scholarly journals A Practical Guide for Using Myelofibrosis Prognostic Models in the Clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1271-1278
Author(s):  
Joan How ◽  
Gabriela S. Hobbs

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has the least favorable prognosis of the Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, which also include essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). However, clinical presentations and outcomes of PMF vary widely, with median overall survival ranging from years to decades. Given the heterogeneity of PMF, there has been considerable effort to develop discriminatory prognostic models to help with management decisions, particularly for the consideration of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients at higher risk. Although earlier models incorporated only clinical features in risk stratification, contemporary models increasingly use molecular and cytogenetic features, leading to more comprehensive prognostication. This article reviews the most widely adopted prognostic models used for PMF, including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS)/DIPSS+, mutation-enhanced IPSS for transplant-age patients (MIPSS70)/MIPSS70+/MIPSS70+ version 2.0, genetically inspired prognostic scoring system, and Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model in patients with post-ET/PV myelofibrosis. We also discuss newly emerging prognostic models and provide a practical approach to risk stratification in patients with PMF and post-ET/PV myelofibrosis.

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akriti G. Jain ◽  
Hany Elmariah

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a diverse group of hematological malignancies distinguished by a combination of dysplasia in the bone marrow, cytopenias and the risk of leukemic transformation. The hallmark of MDS is bone marrow failure which occurs due to selective growth of somatically mutated clonal hematopoietic stem cells. Multiple prognostic models have been developed to help predict survival and leukemic transformation, including the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS), revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R), WHO prognostic scoring system (WPSS) and MD Anderson prognostic scoring system (MDAPSS). This risk stratification informs management as low risk (LR)-MDS treatment focuses on improving quality of life and cytopenias, while the treatment of high risk (HR)-MDS focuses on delaying disease progression and improving survival. While therapies such as erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), erythroid maturation agents (EMAs), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMIDs), and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) may provide benefit, allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT) is the only treatment that can offer cure for MDS. However, this therapy is marred, historically, by high rates of toxicity and transplant related mortality (TRM). Because of this, alloBMT is considered in a minority of MDS patients. With modern techniques, alloBMT has become a suitable option even for patients of advanced age or with significant comorbidities, many of whom who would not have been considered for transplant in prior years. Hence, a formal transplant evaluation to weigh the complex balance of patient and disease related factors and determine the potential benefit of transplant should be considered early in the disease course for most MDS patients. Once alloBMT is recommended, timing is a crucial consideration since delaying transplant can lead to disease progression and development of other comorbidities that may preclude transplant. Despite the success of alloBMT, relapse remains a major barrier to success and novel approaches are necessary to mitigate this risk and improve long term cure rates. This review describes various factors that should be considered when choosing patients with MDS who should pursue transplant, approaches and timing of transplant, and future directions of the field.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1729-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Maffioli ◽  
Elisa Rumi ◽  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Enrica Morra ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1729 Background: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm whose survival at diagnosis is predicted by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), which is based on the presence of the following five risk factors: age greater than 65 years, presence of constitutional symptoms, hemoglobin level below 10 g/dL, leukocyte count greater than 25 ×109/L, and circulating blast cells 1% or greater (Cervantes et al, Blood 2009). To allow dynamic prognostication at any time during follow up, we further developed the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), based on the same IPSS-factors, but with different score values (one point for each risk factor, two points for acquisition of anemia) and with a distinct score model (low risk, LR, 0 points; intermediate-1 risk, Int-1R, 1–2 points; intermediate-2 risk, Int-2R, 3–4 points; high risk, HR, 5–6 points) (Passamonti et al, Blood 2010). The DIPSS model was also efficient in the prediction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution (Passamonti et al, Blood 2010) and in the assessment of survival and non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Scott et al, Blood 2012). Aim: The aim of the present study is to update outcome data of PMF patients included in the original series used to generate the DIPSS model and to assess the DIPSS prediction of survival in PMF patients with a longer follow up. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and the procedures followed were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients and methods: This study was performed on 520 of 525 regularly followed DIPSS-PMF patients, as five patients have been lost to follow up after the original publication. Results: Updated median follow up was of 4.1 years (range, 0.1–30.1). At the time of analysis 326 (63%) patients died, of whom 194 due to known causes: 69 AML, 16 non-AML disease progression, 21 bleeding, 17 thrombosis, 33 infections, 38 other. Median survival was 6 years (95% CI: 5.1–6.7). DIPSS stratification allowed different survivals in PMF patients even with a longer follow-up (Figure 1). Hence, to assess the time to DIPSS-category progression, we evaluated the median time spent within each risk group. This estimate revealed that the median time spent in each risk category was: 4.9 years in LR (range, 0–26.7), 2.1 years in Int-1R (range, 0–18.7), 1.7 years in Int-2R (range, 0–13.4), and 0.74 years in HR (range, 0–13.7). To investigate the prognostic role of the DIPSS score on survival, we analyzed the score as a categorical time-dependent covariate in a Cox survival regression model: the hazard ratio of shifting category from LR to Int-1R was 5.0 (95% CI: 2.4–10.6; P <0.001), it was 3.6 when shifting from Int-1R to Int-2R (95% CI: 2.6–4.9; P <0.001), and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0–3.6; P <0.001) from Int-2R to HR. Conclusion: The updated analysis shows that the DIPSS model continues to predict survival in patients with PMF. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison R. Moliterno ◽  
Yelena Z Ginzburg ◽  
Ronald Hoffman

The Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, are hematopoietic stem cell disorders that are defined by activating mutations in signal transduction pathways and are characterized clinically by the overproduction of platelets, red blood cells and neutrophils, significant burden of disease-specific symptoms, and high rates of vascular events. The focus of this review is to critically re-evaluate the clinical burden of thrombosis in the MPNs, to review the clinical associations between clonal hematopoiesis, JAK2V617F burden, inflammation and thrombosis, and to provide insights into novel primary and secondary thrombosis prevention strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 659
Author(s):  
Yammy Yung ◽  
Emily Lee ◽  
Hiu-Tung Chu ◽  
Pui-Kwan Yip ◽  
Harinder Gill

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are unique hematopoietic stem cell disorders sharing mutations that constitutively activate the signal-transduction pathways involved in haematopoiesis. They are characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation. The key MPNs comprise chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). CML is defined by the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Despite effective cytoreductive agents and targeted therapy, complete CML/MPN stem cell eradication is rarely achieved. In this review article, we discuss the novel agents and combination therapy that can potentially abnormal hematopoietic stem cells in CML and MPNs and the CML/MPN stem cell-sustaining bone marrow microenvironment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (17) ◽  
pp. 1769-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayalew Tefferi ◽  
Paola Guglielmelli ◽  
Terra L. Lasho ◽  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Rhett P. Ketterling ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
Lauren Willis ◽  
Tristin Abair ◽  
Davecia R. Cameron

Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare malignancies that include myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia. The objective of this study is to assess current clinical practices of hematologist/oncologists (hem/oncs) related to current and emerging therapies for MPNs, in order to identify knowledge, competency, and practice gaps. Methods: A continuing medical education (CME)-certified clinical practice assessment consisting of 25 multiple-choice questions was developed to measure knowledge, skills, attitudes, and competence of hem/oncs regarding current and emerging MPN therapies. The self-assessment was available online to physicians without monetary compensation or charge. Respondent confidentiality was maintained, and responses were de-identified and aggregated for reporting. The activity launched on November 21, 2019 and responses collected through July 12, 2020 were analyzed and reported. Results: A total of 2,035 learners participated in the activity and 218 hem/oncs answered all questions in the assessment. Hem/onc demographics and patient load distributions are reported in Table 1. A majority (77%) of hem/oncs lack confidence treating adverse events of MPN therapies (Table 2). Baseline knowledge and competence of hem/oncs were grouped into themes: Knowledge/Competence with Risk Stratification, Prognostic Scoring, and Symptom Assessment: While 87% and 63%, demonstrated knowledge about variables included on the MPN Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score and the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), respectively, only 50% demonstrated knowledge about variables included in the mutation-enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System (MIPSS70). Additionally, only 27% demonstrated competence risk stratifying a patient with high-risk MF according to DIPSS. Knowledge of Available Therapies: While 62% demonstrated knowledge that the 5-year data from the COMFORT-1 trial found ruxolitinib demonstrated an overall survival benefit in patients with intermediate-2 (INT-2) and high-risk MF, only 57% demonstrated knowledge that in addition to reduction in spleen volume, ruxolitinib improved symptoms of patients with MF in the COMFORT trials. Additionally, only 56% demonstrated knowledge that in the RESPONSE trial ruxolitinib increased hematocrit control in patients with PV. A majority (77%) did not demonstrate knowledge that both ruxolitinib and fedratinib are approved for the first-line treatment of patients with high-risk MF. Knowledge of Emerging Therapies: Momelotinib: 72% did not demonstrate knowledge that in the SIMPLIFY-2 trial momelotinib increased symptom improvement compared to best available therapy (BAT) in patients with MF who were pretreated with ruxolitinib. Pacritinib: 47% did not demonstrate knowledge that in the PERSIST trial pacritinib did not demonstrate improved overall survival compared to BAT. Ropeginterferon: 80% did not demonstrate knowledge of the efficacy outcomes in patients with PV who received ropeginterferon in the PROUD-PV study. Knowledge and Competence Managing Adverse Events (AE): A majority (75%) demonstrated competence treating ruxolitinib-associated thrombocytopenia in a patient with INT-2 MF, however only 35% and 44%, respectively, demonstrated knowledge of the need to address thiamine deficiency before starting a patient on fedratinib (encephalopathy risk) and knowledge that diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic AE seen with ruxolitinib in patients on the COMFORT-II trial. Conclusions: This research identified several knowledge, competence, and confidence deficits for hem/oncs related to current and emerging MPN therapies in the areas of: (1) Risk stratification and use of prognostic scoring tools, (2) Clinical trial safety and efficacy data for currently available and emerging therapies, (3) Personalizing treatment selection for patients with MPNs, (4) Preventing and managing treatment-related AEs. Additional education is needed to address these gaps for hem/oncs who care for patients with MPNs, which is expected to translate into improved clinical performance and better patient outcomes. Acknowledgements: This CME activity was supported by an independent educational grant from Incyte Corporation. Reference: www.medscape.org/viewarticle/921334 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 739-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slobodan Ristic ◽  
Milica Radojkovic ◽  
Tatjana Kostic ◽  
Vesna Spasovski ◽  
Sonja Pavlovic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Secondary malignancies, particularly solid tumors, are common in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but association of myeloproliferative neoplasms and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the same patient is very rare. Case Outline. We report of a 67-year-old man with B-cell chronic lymphoid leukemia (B-CLL) who developed primary myelofibrosis (PMF) nine years after initial diagnosis. Patient received alkylation agents and purine analogue, which can be a predisposing factor for the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms. JAK2V617F mutation was not present initially at the time of CLL diagnosis, but was found after nine years when PMF occurred, which indicates that B-CLL and PMF represent two separate clonal origin neoplasms. Conclusion. Pathogenic mechanisms for the development of myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative neoplasms in the same patient are unknown. Further research is needed to determine whether these malignancies originate from two different cell clones or arise from the same pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell.


2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 233-237

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and cytopenia in peripheral blood, where about a third of patients may develop acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The diagnosis of MDS requires the analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow. Depending on the percentage of blasts in the bone marrow, the number of cytopenias and cytogenetic abnormalities, determination of the prognostic indices is possible (IPSS – „International Prognostic Scoring System“, R-IPSS-„Revised International Prognostic Scoring System“, WPSS – „WHO Prognostic Scoring System“). Until today, numerous studies have been conducted on the molecular mechanisms and epigenetic pathways in myelodysplastic syndrome, and their prognostic and therapeutic importance, but there are few studies analyzing the importance of microRNAs (miRNAs) in MDS. In the last few years, there have been numerous results on the impact of aberrant miRNA expression in malignant disorders where the miRNA represent tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes. Several miRNAs have been recognized as diagnostic and prognostic parameters and possible therapeutic targets. In this paper, we present the overview of recent results on the role of miRNA in MDS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
pp. 197-205
Author(s):  
Franziska C. Zeeh ◽  
Sara C. Meyer

AbstractPhiladelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by dysregulated proliferation of mature myeloid blood cells. They can present as polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, or myelofibrosis and are characterized by constitutive activation of JAK2 signaling. They share a propensity for thrombo-hemorrhagic complications and the risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Attention has also been drawn to JAK2 mutant clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential as a possible precursor state of MPN. Insight into the pathogenesis as well as options for the treatment of MPN has increased in the last years thanks to modern sequencing technologies and functional studies. Mutational analysis provides information on the oncogenic driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL in the majority of MPN patients. In addition, molecular markers enable more detailed prognostication and provide guidance for therapeutic decisions. While JAK2 inhibitors represent a standard of care for MF and resistant/refractory PV, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only therapy with a curative potential in MPN so far but is reserved to a subset of patients. Thus, novel concepts for therapy are an important need, particularly in MF. Novel JAK2 inhibitors, combination therapy approaches with ruxolitinib, as well as therapeutic approaches addressing new molecular targets are in development. Current standards and recent advantages are discussed in this review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document