A systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and postprogression survival of second-line chemotherapy for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15768-e15768
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Kasuga ◽  
Yasuo Hamamoto ◽  
Yu Aoki ◽  
Kenta Kawasaki ◽  
Takeshi Suzuki ◽  
...  

e15768 Background: We previously reported positive relationship between overall survival (OS) and both of postprogression survival (PPS) and post-trial anti-cancer therapies in first-line pancreatic cancer patients. We conducted a meta-analysis to gain a better understanding of the impact of PPS and post-trial anti-cancer therapies on OS and to determine the efficacy of second-line systemic therapy. Methods: We searched randomized trials of second-line systemic therapy for pancreatic cancer patients. We evaluated the relation between OS and either progression-free survival (PFS) or PPS and calculated the pooled effect size by using random effects models. Results: Eleven randomized trials with 23 treatment arms that involved examining 2267 patients were analyzed. Median OS was strongly associated with median PPS and PFS (r = 0.908 and 0.754, respectively), but no correlation between rate of post-trial anti-cancer therapies and OS was detected (r = 0.050). Average OS, PFS and PPS were significantly longer in recent trials than in older trials, (6.08 versus 4.17 months, p < 0.001), (2.65 versus 1.95 months, p < 0.001) and (3.43 versus 2.25 months, p < 0.001), respectively. Overall, experimental therapies compared to control did not significantly improve PFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03; I2 = 73%) or OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72-1.11; I2 = 69%). When the analysis was restricted to fluoropyrimidine compared to irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with fluoropyrimidine, each therapy produced advantage in a term of PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88; I2 = 39% for irinotecan, HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; I2 = 13% for oxaliplatin) but only irinotecan produced advantage in a term of OS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; I2 = 0% for irinotecan, HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.65-1.65; I2 = 82% for oxaliplatin). Conclusions: Although second-line treatment benefit for OS can be skewed by PPS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer, the effects of subsequent therapies are weak in the salvage setting.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1197
Author(s):  
Julia Pohl ◽  
Raluca-Ileana Mincu ◽  
Simone M. Mrotzek ◽  
Reza Wakili ◽  
Amir A. Mahabadi ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate a new electrocardiographic (ECG) score reflecting domains of electrical and structural alterations in therapy-naïve cancer patients to assess their risk of cardiotoxicity. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 134 therapy-naïve consecutive cancer patients in our two university hospitals concerning four ECG score parameters: Contiguous Q-waves, markers of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, QRS duration and JTc prolongation. Cardiotoxicity was assessed after a short-term follow-up (up to 12 months). Results: Of all the patients (n = 25), 19% reached 0 points, 50% (n = 67) reached 1 point, 25% (n = 33) reached 2 points, 5% (n = 7) reached 3 points and 0.7% reached 4 or 5 points (n = 1 respectively). The incidence of cardiotoxicity (n = 28 [21%]) increased with the ECG score, with 0 points at 0%, 1 point 7.5%, 2 points 55%, 3 points 71% and ≥3 points 50%. In the ROC (Receiver operating curves) analysis, the best cut-off for predicting cardiotoxicity was an ECG score of ≥2 points (sensitivity 82%, specificity 82%, AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.77–0.92, p < 0.0001) which was then defined as a high-risk score. High-risk patients did not differ concerning their age, LV ejection fraction, classical cardiovascular risk factors or cardiac biomarkers compared to those with a low-risk ECG score. Conclusion: ECG scoring prior to the start of anti-cancer therapies may help to identify therapy-naïve cancer patients at a higher risk for the development of cardiotoxicity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Karen Borgonovo ◽  
Mary Cabiddu ◽  
Veronica Lonati ◽  
Sandro Barni

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1220-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Whelan ◽  
Jim Julian ◽  
Jim Wright ◽  
Alejandro R. Jadad ◽  
Mark L. Levine

PURPOSE: Recent randomized trials in women with node-positive breast cancer who received systemic treatment report that locoregional radiation therapy improves survival. Previous trials failed to detect a difference in survival that results from its use. A systematic review of randomized trials that examine the effectiveness of locoregional radiation therapy in patients treated by definitive surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy was conducted. METHODS: Randomized trials published between 1967 and 1999 were identified through MEDLINE database, CancerLit database, and reference lists of relevant articles. Relevant data was abstracted. The results of randomized trials were pooled using meta-analyses to estimate the effect of treatment on any recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and mortality. RESULTS: Eighteen trials that involved a total of 6,367 patients were identified. Most trials included both pre- and postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy. The type of systemic therapy received, sites irradiated, techniques used, and doses of radiation delivered varied between trials. Data on toxicity were infrequently reported. Radiation was shown to reduce the risk of any recurrence (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.83), local recurrence (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.34), and mortality (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94). CONCLUSION: Locoregional radiation after surgery in patients treated with systemic therapy reduced mortality. Several questions remain on how these results should be translated into current-day clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document