A phase I dose escalation study to evaluate safety and tolerability of cabazitaxel (Cbz) as a single agent in patients (pts) with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who have failed prior chemotherapy (CT) regimens (GASTANA).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
Shinkyo Yoon ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jooyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Human Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

141 Background: Cbz showed antitumor activity in a CT-resistant human gastric cancer xenograft model. The Phase I GASTANA study aimed to determine the safety profile of Cbz in pts with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who failed prior CT regimens. Methods: Asian pts with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma failing 2 prior CT regimens received Cbz (single agent, Day 1 of every 3-week cycle) in a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Dose levels (DL) were 20 mg/m2 (DL 1), 25 mg/m2 (DL 2) and 15 mg/m2 (DL -1). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prophylactic G-CSF was not permitted at cycle 1. Results: Fifteen pts were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at cycle 1. All pts were heavily pretreated (median of 2 prior anticancer regimens), and 11 had prior taxane exposure.At DL 1, no DLTs occurred in any of the first 3 pts. At DL 2, 4 pts were enrolled as 1 pt discontinued prematurely, with only 1 DLT (Grade [Gr] 4 febrile neutropenia [FN]) observed. However, all 4 pts at DL 2 experienced FN, and so 3 more pts were enrolled at DL 1 to further explore safety at this lower DL. Two DLTs (Gr 4 neutropenia > 7 days) occurred in these additional 3 pts. In response, DL -1 was opened, with no DLTs observed in the 6 pts enrolled. The median numbers of cycles were 5 (DL 1), 1.5 (DL 2) and 3 (DL -1). Frequent Gr 3/4 toxicities (safety population, N = 16) included neutropenia (63%) and FN (38%). Best overall responses included 1 partial response (6.3%; DL -1) and 8 stable disease (50%). Conclusions: Due to the unexpectedly high incidence of neutropenia-related complications compared with pts with other cancer types, a further Phase II study of Cbz was put on hold pending further data in pts with gastric cancer. The frequent occurrence of neutropenic complications with Cbz in this study may be attributed in part to the heavily pretreated nature of the pts and the accumulated toxicity of prior taxane therapy. Also, prophylactic G-CSF use after cycle 1 was not mandatory in pts with dose interruptions due to neutropenia, which may have increased the rate of neutropenic complications in subsequent cycles. Clinical trial information: NCT01497964.

Phase I, Dose-Escalation Study of 2 Dosing Regimens of AS703569, An Inhibitor of Aurora and Other Kinases, Administered Orally in Patients with Advanced Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2963-2963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Sonet ◽  
Carlos Graux ◽  
Johan Maertens ◽  
Christine-Maria Hartog ◽  
Justus Duyster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Inhibition Of Proliferation ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: AS703569 is a novel, orally bioavailable, potent ATP-competitive, small molecule that inhibits all three aurora kinase isoforms (A, B, and C), and shows inhibitory activity across other kinases involved in cell proliferation and survival, including FLT3, ABL1, ABL1 (mut. T315I), JAK-2, and FGFR3. AS703569 has been tested as a single agent and in combination with standard-of-care anticancer agents in leukemia cell lines, freshly isolated leukemic cells, and tumor xenograft models. The strong inhibition of proliferation and the triggering of apoptosis induced by AS703569 lead to significant anti tumor activity resulting in tumor regression or growth delay, and prolongation of animal survival. AS703569 is currently being tested in phase I studies as a single agent and in combination; the main objectives are to establish the MTD (based on dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]) and evaluate the safety and PK/PD effects of different regimens. Study design: This is an open-label, phase I, two-arm, dose-escalation study in patients (pts) with AML, CML, MDS, and MPD. Patients were sequentially assigned to one of two AS703569 dosing regimens: Regimen 1: once daily (QD), days 1–3 and 8–10 of a 21-day cycle; Regimen 2: QD, days 1–6 of a 21-day cycle. In both treatment arms, AS703569 was administered at escalating dose levels (DL; 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, and 47 mg/m2/day) using a 3+3 cohort design. Repeated cycles were permitted until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patient characteristics: Pt characteristics are summarized in the Table. Pts had primary AML (n=20), secondary AML (n=13), CML (n=6), MDS (n=5), and MPD (n=1). Pts were heavily pretreated and had failed previous chemotherapy. Safety: The median number of AS703569 cycles received per pt was 2 for Regimen 1 (range 1–7) and 1 for Regimen 2 (range 1–6). In Regimen 1, at DL 7 (47 mg/m2/day, n=3), 2 subjects reported DLTs: 1 case of grade 3 diarrhea with hyponatremia and sepsis with a fatal outcome, and 1 case of grade 3 diarrhea with GI bleeding. In Regimen 2, at DL 7 (n=5), 3 subjects reported DLTs: 2 cases of grade 4 mucositis and 1 case of neutropenic infection. Consequently, the dose was de-escalated to 37 mg/m2/day for both regimens and enrollment is ongoing at this DL to confirm the MTD. Grade ≥3 toxicities reported throughout the study mainly included infections (18 pts), neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (17 pts), thrombocytopenia (15 pts), anemia (11 pts), and GI disorders including mucositis, diarrhea and GI bleeding (8 pts). Alopecia was reported in some pts. PK: Preliminary data for 37 pts (DL 1–6) show an increased exposure with dose, a Tmax of 2–4 h (range 0.5–8 h), and an effective half-life of ~10–20 h. Activity (preliminary data): In Regimen 1, 1 pt with refractory CML (mut. T315I) has received 7 treatment cycles and shown a hematological and cytogenetic response; 5 pts with AML received 5–7 cycles, 3 achieved reduction in BM and/or peripheral blasts. In Regimen 2, 1 pt with MDS received 6 cycles and achieved a PR; 2 pts with AML received 3 cycles and did not progress. Conclusions: These data indicate that AS703569, QD, days 1–3 and 8–10 every 21 days or on days 1–6 every 21 days is generally well tolerated in pts with advanced hematological malignancies. Most grade 3/4 toxicities are commonly seen in pts with advanced hematological malignancies and are in part linked to the underlying disease. A DL with an unacceptable frequency of DLTs was reached and enrollment continues at a lower DL to confirm the MTD. Early evidence of activity was observed in pts with CML, AML, and MDS. Regimen 1 Regimen 2 N 24 21 Median (range) age, years 69.5 (48–83) 71 (49–82) Sex, M/F 15/9 12/9 ECOG PS, 0-1-2 5-12-7 3-12-6 Median (range) previous lines of therapy 3 (1–6) 2 (1–6)

SAR650984, a CD38 Monoclonal Antibody In Patients With Selected CD38+ Hematological Malignancies- Data From a Dose-Escalation Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 284-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G Martin ◽  
Stephen A. Strickland ◽  
Martha Glenn ◽  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Nikki Daskalakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract Background SAR650984 (SAR) is a naked humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds selectively to the human surface antigen CD38 highly expressed in multiple myeloma cells and other hematological malignancies. SAR kills tumor cells via 3 different biological mechanisms: Antibody-dependent cellular-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and Induction of apoptosis (pro-apoptosis). Here we present preliminary data from the ongoing first in human, Phase I dose escalation study of SAR in patients with selected CD38+ hematological malignancies. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01084252) Objectives The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives include characterization of safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity and disease response. Methods SAR is administered as a single agent IV infusion every week (QW) or every 2 weeks (Q2W) to adult patients with selected CD38+ hematological malignancies who have progressed on or after standard therapy or for whom no effective standard therapy exists. An accelerated dose escalation schedule was used for the first 5 dose levels (DL) (0.0001 mg/kg to 0.1 mg/kg Q2W), with one evaluable patient per DL unless DLT was experienced. All subsequent DL (0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 5mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg Q2W and 10 mg/kg QW), followed the classic 3+3 design for dose escalation based on DLT. Results 32 patients have been treated across all DLs including 3 patients with NHL, 2 with CLL, and 27 with MM. The 20 mg/kg Q2W and 10 mg/kg QW DLs are currently being evaluated and the MTD has not been reached. DLTs have been limited to Grade (G) 2 infusion reactions during cycle 1 with 1 at DL 0.3 mg/kg and 1 at DL 3.0 mg/kg. This was mitigated by the implementation of routine pretreatment with methylprednisone, diphenhydramine, ranitidine and acetaminophen. The most frequent occurring adverse events (≥ 10%) all DL, regardless of causality, are fatigue (46.9%), nausea (31.3%), pyrexia (28.1%), cough (25%), vomiting (21.9%), hypercalcemia (18.8%), with headache, constipation, bone pain, chills and diarrhea each occurring in 15.6% of patients. In addition, pneumonia, anemia, dysgeusia and hypokalemia each occurred in 12.5% of patients. Serious adverse events considered related to therapy include G 3 pneumonia (6.3%) associated with fever (3.1%), hyperglycemia (3.1%) and one Grade 2 infusion reaction (3.1%). Of the 19 patients treated at DL 1.0 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg Q2W, 1 had CLL, 1 had NHL and 17 had MM. The 17 MM patients were older and heavily pretreated patients; median age of 64 years (range: 55-74); and median of seven prior regimens (range: 2-14). All MM patients had received prior lenalidomide and bortezomib. The median time from diagnosis to first SAR650984 dosing was 6. 8 years (range 1.8 – 16.8 years). Responses in this group (fig 1), according to EBMT MM criteria, included 1 PR at 1 mg/kg (n = 3) and 5 mg/kg (n=3), and 1 MR at DL 3 mg/kg (n = 6). The 10 mg/kg DL demonstrated 3 PR and 2 SD among 6 MM patients treated. For the 19 patients treated at or above the 1 mg/kg DL the median time on treatment is 8 weeks (range 2-50 weeks). Immunogenicity studies show no anti-SAR antibodies. Receptor Occupancy could be detected from DL 1 mg/kg and reached a range of 84.1 to 97.7 % at 10 mg/kg. PK analysis show a more than dose proportional increase of exposure over the 0.03 to 10 mg/kg dose range with clearance in a similar range between 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg. No accumulation was observed based on Cmax at cycle 2 over the 0.03 to 3 mg/kg dose range. Tumor growth inhibition threshold was reached at Cmax for 1 patient at DL 5 mg/kg and 5 patients at DL 10 mg/kg. Conclusion The safety profile of SAR is predictable and manageable and the MTD has not been reached. SAR demonstrates encouraging single agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM and warrants further evaluation in this patient population. Disclosures: Zheng: sanofi: Employment. Daskalakis:sanofi: Employment.

Safety and efficacy of MET inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) combined with sorafenib in patients (pts) with NRAS wild-type or mutant melanoma from a phase I study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8519-8519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Ann Means-Powell ◽  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Grace K. Dy ◽  
Laura Williams Goff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

8519 Background: The MET receptor tyrosine kinase is implicated in tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and is activated in NRAS mutant melanoma. Tivantinib is an oral, selective MET inhibitor currently in phase II/III clinical trials. Tivantinib plus sorafenib exhibited synergistic antitumor activity vs single-agent activity in several tumor models. This phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety of tivantinib plus sorafenib in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Endpoints were safety, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tivantinib plus sorafenib, and antitumor activity. Dose escalation previously established the RP2D as tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (BID) plus sorafenib 400 mg BID. Extension cohorts enrolled ≤ 20 pts each with melanoma or other tumors. Pts were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 16 pts with melanoma (median age, 66 yr) received treatment at the RP2D, and 3 pts are still on study. 12 pts received ≥ 1 previous systemic anticancer treatment (median, 1.2; range, 0-5) including ipilimumab (2 pts) or MEK inhibitor (1 pt). Common adverse events (≥ 25%) were rash (50%), diarrhea and fatigue (44% each), anorexia (38%), stomatitis and nausea (31% each), and anemia, weight decrease, and hypophosphatemia (25% each). Best responses were complete response (CR) in 1 pt, partial response (PR) in 3 pts, and stable disease (SD) in 3 pts. 4 pts had progressive disease and 5 pts were not evaluable (3 pts had not reached first assessment time, 1 pt withdrew consent, and 1 pt had unacceptable toxicity). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 25% and 44%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.3 mo (95% CI, 1.6-12.9 mo). Among 8 pts with NRAS mutations, mPFS was 9.2 mo (95% CI, 5.3-12.9 mo) and responses were 1 CR, 1 PR, and 2 SD. Conclusions: Tivantinib plus sorafenib combination therapy was well tolerated and exhibited preliminary anticancer activity in pts with melanoma. Dual inhibition of MET and angiogenesis may be an effective treatment strategy in NRAS-mutant melanoma.

First-in-human dose-escalation study of anti-EGFR ADC MRG003 in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3550-3550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Miao-Zhen Qiu ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Li Wei ◽  
Chaohong Hu
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
Human Dose

3550 Background: MRG003 is a novel antibody drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a fully human anti-EGFR IgG1 monoclonal antibody conjugated to a microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). MRG003 is presently being tested in an ongoing phase I study for safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity in patients (pts) with solid tumors (CTR20180310). Methods: In the phase I dose escalation study of a traditional (3+3) design, pts with relapsed or refractory cancers received single agent MRG003 once every 3 weeks (Q3W) for a maximum of 8 treatment cycles. The starting dose of MRG003 is 0.1 mg/kg, followed by 0.3, 0.6, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mg/kg. Observations included adverse events (AEs), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and antitumor activity which is assessed every two cycles. Results: A total of twenty-two pts with colorectal (CRC, n = 15), nasopharyngeal (NPC, n = 3), head and neck (H&N, n = 2), esophageal (EC, n = 1), and duodenal (DC, n = 1) cancer were enrolled in the dose escalation. The median age of pts was 56.5 years. The MTD identified was 2.5 mg/kg. Commonly observed adverse events were anemia (50%), AST increase (41%), decreased appetite (41%), rash (36%), pruritus (36%), asthenia (36%), and proteinuria (32%). Majority of AEs were mild to moderate in severity. EGFR expression in patients’ tumor samples was determined retrospectively by a validated IHC method in a central laboratory. Nine out of 22 pts tested were EGFR positive. Among these 9 EGFR positive pts, one with NPC in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort had partial response, four had stable disease (one with H&N in the 1.5 mg/kg, one each with NPC and H&N in the 2.0 mg/kg, and one with EC in the 2.5 mg/kg cohorts). The disease control rate (DCR) at doses ≥1.5 mg/kg was 100% for the EGFR positive pts. Conclusions: The dose escalation study of MRG003 showed manageable safety profiles and encouraging preliminary antitumor activity in pts with EGFR-positive solid tumors. MRG003 is currently being evaluated as a single agent in phase I dose expansion cohorts to further assess safety, PK, and antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: CTR20180310 .

Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib in Combination with Liposomal Doxorubicin and Melphalan in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5182-5182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Lawrence Kaplan ◽  
Charles Linker ◽  
Lloyd E. Damon ◽  
Willis H. Navarro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Phase I/II studies using either liposomal doxorubicin (D) or oral melphalan (M) in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (V) have found favorable efficacy and tolerance in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Since these drugs have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, we initiated a phase I/II study to examine the safety and efficacy of combining all three agents (DMV) in relapsed or refractory myeloma. Study Aims: Starting at 25–50% of the doses used in the two drug combination studies, the objective of this dose escalation study was to evaluate the safety/tolerability of DMV until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) could be identified. Efficacy was also evaluated. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MM and progressive disease requiring treatment were enrolled in the study. Dose level 1 consisted of D 10 mg/m2 and M 5 mg/m2 given IV on day 1 with V given by IV push on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Cycles were repeated every 28 days up to a maximum of 6 cycles. Dose levels of D, M, V (mg/m2) in the subsequent three cohorts were (10, 10, 0.7), (20, 10, 0.7), and (20, 10, 1.0) respectively. Once the MTD has been identified, an additional 17 patients will be enrolled at this dose level in the phase II portion of the study. Results: 5 patients (2 males, median age 65, range 33–79) have been enrolled in the study thus far. The myeloma subtypes include 2 IgG, 1 IgA, and 2 with light chains only. In this heavily pretreated population (range 2–7 prior therapies), 4 patients received prior autologous stem cell transplantation, 2 had a prior nonmyeloablative allogenic transplant, 4 prior VAD, 1 prior bortezomib, 2 prior oral melphalan, 3 prior thalidomide, 2 prior CC-5013, and 2 prior spinal radiation. The first dose cohort has been completed without any DLT. One patient had 3 days of Grade 3 neutropenia. All other toxicities were Grade 1–2 including asthenia, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and headache. Of note, a patient with baseline Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy and on hemodialysis remained stable. A patient with Grade 2 chronic graft versus host disease also remained stable. Four patients have been enrolled at dose level one. One patient, who had progressive disease after an autologous and a nonmyeloablative allogenic transplant as well as CC5013, had a near CR (IFE+) after the second cycle of DMV. Two patients have had stable disease. One had disease progression after one cycle and subsequently died. The patient on dose level two is too early to evaluate. Conclusion: Thus far, DMV appears to be well tolerated and no DLT has been observed even in elderly patients with significant comorbidities. The finding of a near CR and SD at only dose level 1 is encouraging particularly since the patients were significantly pretreated. Dose escalation continues to determine the MTD.

A Phase I Study of Cloretazine® and Temozolomide in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1971-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
William Tse ◽  
Khuda D. Khan ◽  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Jon Donze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Futile Cycle ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dna Strand

Abstract Background: In recent single agent Phase I trials, both Cloretazine® (VNP40101M) and temozolomide (TMZ) have shown activity in relapsed leukemia with minimal non-hematologic toxicity (Giles et al, 2004, Seiter et al, 2002). The cytotoxic activity of Cloretazine and TMZ have been attributed to the alkylation at the O6 position of guanine leading to a futile cycle of misincorporation of thymidine and ineffective mismatch repair. In addition, activation of Cloretazine generates different alkylating and isocyanate species that produce DNA cross linkages leading to DNA strand breaks and apoptosis. Repair of Cloretazine and TMZ induced alkylation lesions have been attributed to the expression and irreversible activity of enzyme O6 alkylguanine DNA alkyltranferase (AGT). It has been shown that TMZ administered to patients once or twice daily can reduce AGT levels in tumor cells; therefore depletion of AGT by TMZ may sensitize cells to Cloretazine and result in synergistic anti-tumor activity. Methods: Cloretazine given after TMZ priming is currently evaluated in a Phase I dose escalation study. Patients are eligible if they have relapsed or refractory leukemia (ECOG 0–2). TMZ was given orally starting at a dose of 200 mg twice daily for 5 doses. Cloretazine is given intravenously on day 3, 2–4 hours after the last dose of TMZ starting at 100 mg/m2. Dose escalation of TMZ was guided by AGT depletion in leukemic blasts assessed by enzyme assay and HPLC (Gerson et al, 1985). Leukemia response is assessed according for standard criteria for CR and CRp (Cheson et al, 2003). Results: Thirty-two patients have been treated in the first 5 cohorts (I: 200mg TMZ +100mg/m2 Cloretazine n=7, II: 300mg TMZ+100mg/m2 Cloretazine n=6, III: 300mg TMZ + 200mg/m2 Cloretazine n=3, IV: 300 mg TMZ + 300mg/m2 Cloretazine n=7, V: 300 mg TMZ + 400mg/m2 Cloretazine n=9). Median age of the patients is 62 years (range 27–80), M:F = 20:12. Treatment with 300mg TMZ x 5 doses resulted in >90% depletion of AGT levels in 5 of 6 patients in cohort II and was fixed for subsequent dose escalation with Cloretazine. Myelosuppression was the most frequent adverse event occurring in 10/32 (30%) of treated patients (6 Grade 3–4 neutropenia, 4 Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia). Non-hematologic toxicity has been minimal. To date, two patients treated with TMZ 300mg x 5 and Cloretazine 400 mg/m2 have experienced dose-limiting toxicity: Grade 3 pulmonary hemorrhage and Grade 3 neutropenic colitis in Cohort V and no unexpected toxicities were observed. Three early deaths occurred within 30 days (9.4%), all attributed to progressive disease. Responses are as follows: CR=3, CRp=1, and HI=2 for an overall response rate of 18.8%. The study is ongoing. Conclusions: Cloretazine® in combination with TMZ is tolerable and manageable. Evidence of anti-tumor effect has already been observed suggesting the combination of Cloretazine® and TMZ may potentiate their antileukemic activity.

scholarly journals Activity of preclinical and phase I clinical trial of a novel androgen receptor antagonist GT0918 in metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiping Li ◽  
Guohong Song ◽  
Qiaoxia Zhou ◽  
Ran Ran ◽  
Hanfang Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Blood Cholesterol ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Single Dose Study ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Abstract Purpose To evaluate GT0918, a 2nd-generation AR antagonist, for its AR down-regulation activity among breast cancer patients. Methods The effect of GT0918 on AR protein expression was evaluated in AR expression breast cancer cells and in breast cancer xenograft model. A 3 + 3 phase I dose-escalation study was launched in Peking University Cancer Hospital. The endpoints included dose finding, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. Results GT0918 was demonstrated to effectively suppress the expression of AR protein and the growth of AR-positive breast cancer tumors in mouse xenograft tumor models. All patients treated with GT0918 were at a QD dose-escalation of five dose levels from 100 to 500 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs of any grade were asthenia, anemia, decreased appetite, increased blood cholesterol, increased blood triglycerides, decreased white blood cell count, and increased low-density lipoprotein. Grade 3 AEs were fatigue (2 of 18, 11.1%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (1 of 18, 5.6%), alanine aminotransferase increase (1 of 18, 5.6%), and neutrophil count decrease (1 of 18, 5.6%). Clinical benefit rate (CBR) in 16 weeks was 23.1% (3/13). Among 7 AR-positive patients, 6 can evaluate efficacy, and 2 completed 23.5- and 25-cycle treatment, respectively (as of 2020/1/20). PK parameters showed a fast absorption profile of GT0918 in the single-dose study. GT0918 and its major metabolite reached steady-state serum concentration levels at day 21 after multiple dosing. Conclusion GT0918 can effectively inhibit AR-positive breast cancer tumor growth. GT0918 was demonstrated well tolerated with a favorable PK profile. The suitable dose of GT0918 was 500 mg QD and may provide clinical benefits for AR-positive mBC.

scholarly journals Phase I/II intra-patient dose escalation study of vorinostat in children with relapsed solid tumor, lymphoma, or leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis M. van Tilburg ◽  
Till Milde ◽  
Ruth Witt ◽  
Jonas Ecker ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Patient Dose ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Plasma Cytokine

Abstract Background Until today, adult and pediatric clinical trials investigating single-agent or combinatorial HDAC inhibitors including vorinostat in solid tumors have largely failed to demonstrate efficacy. These results may in part be explained by data from preclinical models showing significant activity only at higher concentrations compared to those achieved with current dosing regimens. In the current pediatric trial, we applied an intra-patient dose escalation design. The purpose of this trial was to determine a safe dose recommendation (SDR) of single-agent vorinostat for intra-patient dose escalation, pharmacokinetic analyses (PK), and activity evaluation in children (3–18 years) with relapsed or therapy-refractory malignancies. Results A phase I intra-patient dose (de)escalation was performed until individual maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The starting dose was 180 mg/m2/day with weekly dose escalations of 50 mg/m2 until DLT/maximum dose. After MTD determination, patients seamlessly continued in phase II with disease assessments every 3 months. PK and plasma cytokine profiles were determined. Fifty of 52 patients received treatment. n = 27/50 (54%) completed the intra-patient (de)escalation and entered phase II. An SDR of 130 mg/m2/day was determined (maximum, 580 mg/m2/day). n = 46/50 (92%) patients experienced treatment-related AEs which were mostly reversible and included thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, anemia, and vomiting. n = 6/50 (12%) had treatment-related SAEs. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Higher dose levels resulted in higher Cmax. Five patients achieved prolonged disease control (> 12 months) and showed a higher Cmax (> 270 ng/mL) and MTDs. Best overall response (combining PR and SD, no CR observed) rate in phase II was 6/27 (22%) with a median PFS and OS of 5.3 and 22.4 months. Low levels of baseline cytokine expression were significantly correlated with favorable outcome. Conclusion An SDR of 130 mg/m2/day for individual dose escalation was determined. Higher drug exposure was associated with responses and long-term disease stabilization with manageable toxicity. Patients with low expression of plasma cytokine levels at baseline were able to tolerate higher doses of vorinostat and benefited from treatment. Baseline cytokine profile is a promising potential predictive biomarker. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01422499. Registered 24 August 2011,

A phase I/IB dose-escalation study of BEZ235 in combination with trastuzumab in patients with PI3-kinase or PTEN altered HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 508-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian E. Krop ◽  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Jordi Rodon Ahnert ◽  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
Carolyn D. Britten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Stabilization

508 Background: Alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been implicated in resistance to trastuzumab (T) in HER2+ breast cancer. BEZ235, a potent oral dual PI3K/mTORC1/2 inhibitor, has demonstrated growth inhibition and apoptosis in HER2+ breast cancer models, including those harboring PI3K pathway alterations, and with T resistance. In a Phase I study, BEZ235 was well tolerated as a single agent in pts with advanced solid tumors. The aim of this study was to determine the MTD of BEZ235 in combination with T in pts with T-resistant HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with alterations of the PI3K pathway. Methods: Pts with T-resistant HER2+ mBC (i.e. disease progression during adjuvant therapy or metastatic disease on therapy with T) received oral BEZ235 daily, with weekly T (2 mg/kg). Pts were eligible for enrollment if a tumor sample was demonstrated to contain a molecular alteration of PIK3CA and/or PTEN. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control. Results: As of 23 Sep 2011, 15 of the 19 enrolled pts were evaluable for dose escalation analysis. BEZ235 was evaluated at 3 dose levels: (1) 400 mg/day (3 pts); (2) 600 mg/day (6 pts); (3) 800 mg/day (10 pts), administered either in capsule form (400 mg) or in sachet form (600 mg and 800 mg). The MTD of BEZ235 in combination with T was estimated to be 600 mg/day. Observed DLTs were G3 nausea at 600 mg/day (1 pt), and G3 nausea, G3 fatigue and G3 skin rash (1 pt each) at 800 mg/day. The most frequent G3/4 adverse events (CTCAE v3.0) suspected to be related to study treatment were diarrhea (4 pts) and nausea (2 pts). No deaths related to study treatment occurred. 1 pt with lung and brain metastases had a partial response. 4 pts had disease stabilization for ≥4 cycles (16 weeks), including 1 pt with liver metastases, in whom BEZ235/T treatment resulted in disease stabilization for more than 21 cycles (84 weeks). Conclusions: BEZ235in combination with T demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in pts with HER2+ mBC and PI3K pathway alterations. Following the Bayesian model recommendation, the MTD for BEZ235 in combination with T was estimated to be 600 mg/day. The safety expansion arm is ongoing at the MTD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document