scholarly journals The Impact of MGMT Promoter Methylation and Temozolomide Treatment in Serbian Patients with Primary Glioblastoma

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Nikola Jovanović ◽  
Tatjana Mitrović ◽  
Vladimir J. Cvetković ◽  
Svetlana Tošić ◽  
Jelena Vitorović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Primary Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Impact

Background and objective: Despite recent advances in treatment, glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most lethal and aggressive brain tumor. A continuous search for a reliable molecular marker establishes the methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter as a key prognostic factor in primary glioblastoma. The aim of our study was to screen Serbian patients with primary glioblastoma for an MGMT promoter hypermethylation and to evaluate its associations with overall survival (OS) and sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. Materials and methods: A cohort of 30 Serbian primary glioblastoma patients treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy were analyzed for MGMT promoter methylation and correlated with clinical data. Results: MGMT methylation status was determined in 25 out of 30 primary glioblastomas by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 12 out of 25 patients (48%). The level of MGMT promoter methylation did not correlate with patients’ gender (p = 0.409), age (p = 0.536), and OS (p = 0.394). Treatment with TMZ significantly prolonged the median survival of a patient (from 5 to 15 months; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to a small cohort of primary GBM patients, our study is not sufficient for definitive conclusions regarding the prognostic value of MGMT methylation for the Serbian population. Our preliminary data suggest a lack of association between MGMT promoter methylation and overall survival and a significant correlation of TMZ treatment with overall survival. Further population-based studies are needed to assess the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation status for patients with primary glioblastoma.

Correlation of the quantitative level of MGMT promoter methylation and overall survival in primary diagnosed glioblastomas using the quantitative MethyQESD method

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte von Rosenstiel ◽  
Benedikt Wiestler ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
Friederike Schmidt-Graf ◽  
Jens Gempt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Promoter Region ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Quantitative Level ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Impact

AimsO(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is a high predictive factor for therapy results of temozolomide in patients with glioma. The objective of this work was to analyse the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with primary diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) relating to survival using a quantitative method (methylation quantification of endonuclease-resistant DNA, MethyQESD) by verifying a cut-off point for MGMT methylation provided by the literature (</≥10%) and calculating an optimal cut-off.Methods67 patients aged 70 years or younger, operated between January 2013 and December 2015, with newly diagnosed IDH wild-type GBM and clinical follow-up were retrospectively investigated in this study. A known MGMT promoter methylation status was the inclusion criteria.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months. Patients who had a methylated MGMT promoter region of ≥10% had an improved OS compared with patients with a methylated promoter region of <10% (p=0.002). Optimal cut-off point for MGMT promoter methylation was 11.7% (p=0.012).ConclusionThe results confirm that the quantitative level of MGMT promoter methylation is a positive prognostic factor in newly diagnosed patients with GBM. The cut-off provided by the literature (</≥10%) and the calculated optimal cut-off value of 11.7% give a statistically significant separation. Hence, MethyQESD is a reliable method to calculate MGMT promoter methylation in GBM.

scholarly journals BIOM-02. IDENTIFYING MGMT ALTERATIONS AS BIOMARKERS OF SURVIVAL IN LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA WITH BRAIN METASTASES

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii1
Author(s):  
Yasin Mamatjan ◽  
Jeffrey Zuccato ◽  
Fabio Moraes ◽  
Michael Cabanero ◽  
Wumairehan Shali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Abstract EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas (EGFRm-LUAD) have a higher risk of developing brain metastases (BM) compared to non-EGFR-mutant tumors. BM development has significant prognostic impact and leads to poorer patient survival. MGMT promoter methylation is known to determine response to therapy in other cancer types including intracranial gliomas but has not been investigated in EGFRm-LUAD BM. This work aims to assess whether MGMT promoter methylation predicts patient survival or BM development in EGFRm-LUAD patients. A large cohort of 90 primary EGFRm-LUAD tumors, of which 33 (37%) developed BM, were profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Bead chip. Using the previously reported MGMT-STP27 approach that uses two CpG sites to predict MGMT methylation status, Cox modeling was performed to assess whether MGMT methylation status correlates with overall survival independent of other clinical factors. MGMT methylation significantly predicted poorer survival in EGFRm-LUAD patients that developed BM (p=0.0003) and did not develop BM (p=0.003). A multivariate cox analysis, adjusting for cancer stage and smoking status as potential confounders, showed that MGMT methylation (HR=6.2, 95%CI:2.2–17.4, p=0.0005) and BM development (HR=2.6, 95%CI:1.3–5.3, p=0.007) were both independently predictive of worse overall survival in EGFRm-LUAD patients. This finding of poorer survival in MGMT methylated EGFRm-LUAD is validated in an independent LUAD patient cohort. Total mutation burden, calculated by the number of mutations per megabase of DNA, was substantially higher in MGMT methylated tumours with an interquartile range (IQR) of 58 (30–71) compared to MGMT unmethylated tumours with the IQR of 5.5 (4.3–6.1) resulting p-value of 0.01 for this comparison. Overall, this work shows that MGMT promoter methylation status is an important prognostic biomarker in LUAD patients. MGMT promoter methylation status in EGFRm–LUAD patients with BM may be used to guide patient treatment with potentially a greater extent of treatment for high-risk patients.

scholarly journals BIOM-31. PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF MGMT METHYLATION IN IDH MUTANT GLIOMAS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii8-ii8
Author(s):  
Keng Lam ◽  
Blaine Eldred ◽  
Bryan Kevan ◽  
Matthew Ji ◽  
Jerry Lou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas have been associated with longer survival time than those with IDH wildtype. Previous studies have also shown the predictive value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for glioblastoma. However, little is known in the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status for IDH mutant gliomas. METHODS We retrospectively identified IDH mutant gliomas patients from University of California Los Angeles and Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles that had been tested for MGMT methylation status. We performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses of overall survival (OS) to compare the MGMT methylated versus MGMT unmethylated patients. RESULTS We identified a total of 375 IDH mutant gliomas with MGMT testing. Subgroups include 52 glioblastoma, 191 astrocytoma, and 132 oligodendroglioma. The median OS for all MGMT methylated patients was 20.0 years and for unmethylated patients 14.3 years (log-rank P=0.008). Cox regression analysis also confirmed patients with MGMT methylated to have better survival than those with MGMT unmethylated (hazard ratio of 0.47, P= 0.005). During subgroup analysis, MGMT methylated glioblastoma patients have a median OS of 13.7 years compared to MGMT unmethylated patients 3.2 years (log-rank P=0.004) with a hazard ratio of 0.14 (P=0.005). However, we see no difference yet for astrocytoma (hazard ratio of 1.09, P= 0.81) and oligodendrogliomas (hazard ratio of 0.36, P= 0.193), possibly as a result of immature survival data. CONCLUSIONS MGMT promoter methylation is associated with better outcomes in IDH mutant glioblastoma patients. Progression free survival will be analyzed to determine predictive benefit of MGMT methylation for other glioma subtypes.

Methylation of MGMT in paired primary and recurrent GBMs.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Li Bie ◽  
Feng Xian Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Recurrent Tumors ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Relationship

65 Background: Epigenetic sliencing of the MGMT gene promoter in primary glioblastomas of patients subsequently treated with TMZ is associated with prolonged survival. Further, several studies have observed a change in MGMT silencing in paired primary and recurrent glioblastoma. However, the relationship between this “MGMT switch” and patients outcome is largely unknown. Methods: The study involved primary and recurrent tumor tissue samples from 53 glioblastoma patients diagnosed and treated within the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2003 to November 2010. After surgical treatment, all patients were subjected to radiotherapy with concomitant administration of TMZ. Patients that experienced recurrent tumors received TMZ. 53 patients underwent 58 further operations after recurrence (5 pats received a third surgery). MGMT promoter methylation levels were determined using qMSP. The relationship between “MGMT switch” and clinical outcome was investigated. Results: 53 (M/F=33/20; median age: 49.2±3.6, 19.5-72.3 ys) underwent a first operation for GBM. qMSP analysis revealed MGMT promoter methylation in 19 pats (35.8%, A, OS 31.5 ms); no methylation in 34 pats (64.2%, B, OS 7.9 ms). In the recurrent tumors, MGMT promoter methylation was detected in 25 pats (47.2%); and no methylation in 28 pats (52.8%). Comparison of individual pairs of primary and recurrent GBMs revealed a changed methylation status in 10 (18.9%), including 8 changed from unmethylated to methylated tumors (15.1%, C, OS 29.4 ms), 2 changed from methylated to unmethylated tumors (3.8%, D, OS 10.5 ms). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months. MGMT promoter methylation was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome (A vs B, p=0.0027). The outcome of patients were not significant different between group A and group C (p>0.01). Conclusions: The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was altered in 10 (18.9%) of 53 recurrent GBM after chemoradiotherapy. 8 patients the promoter changed from unmethylated to methylated and these patients had a median overall survival similar to the better prognosis of patients who had a methylated promoter in their primary tumor. 2 pats where a change from methylated to unmethylated was observed had a poorer outcome.

scholarly journals Tim-3 protein expression with MGMT methylation status in glioblastoma and association with survival

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
ji zhang ◽  
Xiaoli Wang ◽  
Shengquan Ye ◽  
Lijiao Liang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract Background Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly crucial for its therapy. Immune checkpoint molecules motivated the emergence of immune checkpoint-targeting therapeutic strategies. However, the prognostic significance of the immune checkpoint molecule T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (Tim-3) on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status remains to be fully elucidated. We aimed to develop an MGMT methylation status-associated immune prognostic signature for predicting prognosis in GBMs.Patients and Methods: A total of 84 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were involved. MGMT methylation status was retrospectively analyzed and the expression level of Tim-3 protein was investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The correlation between Tim-3 protein expression and MGMT methylation status, and the prognosis was explored.Results The obtained data showed that Tim-3 protein was expressed at different levels in GBMs. Mesenchymal expression of Tim-3 protein in these tissues was 73.81% (62/84), including low 15.48% (13/84), moderate 7.14% (6/84) and strong expression 51.19% (43/84), respectively. Of the 48 patients whose tumors tested positive for MGMT methylation, the remaining 36 patients was negative.Conclusions We profiled the immune status in GBM with MGMT promoter methylation and established a local immune signature for GBM, which could independently identify patients with a favorable prognosis, indicating the relationship between prognosis and immune. MGMT promoter methylation with lower Tim-3 protein expression was statistically significantly associated with better survival.

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and relation to 1p/19q loss in low grade gliomas: A GICNO study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20064-20064 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Nicolardi ◽  
R. Bertorelle ◽  
L. Bonaldi ◽  
A. Compostella ◽  
A. Roma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Tumor Localization ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Impact

20064 Background: 1p and 19q deletions have been associated with a favorable response to chemotherapy and a good prognosis in patients (pts) with oligodendroglioma. MGMT promoter methylation has been associated with a longer survival in pts with glioblastoma who receive alkylating agents. As yet, there are no data on the expression of MGMT, and on the relationship between 1p/19q deletions and MGMT promoter methylation in low grade glioma (LGG). Methods: Pts that received a first line chemotherapy regimen with temozolomide for progressive LGG were enrolled in the study, designed to investigate the correlation between MGMT methylation status and 1p/19q deletions in this setting. 1p/19q deletions were analysed by FISH, and MGMT promoter methylation by methylation specific PCR (MSP). Results: Seventy-five pts (26 females, 49 males; median age 42 years: range 22–68 years) were accrued. Of these, 48 (64%) had oligodendrogliomas (O), 19 (25.3%) astrocytomas (A), and 8 (10.6%) oligoastrocytomas (OA); 44 (58.7%) had a history of epilepsy, 41 (54.7%) had a frontal tumor localization, 27 (36%) had MRI contrast enhancing lesions, and 35 (46.7%) had been pre-treated with radiotherapy. 1p/19q deletions, evaluable in 58 pts (77.3%), were both present in 36 pts (62%), (3 being A and 2 OA); 18 pts (31%) had no loss; 1 pt (1.7%) had 1p loss; 3 pts (5.2%) 19q loss. Combined 1p and 19q loss was not correlated with a frontal localization (p = 0.12), median age (0.47) and/or gender (0.62). MGMT promoter methylation, present in 17 (56.6%) of 30 assessable cases, was significantly associated with combined 1p/19q deletions (p = 0.03). MGMT promoter methylation was not significantly associated with age (p = 0.46), gender (p = 0.2), tumor localization (p = 0.12) and/or histology (0.37). Conclusions: 1p/19q deletions are strictly correlated to histology and to MGMT promoter methylation; further prospective trials are required to clarify the impact of these molecular signatures on clinical outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals XGBoost Improves Classification of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in IDH1 Wildtype Glioblastoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le ◽  
Duyen Thi Do ◽  
Fang-Ying Chiu ◽  
Edward Kien Yee Yapp ◽  
Hui-Yuan Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Promoter Methylation Status ◽  
Extreme Gradient Boosting ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Approximately 96% of patients with glioblastomas (GBM) have IDH1 wildtype GBMs, characterized by extremely poor prognosis, partly due to resistance to standard temozolomide treatment. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is a crucial prognostic biomarker for alkylating chemotherapy resistance in patients with GBM. However, MGMT methylation status identification methods, where the tumor tissue is often undersampled, are time consuming and expensive. Currently, presurgical noninvasive imaging methods are used to identify biomarkers to predict MGMT methylation status. We evaluated a novel radiomics-based eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model to identify MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with IDH1 wildtype GBM. This retrospective study enrolled 53 patients with pathologically proven GBM and tested MGMT methylation and IDH1 status. Radiomics features were extracted from multimodality MRI and tested by F-score analysis to identify important features to improve our model. We identified nine radiomics features that reached an area under the curve of 0.896, which outperformed other classifiers reported previously. These features could be important biomarkers for identifying MGMT methylation status in IDH1 wildtype GBM. The combination of radiomics feature extraction and F-core feature selection significantly improved the performance of the XGBoost model, which may have implications for patient stratification and therapeutic strategy in GBM.

scholarly journals Glioblastoma recurrence and the role of MGMT promoter methylation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Storey ◽  
Kevin Leder ◽  
Andrea Hawkins-Daarud ◽  
Kristin Swanson ◽  
Atique U. Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Repair Gene ◽  
Downward Shift ◽  
Dna Repair Gene ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

AbstractTumor recurrence in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is often attributed to acquired resistance to the standard chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ). Promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene MGMT has been associated with sensitivity to TMZ, while increased expression of MGMT has been associated with TMZ resistance. Clinical studies have observed a downward shift in MGMT methylation percentage from primary to recurrent stage tumors. However, the evolutionary processes driving this shift, and more generally the emergence and growth of TMZ-resistant tumor subpopulations, are still poorly understood. Here we develop a mathematical model, parameterized using clinical and experimental data, to investigate the role of MGMT methylation in TMZ resistance during the standard treatment regimen for GBM (surgery, chemotherapy and radiation). We first find that the observed downward shift in MGMT promoter methylation status between detection and recurrence cannot be explained solely by evolutionary selection. Next, our model suggests that TMZ has an inhibitory effect on maintenance methylation of MGMT after cell division. Finally, incorporating this inhibitory effect, we study the optimal number of TMZ doses per adjuvant cycle for GBM patients with high and low levels of MGMT methylation at diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document