Phase II trial of bevacizumab and temozolomide for upfront treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2012-2012
Author(s):  
Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu ◽  
Hye Hyun Bahng ◽  
Albert Lai ◽  
Nadia Faiq ◽  
William H. Yong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

2012 Background: Randomized clinical trials in newly diagnosed, elderly GBM patients have shown that treatment with temozolomide chemotherapy is at least equivalent to treatment with radiotherapy. Glioblastoma in elderly patients may also have high angiogenic activities. Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic agent, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor. We conduct a clinical trial of temozolomide and bevacizumab to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination in the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM, good performance status, and willing to forgo upfront treatment with radiation therapy. Methods: This is a phase II trial of newly diagnosed GBM patients age ≥70 with no prior treatments other than surgery and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60. Patients receive treatments 4-6 weeks after surgery with bevacizumab (10mg/kg every 2 weeks) and temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2 for 5 days out of 28 days, up to 12 cycles) until tumor progression. Primary outcome measures are overall survival and safety evaluations. Results: From June 2010 to January 2016, 50 GBM patients enrolled in this study. To date, all patients have tumor progression and 3 are still alive. The median age is 75 (range 70 - 87), and median KPS is 80 (range 60-100). 15 patients have a gross total resection. 26 out of 49 patients with tissues available for evaluation have methylation of the MGMT promoter, and no patient has IDH-1 mutation. Median overall survival is 12.3 months (14.8 months for those with methylation of MGMT, 10.0 months for unmethylated MGMT). Serious adverse events related to treatments include wound healing problems (2), CNS hemorrhage (3), pulmonary embolism (4), and bowel perforation (1). Serious hematological adverse events include thrombocytopenia (3) and neutropenia (5). Conclusions: For patients with newly diagnosed GBM age ≥70, KPS ≥60, treatment with temozolomide and bevacizumab may show promising survival benefits and have tolerable side effects. More detailed safety and efficacy analysis will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01149850.

scholarly journals A randomized phase II trial of efficacy and safety of the immunotherapy ALECSAT as an adjunct to radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Werlenius ◽  
Giuseppe Stragliotto ◽  
Michael Strandeus ◽  
Malin Blomstrand ◽  
Helena Carén ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background There is an urgent need for effective treatments against glioblastoma (GBM). In this trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of an adoptive cell-based immunotherapy. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed GBM were recruited at four study sites in Sweden. The patients were randomized 1:2 to receive either radiotherapy (RT), 60 Gy/30 fractions, with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) only, or RT and TMZ with addition of Autologous Lymphoid Effector Cells Specific Against Tumor (ALECSAT) in an open-label phase II trial. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were survival and safety of ALECSAT. Results Sixty-two patients were randomized to either RT and TMZ alone (n=22) or RT and TMZ with ALECSAT (n=40). Median age was 57 years (range 38-69), 95% of the patients were in good performance status (WHO 0-1). There was no significant difference between the study arms (SOC vs. ALECSAT + SOC) in PFS (7.9 vs. 7.8 months; HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.70, 2.36; P=0.42), or in median overall survival (OS) (18.3 vs. 19.2 months; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.58, 2.31; P=0.67). The treatment groups were balanced in terms of serious adverse events (52.4% vs. 52.5%), but adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more common in the experimental arm (81.0% vs. 92.5%). Conclusion Addition of ALECSAT immunotherapy to standard treatment with radiochemotherapy was well tolerated but did not improve PFS or OS for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

scholarly journals Temozolomide Plus Bevacizumab in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Poor Performance Status: An ANOCEF Phase II Trial (ATAG)

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Germán Reyes‐Botero ◽  
Stéphanie Cartalat‐Carel ◽  
Olivier L. Chinot ◽  
Maryline Barrie ◽  
Luc Taillandier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

scholarly journals Three Drug Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Transplant-Ineligible Elderly Patients - a Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5574-5574
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz Siddiqui ◽  
Kazi Najamus-saqib Khan ◽  
Arafat Ali Farooqui ◽  
Muhammad Saad Farooqi ◽  
Muhammad Junaid Tariq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Great Efficacy ◽  
Drug Regimens

Introduction: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) tend to have comorbidities and/or advanced age that make this subset of patients difficult to manage with current drug regimens. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science was performed from inception and completed on 07/17/2019. Studies focusing on efficacy and tolerability of 3-drug regimens in patients with NDMM were included for the review. Results: Out of 3579 studies, a total of 10 (08 phase II and 03 phase III) clinical trials in last ten years (2010-2019) using 3-drug regimens in NDMM elderly pts (893M/807F) ineligible for ASCT (determined by investigators) were selected. A total of 1703/1740 NDMM pts were evaluated. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) such as carfilzomib (C), bortezomib (V) and ixazomib (I) showed promising results in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. CLARION trial (phase III, n=955) compared two PIs (C and V) with melphalan (M) and prednisone. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between two groups (median: 22.3 vs 22.1 months; HR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10, p = 0.159) as well as overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.82-1.43). Difference in the least square means of the HR-QoL (Health related- quality of life) was 4.99 (p<.0001) favoring C-group. M may not be an ideal drug to combine with carfilzomib in this setting given more AEs.(Facon et al 2019). V as 3-drug regimen in combination with lenalidomide (L) in 242 pts achieved statistically significant prolonged PFS (median 43 mo) and OS (median 75 mo) with great efficacy and acceptable risk-benefit profile. (Durie et al 2017; phase III). Multinational phase II trial (n=70) by Dimopoulos et al (2019) evaluated I, with different fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy). Median duration was 19 cycles, indicating the long-term tolerability of regimen. With favorable toxicity profile and maintained QoL scores, trial concluded that this therapy is tolerable in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. Tuchman et al (2017) in phase II trial (n=14) investigated (V-Cy-d) and achieved ORR of 64%, with ≥VGPR of 57%. Low dose V showed great efficacy with M yielding ORR of 86% and VGPR or better of 49% in phase II trial (n=101) that also evaluated Cy as 3-drug combination but results were more productive with M with longer PFS and OS which reduced when impact of frailty was examined on outcomes. Since toxicity was higher with M, trial suggested that 2-drug combination should be preferred in elderly frail patients. (Larocca et al 2015). Efficacy was quite promising when Bringhen et al (2014) trialed C with Cy-d; 87% OS and 76% PFS at 1 y in phase II trial (n=58) with much favorable safety profile. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as elotuzumab (E) and pembrolizumab (Pe) are also tested in elderly. First study conducted on NDMM pts using humanized mAb; E, in phase II trial (n=40) by Takezako et al (2017) attained primary endpoint of the study (ORR) of (88%) and VGPR or better of 45% in Japanese pts with tolerable toxicities in elderly. No subjects on this study experienced severe peripheral neuropathy. KEYNOTE-185; a phase III multinational trial by Usmani et al (2019) evaluated Pe with Ld in 151 pts. FDA halted this study due to unfavorable benefit-risk profile; 19 deaths, 6 due to disease progression (PD), and 13 due to treatment-related AEs. Median PFS and median OS were not reached in either group. Immunomodulators such as L achieved one of the longest PFS reported in a trial of transplant ineligible patients (35 mo) by using LVd regimen in phase II multicenter trial (n=50). (O'Donnell et al 2018) Alkylating agents like bendamustine (ben) and M have been tested in different novel regimens. Decreasing intensity and increasing duration of ben resulted in better outcomes in phase II trial (n=59) by Berdeja et al (2016) and can be given as first line treatment. Ben yielded great results with low dose dexa as compared to high dose achieving 92% ORR. Original regimen was effective but relatively more toxic. Incidence of herpes and neuropathy decreased dramatically with the treatment modifications. Conclusion: Three-drug regimens having PIs, mABs, immunomodulators and alkylating agents have shown desirable results in NDMM transplant (ASCT)-ineligible elderly patients and are likely the emerging standard of care for NDMM. Disclosures Anwer: In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

CTNI-59. A MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF CS-131 SEEDS EMBEDDED IN A COLLAGEN CARRIER TILE FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED AND RECURRENT OPERABLE INTRACRANIAL NEOPLASMS – TRIAL IN PROGRESS

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi74-vi74
Author(s):  
Erin Dunbar ◽  
David McCracken ◽  
adam nowlan ◽  
Clark Chen ◽  
Kathryn Dusenbery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Intracranial Neoplasms ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract BACKGROUND For patients with operable intracranial neoplasms, there are opportunities to augment local control beyond traditional methods, such as external beam radiation therapy. Brachytherapy, the implantation of radioactive sources into the resection cavity, can be useful in this setting by providing immediate initiation of radiation and limiting the exposure of surrounding normal tissue to radiation. Traditional intracranial brachytherapy has been limited by uneven dose distributions, complicated workflows, extended procedural times, cost of dedicated equipment, and frequent adverse events. To address these issues, a permanently implanted device with Cs-131 radiation seeds embedded in a bioresorbable collagen carrier tile (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies, Tempe, AZ USA) was developed. Described as surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT), it is FDA-cleared for use in newly-diagnosed malignant intracranial neoplasms and recurrent intracranial tumors, and has demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in early commercial use. The primary objectives of this multicenter, prospective, observational (phase IV) registry study are to evaluate “real-world” clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes that measure the safety and efficacy of STaRT using the GammaTile. METHODS Patients undergoing resection (R) of brain tumors with intra-operative GammaTile placement are eligible for enrollment. Planned sample size is 600 at up to 50 enrolling sites. First subject was enrolled 10/14/2020. Tumor pathology, overall survival, radiation- and surgery-related adverse events, patient- and provider-reported quality of life, serial MRIs, and timing of surgical bed and/or distant recurrence are collected. Powered primary endpoints for recurrent brain metastases, recurrent glioblastoma, and recurrent meningioma (surgical bed-progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, and PFS, respectively), compare STaRT to standard-of-care benchmarks. Results will be used to improve awareness and access to this treatment, benchmark clinical outcomes in the real-world setting, allow for comparisons to existing treatments, facilitate the design of future clinical trials, and contribute to the optimal sequencing of treatments for intracranial neoplasms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document