Adjuvant chemotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) for resectable gastric signet ring cell (SRC) gastric cancer: A multicenter, randomized phase II study (PRODIGE 19).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4019-4019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarisse Eveno ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Olivier Bouche ◽  
Karine Le Malicot ◽  
Vincent Hautefeuille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Signet Ring Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
Stage Ib

4019 Background: The incidence of SRC gastric cancers is markedly increasing in Western countries. SRC cancers may harbor intrinsic resistance to chemotherapy (CTx) leaving many clinicians unsure of the benefits of delaying surgery to pursue a neoadjuvant approach. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether upfront surgery plus adjuvant CTx would provide enough survival benefit for study in a phase III trial when compared to perioperative CTx. Methods: Patients with stage IB-III SRC gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive upfront surgery plus adjuvant CTx (epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil [ECF regimen], 6 cycles; experimental arm [SurgFirst]) or perioperative CTx (ECF, 3 cycles before and 3 cycles after surgery; control arm [CTxFirst]). Randomization (1:1) was stratified by tumor stage, tumor location, performance status and center. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 2 years (OS2; target (H1): OS2 > 26%). Results: 83 eligible patients were included in 27 centers from 11/12 to 09/16 (median age, 61 years (range: 32-80 years); male, 59%; ECOG PS 0-1, 99%). Results were (CTxFirst/SurgFirst): full completion of CTx, 87%/77%; surgical resection, 82.5%/90%; major postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo III-IV), 24%/23%; R0 resection rate, 88%/78%; OS2, 60%/53.5%; and median OS, 39/28 months (exploratory hazard ratio, 0.71 [95%CI: 0.40-2.64]). Conclusions: This trial met its primary endpoint (OS2 > 26% in the experimental arm). With OS2 rates > 50%, both CTx modalities deserve further evaluation in Phase III studies in stage IB-III SRC gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01717924.

Randomized phase II trial of ficlatuzumab with or without cetuximab in pan-refractory, advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015
Author(s):  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Denise Roe ◽  
Jessica R. Bauman ◽  
John M. Kaczmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Immune Biomarkers ◽  
Hpv Status

6015 Background: Cetuximab (C), an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), is approved for advanced HNSCC but benefits a minority. Crosstalk between the EGFR and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/cMet pathways is a known resistance mechanism. HGF is also immunosuppressive within the tumor microenvironment. A Phase I study confirmed the safety of C and ficlatuzumab (F), an IgG1 anti-HGF mAb, with preliminary efficacy and biomarker data suggesting that dual pathway inhibition may overcome tumor-intrinsic or immune cetuximab resistance. Methods: The primary objective of this phase II randomized, non-comparative trial was to evaluate the efficacy of F (20 mg/kg every 2 wks), with or without C (500 mg/m2 every 2 wks), in pan-refractory, advanced HNSCC. Eligibility criteria included recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, performance status (PS) 0-1, C resistance (defined as progression on or within 6 months of exposure), and resistance to or ineligibility for platinum and anti-PD1 mAb. Randomization was stratified by HPV status and center. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). An arm was deemed worthy of further study if the lower bound of the 90% 1-sided confidence interval (CI) excluded the historical control of 2 months. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) in the overall and HPV-stratified populations. A Bayesian continuous monitoring rule for futility was applied. Results: 60 patients were randomized and 58 treated between Jan 2018 and Dec 2020 (27 to F; 33 to FC). Baseline characteristics were balanced across major prognostic variables including age, PS, HPV status, platinum resistance, and PD1 mAb exposure. Median time since prior cetuximab was 3.5 months (range 0-48 months). Grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to F included: pneumonitis (2); edema (3); diarrhea (1); LFT elevation (1); rash (2); electrolyte abnormality (2). The Table presents efficacy data. The F arm stopped for futility after 26 evaluable subjects accrued. The FC arm completed accrual and met the primary endpoint; 32 evaluable subjects had mPFS of 3.6 months (lower bound 90% 1-sided CI: 2.3 months) and ORR of 19% (6/32). All responses were in HPV- subjects, including 2 complete (CR) and 4 partial responses (PR) to the FC combination and 1 PR to F monotherapy. The mPFS and ORR for the HPV- population (n = 16) on FC were 3.8 months and 38% (6/16). Mechanistic signaling and immune biomarkers are under analysis. Conclusions: The well-tolerated FC combination met the primary PFS endpoint in pan-refractory, advanced HNSCC with notable activity in HPV- HNSCC, warranting phase III investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03422536. [Table: see text]

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer patients after curative D2 gastrectomy (OGSG 0604)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15567-e15567
Author(s):  
K. Fujitani ◽  
S. Tamura ◽  
Y. Kimura ◽  
T. Tsuji ◽  
J. Matsuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Grade 3

e15567 Background: Although an adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 has become the standard treatment for stage II-III gastric cancer (GC) patients (pts) after curative D2 gastrectomy in Japan, the survival benefit for stage III pts obtained by S-1 is considered to be modest. S-1 plus docetaxel has shown a good response rate of 56% with prolonged median overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months in pts with advanced GC. This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III GC pts after R0 resection. Methods: Patients with curatively resected pathological stage III GC receiving D2 dissection, age 20–80 years, performance status < 1, no prior adjuvant treatment, adequate organ function, and informed consent were given S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) orally for consecutive 2 weeks plus docetaxel (40 mg/m2) intravenously on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. The treatment was started within 45 days after gastrectomy, and repeated for 4 cycles, followed by S-1 monotherapy until 1 year after surgery. Study endpoints included feasibility of the 4 cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel as primary, and safety, progression free survival (PFS), and OS as secondary. Sample size was set to be 50, which was determined to reject the feasibility of 50% under the expectation of 75% with power of 90% and two-sided α of 5%. Results: Fifty-three pts, 42 males and 11 females with a median age of 65 years, were enrolled between 5/2007 and 8/2008. Pathological stages included IIIA in 36 pts and IIIB in 17 pts. Planned 4 cycles of treatment were delivered to 41 out of 53 pts, with the feasibility of 77.4% (95% CI 63.8–87.7%, P<0.001). Reasons for discontinuation were recurrent cancer in 1 pt, adverse events in 10, and miscellaneous in 1, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 28% of pts with grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 9%. Non-hematological toxicities of grade 3 or more involved fatigue in 6%, anorexia in 9%, and nausea in 6%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel was well-tolerated and showed good compliance. Although follow-up is ongoing on survival, this regimen could be a candidate of future phase III trial seeking for the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III GC pts after curative D2 gastrectomy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Stomach and Cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Trial 40954

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (35) ◽  
pp. 5210-5218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schuhmacher ◽  
Stephan Gretschel ◽  
Florian Lordick ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate

PurposePatients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from combined pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, although fewer than 50% could receive postoperative chemotherapy. We examined the value of purely preoperative chemotherapy in a phase III trial with strict preoperative staging and surgical resection guidelines.Patients and MethodsPatients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (AEG II and III) were randomly assigned to preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery or to surgery alone. To detect with 80% power an improvement in median survival from 17 months with surgery alone to 24 months with neoadjuvant, 282 events were required.ResultsThis trial was stopped for poor accrual after 144 patients were randomly assigned (72:72); 52.8% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach, including AEG type II and III. The International Union Against Cancer R0 resection rate was 81.9% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared with 66.7% with surgery alone (P = .036). The surgery-only group had more lymph node metastases than the neoadjuvant group (76.5% v 61.4%; P = .018). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant arm (27.1% v 16.2%; P = .09). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years and 67 deaths, a survival benefit could not be shown (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35; P = .466).ConclusionThis trial showed a significantly increased R0 resection rate but failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Possible explanations are low statistical power, a high rate of proximal gastric cancer including AEG and/or a better outcome than expected after radical surgery alone due to the high quality of surgery with resections of regional lymph nodes outside the perigastic area (celiac trunc, hepatic ligament, lymph node at a. lienalis; D2).

Multicenter Phase II Trial of S-1 Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Untreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 663-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Fa-Chyi Lee ◽  
Deepti A. Singh ◽  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Purpose S-1 plus cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric cancer patients. We conducted a phase II multi-institutional trial, in the West, in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma to evaluate activity and safety of this combination. Methods Patients received cisplatin intravenously at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 orally at 25 mg/m2/dose bid (50 mg/m2/d) on days 1 to 21, repeated every 28 days. Patients with histologic proof of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of ≥ 70% and near-normal organ function were eligible. All patients provided a written informed consent. To observe a 45% confirmed overall response rate (ORR), 41 assessable patients were needed. Results All 47 patients were assessed for safety and survival, and 41 patients were assessed for ORR. The median age was 56 years and median KPS was 80%. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was four. The confirmed ORR was 51% (95% CI, 35% to 67%) and it was 49% by an independent review. At the 6-month interval, 71% of patients were alive, with a median survival time of 10.9 months. Frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities included fatigue (26%), neutropenia (26%), vomiting (17%), diarrhea (15%), and nausea (15%); however, stomatitis (2%) and febrile neutropenia (2%) were uncommon. There was one (2%) treatment-related death. Conclusion S-1 plus cisplatin is active against gastric cancer and has a favorable toxicity profile. A global phase III study of S-1 plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin currently is accruing patients.

scholarly journals Updated Analysis of SWOG-Directed Intergroup Study 0116: A Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy Versus Observation After Curative Gastric Cancer Resection

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2327-2333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Smalley ◽  
Jacqueline K. Benedetti ◽  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Scott A. Hundahl ◽  
Norman C. Estes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Second Malignancies ◽  
Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Failure Patterns ◽  
Postoperative Radiochemotherapy

Purpose Surgical resection of gastric cancer has produced suboptimal survival despite multiple randomized trials that used postoperative chemotherapy or more aggressive surgical procedures. We performed a randomized phase III trial of postoperative radiochemotherapy in those at moderate risk of locoregional failure (LRF) following surgery. We originally reported results with 4-year median follow-up. This update, with a more than 10-year median follow-up, presents data on failure patterns and second malignancies and explores selected subset analyses. Patients and Methods In all, 559 patients with primaries ≥ T3 and/or node-positive gastric cancer were randomly assigned to observation versus radiochemotherapy after R0 resection. Fluorouracil and leucovorin were administered before, during, and after radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was given to all LRF sites to a dose of 45 Gy. Results Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) data demonstrate continued strong benefit from postoperative radiochemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS is 1.32 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.60; P = .0046). The HR for RFS is 1.51 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.83; P < .001). Adjuvant radiochemotherapy produced substantial reduction in both overall relapse and locoregional relapse. Second malignancies were observed in 21 patients with radiotherapy versus eight with observation (P = .21). Subset analyses show robust treatment benefit in most subsets, with the exception of patients with diffuse histology who exhibited minimal nonsignificant treatment effect. Conclusion Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) demonstrates strong persistent benefit from adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Toxicities, including second malignancies, appear acceptable, given the magnitude of RFS and OS improvement. LRF reduction may account for the majority of overall relapse reduction. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy remains a rational standard therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with primaries T3 or greater and/or positive nodes.

scholarly journals A Review of Docetaxel: Its Use in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMT.S5191
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Michele Basso ◽  
Alessandra Cassano ◽  
Carlo Barone
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Combination Regimens

Docetaxel, a member of the taxane family, promotes cell death by binding β-tubulin and has demonstrated activity against several human malignancies, both as a single agent and in combination therapy. It has been approved in Europe and the US as front-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF regimen). This approval was based on the results of a pivotal study (V325) which demonstrated that the addition of docetaxel to the reference regimen of cisplatin and fluorouracil improves overall survival and progression-free survival with a better quality of life despite increased toxicity (mainly haematological). Modifications of DCF regimen have been successfully investigated as a means of making the treatment more tolerable and suitable also for elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. Emerging data from several phase II studies suggest that other docetaxel-based combination regimens with anthracyclines or irinotecan have interesting activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, but the true efficacy of these regimens needs to be assessed in large randomized phase III studies. Thus, the best docetaxel-containing regimen has yet to be identified. Docetaxel also represents a good candidate for combination with novel molecular target agents. In light of the high response rates observed in phase II-III studies, a docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimen might also be considered a treatment option as perioperative or adjuvant therapy in potentially curable gastric cancer and further studies with or without biological agents are eagerly awaited in this setting.

Conditional survival nomogram after an R0 resection for gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
J. L. Dikken ◽  
C. J. Van De Velde ◽  
M. Verheij ◽  
R. Baser ◽  
M. Gonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conditional Survival ◽  
Disease Free Interval ◽  
The Us ◽  
One Year

11 Background: The risk of dying of cancer is highest in the first two years after a curative resection for gastric cancer. Therefore, the prognosis of patients who did not recur in the first two years is improved because they survived this critical period, a phenomenon called conditional survival. The US-derived gastric cancer nomogram predicts disease-specific survival (DSS) based on pathological variables. However, a disease-free interval after surgery, which improves the prognosis, is not captured by the nomogram. Therefore, it has only been used directly after surgery and not in the follow-up setting. The purposes of this study were to develop a conditional survival nomogram for 1, 2 and 3-year survivors (step 1) and to test if the introduction of follow-up variables would improve predictive accuracy of the nomogram in the follow-up setting (step 2). Methods: In a combined US-Dutch population of 1642 patients who underwent an R0 resection for gastric cancer and for whom the old nomogram variables were available, a conditional survival nomogram based on the original variables was developed for one (N=1147), two (N=879) and three (N=721) year survivors (step 1). To improve predictive accuracy in the follow-up setting, weight loss, performance status (PS), hemoglobin (HGB), and albumin (ALB) at one year after resection were retrospectively collected and added to the baseline variables in a new nomogram (step 2). Results: The conditional survival nomograms for 1, 2 and 3-year survivors (step 1) showed a high predictive accuracy in the calibration plots. Surviving one, two and three years shows a median improvement of 5-year DSS of 4%, 9% and 14% respectively. The introduction of weight loss, PS, HGB, and ALB at one year after surgery (step 2) did not improve this nomogram, but availability of these variables was limited. Conclusions: A strongly predictive conditional survival nomogram was developed, giving an improved prognosis for 1, 2 and 3-year survivors of gastric cancer. Introduction of variables available at one year after resection did not further improve this nomogram. This might be caused by the limited availability of follow-up data, as well as the strong predictive accuracy of the original variables. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
M. Ryu ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

Updated results of the GEST study: Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4035-4035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Fukutomi ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Kazuya Sugimori ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locally Advanced Disease ◽  
Phase Iii Study

4035 Background: The GEST study (Ioka et al. ASCO 2011, Abstract 4007) demonstrated the non-inferiority of S-1 to GEM with respect to the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We now report the updated results of this study. Methods: The GEST study was a randomized, 3-arm, phase III study. Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable advanced PC, an ECOG Performance status (PS) of 0-1, and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to receive GEM (1000 mg/m2, iv, d1, 8 and 15, q4w), S-1 (80/100/120 mg/day based on BSA, po, d1-28, q6w), or GS (GEM 1000 mg/m2, iv, d1 and 8 plus S-1 60/80/100 mg/day based on BSA po, d1-14, q3w). The primary endpoint was OS, used to assess the non-inferiority of S-1 and the superiority of GS to GEM. Patient information was updated in July 2011. Results: At the time of this follow-up analysis, median follow-up was 29.8 months with 795 OS events, compared with 18.4 months with 710 OS events out of 832 patients at the previous analysis. Median OS was 8.8 months (95% CI: 8.0–9.7) in the GEM group and 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.8) in the S-1 group (HR=0.96, 97.5% CI: 0.79-1.17, p<0.001 for non-inferiority), which is consistent with prior results (HR=0.96, 97.5% CI: 0.78-1.18, p<0.001). In the GS group, median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.2). The HR was 0.91 (97.5%CI: 0.75-1.11, p=0.28 for superiority versus the GEM group). On subgroup analysis, GS was associated with a non-statistically significant trend toward better OS compared with GEM among patients with locally advanced disease and those with a PS of 1. Median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 9.7–14.9) in the GEM group and 15.9 months (95% CI: 13.0-19.7) in the GS group (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.51-1.03) among patients with locally advanced disease, and 6.2 months (95% CI: 4.9–8.3) in the GEM group and 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.0-10.9) in the GS group (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.83) among patients with a PS of 1. Conclusions: The non-inferiority of S-1 to Gem in terms of the primary endpoint of OS was reconfirmed. Monotherapy with S-1 can be used as one of the standard treatments for advanced PC. As for GS therapy, there is room for further investigation.

Randomized phase III trial of regorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) progressing despite prior treatment with at least imatinib (IM) and sunitinib (SU): GRID trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA10008-LBA10008 ◽  
Author(s):  
George D. Demetri ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Heikki Joensuu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor

LBA10008 Background: Oral multikinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) demonstrated substantial activity in a phase II trial in pts with GIST after failure of both IM and SU (J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:606s; abstr 10007). This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of REG for this unmet clinical need. Methods: Eligible pts had metastatic and/or unresectable GIST, objective failure of both prior IM and SU (progressive disease [PD] on, or intolerance to, IM and PD on SU), ≥1 measurable lesion, ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive best supportive care plus either REG 160 mg po once daily (3 wks on/1 wk off) or placebo (PL). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (modified RECIST 1.1, independent central review). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR, defined as rate of partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD] lasting for ≥12 wks), response rate and duration, safety and correlative genotype analyses. At time of PD, pts were eligible for unblinding and crossover to open-label REG. Results: Between Jan and Aug of 2011, 234 pts were screened; 199 were randomized (REG: 133, PL: 66). Pts were stratified at randomization according to number of prior systemic therapies and geographical region. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The primary endpoint was met: median PFS was 4.8 months for REG vs. 0.9 months for PL. Hazard ratio for PFS was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.18-0.39), p<0.0001. PFS rates at 3 and 6 months were 60% and 38% for REG vs. 11% and 0% for PL. DCR was 53% (REG) vs. 9% (PL).The HR for OS was 0.77 (p=0.20) with 85% PL pts having crossed over to REG. The most common > grade 3 treatment-emergent AEs in the REG arm during double-blind study were hypertension (28%), hand-foot skin reaction (21%), and diarrhea (8%). Conclusions: This randomized trial demonstrated that REG significantly improved PFS and DCR in pts with advanced GIST after failure of at least prior IM and SU. REG was well tolerated, with AEs as expected for this class and manageable with dose modifications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document