Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy with complete mesogastrium excision (D2+CME) for advanced gastric cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Daxing Xie ◽  
Jianping Gong
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
The Mean

43 Background: D2 lymphadenectomy has been widely accepted as a standard procedure of surgical treatment for local advanced gastric cancer [1,2]. However, neither the dissection boundary nor the extent of the excision for perigastric soft tissues has been described [3-7]. Our previous researches demonstrate the existence of disseminated cancer cells in the mesogastrium [8, 9] and present an understandable mesogastrium model for gastrectomy [10]. Hence, the D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision (D2+CME) is firstly proposed in this study, aiming to assess the safety, feasibility and corresponding short-term surgical outcomes. Methods: All of these patients underwent laparoscopy assisted D2+CME radical gastrectomy with a curative R0 resection, and all the operation was performed by Prof. Jianping Gong, chief of GI surgery of Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All participants provided informed written consent to participate in the study. This study was approved by the Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee. The standard surgical procedures in the video are described as follows. Reconstruction of the alimentary tract was done by extracorporeal anastomosis. Standard recovery protocols were followed in postoperative treatments. Results: 68 patients between September 2014 and March 2016 have been recruited with informed consent and underwent laparoscopic D2+CME by a single surgeon. The mean number of retrieved regional lymph nodes was 33.62±11.40 (ranges 14-55). The mean volume of blood loss was 12.44±22.89 ml (ranges 5-100). The mean laparoscopic surgery time was 127.82±17.63 mins (ranges 110-165). The mean hospitalization time was 16.5±3.3 days (ranges 8-28). No operative complication was observed during the hospitalization. Conclusions: The anatomical boundary of mesogastrium is well described and dissected within D2+CME surgical process. It proves to be safely feasible and repeatable with less blood lost, qualified lymph nodes, retrieval results, and other improved short-term surgical outcomes in advanced gastric cancer. Meanwhile, potential disseminated cancer cells fall into the mesogastrium can be eradicated by D2+CME. Clinical trial information: NCT01978444.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic infrapyloric lymph nodes dissection through the right bursa omentalis approach for gastric cancer

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Yang ◽  
Wei-Han Zhang ◽  
Kai Liu ◽  
Xin-Zu Chen ◽  
Xiao-Long Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Bursa Omentalis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Infrapyloric Lymph Nodes ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background A complete dissection of infrapyloric lymph nodes is the key to a curative gastrectomy, which can be sometimes technically challenging in laparoscopic surgery. Methods One hundred and eighteen patients with gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in which the infrapyloric lymph nodes were dissected through the right bursa omentalis approach were included. The clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results The laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was successful in all 118 patients with no open conversion. The mean operation time was 246.6 ± 45.7 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 87.0 ± 35.9 mL. Postoperative complications occurred in 17.8% of the patients, which were treated successfully with conservative therapy or aspiration in all. There were no No.6 lymphadenectomy-associated complications, such as injury of transverse colon, vessels of mesocolon, pancreas or duodenum, no pancreatitis, pancreatic leakage or postoperative hemorrhage. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.6 ± 3.7 days. On average, the total lymph nodes harvested were 36.8 ± 12.9, in which the ones from the infrapyloric area were 5.1 ± 3.1. Conclusion Laparoscopic dissection of infrapyloric lymph nodes through the right bursa omentalis approach seems to be feasible and safe, facilitating a more complete No.6 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Is it necessary to dissect the posterior lymph nodes along the splenic vessels during total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer?

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2357-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Xian Lin ◽  
Chang-Ming Huang ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Jian-Wei Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Splenic Vessels

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Robotic- versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changdong Yang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Shaohui Xie ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Yongliang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of RATG compared with LATG for AGC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 126 and 257 patients who underwent RATG or LATG, respectively. In addition, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between RATG and LATG for clinicopathological characteristics to reduce bias and compared short-term surgical outcomes. Results: After PSM, the RATG group had a longer mean operation time (291.14±59.18 vs. 270.34±52.22 min, p=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (154.37±89.68 vs. 183.77±95.39 ml, p=0.004) and more N2 tier RLNs (9.07±5.34 vs. 7.56±4.50, p=0.016) than the LATG group. Additionally, the total RLNs of the RATG group were almost significantly different compared to that of the LATG group (34.90±13.05 vs. 31.91±12.46, p=0.065).Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the length of incision, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, residual disease and postoperative hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the RATG and LATG groups after PSM (23.8% vs. 28.6%, p=0.390). Grade II complications accounted for most of the complications in the two cohorts after PSM. The conversion rates were 4.55% and 8.54% in the RATG and LATG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.145), and the ratio of splenectomy were 1.59% and 0.39% (p=0.253). The mortality rates were 0.8% and 0.4% for the RATG and LATG groups, respectively (p=1.000). Conclusion : This study demonstrates that RATG is comparable to LATG in terms of short-term surgical outcomes.

Clinical study on harvesting lymph nodes with carbon nanoparticles for advanced gastric cancer: A prospective randomized trail.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 159-159
Author(s):  
Ziyu Li ◽  
Sheng Ao ◽  
Jiafu Ji
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Carbon Nanoparticles ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Solution Methods ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

159 Background: There were no ideal materials nor quantizing regime for surgeons’ training on harvesting lymph nodes in advanced gastric cancer(AGC). A prospective randomized trial on Carbon Nanoparticles (CNP),a kind of lymphatic tracers, was designed to find a solution. Methods: Patients with previously untreated resectable AGC were eligible for inclusion in this study. All patients were randomly allocated to two subgroups. In experimental group, total of 1.0 mL CNP was injected into the subserosa of stomach around the tumor before gastrectomy with D2 dissection performed. On the contrary, the same procedure was performed directly without any coloring materials in control arm. Following surgery,the investigator harvested lymph nodes (LNs), counted colored LNs and measured the diameters with pathologist. Results: 30 patients were enrolled in the study. We observed no serious adverse effects related to CNP injection. The rate of stained LNs was 46.6%. The mean number of harvested LNs was larger in experimental than control group (38.33 vs. 28.27, p=0.041). Smaller diameter was recorded in experimental arm (3.32vs4.30mm,p=0.023), which might clarify the reason why the number of LNs was larger with CNP. In addition, we set up a model for predicting total number of LNs based on the data of CNP-staining LNs and metastatic LNs(MLNs), which might help the surgeons review their work of removing LNs so as to improve their surgical skills. Conclusions: CNP was a kind of safe materials and surgeons could harvest more LNs with it in AGC, which might benefit from the harvest of more smaller ones. Further study was needed to prove the model’s practicability. Clinical trial information: NCT02123407.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision for advanced gastric cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 5138-5139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daxing Xie ◽  
Chaoran Yu ◽  
Liang Liu ◽  
Hasan Osaiweran ◽  
Chun Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Short Term

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Robotic- versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changdong Yang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Shaohui Xie ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Yongliang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of RATG compared with LATG for AGC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 126 and 257 patients who underwent RATG or LATG, respectively. In addition, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between RATG and LATG for clinicopathological characteristics to reduce bias and compared short-term surgical outcomes. Results: After PSM, the RATG group had a longer mean operation time (291.14±59.18 vs. 270.34±52.22 min, p=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (154.37±89.68 vs. 183.77±95.39 ml, p=0.004) and more N2 tier RLNs (9.07±5.34 vs. 7.56±4.50, p=0.016) than the LATG group. Additionally, the total RLNs of the RATG group were almost significantly different compared to that of the LATG group (34.90±13.05 vs. 31.91±12.46, p=0.065).Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the length of incision, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, residual disease and postoperative hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the RATG and LATG groups after PSM (23.8% vs. 28.6%, p=0.390). Grade II complications accounted for most of the complications in the two cohorts after PSM. The conversion rates were 4.55% and 8.54% in the RATG and LATG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.145), and the ratio of splenectomy were 1.59% and 0.39% (p=0.253). The mortality rates were 0.8% and 0.4% for the RATG and LATG groups, respectively (p=1.000).Conclusion: This study demonstrates that RATG is comparable to LATG in terms of short-term surgical outcomes.

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Robotic- versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changdong Yang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Shaohui Xie ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Yongliang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of RATG compared with LATG for AGC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 126 and 257 patients who underwent RATG or LATG, respectively. In addition, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between RATG and LATG for clinicopathological characteristics to reduce bias and compared short-term surgical outcomes. Results: After PSM, the RATG group had a longer mean operation time (291.14±59.18 vs. 270.34±52.22 min, p=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (154.37±89.68 vs. 183.77±95.39 ml, p=0.004) and more N2 tier RLNs (9.07±5.34 vs. 7.56±4.50, p=0.016) than the LATG group. Additionally, the total RLNs of the RATG group were almost significantly different compared to that of the LATG group (34.90±13.05 vs. 31.91±12.46, p=0.065).Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the length of incision, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, residual disease and postoperative hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the RATG and LATG groups after PSM (23.8% vs. 28.6%, p=0.390). Grade II complications accounted for most of the complications in the two cohorts after PSM. The conversion rates were 4.55% and 8.54% in the RATG and LATG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.145), and the ratio of splenectomy were 1.59% and 0.39% (p=0.253). The mortality rates were 0.8% and 0.4% for the RATG and LATG groups, respectively (p=1.000). Conclusion : This study demonstrates that RATG is comparable to LATG in terms of short-term surgical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document