) in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy (median 6.8 vs 5.6 y; hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.98; P= 0.03). An exploratory analysis evaluated associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in angiogenesis-related genes and clinical outcomes in S-TRAC. Methods: Prospectively collected blood samples were genotyped for 10 SNPs and 1 insertion/deletion mutation with TaqMan assays. DFS was compared with a log-rank test for each SNP genotype in SU vs PBO arms and between SNP genotypes within each arm. P-values are unadjusted for multiplicity comparison. Results: Of 615 patients, 286 (142 SU; 144 PBO) were analyzed. There were generally no genotype frequency deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, but linkage disequilibrium was seen between VEGFA rs699947 and rs833061 on chromosome 6 (D′ = 1.000, r2 = 0.979). Longer DFS was observed with SU vs PBO for VEGFR1 rs9554320 C/C (median: not reached [NR] vs 5.56 y; HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21–0.91; P= 0.023), VEGFR2 rs2071559 T/T (median: NR vs 4.47 y; HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23–0.90; P= 0.020), and eNOS rs2070744 T/T (median: 7.07 vs 3.44 y; HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.94; P= 0.028), with a trend for VEGFR1 rs9582036 A/A (median: NR in both arms; P= 0.054) and SH3GL2 rs10963287 C/T (median: NR vs 5.35 y; P= 0.088). Shorter DFS was observed for VEGFR1 rs9582036 C/A vs C/C in the SU, PBO, and combined arms ( P< 0.05); for A/A vs common, the association was only seen in the SU arm ( P= 0.022). VEGFR1 rs9554320 A/C was associated with shorter DFS vs A/A in the PBO ( P= 0.038) and combined arm ( P= 0.006), with a trend in the SU arm ( P= 0.051). VEGFR2 rs1870377 T/T was associated with longer DFS vs A/A in the combined arms, but not in the PBO arm (n = 7 with A/A genotype in the SU arm precluded statistical tests). Conclusions: Correlations between common VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 SNPs and longer DFS with SU suggest germline SNPs are predictive of improved outcomes with adjuvant SU. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, prospective validation studies are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical trial information: NCT00375674.

Molecular subtyping using MammaPrint and BluePrint as an outcome predictor in 180 U.S. breast cancer (BC) patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 577-577
Author(s):  
Lisette Stork-Sloots ◽  
Katharine Yao ◽  
Mary Turk ◽  
Karen Kaul ◽  
JoEllen Weaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Molecular Subtyping ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Luminal Type ◽  
Basal Type

577 Background: Combined use of MammaPrint and a molecular subtyping profile (BluePrint) identifies disease subgroups with marked differences in long-term outcome and response to neo-adjuvant therapy (Glück SABCS2011). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of Molecular Subtyping using MammaPrint and BluePrint in women with early stage BC treated at US Institutions following National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) standard guidelines. Methods: Frozen tumor samples from 180 BC patients (TI-III, N0-Ib) median age 57 years at diagnosis (range 28-89) were suitable for hybridization on full genome array. MammaPrint and BluePrint Molecular Subtypes were determined and survival for Luminal A (MammaPrint Low Risk), Luminal B (MammaPrint High Risk), HER2-type and Basal-type patients was assessed. Patients were treated either with breast conserving therapy or mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection between 1992 and 2005. The median follow-up is 12.7 years. 71% was ER positive and 20% Her2 positive by IHC/FISH. 58% received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) (excluding 13 patients unknown treatment), 64% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) (excluding 12 patients unknown treatment) and 33% received both. Results: 61 (34%) Patients with MammaPrint Low Risk/Luminal-type (Luminal A) showed 5-year DFS of 97% (34% received CT and 69% ET) and 50 (28%) patients with MammaPrint High Risk/Luminal-type (Luminal B) had a 5-year DFS of 98% (60% received CT and 68% ET). Patients with BluePrint Basal-type tumors (46 (26%)) had a 5-year DFS of 80% (78% received CT); HER2-type (23 (13%)) had a 5-year DFS of 78% (87% received CT without HER-2 targeted therapy). Conclusions: In this retrospective study evaluating 180 US patients with early BC treated according to standard guidelines we showed how combining BluePrint with MammaPrint can detect molecularly defined subgroups of patients who are at high risk of recurrence (HER2 and Basal-type). Furthermore, we confirmed that molecularly defined Luminal type disease is associated with excellent disease-free survival. MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular and prognostic stratification should be prospectively evaluated for therapeutic selection.

FOLFOX4 (12 cycles) versus sequential dose-dense FOLFOX7 (6 cycles) followed by FOLFIRI (6 cycles) in patients with initially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer: A GERCOR randomized phase III study (MIROX).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3506-3506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hebbar ◽  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Denis Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Site ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

3506 Background: Perioperative FOLFOX4 is the standard chemotherapy (CT) in patients with resectable metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) (Nordlinger et al, Lancet 2008). To increase curability and reduce the risk of severe neuropathy, we evaluated the sequential administration of a dose-dense oxaliplatin-based regimen followed by an irinotecan-based regimen. Methods: Patients with CRC and initially resectable or resected metastases were randomized between arm A (control): FOLFOX4 (12 cycles; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²) or arm B (investigational): FOLFOX7 (6 cycles; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m²) followed by FOLFIRI (6 cycles; irinotecan 180 mg/m²). CT was either perioperative or postoperative. Stratification criteria were: perioperative vs. postoperative CT, surgery alone vs. radiofrequency ablation +/- surgery, Blumgart’s prognostic score (0-1 vs. 2-3 vs. 4-5). Only one metastatic site was allowed, but the number of metastases per organ was not limited. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: From May 2004 to June 2010, 284 patients were randomized (142 in each arm). Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both arms. Liver was the main metastatic site. There was only one metastasis in 70 (49.3%) patients in arm A and 69 (48.6%) patients in arm B. CT was administered perioperatively in 168 (59.1%) patients, and postoperatively in 116 (40.9%) patients. In case of perioperative CT, R0-R1 resection was achieved in 58/85 (68.2%) patients in arm A and 67/83 (80.7%) patients in arm B. Grade 3 neuropathy occurred in 34 (23.9%) and 28 (20.0%) patients in arm A and B, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal toxicities (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) were more frequent in arm B. Median follow-up was 50.4 months [95% CI: 45.6-54.4]. Median DFS were 22.4 months [95% CI: 17.9-36.2] in arm A and 23.0 months [95% CI: 19.7-35.6] in arm B (HR=0.97 [95% CI: 0.72-1.31]; p=.856). Conclusions: FOLFOX7 followed by FOLFIRI is not superior to the standard FOLFOX4 chemotherapy in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Initial results from ASSURE (E2805): Adjuvant sorafenib or sunitinib for unfavorable renal carcinoma, an ECOG-ACRIN-led, NCTN phase III trial.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 403-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
Judith Manola ◽  
Robert G. Uzzo ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
George Wilding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Oral Agents ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

403 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not uniformly cured by resection. The pursuit of tolerable and effective adjuvant therapies led to this investigation of two oral agents that are widely effective in the metastatic setting. Methods: 1,943 pts with completely resected RCC (pT1b high grade to pT4 any grade N any) were stratified on risk (intermediate-high or very high), clear/non-clear histology, ECOG PS, and resection approach, and randomized equally to sunitinib daily for 4 of 6 wk cycle, sorafenib daily, or placebo, then treated for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The study was designed to detect a 25% reduction in the hazard rate, corresponding to an improvement from 5.8 to 7.7 years median DFS. After accrual of 1322 pts, the starting dose was reduced and then individually titrated to mitigate the effect of pt discontinuation from treatment intolerance. Results: At an interim analysis conducted with 62% information, although no efficacy or futility boundaries were crossed, the Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended release of results. Using a stratified log-rank test, there were no significant differences in DFS or overall survival between either of the experimental arms and placebo. The redesign reduced the discontinuation rate on the experimental arms from about 26% in pts starting at full dose to about 14% in pts starting at reduced dose. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension (16%/16%/4%), hand-foot reaction (15%/33%/1%), Rash (2%/15%/<1%), and fatigue (17%/7%/3%) on sunitinib, sorafenib and placebo, respectively. (See Table.) Conclusions: In pts with locally advanced, resected RCC, adjuvant treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib should not be pursued. Dose titration reduced the treatment discontinuation rate; this finding may have relevance in other settings. Clinical trial information: NCT00326898. [Table: see text]

Primary analysis of KAITLIN: A phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) + pertuzumab versus trastuzumab + pertuzumab + taxane, after anthracyclines as adjuvant therapy for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 500-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Harbeck ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Herve R. Bonnefoi ◽  
Julie Gralow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

500 Background: The standard of care for HER2-positive EBC is chemotherapy plus one year of HER2-directed therapy. However, recurrence—particularly in high-risk populations—remains a problem, as does systemic chemotherapy-associated toxicity. In KAITLIN, we aimed to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity by replacing taxanes and trastuzumab with T-DM1. Methods: KAITLIN (NCT01966471) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study that enrolled 1846 patients with adequately excised, centrally confirmed HER2-positive EBC either node-positive (LN+); or node-negative, HR-negative, and tumor size > 2.0 cm. Within 9 weeks of surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to 3-4 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 18 cycles of T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg + pertuzumab 420 mg q3w (loading dose [LD] 840 mg) (AC-KP) or taxane (3-4 cycles) + concurrent trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (LD 8 mg/kg) + pertuzumab 420 mg q3w (LD 840 mg) (AC-THP). Patients were stratified by world region, nodal status, HR status, and anthracycline type. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy was administered after 4 cycles of HER2-targeted therapy when indicated. The co-primary endpoints were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the LN+ and in the ITT populations applying a hierarchical testing procedure. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety. Results: KAITLIN did not meet its co-primary endpoints. In LN+ patients (n = 1658), there was no significant difference between arms in IDFS event risk (stratified hazard ratio = 0.97; 95%CI 0.71–1.32). Three-year IDFS was 94.1% with AC-THP and 92.7% with AC-KP. Results were similar in the ITT population (stratified hazard ratio = 0.98; 95%CI 0.72–1.32; 3-year IDFS: 94.2% vs 93.1%). OS data are immature with an event rate of ~4%–5% in each arm. During the study overall, there was a similar incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (55.4% vs 51.8%) and SAEs (23.3% vs 21.4%) with AC-THP and AC-KP, respectively. More patients receiving AC-KP than AC-THP discontinued T-DM1 or trastuzumab, respectively, because of AEs (26.8% vs 4.0%). PRO data will be presented. Conclusions: Replacing adjuvant taxane and trastuzumab with T-DM1 did not result in significantly improved efficacy or overall safety. Nonetheless, in this high-risk population, a favorable IDFS outcome was achieved in both study arms. HP + chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with high-risk HER2-positive EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT01966471 .

scholarly journals Definitive Results of a Phase III Adjuvant Trial Comparing Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Women With Operable, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The NSABP B-38 Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26) ◽  
pp. 3197-3204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra M. Swain ◽  
Gong Tang ◽  
Charles E. Geyer ◽  
Priya Rastogi ◽  
James N. Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose Anthracycline- and taxane-based three-drug chemotherapy regimens have proven benefit as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. This trial (NSABP B-38; Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women Who Have Undergone Surgery for Node-Positive Breast Cancer) asked whether the incorporation of a fourth drug could improve outcomes relative to two standard regimens and provided a direct comparison of those two regimens. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 4,894 women with node-positive early-stage breast cancer to six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC), four cycles of dose-dense (DD) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of DD paclitaxel (P; DD AC→P), or DD AC→P with four cycles of gemcitabine (G) added to the DD paclitaxel (DD AC→PG). Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was required; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were used at the investigator's discretion. Results There were no significant differences in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between DD AC→PG and DD AC→P (80.6% v 82.2%; HR, 1.07; P = .41), between DD AC→PG and TAC (80.6% v 80.1%; HR, 0.93; P = .39), in 5-year overall survival (OS) between DD AC→PG and DD AC→P (90.8% v 89.1%; HR, 0.85; P = .13), between DD AC→PG and TAC (90.8% v 89.6%; HR, 0.86; P = .17), or between DD AC→P versus TAC for DFS (HR, 0.87; P = .07) and OS (HR, 1.01; P = .96). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities for TAC, DD AC→P, and DD AC→PG, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (9%, 3%, 3%; P < .001), sensory neuropathy (< 1%, 7%, 6%; P < .001), and diarrhea (7%, 2%, 2%; P < .001). Exploratory analyses for ESAs showed no association with DFS events (HR, 1.02; P = .95). Conclusion Adding G to DD AC→P did not improve outcomes. No significant differences in efficacy were identified between DD AC→P and TAC, although toxicity profiles differed.

Phase III study of standard triweekly versus dose-dense biweekly capecitabine (C) + oxaliplatin (O) + bevacizumab (B) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): XELOX-A-DVS (dense versus standard): Interim analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4078-4078
Author(s):  
H. Hurwitz ◽  
Y. Z. Patt ◽  
D. Henry ◽  
L. Garbo ◽  
E. P. Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

4078 Background: Every 3 week (Q3W) COB has been shown to be highly active and non-inferior to FOLFOX+B in first-line mCRC. Phase II data suggest that dose-dense every 2 week (Q2W) COB may be significantly more active and better tolerated than Q3W COB. Methods: XELOXA-DVS was a phase III, open-label study of 435 patients with chemonaive mCRC who met standard eligibility criteria. Patients were randomized to Q3W: C 850 mg/m2 BID d1–14 + O 130 mg/m2 d1 + B 7.5 mg/kg d1 or Q2W: C 1500 mg/m2 BID d1–7 + O 85 mg/m2 d1 + B 5 mg/kg d1 for up to 72 weeks. Complete surgical resection was allowed using pre-defined criteria. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was estimated using the Kaplan- Meier method, while the hazard ratio and 95% CI were estimated using Cox regression analysis, based on the intent-to-treat population. No formal statistical testing was conducted. Results: The median PFS was 8.4 months (Q2W) and 9.7 months (Q3W) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.84; 95% CI=0.62–1.13). The median PFS (on-treatment) was 9.1 months and 10.2 months, respectively (HR=0.81). Of the 72 and 73 patients with disease progression (DP), the median time to DP was 9.4 and 10.8 months, respectively (HR=0.86). The objective response rates were 21.7% vs 29.4%, respectively (HR=1.05). Patients in the Q2W vs Q3W group experienced higher rates of grade 3/4 diarrhea (29% vs 24%), hand-foot syndrome (12% vs 8%), and treatment discontinuation rates (40% vs 20%), respectively. Other grade 3/4 toxicities (>5%, Q2W vs Q3W) included fatigue (13% vs 13%), dehydration (12% vs 10%), nausea (8% vs 9%), peripheral neuropathy (5% vs 9%), anorexia (5% vs 7%), and abdominal pain (5% vs 7%). Conclusions: At the dose and schedule used, dose-dense Q2W COB was not superior to standard Q3W COB. These data further confirm the activity and tolerability of Q3W COB. The activity and tolerability of a lower C dose Q2W, with more aggressive dose reduction, combined with B and O or irinotecan is currently being evaluated (X-BIO). [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document