Overall survival advantage with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Christopher David Kosarek ◽  
Stephen Bentley Williams ◽  
Jinhai Huo ◽  
Karim Chamie ◽  
Marc C. Smaldone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference

37 Background: To compare overall survival of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy versus non-cancer controls in order to discern if there is a survival advantage according to prostate cancer treatment. Methods: A matched cohort study was performedusingthe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. We identified 34,473 patients age 66 to 75 years without significant comorbidity from who were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer treated with surgery or radiotherapy between 2004 and 2011. These patients were matched to a non-cancer control cohort. We compared the rates of all-cause mortality that occurred within the study period. We used Cox Proportional Hazards Regression analysis to identify determinants associated with overall survival. Results: Of the total 34,473 patients who were included in the analysis, 21,740 (63%) received radiation therapy and 12,733 (37%) received surgery. When compared to the non-cancer control, there was no significant difference between the prostate cancer cohort and the non-cancer control group with exception of race/ethnicity (p < 0.001). There was improved survival in patients treated with surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.32-0.38) as well as with radiotherapy (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.68-0.75) when compared to non-cancer controls. There was significantly improved overall survival among both treatment groups with most benefit observed among patients who underwent surgery ( log rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: Using population based data, treatment with either surgery or radiotherapy demonstrated improved overall survival when compared to a cohort of matched non-cancer controls. Treatment with surgery resulted in longer overall survival compared to those receiving radiation therapy. These results suggest inherent selection-bias due to unmeasured confounding variables when using cancer registry data.

Impact of proximity to NCI- and NCCN-designated cancer centers on outcomes for patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Ghaffary ◽  
Tamer Dafashy ◽  
Christopher David Kosarek ◽  
Zhigang Duan ◽  
Brian F. Chapin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Significant Difference

14 Background: National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-designated cancer centers (CCs) offer patients state-of-the-art treatment. We sought to identify whether proximity to NCI/NCCN CCs was associated with survival outcomes for prostate cancer patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: A total of 12,478 total patients diagnosed with clinical stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer between 2004–2011 using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data were included. Multivariable regression analyses were used to quantify overall survival and use of secondary therapies for RP patients according to proximity to NCI/NCCN CCs. Cox proportional hazards models were used to quantify the association between survival outcomes and access to NCI/NCCN CCs. Results: Patients with proximity to ≥ 2 NCI centers and those diagnosed in 2011 enjoyed a statistically significant overall survival advantage when compared to no access to an NCI center (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.92, p < 0.01). Proximity to an NCCN CC, when compared with men who did not have access, was associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61–0.95, p = 0.015). There was no significant difference in use of secondary therapies according to NCI or NCCN access. Conclusions: Patients who undergo RP with access to an NCI/NCCN CCs experienced improved overall survival with no significant difference in utilization of secondary therapies. Given the need for improved health quality measures in cancer care, these findings may support health policy implementation and regionalization of care to these centers.

Integration of bone scan (BS) and computerized tomography (CT) findings as an endpoint to assess bone metastasis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
Scott J. Parker ◽  
Gregory Russell Pond ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
Anitha Alex ◽  
Marta Elise Heilbrun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ct Findings ◽  
Significant Difference

191 Background: Progression of bone metastasis in mCRPC is assessed solely by BS findings and correlates modestly with overall survival (OS). Given the lack of reliability of BS findings and the ready availability of routinely performed CT scans, which commonly identify bone metastases, we aimed to better assess progression in bone by integrating BS and CT findings and to explore their association with OS. Methods: Data were obtained from patients treated at the University of Utah receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy (D) or post-docetaxel therapy with orteronel (O). Patients with both baseline and on-therapy CT and BS within 90 days were eligible for analysis. CT and BS underwent central radiology review for bone lesions by a single radiologist. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥ 1 new lesion. Survival was measured from start of therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore potential prognosticators of overall survival (OS). Statistical significance was defined as 2-sided p < 0.05. Therapy was a stratification factor. Results: Twenty-eight patients were evaluable including 18 patients receiving D, and 10 receiving O post-docetaxel. The mean age of these patients was 71.4 years and median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.4 (9.7-35.4) months. Four patients had PD on both BS and CT, while 2 (7%) had PD on CT but not BS and 3 had PD on BS but not CT. Patients with PD on BS or CT had worse OS (HR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.04-6.90, p = 0.041) than those with no PD on either CT or BS. Looking at individual lesions, 4 (14%) patients had new lesions identified on CT which was not observed using BS, and they were associated with worse OS (HR = 3.72, 1.01-13.66, p = 0.048). Conversely, no significant difference in OS was observed for 4 patients with lesions identified on BS which were not observed using CT (HR = 2.67, 0.58-12.32, p = 0.21). Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating study suggests that CT can complement and enhance the ability of BS to capture PD and predict OS. Integration of BS findings using Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-3 guidelines to define PD and CT bone findings should be investigated in a larger study as an intermediate endpoint.

Evaluating the impact of African American ancestry among men with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 41-41
Author(s):  
Daniel Canter ◽  
Julia E. Reid ◽  
Maria Latsis ◽  
Margaret Variano ◽  
Shams Halat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
African American ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

41 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common male malignancy. Prior data has suggested that African American (AA) men present with more aggressive disease relative to men of other ancestries. Here, we examined the effects of ancestry on clinical and molecular measures of disease aggressiveness as well as pathologic outcomes in men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized PC. Methods: Data was collected from patients undergoing RP at the Ochsner Clinic from 2006 to 2011. Formalin−fixed paraffin embedded biopsy tissue was analyzed for the RNA expression of 31 cell cycle progression (CCP) genes and 15 housekeeping genes to obtain a CCP score (a validated molecular measure of PC aggressiveness). Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) scores were also determined based on clinicopathologic features at the time of diagnosis. Clinical (Gleason score, tumor stage, CAPRA score) and molecular (CCP score) measures of disease aggressiveness were compared based on ancestry (AA versus non−AA). Cox proportional hazards models were used to test association of ancestry to biochemical recurrence (BCR) and progression to metastatic disease. Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare ancestries. Results: A total of 384 patients were treated with RP, including 133 (34.8%) AA men. At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 62 years (interquartile range (IQR) 56, 66) and PSA was 5.4 ng/mL (IQR 4.2, 7.6). When compared by ancestry, there were no significant differences in biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.26), clinical stage (p = 0.27), CAPRA score (p = 0.58), or CCP score (p = 0.87). In addition, there was no significant difference in the risk of BCR between ancestries (p = 0.55). Only non−AA men progressed to metastatic disease within the ten years of follow−up. Conclusions: Contrary to prior reports, these data appears to indicate that men of AA ancestry do not necessarily present with or develop a more biologically aggressive form of PC. Although these data represents only one institution’s experience, it contains a highly robust AA population compared to prior reports. Further research is required to account for the discrepancy in the previously published literature.

scholarly journals Metastatic progression following multimodal therapy for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Guy ◽  
Rachel Glicksman ◽  
Roger Buckley ◽  
Patrick Cheung ◽  
Hans Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models

Introduction: Identifying the optimal management of unfavorable-risk (ProCaRS high intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk categories) non-metastatic prostate cancer is an important public health concern given the large burden of this disease. We compared the rate of metastatic progression-free survival among men diagnosed with unfavorable-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer who were initially treated with radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy. Methods: Information was obtained from medical records at two academic centers in Canada from 333 men diagnosed with unfavorable-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer between 2007 and 2012. Median followup was 90.4 months. Men were eligible for study if they received either primary radiation therapy (n=164) or radical prostatectomy (n=169), in addition to various adjuvant and salvage therapies when deemed clinically appropriate. Patients were matched on prognostic covariates using two matching techniques. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) for metastatic progression-free survival between groups. Results: After matching, treatment groups were balanced on prognostic variables except for percent core positivity. Hazard ratios from all Cox proportional hazards models (i.e., before and after matching, and with and without multivariable adjustment) showed no difference in the rate of metastatic progression-free survival between groups (adjusted unmatched HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63, 2.13, p=0.64). Conclusions: Metastatic progression-free survival did not differ between men diagnosed with unfavorable risk non-metastatic prostate cancer who were treated with either radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy.

Prostate cancer specific mortality and overall survival outcomes for salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Shree Agrawal ◽  
Jason A. Efstathiou ◽  
Jeff M. Michalski ◽  
Thomas Michael Pisansky ◽  
Bridget F. Koontz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Salvage Radiation Therapy ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Completion Date ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

9 Background: Early salvage radiation therapy (SRT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to reduce biochemical recurrence and distant metastases. We aim to identify factors predictive of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) from a consortium database from 10 academic institutions. Methods: 2,454 node-negative patients (pts) with detectable post-prostatectomy PSA ( ≥ 0.01 ng/mL) treated with SRT ± neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (N/C ADT) were included. Cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate rates of PCSM and ACM, respectively. Univariate and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed by competing risks regression and Cox proportional hazards methods for PCSM and ACM. Results: Median follow-up was 5 years from SRT completion and 8 years from date of RP; 24% had pathologic Gleason score (GS) of ≤ 6, 56% GS 7, and 19% GS ≥ 8; 56% extraprostatic extension (EPE), 18% seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), 58% positive surgical margins, and 16% received N/C ADT. Median age at RP and SRT were 62 years (IQR 56-66) and 64 years (59-69), respectively. Median SRT dose was 66 Gy (IQR 65-68) and median pre-SRT PSA was 0.5 ng/mL (IQR 0.3-1.1). MVA performed from SRT completion date demonstrated higher pre-SRT PSA (HR = 2.1), higher GS (GS 7 vs. ≤ 6: HR 2.0; GS ≥ 8 vs. 6: HR 3.3) , SVI (HR 2.5), year of SRT (2000-2004, 1995-1999, 1985-1994 vs. 2005-2012; HR 2.9, HR 2.5, HR 3.6, respectively) were significantly associated with higher PCSM. These same variables were all significantly associated with higher PCSM and ACM rates calculated from both SRT completion date and date of RP. Conclusions: Initiation of early SRT at lower post-operative PSA levels following RP is associated with reduced risk of PCSM and ACM, even when calculated from RP date to account for lead time bias. Other factors significantly associated with PCSM include higher GS, SVI, and earlier year of SRT. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Survival rates and prognostic factors in right- and left-sided colon cancer stage I–IV: an unselected retrospective single-center trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudius E. Degro ◽  
Richard Strozynski ◽  
Florian N. Loch ◽  
Christian Schineis ◽  
Fiona Speichinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Blood Level ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Purpose Colorectal cancer revealed over the last decades a remarkable shift with an increasing proportion of a right- compared to a left-sided tumor location. In the current study, we aimed to disclose clinicopathological differences between right- and left-sided colon cancer (rCC and lCC) with respect to mortality and outcome predictors. Methods In total, 417 patients with colon cancer stage I–IV were analyzed in the present retrospective single-center study. Survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and uni/multivariate analyses were performed with a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results Our study showed no significant difference of the overall survival between rCC and lCC stage I–IV (p = 0.354). Multivariate analysis revealed in the rCC cohort the worst outcome for ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score IV patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 16.0; CI 95%: 2.1–123.5), CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) blood level > 100 µg/l (HR: 3.3; CI 95%: 1.2–9.0), increased lymph node ratio of 0.6–1.0 (HR: 5.3; CI 95%: 1.7–16.1), and grade 4 tumors (G4) (HR: 120.6; CI 95%: 6.7–2179.6) whereas in the lCC population, ASA score IV (HR: 8.9; CI 95%: 0.9–91.9), CEA blood level 20.1–100 µg/l (HR: 5.4; CI 95%: 2.4–12.4), conversion to laparotomy (HR: 14.1; CI 95%: 4.0–49.0), and severe surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo III–IV) (HR: 2.9; CI 95%: 1.5–5.5) were identified as predictors of a diminished overall survival. Conclusion Laterality disclosed no significant effect on the overall prognosis of colon cancer patients. However, group differences and distinct survival predictors could be identified in rCC and lCC patients.

scholarly journals Combined Androgen Blockade in Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1497-1504
Author(s):  
Lucas K. Vitzthum ◽  
Chris Straka ◽  
Reith R. Sarkar ◽  
Rana McKay ◽  
J. Michael Randall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Combined Androgen Blockade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Androgen Blockade

Background: The addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy (RT) improves survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but it is not known whether combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-A) and a nonsteroidal antiandrogen improves survival over GnRH-A monotherapy. Methods: This study evaluated patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa diagnosed in 2001 through 2015 who underwent RT with either GnRH-A alone or CAB using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. Associations between CAB and prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS) were determined using multivariable regression with Fine-Gray and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. For a positive control, the effect of long-term versus short-term GnRH-A therapy was tested. Results: The cohort included 8,423 men (GnRH-A, 4,529; CAB, 3,894) with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. There were 1,861 deaths, including 349 resulting from PCa. The unadjusted cumulative incidences of PCSM at 10 years were 5.9% and 6.9% for those receiving GnRH-A and CAB, respectively (P=.16). Compared with GnRH-A alone, CAB was not associated with a significant difference in covariate-adjusted PCSM (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85–1.30) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93–1.12). For high-risk patients, long-term versus short-term GnRH-A therapy was associated with improved PCSM (SHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.95) and OS (SHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73–0.93). Conclusions: In men receiving definitive RT for intermediate- or high-risk PCa, CAB was not associated with improved PCSM or OS compared with GnRH alone.

Association between radiographic response and overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
G. Sonpavde ◽  
G. R. Pond ◽  
W. R. Berry ◽  
R. De Wit ◽  
M. A. Eisenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier

118 Background: In men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC),the association of measurable tumor responses with overall survival (OS) is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the TAX327 phase III trial to study this relationship. Methods: Eligible patients for this analysis included those with WHO-defined measurable metastatic disease randomized to receive either docetaxel or mitoxantrone. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the prognostic relationship of WHO-defined radiologic response with OS was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Landmark analyses evaluated survival from baseline and 2, 3, 4 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Four hundred and twelve patients enrolled on the TAX327 trial had measurable tumors. Thirty-seven patients exhibited a complete or partial objective response (CR/PR, 9.0%), 116 had stable disease (SD, 28.2%), 99 had progressive disease (PD,24%) and 160 (38.8%) did not have a post-baseline objective assessment. Partial responders demonstrated longer median OS (29.0 months) than patients with SD (22.1 months), or those with PD (10.8 months) or those who were not assessed (12.7 months). These results remained after landmark analysis. We found a significant association between ≥30% PSA declines and radiologic response, with ≥30% PSA declines occurring in all patients with CR/PR, 79.8% of patients with SD and 34.4% with PD. Radiologic response remained a significant but modest post-treatment prognostic factor for OS after adjusting for treatment, pain-response and ≥30% PSA-decline (p=0.009). Conclusions: In men with metastatic CRPC and measurable disease receiving chemotherapy, objective tumor response was prognostic for OS, and appears to complement PSA assessment. [Table: see text]

Antiandrogen withdrawal (AAWD) in patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PCa): Retrospective analysis of data from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcome Collaborative (SA-PCCOC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 240-240
Author(s):  
Sina Vatandoust ◽  
Ganessan Kichenadasse ◽  
Michael E O'Callaghan ◽  
Tina Kopsaftis ◽  
Scott Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Australian State ◽  
Chi Squared

240 Background: In 15-30% of pts with metastatic PCa who progress on Maximal Androgen Blockade (MAB), withdrawal of the antiandrogen agent (AAWD) and continuing the LHRH agonist alone, leads to PSA decreases of ≥50% and prolonged progression free survival. Here we describe patient and disease characteristics, treatment history and outcomes of pts who have been managed with AAWD. Methods: Data were obtained from SA-PCCOC (a longitudinal, observational registry of biopsy-proven PCa cases, throughout the Australian state of South Australia since 1998). Proportions were compared using a Chi squared test. A multivariable model used competing risks (Fine and Gray) and Cox proportional Hazards models to assess overall survival and Prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM). Survival was calculated from the date of rising PSA for patients on LHRH and AA. Results: 140 pts were found to have MAB. Of these, 31(22.1%) had AAWD. In the AAWD group, median age was 81y (51-95). Age at diagnosis, Gleason score at biopsy and diagnostic PSA were not significantly different amongst the two groups. Treatment PSA was significantly lower in the AAWD group (20.55 (range 0.6-9,995) vs 50.50 (range 0.95-4378) p= 0.02). There was a significant association of AAWD with PCSM (sHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.76; p = 0.008). Also significant in the model was prior time on hormones (sHR [per month increase] 0.96 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p<0.001). There was also a significant association of AAWD with overall survival (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.46; p <0.001). Again, prior time on hormones was also significant (HR [per month increase] 0.96 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis was performed on data from 80 pts (60 pts omitted due to missing data). Conclusions: Pts in whom AAWD was used were older and had lower treatment PSA. In this small cohort, AAWD was associated with both reduced PCSM and overall risk of death. The time spent on MAB also appeared to be significant. This retrospective observational study may be subject to confounding, however the observation warrants further investigation in larger cohorts and in a prospective setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document