A propensity-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
Mustafa Raoof ◽  
Sinziana Dumitra ◽  
Philip HG Ituarte ◽  
Yanghee Woo ◽  
Susanne Warner ◽  
...  

376 Background: Laparoscopic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has improved perioperative outcomes over open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Concerns regarding failure to achieve proper oncologic resection and compromised survival remain. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we analyzed patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma over a four-year period (2010-2014). Propensity score nearest-neighbor 1:1 matching (PSM) was performed between LDP and ODP patients based on age, sex, race, insurance, hospital volume, comorbidities, T-stage, N-stage, grade, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy. Primary outcome was overall survival. Results: Of the 1,947 eligible patients, 605 (31%) underwent LDP. After PSM two well-balanced groups of 544 patients each were analyzed. There was a trend towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing LDP as compared to ODP (HR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.0; Median OS 29 vs. 23 months, p = 0.06). Patients undergoing ODP had a higher margin positive rate compared to those undergoing LDP (21.1% vs. 14.9%, p-value = 0.007). Overall conversion rate was 27%. Patients undergoing ODP had comparable outcomes to LDP in regards to median time to chemotherapy (50 vs. 48 days, p-value = 0.96); median nodes examined (12 vs. 12, p-value = 0.61); 30-day mortality (1.6% vs. 1.1%, p-value = 0.43); 90-day mortality (3.5% vs. 2.4%, p-value = 0.28); 30-day readmission rate (8.6% vs. 9.4%, p-value = 0.67). However, the median length of stay was shorter in the LDP group (6 vs. 7 days, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: In the absence of randomized trials, this is the largest comparative study demonstrating LDP as an acceptable alternative ODP, associated with a lower margin positive rate and shorter length of stay, and with no detriment in long term survival.

Author(s):  
Lei Yu ◽  
Guozhong Zhang ◽  
Songtao Qi

Abstract Background and Study Aims The exact reason of long-term survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients has remained uncertain. Molecular parameters in addition to histology to define malignant gliomas are hoped to facilitate clinical, experimental, and epidemiological studies. Material and Methods A population of GBM patients with similar clinical characteristics (especially similar resectability) was reviewed to compare the molecular variables between poor (overall survival [OS] < 18 months, control cohort) and long-term survivors (overall survival > 36 months, OS-36 cohort). Results Long-term GBM survivors were younger. In the OS-36 cohort, the positive rate of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation was very low (7.69%, 3/39) and there was no statistical difference in OS between IDH mutant and wild-type patients. The results of 1p/19q codeletions are similar. Besides, there were no significant difference in MGMT promoter methylation, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, and TP53 mutations between OS-36 cohort and control cohort. Conclusions No distinct markers consistently have been identified in long-term survivors of GBM patients, and great importance should be attached to further understand the biological characteristics of the invasive glioma cells because of the nature of diffuse tumor permeation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Feng Soh ◽  
Alfred Wei Chieh Kow ◽  
Kar Yong Wong ◽  
Bei Wang ◽  
Chung Yip Chan ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2049-2049
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Jillian Alyse Deppa ◽  
Zahir Ali ◽  
Michael Graiser ◽  
Amelia Langston ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2049 Background: Post-transplant thrombocytopenia is universal among recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We have previously reported a secondary post-transplant thrombocytopenia following autologous HSCT which is associated with poor survival (Ninan MJ, et al., BBMT 2007), however the clinical significance of a fall post-engraftment in platelet counts among recipients of allogeneic HSCT has not been studied. Methods: A total of 929 consecutive pts who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 1993 and 2009 were studied in an IRB-approved retrospective analysis. 55% of pts were male and 45% were female with a median age of 43 ± 12.6 years. Diagnoses included: acute leukemia (423, 46%), chronic leukemia (197, 21%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (110, 12%),myelodysplastic syndrome (93, 10%), multiple myeloma (26, 3%), and other less common malignancies (80, 8%). Disease status was classified into five different categories: complete remission (287, 31%), partial remission (297, 34%), refractory (180, 19%), untreated (28, 3%) and incompletely classified (137, 15%). Grafts were obtained from related donors in 595 pts (64%), and unrelated donors in 334 pts (36%), with 55% peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC), 42% bone marrow (BM), and 3% cord blood units or multiple sources. Blood platelet counts and platelet transfusions were collected from 15 days pre-transplant until 100 days post-transplant. Platelet engraftment was defined as a platelet count ≥ 50 x10E3/mcL without a platelet transfusion in the previous 7 days. Pts (n=816) who achieved platelet engraftment and survived at least 30 days were selected for further analysis. Results: The 816 evaluable pts were divided into cohorts based upon their post-transplant survival: 146(18%) who died within 100 days post-transplant (early death); 267 (33%) that survived 100 days −2 years post-transplant (late death), 319 (39%) who survived > 2 years (long-term survival), and 84 (10%) were lost of follow-up within the first 2 years. Transfusion-independent platelet engraftment was achieved at median of 15 days post-transplant with no significant differences seen in the kinetics of initial engraftment among the different pt cohorts. Median platelet counts at different time points post-transplant were plotted for each pt cohort (Figure 1). Pts in the early-death cohort had a continuous decline in median platelet counts from engraftment values of > 50 x10E3/mcL to a median values of ∼20 x10E3/mcL. Univariate analyses indicated that higher platelet counts at day −15 (prior to conditioning) or at day 100 post-transplant were significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR of 0.63 and 0.39 respectively, P < 0.01). Cox-regression analysis was performed to evaluate significance of pre- and post-transplant platelet counts with clinical covariates that have been previously associated with survival including age, diagnosis, disease status and the source of the grafts. The multivariate model confirmed the significant association of the following factors with overall survival: higher platelet counts on day 15 pre-transplant (HR:0.81; 95%Cl:0.70∼0.93; P-value <0.01), the platelet count on day 100 post-transplant (HR: 0.62; 95%Cl:0.55∼0.70; P-value:<0.01 ), a diagnosis of acute leukemia (HR:1.64; 95%Cl:1.13∼2.39; P-value <0.01), a diagnosis of multiple myeloma (HR: 2.12; 95%Cl:1.05∼4.23; P-value= 0.04), a disease status of complete remission (CR) versus not in CR (HR: 0.66; 95%Cl:0.44∼0.97; P-value = 0.04), and age (HR: 1.01; 95%Cl:1.00∼1.02; P-value= 0.08). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival were performed based upon stratification of pt groups on the platelet count at day-15 pre-transplant or the day +100 post-transplant platelet count (Figure 2). Pts with a platelet count > 80 × 10E3/mcL on day +100 had 5 year survival of more than 50% compared with 30% survival in the pt cohort with platelet counts < 50 x10E3/mcL on day +100. Conclusion: Pts with continuously low platelet count after initial platelet engraftment are at high risk for early death. Higher pre-transplant platelet may be a surrogate for disease status and extent of prior therapy and are associated with long-term survival among pts undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Post-transplant thrombopoiesis at day 100 is highly correlated with long-term survival after allogeneic HSCT, identifying a high-risk group of transplant pts for whom additional treatment strategies are needed. Disclosures: Gleason: Celgene, Merck, Millenium: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 388-388
Author(s):  
Bhavina D O Batukbhai ◽  
Joseph M. Herman ◽  
Marianna Zahurak ◽  
Daniel A. Laheru ◽  
Dung T. Le ◽  
...  

388 Background: There is limited data of survival following distal pancreatectomy and adjuvant therapy in patients with distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the survival following combined modality (chemo-radiation and chemotherapy) compared to chemotherapy alone following distal pancreatectomy (DP). Methods: Patients who underwent DP for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas between the years 2000 and 2015 at Johns Hopkins were included. Comparison analysis was performed between patients who received combined modality versus chemotherapy alone. Kaplan- Meier curve was used to estimate the median overall survival (OS) and the disease free survival (DFS) at 1, 3 and 5 years after pancreatectomy. Results: A total of 294 patients underwent DP at our institution. Patients were excluded if adjuvant therapy was not administered, developed metastasis prior to adjuvant therapy, had stage IV disease at the time of surgery, received neoadjuvant therapy or had inadequate follow up at our institution to assess survival outcomes. We included a total of 105 patients, of which 45 patients received chemotherapy alone and 60 patients received combined modality. The two groups were similar with respect to nodal and margin status. Patients treated with combined modality had larger > 3cm tumors (p = 0.02). Median OS with combined modality was 60.6 mo and 50.2 mo with chemotherapy only. DFS was 15.2 mo with combined modality and 17.6 mo with chemotherapy only. There was no significant difference between the groups for OS (p = 0.73) or DFS (p = 0.495). Further analysis showed a trend away from chemoradiation in the recent years. Thirty patients (29%) received multi-agent chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. A tumor diameter > 3cm was a predictive factor for receiving chemoradiation (chi-square p value 0.02). Conclusions: There is no difference in survival with combined modality compared to chemotherapy alone as adjuvant therapy following DP. All patients in this study received adjuvant therapy. We report a higher survival than previously described which could suggest a different biology for distal tumors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6549-6549
Author(s):  
Vadryn Pierre ◽  
Xiang Guo ◽  
Ignacio Gonzalez-Garcia ◽  
Nassim Morsli ◽  
Alejandro Javier Yovine ◽  
...  

6549 Background: Optimal patient selection for immunotherapy remains a challenge as most patients fail to respond. We aim to assess baseline factors for association with long-term survival from durvalumab treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)1,2. Methods: Pooled longitudinal tumor size, survival, and dropout data from four trials (1108: NCT01693562, CONDOR: NCT02319044 , HAWK: NCT02207530, and EAGLE: NCT02369874) involving 467 HNSCC patients were used to develop tumor size-driven hazard models. A panel of 66 serum protein biomarkers at baseline and 4 relevant clinical markers from 346 out of 413 patients treated with durvalumab (all studies except 1108) were initially screened to select a pool of 21 candidate covariates. The criteria for dimensionality reduction comprised correlation strength between biomarkers and pharmacological hypotheses pertaining to a prior analysis3 (inflammation, immunomodulation, tumor burden and angiogenesis). Results: The final tumor model highlighted that high tumor burden, elevated LDH and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were associated with faster tumor growth while patients with lower baseline tumor burden had an increase in net tumor shrinkage. For overall survival, the model suggested that high levels of immunomodulators (IL23, Osteocalcin), low inflammation (IL6, NLR), low tumor burden, and low angiogenesis factors (von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)) were associated with survival benefits for patients treated with durvalumab. Specifically, these patients had baseline serum IL23 > 2.1 pg/mL and Osteocalcin > 32 pg/mL or serum PAI-1 < 229 pg/mL and serum IL6 < 5.4 pg/mL which corresponded to a hazard ratio estimate (HR and 95%CI) of 0.36 (0.27- 0.47), logrank p-value: 2.3x10−14. The median (n, 95%CI) overall survival time for the patients with favorable biomarker profile was 14.6 months (n = 129, 11.2-21.4) vs. 4.4 months (n = 217, 3.6-5.3). Conclusions: Our results corroborate the prior hypothesis highlighting the prognostic value of inflammation, disease burden, tumor angiogenesis, and immunomodulatory factors on the clinical outcomes of HNSCC patients treated with durvalumab3. Collectively, we identified a serum biomarker profile of HNSCC patients with median survival times exceeding 1 year which may potentially be used for patient enrichment following further validation in prospective studies. References: 1Yanan CPT 2017, 2Baverel, 2018 ENA, 3Guo, X, 2019 Asco P6048 Clinical trial information: NCT01693562, NCT02319044, NCT02207530, NCT02369874 .


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8573-8573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Simeone ◽  
Giusy Gentilcore ◽  
Anna Romano ◽  
Antonio Daponte ◽  
Corrado Caraco ◽  
...  

8573 Background: Ipilimumab (Ipi) is approved in the US as first and second line therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) and in MM patients with previous therapy in the EU, based on an overall survival benefit shown in a phase III study (Hodi, NEJM 2010). To date, no clinical parameter has been found to be predictive for response to treatment and only few immunologic changes have been identified as potential candidates. Methods: From June 2010 to November 2011 we treated in the Expanded Access Program with Ipi at 3 mg/kg, 95 pre-treated metastatic melanoma patients. The median age was 58 yrs (range 17-84); 10 pts (10,5%) were stage IIIc inoperable, 2 pts (2,1%) stage M1a, 4 pts (4,2%) stage M1b, and 79 pts (83,2%) stage M1c. 30/95 pts had brain metastases and 1/95 spinal cord metastases. All 95 patients were evaluable for response (DCR = CR+PR+SD according the irRC), overall survival, safety, including changes in LDH, CRP (C-reactive protein) and lymphocyte populations (CD4+,CD4CD25+,FOXP3/T-Reg cells). PBMC and sera were collected at week 0, 4, 7, 10 and 12. Results: We found a statistical significant decrease of LDH, CRP and FOXP3/T-Reg cells (p<0.0001; χ2 and Mann-Whitney), and an increase of lymphocyte count (p<.0001) in the responders group. These differences were also correlated to survival (log-rank test). No differences were observed for CD4+ and CD4+CD25+ between responders and non-responders (p=0.39;p=0.83; Mann-Whitney). An ORR of 22.1% (1CR+20PR; 95% CI 13.8-30.4) and a DCR at week 24 of 37.9% (36/95; 28.1-47.6, 95% CI) were observed. Median overall survival was estimated of 7.8 months (95%CI:5.0-10.6), with a p value not evaluable at the moment of the analysis due to insufficient follow-up because of long-term survival. Adverse events were registered in 40% (38/95) of patients and the most frequent were of grade 1 and 2 (pruritus 57.9%; rash 5.3%; thyroditis 5.3%). Conclusions: The decrease of LDH, CRP and T-Reg cells during Ipi treatment suggest these parameters should be further explored as potential predictive markers for response and survival. Given the potential clinical utility of these findings, these data warrants further prospective validation in a randomized trial.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 318-318
Author(s):  
Pablo Emilio Serrano Aybar ◽  
Peter Tae Wan Kim ◽  
Kenneth Leung ◽  
Sean P. Cleary ◽  
Carol-anne Moulton ◽  
...  

318 Background: There have been improvements in short and long-term survival rates for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma over time The main objective of this study was to evaluate differences in long-term survival in a cohort of patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma over 2 decades at a high volume academic centre. Univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model were performed to evaluate prognostic factors associated with long-term survival. Time trend analyses were performed to evaluate differences between decades. Results: There were 489 patients identified, 179 patients during the early (1991-2000) and 310 during the recent decade (2001-2010). Main differences between early and recent decade were: node-positive disease rate (59% vs. 69%), number of lymph nodes collected (median 7 vs. 17), perioperative mortality (6.7% vs. 1.6%) and percentage of patients receiving adjuvant therapy (33% vs. 68%), respectively. There were no differences in sex distribution, age, margin positivity rate or tumor grade. In the multivariate analysis, node, margin status, tumor grade, adjuvant therapy and decade of resection were independently associated with overall survival for the entire cohort. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had better median overall survival: 17 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14-22] vs. 26 months (95% CI: 24-31). Median overall survival for the early and recent decade were 16 months (95% CI: 14-20) and 27 months (95% CI: 24-30, p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Factors associated with improved long-term survival remain comparable over time: low tumor grade, node and margin negative disease. Short and long-term survival for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma has improved in the recent decade. This is due to decreased perioperative mortality and increase use of adjuvant therapy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S1212
Author(s):  
Onur Kutlu ◽  
Katherine A. Morgan ◽  
Megan L. Walters ◽  
David Adams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document