scholarly journals Effect of Depression on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Mortality of Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (23) ◽  
pp. 2471-2478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip M. Prasad ◽  
Scott E. Eggener ◽  
Stuart R. Lipsitz ◽  
Michael R. Irwin ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Median Income ◽  
Clinicopathologic Characteristics ◽  
Definitive Therapy

Purpose Although demographic, clinicopathologic, and socioeconomic differences may affect treatment and outcomes of prostate cancer, the effect of mental health disorders remains unclear. We assessed the effect of previously diagnosed depression on outcomes of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Patients and Methods We performed a population-based observational cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data of 41,275 men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer from 2004 to 2007. We identified 1,894 men with a depressive disorder in the 2 years before the prostate cancer diagnosis and determined its effect on treatment and survival. Results Men with depressive disorder were older, white or Hispanic, unmarried, resided in nonmetropolitan areas and areas of lower median income, and had more comorbidities (P < .05 for all), but there was no variation in clinicopathologic characteristics. In adjusted analyses, men with depressive disorder were more likely to undergo expectant management for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease (P ≤ .05, respectively). Conversely, depressed men were less likely to undergo definitive therapy (surgery or radiation) across all risk strata (P < .01, respectively). Depressed men experienced worse overall mortality across risk strata (low: relative risk [RR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.48 to 2.33; P < .001; intermediate: RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.49; P = .01; high: RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.32; P = .02). Conclusion Men with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer and a recent diagnosis of depression are less likely to undergo definitive treatment and experience worse overall survival. The effect of depression disorders on prostate cancer treatment and survivorship warrants further study, because both conditions are relatively common in men in the United States.

Overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer in the United States: Incidence, cost, complications, and implications for the screening debate.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 161-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayal A. Aizer ◽  
Xiangmei Gu ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Neil E. Martin ◽  
Jim C. Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

161 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends active surveillance as the sole option for men with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) and a life expectancy <10 years. We sought to describe the incidence, risk factors, cost, and morbidity related to overtreatment of LRPC within the United States. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Program to identify 11,744 men ≥66 years with LRPC diagnosed from 2004-2007. Expected survival was estimated using the 2007 Social Security Life Table and was increased and decreased by 50% in men in the upper and lower quartiles of comorbidity, respectively, as specified by the NCCN. Overtreatment was definitive treatment in men with LRPC and life expectancy <10 years. Costs were the amount paid by Medicare in the year following minus the year prior to diagnosis. Toxicities were defined as relevant Medicare diagnoses or interventions. Results: Of 3001 men with LRPC and a life expectancy <10 years, 2011 (67%) were treated definitively. On multivariable logistic regression, men overtreated for prostate cancer were more likely to be younger (p<.001), white (vs black, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.02, p=.03), married (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.61, p=.02), urban (trend, OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.98-2.00, p=.06), have higher Elixhauser comorbidity (p<.001), and have a higher clinical stage (T2 vs T1, OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.19-2.07, p=.001) and prostate-specific antigen level (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02, p<.001). Relative to expectant management, the mean added cost per definitive treatment was $15,308. When extrapolated nationally the cumulative net cost of overtreatment in men ≥66 years is $32 million per annum. Long-term urinary, erectile, and bowel toxicity occurred in 59.2% and 50.0%, 47.9% and 19.7%, and 7.1% and 17.8% of prostatectomy and radiation patients, respectively. Conclusions: Overtreatment of prostate cancer is partially driven by sociodemographic factors and occurs in a high percentage of men with LRPC and limited life expectancy, with marked impact on patient quality of life and health care costs. Efforts to enhance appropriate management of LRPC would reduce the harms associated with screening.

Utilization and survival outcomes between definitive versus conservative treatments among elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 204-204
Author(s):  
Sagar Anil Patel ◽  
Hiram Alberto Gay ◽  
Jeff M. Michalski ◽  
Brian Christopher Baumann ◽  
Randall Brenneman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Elderly Men ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality

204 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in men > 80 years old. However, studies have shown that older men are less likely to undergo curative treatment for localized PCa, possibly due to competing comorbidities or inability to accurately estimate life expectancy. Herein, we investigate utilization trends and survival outcomes amongst guideline-supported treatment options in elderly men with high-risk PCa in the United States. Methods: Men ≥ 80 years diagnosed with high-risk PCa (cT3-4 or Gleason 8-10 or PSA > 20) between 2004-2016 were analyzed from the National Cancer Database. Those missing risk-stratification or treatment data were excluded. Eligible patients were grouped based on their primary treatment modality: no treatment (observation), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, radiation therapy (RT) alone, RT + ADT, or radical prostatectomy (RP). Cochran-Armitage was used to evaluate treatment trends over time, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic predictors of treatment. Overall survival (OS) between treatments was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards. Results: With a median follow up of 42 months, 19,920 men were eligible for analysis. The most utilized treatment modality was RT+ADT (37.2%), followed by ADT alone (29.4%), observation (23.9%), RT alone (7.8%), and RP (1.7%). There was a significant increase in use of RT+ADT and RT alone (p < 0.001) and decrease in use of ADT alone and observation ( p< 0.001); no change was seen in RP use. There was no OS difference between observation versus ADT alone (aHR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99-1.09, p = 0.11). Definitive local treatment was associated with improved OS compared to ADT alone (RT+ADT: aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.46-0.50, p < 0.0001; RT alone: aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59, p < 0.0001; RP: aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.59, p < 0.0001). Black men and uninsured status were independently associated with lower likelihood of undergoing definitive treatment (i.e. RT+ADT, RT, or RP). Conclusions: For men ≥ 80 years old with high-risk PCa in this large US registry, definitive local therapy using RT +/- ADT or RP was associated with a 50% reduction in overall mortality compared to observation or ADT alone. Less than half of men in this time period underwent a definitive treatment, and Black and uninsured men remained at particularly high risk of undertreatment.

scholarly journals Economic burden of illness associated with localized prostate cancer in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 4265-4277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Gustavsen ◽  
Laura Gullet ◽  
Doria Cole ◽  
Nicolas Lewine ◽  
Jay T Bishoff
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Burden Of Illness ◽  
The United States ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Risk Patients

Aim: Prior studies have established the economic burden of prostate cancer on society. However, changes to screening, novel therapies and increased use of active surveillance (AS) create a need for an updated analysis. Methods: A deterministic, decision-analytic model was developed to estimate medical costs associated with localized prostate cancer over 10 years. Results: 10-year costs averaged $45,957, $99,445 and $188,928 for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. For low-risk patients, AS 10-year costs averaged $33,912/patient, whereas definitive treatment averaged $49,667/patient. Despite higher failure rates in intermediate-risk patients, AS remained less costly than definitive treatment, with 10-year costs averaging $90,614/patient and $99,394/patient, respectively. Conclusion: Broader incorporation of AS, guided by additional prognostic tools, may mitigate this growing economic burden.

scholarly journals Erratum: Contemporary management of men with high-risk localized prostate cancer in the United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
A B Weiner ◽  
R S Matulewicz ◽  
E M Schaeffer ◽  
S L Liauw ◽  
J M Feinglass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
High Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Contemporary Management

Definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer: Time and geographic trends.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Tward ◽  
Lindsay Burt ◽  
Dennis C. Shrieve
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Regional Variation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Relative Distribution ◽  
Population Database ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Over Time

132 Background: Numerous definitive treatment options exist for localized prostate cancer. We evaluated how the distribution of treatments varied by geographic location and over time in a contemporary US population database. Methods: All subjects with NCCN clinical risk-stratifiable localized prostate cancer between the years 2004 and 2011 were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Results Database. Descriptive statistics evaluating the relative distribution of therapies by geographic region and over time were performed. Results: There were 290,631 evaluable subjects identified. The Table shows trends in treatment over time for combined low, intermediate, high, and very high risk prostate cancer. The use of brachytherapy has been significantly declining between 2004 and 2011, and no definitive therapy has been increasing. In 2010-2011, regional prostatectomy use varied from a low of 18% (Rural Georgia) to a high of 57% (Iowa). No definitive therapy rates varied between 12% (Hawaii) and 35% (Rural Georgia). Analyses of regional variation at the State County level reveals significant variability in the ratio of subjects receiving surgery to radiation (e.g., State of Utah surgery:radiation ratio 0.25 (Beaver County) versus 3.06 (Toole County). Conclusions: There is marked regional variation of practice at both the county and state levels for localized prostate cancer definitive therapy. The use of radiotherapy has been declining between the years 2004 and 2011, and appears to be offset by increases in no definitive therapy. Prostatectomy rates remained stable. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictor of Treatment Response in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simpa S. Salami ◽  
Udit Singhal ◽  
Daniel E. Spratt ◽  
Ganesh S. Palapattu ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Pten Loss ◽  
Definitive Therapy

PURPOSE Using nonenrichment-based, potentially more sensitive Epic Sciences circulating tumor cell (CTC) platform, we sought to detect and characterize CTCs in untreated, high-risk localized prostate cancer and to evaluate their clinical implication. METHODS Between 2012 and 2015, blood samples were prospectively collected from patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk localized prostate cancer undergoing either radiotherapy (XRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy or radical prostatectomy (RP) with curative intent. Samples were analyzed with the Epic Sciences platform with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, CD45, cytokeratin (CK), and androgen receptor (AR) N-terminal staining. CTC counts were correlated with biochemical recurrence (BCR). RESULTS A diversity of CTC subtypes, including CK-positive, CK-negative, AR-positive, and CTC clusters, were observed in 73.3% (33 of 45) of patients with evaluable data. The median follow-up was 14.2 months (range, 0.5 to 43.7 months). BCR occurred more frequently in the RP group than XRT (15 of 26 v one of 19), with most patients in the XRT group continuing to receive androgen deprivation therapy. A higher proportion of metastatic events were observed in the RP group (five of 26 v one of 19). In the RP group, BCR and development of metastases were associated with a higher total number of CTCs, AR-positive CTCs, and CTC phenotypic heterogeneity. One patient who developed BCR and metastases quickly after RP had diverse phenotypical CTC subtypes, and single-cell genomic analyses of all detectable CTCs confirmed common prostate cancer copy number alterations and PTEN loss. CONCLUSION CTCs can be identified in most patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer before definitive therapy using the Epic Sciences platform. If confirmed in a larger cohort with longer follow-up, phenotypic and genomic characterization of CTCs pretherapy may provide an additional means of risk stratifying patients with newly diagnosed high-risk disease and potentially help identify patients who could require multimodal therapy.

Effect of PSA on equal treatment of high-risk patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17514-e17514
Author(s):  
Basil Ferenczi ◽  
Jason Frankel ◽  
Nathan Jung ◽  
Christopher Porter ◽  
John Paul Flores
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
The United States ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

e17514 Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend definitive treatment for high risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). This study aims to assess treatment trends for men with HRPCa, focusing on men deemed high risk on the basis of an elevated PSA alone with otherwise low risk features. Our hypothesis is that this group is treated differently than other patients with high risk disease. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) prostate cancer (PCa) participant use file was queried for high risk patients ages 18-75 with biopsy proven PCa from 2010-2016. The NCDB represents approximately 55% of men treated for PCa in the United States. Patients were divided into two groups: the study group with PSA > 20 and otherwise low risk features, and a comparison group comprised of high-risk patients due to cT stage ≥T3a or Gleason Grade Group ≥4. Patients with nodal or metastatic disease were excluded. Rates of treatment by modality were compared over the years studied. Survival was modeled using Kaplan Meier analysis. Results: 91,565 patients met eligibility criteria with 12,156 in the study group and 79,409 in the comparison group (Table). In the study group, a significantly higher number of patients underwent surveillance (10.2%) versus the comparison group (0.3%)(p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was an upward trend in use of surveillance in the study group, with a surveillance rate of 18.9% in 2016. Amongst patients receiving radiation, only 26.1% received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the study group versus 82.8% in the comparison group. Despite these findings, survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher 5-year overall survival in the study group (95.1%) vs the comparison group (87.8%) (HR = 0.41, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Men categorized as HRPCa by PSA alone with otherwise low risk features are treated less aggressively than other high-risk patients with significantly higher rates of surveillance and radiation without ADT. However, these men appear to have better survival outcomes than other high-risk patients at 5-year follow-up. [Table: see text]

Prostate specific antigen testing as disease surveillance and monitoring five years after definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17602-e17602
Author(s):  
Ibrahim M. Asiri ◽  
Ewan Kemar Cobran
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Disease Surveillance ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
First Year ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Survivorship Care Planning

e17602 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, in 2007, recommends prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing every 6-12 months for the first 5 years following definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. We compared guideline-concordant PSA testing, as disease surveillance and monitoring, in African-American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men 5-years after definitive therapy. Methods: A total of 19,377 CA and 1,995 AA men from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database diagnosed with prostate cancer and received definitive treatments from 2007 through 2016 were included. Multivariate log-binomial regression model were used to examine the effect of demographic and clinical characteristics on the likelihood of not receiving at least one PSA surveillance test annually for the first 5 years following definitive treatment. Results: Overall, receipt of surveillance testing and monitoring was high, with 97% of CA men and 94% of AA men receiving at least one test the first year after treatment and approximately 81% of CA men and 77% of AA men receiving at least one test in the fifth year after treatment. Risk of not receiving a test in AA men declined with time compared to CA men, in the first year (Relative Risk [RR], 1.68, 95% CI, 1.37-2.07) and the fifth year (RR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.98-1.18) since treatment. Further, non-married men and men with intermediate risk had a higher risk of not receiving a surveillance test. Conclusions: Most men received guideline-concordant PSA testing 5-years after definitive therapy. The decline in PSA surveillance overtime reflects the need for continued long-term survivorship care planning and coordination. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document