A novel MGMT methylation-based prognostic score in patients with glioblastoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2048-2048
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Gerratana ◽  
Giuseppe Lombardi ◽  
Elisa De Carlo ◽  
Vanessa Buoro ◽  
Giovanna De Maglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Quantitative Detection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

2048 Background: The methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter has been associated with improved outcome in glioblastoma (GBM) patients (pts). Pyrosequencing (PSQ) has been reported to be an accurate method for quantitative detection of CpG islands (CpGs) methylation, but the role of methylation heterogeneity among different CpGs sites is still unclear. Aim of this study was to evaluate on a large multicentric cohort a novel prognostic score based on the evaluation of the MGMT promoter methylation at 10 different CpGs sites. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 185 pts with GBM treated at the University Hospital of Udine and Istituto Oncologico Veneto in Padua between 2006 and 2015. The methylation level of 10 CpGs (74 – 83) was determined by PSQ. The cut-off point of 9% was used to define a CpG as methylated. One point was assigned to each methylated CpG, with a total score from 0 (all CpGs < 9%) to 10 (all CpGs ≥ 9%). A threshold capable to detect a favorable outcome (Overall Survival, OS > 24 months) has been identified through ROC analysis as 6 by a previous study conducted at our center. The prognostic impact was explored through Cox regression. Results: After a median follow-up of 59 months, the median OS and Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the whole population were 16.41 and 9.67 months, respectively. A score ≥ 6 identified pts with a considerably better median OS (24.85 vs 12.99 months, p < .0001) and PFS (11.44 vs 8.22 months, p < .0001). On multivariate analysis, it remained independently associated with a favorable prognosis (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27-0.55, p < 0.0001) after adjustment for IDH1 mutational status (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.87, p = .02), age ( > 70 vs ≤ 70 years HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.48-3.28, p = .0001) and ECOG performance status (2-3 vs 0-1 HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.59-3.49, p < .0001). The score’s prognostic value was maintained in all the explored subgroups. Conclusions: Combining methylation data from multiple CpGs increases the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation assessment. The study confirmed the independent prognostic value of a novel score system based on the evaluation of the MGMT promoter methylation at 10 different CpGi sites.

scholarly journals BIOM-31. PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF MGMT METHYLATION IN IDH MUTANT GLIOMAS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii8-ii8
Author(s):  
Keng Lam ◽  
Blaine Eldred ◽  
Bryan Kevan ◽  
Matthew Ji ◽  
Jerry Lou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas have been associated with longer survival time than those with IDH wildtype. Previous studies have also shown the predictive value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for glioblastoma. However, little is known in the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status for IDH mutant gliomas. METHODS We retrospectively identified IDH mutant gliomas patients from University of California Los Angeles and Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles that had been tested for MGMT methylation status. We performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses of overall survival (OS) to compare the MGMT methylated versus MGMT unmethylated patients. RESULTS We identified a total of 375 IDH mutant gliomas with MGMT testing. Subgroups include 52 glioblastoma, 191 astrocytoma, and 132 oligodendroglioma. The median OS for all MGMT methylated patients was 20.0 years and for unmethylated patients 14.3 years (log-rank P=0.008). Cox regression analysis also confirmed patients with MGMT methylated to have better survival than those with MGMT unmethylated (hazard ratio of 0.47, P= 0.005). During subgroup analysis, MGMT methylated glioblastoma patients have a median OS of 13.7 years compared to MGMT unmethylated patients 3.2 years (log-rank P=0.004) with a hazard ratio of 0.14 (P=0.005). However, we see no difference yet for astrocytoma (hazard ratio of 1.09, P= 0.81) and oligodendrogliomas (hazard ratio of 0.36, P= 0.193), possibly as a result of immature survival data. CONCLUSIONS MGMT promoter methylation is associated with better outcomes in IDH mutant glioblastoma patients. Progression free survival will be analyzed to determine predictive benefit of MGMT methylation for other glioma subtypes.

scholarly journals Superiority of temozolomide over radiotherapy for elderly patients with RTK II methylation class, MGMT promoter methylated malignant astrocytoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1162-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje Wick ◽  
Tobias Kessler ◽  
Michael Platten ◽  
Christoph Meisner ◽  
Michael Bamberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract Background O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is predictive for alkylating chemotherapy, but there are non-benefiting subgroups. Methods This is the long-term update of NOA-08 (NCT01502241), which compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT, n = 176) and temozolomide (TMZ, n = 193) at 7/14 days in patients &gt;65 years old with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations were assessed in the biomarker cohort of 104 patients and in an independent cohort of 188 patients treated with RT+TMZ-containing regimens in Heidelberg. Results In the full NOA-08 cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 [7.0–10.0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9.4 [8.1–10.4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76–1.15) of TMZ versus RT. Median event-free survival (EFS) [3.4 (3.2–4.1) months vs 4.6 (4.2–5.0) months] did not differ, with HR = 1.02 (0.83–1.25). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors had markedly longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18.4 [13.9–24.4] mo and 8.5 [6.9–13.3] mo) versus RT (9.6 [6.4–13.7] mo and 4.8 [4.3–6.2] mo, HR 0.44 [0.27–0.70], P &lt; 0.001 for OS and 0.46 [0.29–0.73], P = 0.001 for EFS). Patients with glioblastomas of the methylation classes receptor tyrosine kinase I (RTK I) and mesenchymal subgroups lacked a prognostic impact of MGMT in both cohorts. Conclusion MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ. It indicates favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors primarily in the RTK II subgroup.

Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Conventional Glioblastoma: A Modified Prognostic Score Based on a Single-Institution Series

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 756-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Bertolini ◽  
Elena Zunarelli ◽  
Caterina Baraldi ◽  
Antonella Valentini ◽  
Cinzia Del Giovane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Promoter Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Aims and background Recursive partioning analysis (RPA) is commonly used to define the stratification of patients with glioblastoma. Epigenetic silencing of the O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by promoter methylation plays an important role in regulating MGMT expression in gliomas and this is an established independent prognostic factor. We tested a prognostic scoring system including all clinical variables used by RPA classification (age, ECOG performance status and type of surgery) and MGMT gene promoter methylation status. Methods Seventy-eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically confirmed conventional glioblastoma were included. Information about MGMT promoter methylation status was available for all of them. Based on the patients' age (<50 vs ≥50 years), ECOG performance status (0 vs ≥1), type of surgery (gross tumor resection versus partial resection/biopsy) and MGMT promoter methylation status (methylated versus unmethylated), three classes of risk were generated where the prognostic score was defined assigning 1 point to every favorable parameter (Class I: ≥3; Class II: 2; Class III: 0–1). All classes were correlated with overall survival. Results The median survival times were 32.4, 8.6 and 8.8 months for Class I, II and III, respectively, corresponding to 2-year survival rates of 69%, 13.5% and <1%. The same analysis was performed on 54 patients treated with postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The median survival times were 32.5, 13.4 and 8.9 months for Class I, II and III, respectively, corresponding to 2-year survival rates of 68.6%, 26.9% and <1%. In both groups of 78 and 54 patients the differences in survival between Class I and III were statistically significant (P <0.0001). Conclusions The proposed prognostic scoring system including clinical variables and MGMT promoter methylation status proved valuable in patients with primary conventional glioblastoma, especially those treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

scholarly journals ACTR-37. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MGMT PROMOTER METHYLATION SCORE AND SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi21-vi21
Author(s):  
Carlos Romo ◽  
Pavan Shah ◽  
Yuqing Sun ◽  
Xiaobu Ye ◽  
Stuart Grossman
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Specific Pcr ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Methylation Score ◽  
Group 2

Abstract BACKGROUND MGMT promoter methylation is associated with longer survival in patients with high-grade gliomas who receive alkylating therapy. Methylation status is commonly determined by methylation-specific PCR and results are reported in two forms: a dichotomization of “present” or “not present,” and as a methylation score (MGMT/beta-actinx1000). The primary objective of this study is to determine the association between the degree of methylation and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma. METHODS A retrospective IRB-approved study was conducted of 684 patients treated at Johns Hopkins from 2007–2015. Adults with a histologically confirmed glioblastoma treated with standard therapy were included in the analysis. OS was estimated from the date of diagnosis to time of death or last follow up using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression model was used to assess possible positive association between MGMT score and OS. For purposes of this analysis IDH1-mutated patients were excluded. RESULTS In 100 evaluable patients, median age at diagnosis was 56 years [45–77]. Fifty-two patients were MGMT promoter methylated (score ≥2.00) and 48 were unmethylated. The median OS was 31 months in the methylated patients and 15 months in the unmethylated (p=0.0001). Methylated patients had MGMT scores ranging from 2.53-1278. The methylated scores were classified into 3 groups; #1: 0-25th percentile, #2: 25-75th percentiles, and #3: >75th percentile. mOS was: 30.8 months for group 1 (n=13); 34.8 months for group 2 (n=27); and 20.9 months for group 3 (n=12) (p=0.19). Difference in mOS between groups 1 and 3 was not statistically significant (HR 0.819 [95% CI, 0.3–2.2], p=0.69). DISCUSSION The prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with glioblastoma was replicated in our study sample. The degree of methylation reported as a score on routine testing does not appear to be directly related to OS in this patient population.

scholarly journals The Impact of MGMT Promoter Methylation and Temozolomide Treatment in Serbian Patients with Primary Glioblastoma

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Nikola Jovanović ◽  
Tatjana Mitrović ◽  
Vladimir J. Cvetković ◽  
Svetlana Tošić ◽  
Jelena Vitorović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Primary Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Impact

Background and objective: Despite recent advances in treatment, glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most lethal and aggressive brain tumor. A continuous search for a reliable molecular marker establishes the methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter as a key prognostic factor in primary glioblastoma. The aim of our study was to screen Serbian patients with primary glioblastoma for an MGMT promoter hypermethylation and to evaluate its associations with overall survival (OS) and sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. Materials and methods: A cohort of 30 Serbian primary glioblastoma patients treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy were analyzed for MGMT promoter methylation and correlated with clinical data. Results: MGMT methylation status was determined in 25 out of 30 primary glioblastomas by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 12 out of 25 patients (48%). The level of MGMT promoter methylation did not correlate with patients’ gender (p = 0.409), age (p = 0.536), and OS (p = 0.394). Treatment with TMZ significantly prolonged the median survival of a patient (from 5 to 15 months; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to a small cohort of primary GBM patients, our study is not sufficient for definitive conclusions regarding the prognostic value of MGMT methylation for the Serbian population. Our preliminary data suggest a lack of association between MGMT promoter methylation and overall survival and a significant correlation of TMZ treatment with overall survival. Further population-based studies are needed to assess the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation status for patients with primary glioblastoma.

scholarly journals Prospective Biomarker Study in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Cyto-C Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne E Griguer ◽  
Claudia R Oliva ◽  
Christopher S Coffey ◽  
Merit E Cudkowicz ◽  
Robin A Conwit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3–5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retrospective trial, CcO activity in GBMs inversely correlated with clinical outcome. The current Cyto-C study was designed to prospectively evaluate and validate the prognostic value of tumor CcO activity in patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM, and compared to the known prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation status. Methods This multi-institutional, blinded, prospective biomarker study enrolled 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were to undergo surgical resection and would be candidates for standard of care. The primary end point was overall survival time (OS), and the secondary end point was progression-free survival time (PFS). Tumor CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation status were assayed in a centralized laboratory. Results OS and PFS did not differ by high or low tumor CcO activity, and the prognostic validity of MGMT promoter methylation was confirmed. Notably, a planned exploratory analysis suggested that the combination of low CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation in tumors may be predictive of long-term survival. Conclusions Tumor CcO activity alone was not confirmed as a prognostic marker in GBM patients. However, the combination of low CcO activity and methylated MGMT promoter may reveal a sub-group of GBM patients with improved long term survival that warrants further evaluation. Our work also demonstrates the importance of performing large, multi-institutional, prospective studies to validate biomarkers. We also discuss lessons learned in assembling such studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document