MIPSS70+ Version 2.0: Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (17) ◽  
pp. 1769-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayalew Tefferi ◽  
Paola Guglielmelli ◽  
Terra L. Lasho ◽  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Rhett P. Ketterling ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1271-1278
Author(s):  
Joan How ◽  
Gabriela S. Hobbs

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has the least favorable prognosis of the Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, which also include essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). However, clinical presentations and outcomes of PMF vary widely, with median overall survival ranging from years to decades. Given the heterogeneity of PMF, there has been considerable effort to develop discriminatory prognostic models to help with management decisions, particularly for the consideration of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients at higher risk. Although earlier models incorporated only clinical features in risk stratification, contemporary models increasingly use molecular and cytogenetic features, leading to more comprehensive prognostication. This article reviews the most widely adopted prognostic models used for PMF, including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS)/DIPSS+, mutation-enhanced IPSS for transplant-age patients (MIPSS70)/MIPSS70+/MIPSS70+ version 2.0, genetically inspired prognostic scoring system, and Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model in patients with post-ET/PV myelofibrosis. We also discuss newly emerging prognostic models and provide a practical approach to risk stratification in patients with PMF and post-ET/PV myelofibrosis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Domenica Caramazza ◽  
Rakhee Vaidya ◽  
Geeta George ◽  
Kebede Begna ◽  
...  

Purpose The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) uses five risk factors to predict survival: age older than 65 years, hemoglobin lower than 10 g/dL, leukocytes higher than 25 × 109/L, circulating blasts ≥ 1%, and constitutional symptoms. The main objective of this study was to refine DIPSS by incorporating prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. Patients and Methods Mayo Clinic databases for PMF were used to identify patients with available bone marrow histologic and cytogenetic information. Results Seven hundred ninety-three consecutive patients were selected and divided into two groups based on whether or not their referral occurred within (n = 428; training set) or after (n = 365; test set) 1 year of diagnosis. Multivariable analysis identified DIPSS, unfavorable karyotype, platelets lower than 100 × 109/L, and transfusion need as independent predictors of inferior survival. Hazard ratio (HR) –weighted adverse points were assigned to these variables to develop a composite prognostic model using the training set. The model was subsequently validated in the test set, and its application to all 793 patients resulted in median survivals of 185, 78, 35, and 16 months for low, intermediate-1 (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.6), intermediate-2 (HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2 to 7.7), and high-risk groups (HR, 10.7; 95% CI, 6.8 to 16.9), respectively (P < .001). Leukemia-free survival was predicted by the presence of thrombocytopenia or unfavorable karyotype (10-year risk of 31% v 12%; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9 to 5.6). Conclusion DIPSS plus effectively combines prognostic information from DIPSS, karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status to predict overall survival in PMF. In addition, unfavorable karyotype or thrombocytopenia predicts inferior leukemia-free survival.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1729-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Maffioli ◽  
Elisa Rumi ◽  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Enrica Morra ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1729 Background: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm whose survival at diagnosis is predicted by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), which is based on the presence of the following five risk factors: age greater than 65 years, presence of constitutional symptoms, hemoglobin level below 10 g/dL, leukocyte count greater than 25 ×109/L, and circulating blast cells 1% or greater (Cervantes et al, Blood 2009). To allow dynamic prognostication at any time during follow up, we further developed the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), based on the same IPSS-factors, but with different score values (one point for each risk factor, two points for acquisition of anemia) and with a distinct score model (low risk, LR, 0 points; intermediate-1 risk, Int-1R, 1–2 points; intermediate-2 risk, Int-2R, 3–4 points; high risk, HR, 5–6 points) (Passamonti et al, Blood 2010). The DIPSS model was also efficient in the prediction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution (Passamonti et al, Blood 2010) and in the assessment of survival and non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Scott et al, Blood 2012). Aim: The aim of the present study is to update outcome data of PMF patients included in the original series used to generate the DIPSS model and to assess the DIPSS prediction of survival in PMF patients with a longer follow up. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and the procedures followed were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients and methods: This study was performed on 520 of 525 regularly followed DIPSS-PMF patients, as five patients have been lost to follow up after the original publication. Results: Updated median follow up was of 4.1 years (range, 0.1–30.1). At the time of analysis 326 (63%) patients died, of whom 194 due to known causes: 69 AML, 16 non-AML disease progression, 21 bleeding, 17 thrombosis, 33 infections, 38 other. Median survival was 6 years (95% CI: 5.1–6.7). DIPSS stratification allowed different survivals in PMF patients even with a longer follow-up (Figure 1). Hence, to assess the time to DIPSS-category progression, we evaluated the median time spent within each risk group. This estimate revealed that the median time spent in each risk category was: 4.9 years in LR (range, 0–26.7), 2.1 years in Int-1R (range, 0–18.7), 1.7 years in Int-2R (range, 0–13.4), and 0.74 years in HR (range, 0–13.7). To investigate the prognostic role of the DIPSS score on survival, we analyzed the score as a categorical time-dependent covariate in a Cox survival regression model: the hazard ratio of shifting category from LR to Int-1R was 5.0 (95% CI: 2.4–10.6; P <0.001), it was 3.6 when shifting from Int-1R to Int-2R (95% CI: 2.6–4.9; P <0.001), and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0–3.6; P <0.001) from Int-2R to HR. Conclusion: The updated analysis shows that the DIPSS model continues to predict survival in patients with PMF. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (15) ◽  
pp. 2857-2858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Passamonti ◽  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Alessandro Maria Vannucchi ◽  
Enrica Morra ◽  
Elisa Rumi ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kebede Hussein ◽  
Jocelin Huang ◽  
Terra Lasho ◽  
Animesh Pardanani ◽  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kebede Hussein ◽  
Animesh D. Pardanani ◽  
Daniel L. Van Dyke ◽  
Curtis A. Hanson ◽  
Ayalew Tefferi

Abstract Among 200 patients with primary myelofibrosis, karyotype at diagnosis was abnormal in 83 (42%). To assess their individual prognostic impact, specific cytogenetic abnormalities with more than or equal to 5 informative cases were identified and the rest grouped separately as “other abnormalities.” Median survival in patients with sole +9 (n = 6), sole 20q− (n = 21), sole 13q− (n = 8), normal karyotype (n = 117), “other abnormalities” (n = 28), complex karyotype (n = 13), and sole +8 (n = 7) were “not reached,” 112, 105, 80, 46, 34, and 28 months, respectively (P = .01). Accordingly, 4 cytogenetic risk groups were considered: (1) favorable (sole +9, 20q−, or 13q−), (2) normal, (3) unfavorable (complex karyotype or sole +8), and (4) “other abnormalities.” Multivariable analysis confirmed the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)–independent prognostic value of both 4-way and 2-way (ie, favorable/normal vs unfavorable/other abnormalities; IPSS-adjusted hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.58) cytogenetic risk categorization (P < .01). The ability to prognostically dissect a specific IPSS category has major therapeutic implications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-524
Author(s):  
Vesna Djordjevic ◽  
Marija Dencic-Fekete ◽  
Jelica Jovanovic ◽  
Ivan Soldatovic ◽  
Gradimir Jankovic ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aim. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a chronic, malignant hematological disease characterized by a leucoerythroblastic blood picture, anisopoikilocytosis teardrop- shaped erythrocytes, different degrees of bone marrow fibrosis and hepatosplenomegaly due to extramedullary hematopoiesis. Among genetic specificities of the disease, those that stand out are chromosomal aberrations in pathological, myeloid blood cells. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of clinical, hematologic and cytogenetic parameters in PMF. Methods. A retrospective study included 144 patients with PMF. Karyotypes were analyzed using conventional cytogenetic methods. Results. The chromosome examinations were successful in 126 (88%) patients and failed in the remainder ones (12%). Karyotype was abnormal in 36/126 (29%) subjects at presentation. The most frequent changes included +9, 13q- and 20q- (28%). Other abnormalities were: aberrations of chromosome 18 and 16, deletions (9q-, 12p-, 7q-, 5q-, 6q-, 8q-), trisomies (+1q, +8, +10, +21), monosomies (-7, -11), 3q inversion and loss of Y chromosome. We detected four novel balanced translocations in PMF: t(17;22)(q11;q13), t(15;17)(q22;q25), t(9;12)(q22;q24) and t(2;4)(q21;p16), one constitutional translocation-rob(13;14)(q10;q10) and some new karyotype anomalies ? deletion of both homologues, hyperdiploidy and the coexistence of unrelated pathological clones. Conclusion. Chromosomal aberrations had a significant influence on overall survival of patients with PMF according to the refined cytogenetic-risk of the International Prognostic Scoring System (Refined CIPSS) (p = 0.004). Our patients matched the pattern of chromosome aberrations usually observed in PMF but some newly registered, balanced translocations and other rare karyotype anomalies were recorded as well.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (11) ◽  
pp. 2469-2473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zefeng Xu ◽  
Robert Peter Gale ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Tiejun Qin ◽  
Huishu Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Clinical and laboratory features of 642 consecutive Chinese subjects with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) were analyzed and compared with those of 1054 predominately white subjects with PMF. Chinese subjects were significantly younger, fewer had constitutional symptoms, and fewer had a palpable spleen or liver. Anemia, in contrast, was significantly more common in Chinese as was an increased white blood cell count and low platelet count. The reason for these differences is unclear, but it does not seem to be correlated with delayed diagnosis. A small but significantly increased proportion of Chinese had the JAK2V617F mutation but no difference in the frequency of haplotypes associated with PMF in whites. Survival of Chinese with PMF was also significantly longer than that of whites with PMF. We found commonly used staging systems for PMF such as the International Prognostic Scoring System and the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System were suboptimal predictors of survival in Chinese with PMF, and we developed a revised prognostic score that should help in comparison of data between studies of PMF in different populations and planning of clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document