scholarly journals Group Yoga Effects on Cancer Patient and Caregiver Symptom Distress: Assessment of Self-reported Symptoms at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Alejandro Chaoul ◽  
Catherine Powers-James ◽  
Carol A Eddy ◽  
Smitha Mallaiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychosocial Health ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Yoga Group ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background. Complementary and integrative health approaches such as yoga provide support for psychosocial health. We explored the effects of group-based yoga classes offered through an integrative medicine center at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods. Patients and caregivers had access to two yoga group classes: a lower intensity (YLow) or higher intensity (YHigh) class. Participants completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS; scale 0-10, 10 most severe) immediately before and after the class. ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS; score 0-90), physical (PHS; 0-60), and psychological distress (PSS; 0-20). Data were analyzed examining pre-yoga and post-yoga symptom scores using paired t-tests and between types of classes using ANOVAs. Results. From July 18, 2016, to August 8, 2017, 282 unique participants (205 patients, 77 caregivers; 85% female; ages 20-79 years) attended one or more yoga groups (mean 2.3). For all participants, we observed clinically significant reduction/improvement in GDS, PHS, and PSS scores and in symptoms (ESAS decrease ≥1; means) of anxiety, fatigue, well-being, depression, appetite, drowsiness, and sleep. Clinically significant improvement for both patients and caregivers was observed for anxiety, depression, fatigue, well-being, and all ESAS subscales. Comparing yoga groups, YLow contributed to greater improvement in sleep versus YHigh (−1.33 vs −0.50, P = .054). Improvement in fatigue for YLow was the greatest mean change (YLow −2.12). Conclusion. A single yoga group class resulted in clinically meaningful improvement of multiple self-reported symptoms. Further research is needed to better understand how yoga class content, intensity, and duration can affect outcomes.

Outcomes of supportive/palliative care (SPC) for advanced cancer patients (AdCa) in a general public hospital and a comprehensive cancer center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay ◽  
Jeanette Ferrer ◽  
Jewel Ochoa ◽  
Hilda Cantu ◽  
Janet L. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Public ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

208 Background: AdCa experience severe physical, psychosocial and existential distress. Their needs might not be met only by standard care. We compared outcomes of AdCa receiving SPC at a General Public Hospital (GPH) and at a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). Methods: We reviewed 364 consecutive AdCa(182 at GPH and 182 at CCC). AdCa were managed by SPC-specialists with common clinical-pathways. We assessed symptoms(Edmonton Symptom Assessment System:ESAS) and outcomes at consult and first follow-up. Results: Race was White, African-American, and Hispanic in 42(23%), 70(39%), 63(35%) at GPH vs. 112(64%, p<0.0001), 30(17%, p<0.0001), 20(11%, p<0.0001) at CCC, respectively. Age, gender and cancer diagnoses were similar at both sites. 98(54%) at GPH vs. 181(99%) at CCC reported to have some health-insurance(p<0.0001). Symptoms at consult-time at GPH and CCC: Pain 133(85%) vs. 151(91%,p=0.0586); Fatigue 127(80%) vs. 153(94%,p<0.0001); Nausea 69(44%) vs. 89(55%,p=0.0438); Depression 79(51%) vs. 109(68%,p=0.0015); Anxiety 72(46%) vs. 121(75%,p<0.0001); Drowsiness 78(50%) vs. 119(76%, p<0.0001); Appetite 89(56%) vs. 146(91%, p<0.0001); Dyspnea 72(46%) vs. 107(65%,p=0.0004); Sleep 90(59%) vs. 142(88%,p<0.0001); and Well-Being 95(63%) vs. 132(93%,p<0.0001). Both SPC provided multiple not different interventions: opioid-management, medication review for polypharmacy, bowel-regimen, antiemetics, and interdisciplinary counseling. At follow-up ESAS-improvement(decrease ≥2 points) was: pain 21/80(26%) at GPH vs. 43/107(40%) at CCC(p=0.0469), anxiety 18/75(24%) vs. 40/98(41%,p=0.0202); appetite 15/74(20%) vs. 37/90(41%,p=0.0043); sleep 20/74(27%) vs. 42/95(44%,p=0.0215); nausea 23/77(30%) vs. 35/97(36%,p=0.3879); depression 18/74(24%) vs. 30/94(32%,p=0.2796). Median Time(range) from consult-to-follow-up at GPH 21 days(0-427) vs. 14 days(1-275,p=0.032), and from consult-to-death at GPH 53 days(1-699) vs. 51 days(1-898,p=0.8473). Conclusions: AdCa at GPH and CCC had frequent and severe-symptoms. Response-rate was lower and follow-up less-frequent at GPH. SPC needs to be more frequent and more resources are needed at GPH.

Testing the feasibility of using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to assess caregiver symptom burden

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberson Tanco ◽  
Marieberta Vidal ◽  
Joseph Arthur ◽  
Marvin Delgado Guay ◽  
David Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Outpatient Supportive Care

ABSTRACTObjective:Caregiver symptom assessment is not part of regular clinical cancer care. The ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) is a multidimensional tool regularly used to measure symptom burden in patients but not caregivers. The objectives of the present study were to determine the feasibility of the ESAS in caregiver completion (defined as ≥ 9 of 12 items) and determine its concurrent validity with the Zarit Burden Interview–12 (ZBI–12).Method:We conducted a prospective study on 90 patient–primary caregiver dyads seen in an outpatient supportive care center in a cancer center. The 12 item ESAS–FS (financial–spiritual) was completed by the dyads along with other clinical and psychosocial measures.Results:The caregiver ESAS was found to be feasible (90/90 caregivers, 100% completed ≥ 9/12 items) and useful (66/90 caregivers, 73%) by caregivers to report their symptom burden. Some 68 of 90 (76%) caregivers had symptom distress scores ≥ 4 on at least one symptom. A significant association was found between the ESAS scores of caregivers and patients for fatigue (0.03), depression (<0.01), anxiety (<0.01), sleep (0.05), well-being (<0.01), financial distress (<0.01), spiritual pain (<0.01), and total ESAS score (<0.01). Concurrent validity with the ZBI–12 was not achieved (r = 0.53, p = 0.74). A significant correlation was found between caregiver ESAS scores and time spent feeding, housekeeping, total combined caregiver activities, and total ZBI–12 scores.Significance of results:The caregiver ESAS is a feasible tool and was found useful by our caregivers. Further research is needed to modify the ESAS based on caregivers' recommendations, and further psychometric studies need to be conducted.

Developing pathways for cancer rehabilitation in tertiary oncology centers: Initial observations at the McGill University Health Centre.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Sabrina Cesare ◽  
Irina Uscatescu ◽  
Jonathan di Tomasso ◽  
Lorella Ciutto ◽  
Kevin Yu-Chueh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cancer Rehabilitation ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Mcgill University ◽  
Clinically Significant

17 Background: No definitive rehabilitation pathways exist for cancer patients. To address this gap, the Cancer Rehabilitation interdisciplinary team at the McGill University Health Centre has developed three program paths (e.g., Restorative, Supportive, and Cachexia) to meet the various specialized and personalized needs of cancer patients. Methods: A consecutive cohort of patients referred to the Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic between January 1st and June 30th, 2014 was considered. We examined the following baseline characteristics: handgrip strength (HGS), the abridged Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (aPG-SGA) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) self-reported questionnaires. Results: Of the 54 patients evaluated (57.4% male), 20 (mean age: 47.4 yrs), 8 (59.9 yrs) and 26 (64.6 yrs) were assigned to the restorative, supportive and cachexia streams, respectively. The most common cancer diagnoses were gastrointestinal (15%), gynecological (13%), breast (12%) and lung (12%). Table 1 contains baseline aPG-SGA, ESAS and HGS scores. Conclusions: Our preliminary data confirm clinically significant differences in muscle strength across the 3 streams for both males and females, as well as significant differences in nutritional, appetite and well-being scores between the patients in the restorative and cachexia pathways. Our data confirm the need of personalized and targeted interventions to achieve or maintain optimal performance and quality of life in cancer survivors with different disease and treatment characteristics. [Table: see text]

Retrospective review of symptoms and palliative care interventions in women with advanced cervical cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 104-104
Author(s):  
YuJung Kim ◽  
Mark F. Munsell ◽  
Ji Chan Park ◽  
Larissa Meyer ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Symptom Distress ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Time Of Presentation

104 Background: Symptoms reported by women with cervical cancer (CCx) include pain, fatigue, lymphedema, sexual dysfunction, proctitis, cystitis, constipation and diarrhea. The objective of this study was to delineate and measure the symptom distress experienced by patients with advanced CCx at the time of palliative care (PC) referral. Methods: A total of 156 advanced CCx patients were referred to PC from 2010 to 2012. Of these, 88 patients had completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: At the time of presentation mean age was 45 (25-76), 47% were Caucasian, 18% African American, and 33% Hispanic. Fifty-one percent were married; 64% had no advance directives; 75% had recurrent disease. Clinically significant symptoms (defined as ESAS scores ≥ 4) were pain (81%), anorexia (72%), a poor feeling of well-being (70%), fatigue (69%), and insomnia (54%). The chief complaint was pain in 94% of patients. According to the PC specialists’ assessment, pain (96%), emotional distress (77%), and constipation (50%) were predominant symptoms. Various palliative care interventions including opioids, laxatives, and expressive supportive counseling were provided. The median time from advanced cervical diagnosis to PC consultation was 6.0 months (95% CI 5.0-7.8) and the median survival after first PC visit was 4.8 months (95% CI 3.4-6.2). Clinically significant symptoms including nausea, depression, anxiety, and feeling of well-being showed significant improvements at follow-up visits. Conclusions: More than half of patients with advanced CCx were significantly burdened with pain, anorexia, poor feeling of well-being, fatigue, insomnia, and constipation at the time of PC referral. Clinically significant symptoms showed improvements at follow-up visits. In patients with significant symptom distress, early PC involvement may be important to improve quality of life.

Effects of Tai Chi and Qi Gong group class participation on self-reported symptoms in cancer patients and caregivers: A preliminary report.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Santhosshi Narayanan ◽  
Amie J Christie ◽  
Catherine Powers-James ◽  
M. Kay Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tai Chi ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Qi Gong ◽  
Class Participation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Global Distress

100 Background: Tai chi and qi gong are movement-based, mind-body approaches offered as part of an integrative oncology program at a comprehensive cancer center. We explored the effects of tai chi and qi gong group class participation on cancer patient and caregiver self-reported symptoms. Methods: Patients and caregivers attending a tai chi and/or qi gong group class completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) immediately before and after participation. The ESAS assessed 10 symptoms (scale 0-10, 10 worst possible); ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS), physical (PHS), and psychosocial (PSS). Descriptive statistics; Chi-Squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for data analysis. Results: 304 participants (Oct 2017-April 2019; 184 patients, 120 caregivers; 72% women, 60% white; mean age 58) were included in the analysis. For patients (symptom reduction by class type: tai chi -4.5 SD 7.6; qi gong -6.1 SD 7.9) and caregivers (tai chi -3.7 SD 6.3; qi gong -4.0 SD 7.8), both class types contributed to clinically and statistically significant improvement (ESAS GDS decrease ≥3; p’s ≤0.0001) in global distress. Patients (-2.07 SD 5.49) and caregivers (-2.34 SD 3.71) participating in tai chi experienced clinically and statistically significant improvement in physical distress (ESAS PHS decrease ≥2; p’s ≤0.0001). For the individual symptom of well-being, we observed clinically and statistically significant improvement for caregivers participating in qi gong (-1.2 SD 2) and patients participating in tai chi (-1.0 SD 1.8) (p’s ≤0.0001). For fatigue, patients (-1.4) and caregivers (-1.0) participating in qi gong experienced clinically and statistically significant improvement (p’s ≤0.0001). Conclusions: Patients and caregivers participating in both class types experienced significant improvement in physical and global distress. Additional research is warranted to learn more about how differences in class content (tai chi vs qi gong) and participants may contribute to observed differences in symptom change.

scholarly journals Effects of Center-Based Delivery of Tai Chi and Qi Gong Group Classes on Self-Reported Symptoms in Cancer Patients and Caregivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542094160
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Santhosshi Narayanan ◽  
Aimee Christie ◽  
Catherine Powers-James ◽  
Wenli Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tai Chi ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Qi Gong ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Global Distress

Background: There is increasing interest in complementary approaches such as Tai Chi (TC) and Qi Gong (QG) in oncology settings. We explored the effects of TC/QG delivered in group classes at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Patients and caregivers who participated in TC or QG completed assessments before and after an in-person group class. Assessments included questions about expectancy/satisfaction and common cancer symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS]). ESAS distress subscales analyzed included global (GDS), physical (PHS), and psychosocial (PSS). Results: Three hundred four participants (184 patients, 120 caregivers) were included in the analysis. At baseline, caregivers had a greater expectancy for change in energy level as a result of class participation compared with patients (22.9% vs 9.9%). No significant difference was observed between baseline patient and caregiver PSS. Clinically significant improvement in well-being was observed among patients in TC classes (1.0) and caregivers in QG classes (1.2). For fatigue, patients (1.4) and caregivers (1.0) participating in QG experienced clinically significant improvement. Both TC and QG classes were associated with clinically significant improvements (ESAS GDS decrease ≥3) in global distress for patients (TC = 4.52, SD= 7.6; QG = 6.05, SD = 7.9) and caregivers (TC = 3.73, SD = 6.3; QG = 4.02, SD = 7.8). Eighty-nine percent of participants responded that their expectations were met. Conclusions: Patients and caregivers participating in TC or QG group classes were satisfied overall and experienced significant improvement in global distress. Additional research is warranted to explore the integration of TC and QG in the delivery of supportive cancer care.

scholarly journals Augmenting the Patient Experience: Therapeutic Arts Interventions for Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy/Infusion

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2187-2187
Author(s):  
Fred Schiffman ◽  
Cynthia S Peng ◽  
Anna C Delamerced ◽  
Lauren V Ready ◽  
Kevin S Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Experience ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Emotional States ◽  
Writing Activity

Introduction Intravenous infusions and chemotherapy can be a stressful and emotionally-draining process. Prior studies have examined patient perceptions of care and how to improve patient experience during this time. Art interventions have been performed to enhance the patient experience and reduce negative side effects. This patient-centered study investigated the process by which two distinct art modalities - reflective writing and tile painting -- alleviated patients' symptom burden. Methods Chemotherapy patients at The Comprehensive Cancer Center at The Miriam Hospital (Providence, RI) were invited to participate in a therapeutic activity of their choice during their infusions - either painting a wooden tile or engaging in a reflective writing activity. The tile painting consisted of free-form painting with either acrylic paints or pastels. The reflective writing activity consisted of guided or personal reflections on a variety of predefined prompts. Patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) immediately before and immediately after engaging in their chosen activity, allowing a direct within-subjects comparison of associated symptomatology. Patients also completed a qualitative survey, which allowed them to expand upon their experience in their own words, write recommendations, and reflect upon the process. The activity and surveys were standardized to 30 minutes duration. After the post-activity survey, patients were allowed to continue writing or painting if they so desired. Patients were encouraged to keep the art materials and journal for further therapeutic benefit. Results Twenty-six participants were included in data analysis, with 9 choosing to journal and 17 choosing to paint. In the painting group, there was a significant reduction in the following ESAS measures: tiredness (p = 0.021), anxiety (p = 0.013), shortness of breath (p = 0.016), and a marked increase in feelings of well-being (p = 0.002). In the reflective writing group, there was a significant reduction in anxiety (p = 0.05). Conclusion Overall, both tile painting and reflective writing initiatives resulted in improved patient experience and sense of wellness. The tile painting activity led to a greater number of improved symptoms, whereas reflective writing led to a singular reduction in anxiety, illustrating perhaps the different mechanisms by which these activities foster healing. The tile painting may have served to distract the patient from the gravity of the current illness; its free-form nature allowed participants to be creative with pleasant imagery of their choice, and finishing a work of art perhaps elicited a sense of accomplishment. In comparison, reflective writing may have allowed patients to process their experience of living with their illness and delve deeply into emotional states, fostering a sense of resilience and introspection. Taken together, the specific mechanisms by which these activities provide solace may explain the differential nature of these contrasting yet ultimately beneficial therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Outpatient acupuncture effects on patient self-reported symptoms in oncology care: A retrospective analysis of real-world data.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
M. Kay Garcia ◽  
Wenli Liu ◽  
Michael Spano ◽  
Susan Underwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Clinically Significant

135 Background: Increased access to complementary therapies such as acupuncture at academic medical centers has created new opportunities for management of cancer and cancer treatment related symptoms. Methods: Patients presenting for acupuncture treatment during calendar year 2016 at an outpatient integrative medicine clinic in a comprehensive cancer center were asked to complete a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; 16 symptoms, score 0-10, 10 worst possible) before and after each visit. ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS; score 0-90), physical (PHS, 0-60), and psychological distress (PSS, 0-20). ESAS symptom score change pre/post treatment and from baseline visit to first follow up were evaluated by paired t-test. Results: Of 375 participants [mean age 55.6, 68.3% female, 73.9% white, most common cancer diagnosis of breast (32.8%) and thoracic/head&neck (25.9%)], 73.3% had at least one follow-up treatment [mean 4.6 (SD 5.1) treatments]. Highest/worst symptoms at baseline were poor sleep (3.92), fatigue (3.43), well-being (3.31), and pain (3.29). Statistically significant reduction/improvement (pre/post) was observed for all ESAS symptoms and subscales for the initial treatment (p <0.001). Hot flashes had the highest mean reduction (-1.93), followed by fatigue (-1.72), numbness/tingling (-1.70), and nausea (-1.67). Clinically significant reductions were also observed for ESAS subscales of GDS (-12.2), PHS (-8.5), and PSS (-2.6). For symptom change from initial treatment to first follow-up (pre/pre), statistically and clinically significant improvement was observed for spiritual pain (-1.10; p<0.001) and ESAS subscale of GDS (-6.09; p=0.048). Clinical response rates (reduction ≥1) on follow-up were highest for symptoms of spiritual pain (58.9%), dry mouth (57.8%) and nausea (57.3%). Conclusions: Outpatient acupuncture was associated with immediate and longitudinal significant improvement across a range of symptoms commonly experienced by individuals during cancer care. Further research is needed to better understand frequency of treatments needed in clinical practice to help maintain benefit.

scholarly journals Fears, beliefs, and quality of life of patients with cancer vs the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Lombardy

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110228
Author(s):  
Carla Ida Ripamonti ◽  
Giacomo Massa ◽  
Daniela Insolvibile ◽  
Mauro Guglielmo ◽  
Guido Miccinesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
General Population ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Psychological Consequences ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Fear Of Cancer

Aim: To understand how patients with cancer reacted to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether their quality of life (QoL) was affected. Methods: In June 2020, 111 patients with cancer treated in the supportive care unit of a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Milan and 201 healthy controls from the general population were enrolled and assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively for fears and COVID-19–related beliefs as well as for QoL. Results: Fear of COVID-19 was significantly lower among patients (41% vs 57.6%; p = 0.007), as was fear of cancer (61.5% vs 85.6%; p < 0.001) and other diseases. The perceived risk of getting COVID-19 was lower among patients (25.2% vs 52.7%; p < 0.001), as was the belief of having been exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (18.1% vs 40.8%; p < 0.001). The physical component of QoL was better among the population (54.5 vs 43.8; p < 0.001); the reverse was true for patients’ psychological well-being (44.6 vs 39.6; p < 0.001). The qualitative data supported such results, showing a reduced psychological effect on the patients with cancer compared to the controls. Various reasons explain this result, including the awareness of being treated for cancer and nevertheless protected against getting infected in a cancer center of public health reorganized to continue treating patients by protecting them and personnel from the risk of infection. Conclusions: The experience of a cancer diagnosis, together with proper hospital reorganization, may act as protective factors from fears and psychological consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document