Multimodality liquid biopsy for early monitoring and outcome prediction in first-line metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer: Final results of the prospective cohort from the French Breast Cancer InterGroup Unicancer (UCBG)— COMET study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3019-3019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Pierga ◽  
Amanda Silveira ◽  
Olivier Tredan ◽  
Marie-Laure Tanguy ◽  
Veronique Lorgis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
First Line

3019 Background: Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) are independent markers of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Monitoring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can detect mutation associated with resistance to treatment and its variations reflect changes in tumor burden. We prospectively monitored CTC, Circulating Endothelial Cells (CEC), serum markers and ctDNA during first line chemotherapy for MBC. Methods: The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2 negative pts receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab . Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL) and before the second cycle of chemotherapy (C2).We present here the final planned analysis. Results: From 09/2012 to 11/2014, 286 patients were included: 198 for ctDNA, 251 for CEC and 283 for CTC. Median age was 56 years and 23% of pts had triple negative BC. At baseline, 71% of pts had ≥1 detectable CTC per 7.5 ml of blood (median 4 CTC, range 1- 30,000). With a threshold of ≥5 CTC, 49% of pts were positive at baseline and 22% at C2. For ctDNA, out of the first 196 pts analyzed, 147 had at least one somatic mutation (SNV) detected in plasma (75%). The average number of mutations per pt was 2.4 (range 1 to 9). Most commonly mutated genes were TP53 and GATA3. ESR1 was mutated in 10.6% of the pts and restricted to the ER+ subgroup. PIK3CA was mutated in 23.2% of the pts. Median Allelic Frequency was 9.1% . Only 68 pts (36%) had detectable ctDNA at C2. At baseline, CTC and ctDNA levels were correlated (r = 0.40, p < 0.0001). Despite no complete overlap, 24 pts (12%) had no CTC nor ctDNA detected at baseline. Median follow-up was 53 months and median OS was 32 months. Detectable CTC and ctDNA at baseline and at C2 were significantly associated with decreased PFS and OS. CEC and serum markers level had no prognostic value. At multivariate analysis, triple negative status, detectable ctDNA at C2, CTC ≥5 at C2 and grade 3 on primary tumor were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: This is the largest prospective cohort assessing the respective prognostic values of early CTC and ctDNA changes in homogenously treated first line MBC pts. Early decrease of CTC and ctDNA after one cycle of chemotherapy are independent predictive markers of favorable outcome, with a stronger value for ctDNA compared to CTC. Clinical utility of early ctDNA variations monitoring and changes in mutation profile remain to be demonstrated. Clinical trial information: NCT01745757.

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy (CAMELLIA study).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14568-e14568
Author(s):  
Zongbi Yi ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Guohua Rong ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Lianpeng Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
First Line ◽  
Tumor Dna ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e14568 Background: Our precious study indicated that the dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could reflect changes in tumor burden. We conduct this study to validate the role of ctDNA as a therapeutic response biomarker in a larger cohort prospective phase III randomized multicenter study. Methods: In this study, we collected 292 serial ctDNA samples from 125 metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line chemotherapy. Target-capture deep sequencing of 1021 genes was performed to detect somatic variants in ctDNA. Results: 81.4% patients had detectable ctDNA at baseline. An undetectable ctDNA at baseline was associated with a lower disease volume (p < 0.05). The commonly mutated genes were PIK3CA (35.0%), TP53 (34.2%), MLL3 (9.4%) and ESR1 (9.4%). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that TP53 gene mutations and remaining C2 (detected at base line and remaining at the second cycle of chemotherapy) were significantly associated with poor PFS. Longitudinal monitoring of 27 patients during treatment showed that the molecular tumor burden index ([mTBI] a measure of the percentage of ctDNA in samples) was positively correlated with tumor size as evaluated by computed tomography (P < 0.05). The evaluations based on mTBI values were consistent with those based on CT scans in 87.5% of cases at the endpoint of clinical observation. Conclusions: ctDNA could be used to predict treatment outcomes and the mTBI is a potential method to assess therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01917279.

Immediate and long-term results of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. Final analysis of randomized study

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
S.A. Lyalkin ◽  
◽  
L.A. Syvak ◽  
N.O. Verevkina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Group 1

The objective: was to evaluate the efficacy of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and methods. Open randomized study was performed including 122 patients with metastatic TNBC. The efficacy and safety of the first line chemotherapy of regimens АТ (n=59) – group 1, patients received doxorubicine 60 мг/м2 and paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and ТР (n=63) – group 2, patients received paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and carboplatin AUC 5 were evaluated. Results. The median duration of response was 9.5 months (4.5–13.25 months) in patients received AT regimen and 8.5 months (4.7–12.25 months), in TP regimen; no statistically significant differences were observed, р=0.836. The median progression free survival was 7 months (95% CI 5–26 months) in group 1 and 7.5 months (95% CI 6–35 months) in group 2, p=0.85. Both chemotherapy regimens (AT and TP) had mild or moderate toxicity profiles (grade 1 or 2 in most patients). No significant difference in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was higher in patients of group 2 (TP regimen): 42.8% versus 27% (р<0.05). Conclusions. Both regimens of chemotherapy (AT and TP) are appropriate to use in the first line setting in patients with metastatic TNBC. Key words: metastatic triple negative breast cancer, chemotherapy, progression free survival, chemotherapy toxicity.

scholarly journals Phase II study of metronomic treatment with daily oral vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer resistant to endocrine therapy: VinoMetro—AGO-B-046

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slavomir Krajnak ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Lukas Schollenberger ◽  
Christian Rosé ◽  
Christian Ruckes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Purpose Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is an increasingly used treatment option in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after failure of endocrine-based therapies. Methods VinoMetro was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study of metronomic oral vinorelbine (VRL; 30 mg/day) as a first-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC after endocrine failure. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 weeks. Results Between January 2017 and April 2019, nine patients were enrolled. The CBR was 22.2% (90% confidence interval [CI] 4.1–55.0), p = 0.211. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 weeks (95% CI 11.3–12.7). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.2% of patients. One patient died of febrile neutropenia. Conclusion VinoMetro (AGO-B-046) was closed early after nine patients and occurrence of one grade 5 toxicity in agreement with the lead institutional review board (IRB). Metronomic dosing of oral VRL in HR+/HER2− MBC as first-line CT after failure of endocrine therapies showed only limited benefit in this population. Trial registration number and date of registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03007992; December 15, 2016.

The cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in first-line for metastatic triple negative breast cancer is heavily linked to PD-L1 level

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110194
Author(s):  
Jacopo Giuliani ◽  
Beatrice Mantoan ◽  
Andrea Bonetti
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
First Line Treatment

The present analysis was conducted to assess the pharmacological costs of atezolizumab as first-line treatment in triple negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Pivotal phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) was considered. Nine hundred and two patients were included. Differences in costs between the 2 arms (atezolizumab plus nabpaclitaxel versus placebo plus nab-paclitaxel) was 17 398 €, with a cost of 7564 €per month of OS-gain in the overall population and 2485 €per month of OS-gain in PD-L1-positive (≥1) population. Combining pharmacological costs of drugs with the measure of efficacy represented by the OS, atezolizumab could be considered cost-effective in first-line treatment for triple-negative mBC only in PD-L1-positive population, but a reduction of costs is mandatory.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab and Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of First-Line Phase III Studies and a Critical Reappraisal of Available Evidence

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
José R. Rossari ◽  
Otto Metzger-Filho ◽  
Marianne Paesmans ◽  
Kamal S. Saini ◽  
Alessandra Gennari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Statistical Estimates ◽  
Treatment Indications ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

Background. Randomized studies have shown different magnitude of bevacizumab benefit in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Regulatory agencies have modified bevacizumab treatment indications across different regions. In this study, we perform a meta-analysis of phase III studies aiming to interrogate the magnitude of bevacizumab benefit for the treatment of first-line HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods. Data from studies E2100, AVADO and RIBBON-1 were used to calculate the benefit of bevacizumab in terms of tumor overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. Combined statistical estimates of hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models.Results. A total of 2,695 patients were evaluated. Combining bevacizumab with different chemotherapy backbones resulted in a 30% risk reduction of PFS events (HR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–0.86) and increased ORR (odds ratio 1.81; 95% CI, 1.53–2.14). No OS benefit could be demonstrated (HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85–1.06). Bevacizumab significantly increased the incidence of adverse events such as proteinuria, hypertension and cardiovascular events.Conclusions. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of MBC significantly improved ORR and PFS, but also increased grade 3-4 toxicities. No significant OS advantage was observed.

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel and Capecitabine Compared With Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel inHER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Wardley ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Flavia Morales-Vasquez ◽  
Luis M. Zetina ◽  
Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) as first-line combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to H (8 mg/kg loading; 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus T (75 mg/m2in HTX arm, 100 mg/m2in HT arm, every 3 weeks) with or without X (950 mg/m2twice per day on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn 222 patients, median follow-up was approximately 24 months. ORR was high with both regimens (70.5% with HTX; 72.7% with HT; P = .717); complete response rate was 23.2% with HTX compared with 16.4% with HT. HTX demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival: median 17.9 months compared with 12.8 months with HT (hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .045), which translates to a gain of around 5 months. Two-year survival probability was 75% with HTX compared with 66% with HT. Febrile neutropenia (27% v 15%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (77% v 54%) incidences were higher with HT than HTX. Treatment-related grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (17% v < 1%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (11% v 4%) occurred more commonly with HTX than HT. One case of congestive heart failure occurred in each arm.ConclusionHTX is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, although it should be reserved for patients with good performance status who are not receiving long-term steroids.

Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8322-8330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alison L. Jones ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity. Results Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document