scholarly journals A Review of Docetaxel: Its Use in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMT.S5191
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Michele Basso ◽  
Alessandra Cassano ◽  
Carlo Barone

Docetaxel, a member of the taxane family, promotes cell death by binding β-tubulin and has demonstrated activity against several human malignancies, both as a single agent and in combination therapy. It has been approved in Europe and the US as front-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF regimen). This approval was based on the results of a pivotal study (V325) which demonstrated that the addition of docetaxel to the reference regimen of cisplatin and fluorouracil improves overall survival and progression-free survival with a better quality of life despite increased toxicity (mainly haematological). Modifications of DCF regimen have been successfully investigated as a means of making the treatment more tolerable and suitable also for elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. Emerging data from several phase II studies suggest that other docetaxel-based combination regimens with anthracyclines or irinotecan have interesting activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, but the true efficacy of these regimens needs to be assessed in large randomized phase III studies. Thus, the best docetaxel-containing regimen has yet to be identified. Docetaxel also represents a good candidate for combination with novel molecular target agents. In light of the high response rates observed in phase II-III studies, a docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimen might also be considered a treatment option as perioperative or adjuvant therapy in potentially curable gastric cancer and further studies with or without biological agents are eagerly awaited in this setting.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1348-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Levi ◽  
R M Fox ◽  
M H Tattersall ◽  
R L Woods ◽  
D Thomson ◽  
...  

A multi-institutional cooperative study of patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who had not previously received chemotherapy was conducted, prospectively randomizing patients to receive either doxorubicin or the three-drug combination, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), and BCNU (FAB). The 187 evaluable patients were initially stratified according to the presence of measurable or evaluable disease and performance status. There was a significantly higher response rate observed for FAB (40%) compared with doxorubicin (13%) among the 145 measurable-disease patients. Duration of response and survival were significantly longer for FAB in the measurable-disease group, but for the total patient population an early advantage for FAB in time to disease progression and survival was lost with continued follow-up. Median survival was 33 weeks for patients receiving FAB and 19 weeks for those receiving doxorubicin. Significant pretreatment factors adversely affecting survival included poor performance status, weight loss of greater than 10%, and more than two sites of metastases. Toxicity was not severe in either treatment arm, and only thrombocytopenia occurred significantly more often with FAB. It is contended that in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, chemotherapy only exerts a relatively short-term and modest beneficial effect, most apparent in patients with intermediate tumor bulk. 5-FU remains the most active single agent, and combination chemotherapy has not yet proven its overall worth. Further studies are indicated comparing the most active combinations with 5-FU using optimal doses and schedules, and consideration must be given to the incorporation of no-treatment controls.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1040
Author(s):  
Valérie Gounant ◽  
Michael Duruisseaux ◽  
Ghassen Soussi ◽  
Sylvie Van Hulst ◽  
Olivier Bylicki ◽  
...  

Anti-PD-1 antibodies prolong survival of performance status (PS) 0–1 advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. Their efficacy in PS 3–4 patients is unknown. Conse- cutive PS 3–4 aNSCLC patients receiving compassionate nivolumab were accrued by 12 French thoracic oncology departments, over 24 months. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic variables were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Overall, 35 PS 3–4 aNSCLC patients (median age 65 years) received a median of 4 nivolumab infusions (interquartile range [IQR], 1–7) as first- (n = 6) or second-line (n = 29) therapy. At a median of 52-month follow-up (95%CI, 41–63), 32 (91%) patients had died. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95%CI, 1.1–3.2). Median OS was 4.4 months (95%CI, 0.5–8.2). Overall, 20% of patients were alive at 1 year, and 14% at 2 years. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8/35 patients (23%), mostly of low-grade. After adjustment, brain metastases (HR = 5.2; 95%CI, 9–14.3, p = 0.001) and <20 pack-years (HR = 4.8; 95%CI, 1.7–13.8, p = 0.003) predicted worse survival. PS improvement from 3–4 to 0–1 (n = 9) led to a median 43-month (95%CI, 0–102) OS. Certain patients with very poor general condition could derive long-term benefit from nivolumab salvage therapy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5055-5055 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Bajorin ◽  
I. Ostrovnaya ◽  
A. Iasonos ◽  
M. I. Milowsky ◽  
M. Boyle ◽  
...  

5055 Background: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for pts with metastatic or unresectable UC with phase III studies reporting median survivals of 12–15 months. Even more survival variation exists in phase II studies and this disparity is most frequently due to prognostic factors and not individual regimens. Thus, better tools are needed to predict survival both for individual pts and to balance phase III trials. Nomograms have utility in predicting short- and long-term outcome in muscle-invasive UC treated by surgery but they have not been explored in more advanced UC. Methods: We identified 308 pts with metastatic and/or unresectable UC treated on prospective phase II MSKCC protocols of cisplatin-based therapy containing 3–5 total chemotherapy agents. 203 pts received methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC), 45 had ifosfamide, paclitaxel and cisplatin (ITP) and 60 pts received doxorubicin plus gemcitabine (AG) followed by ITP (AG-ITP). Survival distributions were compared across trials. Pre-treatment characteristics were then assessed for impact on survival and a nomogram from a fitted Cox model was created to predict 1-yr, 2-yr, 5-yr and median survival. Results: No difference in median survivals were seen among the 3 regimens; median survival was 14.8 months for MVAC, 18.0 months for ITP and 16.1 months for AG- ITP (p=NS). Median survival for all pts was 12.99 months; 268 pts died and 40 pts were censored. 288 pts had all pre-treatment data. Characteristics most associated with survival included visceral metastases (present versus absent, p=.00001) and Karnofsky poor performance status (≥ 80 versus < 80, p= .0005) followed by hemoglobin (normal versus < normal, p=.01) and albumin (actual values, p<.02). These characteristics were then used to construct a nomogram utilizing all 4 factors to predict probabilities of 1-yr, 2-yr, and 5-yr survival. Conclusions: The number and sequence of drugs utilized in cisplatin-based chemotherapy did not substantially impact survival of pts with advanced UC. A nomogram of pre-treatment clinical factors can predict probability of pt survival at 1 yr, 2yrs, and 5 yrs. This nomogram may also be useful to balance treatment arms in phase III trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 392-392
Author(s):  
Akinori Sugaya ◽  
Shunsuke Ueyama ◽  
Hirosumi Suzuki ◽  
Takeshi Yamada ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  

392 Background: Nivolumab is a standard of care as the later-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. However, there are few data about efficacy and safety of nivolumab for pts with malignant ascites. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study for pts with advanced gastric cancer who received nivolumab alone from Oct. 2017 to Feb. 2019. Pts were divided into two groups; high ascites burden (HAB) with moderate or massive ascites and non-HAB with none or a small amount of localized ascites at pelvis and/or liver surface. Results: A total of 72 pts (23 pts with HAB and 49 pts with non-HAB) were evaluable. The HAB group had more pts with young (median 62 vs 70 years), female (35 vs 14 %), no prior gastrectomy (63 vs 35 %) and poor performance status (PS > 1; 26 vs 10 %), compared to the non-HAB group. Disease control rate was 44% (95% CI 23-64%) in the HAB group and 57% (95% CI 43-71%) in the non-HAB group. Ascites decreased in 4 pts (17%) and completely disappeared in 2 pts (8.7%) in the HAB group. These 6 pts were all male and had prior ramucirumab treatment with a mean neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio 2.1 (from 0.85 to 3.7) at the initiation of nivolumab. After 5 months of follow up period, disease progression or death events for progression-free survival (PFS) occurred in 74% of the HAB group and 53% of the non-HAB group. Median PFS was 1.0 (95%CI 0.5-1.5) and 2.6 (95%CI 0.9-7.4) months in pts with HAB and non-HAB, respectively. PFS rates at 6 months were 31% in the HAB group and 33% in the non-HAB group. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 26% of the HAB group and 16% of the non-HAB group including one and two pts with grade 3 or 4 events, respectively. There was no treatment-related death in both groups. Conclusions: Although pts with HAB showed trends of worse outcomes compared with those with non-HAB, nivolumab was suggested to provide a survival benefit to some pts with HAB, and was tolerable in the HAB group.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3924-3924
Author(s):  
Chaitra S. Ujjani ◽  
Edmund Gehan ◽  
Saad Jamshed ◽  
Jeanette Crawford ◽  
Catherine Broome ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3924 Background: Current front-line regimens for previously untreated CLL typically include fludarabine (F) and rituximab (R), with or without cyclophosphamide, based on the results of single and multicenter trials demonstrating ORR of > 90% (CR 44–70%). Nevertheless, relapse is inevitable. In phase II studies lenalidomide (L) has shown ORR of 32–47% (CR 7–9%) in relapsed/refractory CLL. Given these findings, we proposed following FR therapy with L in previously untreated CLL patients to determine if CR rate and PFS can be improved upon. This study is the first of FR followed by L monotherapy in patients (pts) with untreated CLL. Methods: Pts were eligible for this 2-stage Phase II study with untreated CLL requiring therapy, a performance status < 2, and adequate organ function. Pts received R 375 mg/m2 IV on D1 and F 25 mg/m2 IV D1–5 for 3 cycles. Pts with a CR/PR received 3 more cycles of FR followed by 3 cycles of L 5 mg po daily D1–21, which was increased to 10 mg with Cycle 2 if tolerated. Pts with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) after 3 cycles of FR were switched to L 5 mg po daily D1–21, which was increased to 10 mg with Cycle 2 if tolerated. Pts with SD or better after 3 cycles of L received another 3 cycles. Pts with PD were removed. The primary endpoint was the CR rate with FR followed by L monotherapy. Results: Of 22 pts on study, the median age was 61 years (range: 41–78), 68% were male, 27% were Rai Stage III/IV, 73% were CD38+, and 18% had a b-2 microglobulin level > 4. Of the 21 pts evaluated for ZAP-70, 36% had expression > 20%. Four pts had sole del 13q and 4 had normal cytogenetics. Of the remaining 14 patients, the majority had greater than 1 cytogenetic abnormality, 3 of which were del 17p and 7 del 11q. Pts completed a median of 10 cycles of therapy. The median time to response was 7 months (Range: 6–8 months). ORR with FR was 77.2% (CR 22.7%). With the addition of L in 15 patients, 3 pts (including both normal and complex cytogenetics) converted from a PR to CR, increasing the CR rate to 36.4%. ORRs by cytogenetics were: del 17p 33.3% (CR 0%), del 11q 85.7% (CR 28.5%), normal 75% (CR 25%), and del 13q 100% (CR 50%). L was unable to produce a response in the two pts refractory to FR. As shown in Fig 1, the estimated median progression-free survival was 34.4 months. One pt developed breast cancer and one pt developed Hodgkin's lymphoma after completing FR alone. The most common > Grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia, lymphopenia, and leucopenia. Less frequent >Grade 3 adverse events included thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, infection, and anemia. One pt suffered a fatal septic shock. The most common reasons for withdrawing from study were rash and fatigue. Conclusions: In our single-institution study of FR followed by L in untreated CLL, we were unable to achieve the previously reported CR rates with fludarabine-based regimens, nor were we able to reach our statistical endpoint of a CR of 48% in order to proceed to stage II. Our data were likely inferior as the majority of our pts were CD38 positive and half had poor-risk cytogenetics. L monotherapy appeared to improve the quality of response in pts with a response to FR. This regimen is currently being studied in the North American Intergroup trial (CALGB 10404). Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide has not yet been approved for treatment of CLL. It has shown preliminary efficacy as a single agent in CLL in the relapsed refractory setting. We are investigating it's efficacy in the front line setting. Jamshed:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Broome:Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Cohen:Teva: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Cheson:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15567-e15567
Author(s):  
K. Fujitani ◽  
S. Tamura ◽  
Y. Kimura ◽  
T. Tsuji ◽  
J. Matsuyama ◽  
...  

e15567 Background: Although an adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 has become the standard treatment for stage II-III gastric cancer (GC) patients (pts) after curative D2 gastrectomy in Japan, the survival benefit for stage III pts obtained by S-1 is considered to be modest. S-1 plus docetaxel has shown a good response rate of 56% with prolonged median overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months in pts with advanced GC. This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III GC pts after R0 resection. Methods: Patients with curatively resected pathological stage III GC receiving D2 dissection, age 20–80 years, performance status < 1, no prior adjuvant treatment, adequate organ function, and informed consent were given S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) orally for consecutive 2 weeks plus docetaxel (40 mg/m2) intravenously on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. The treatment was started within 45 days after gastrectomy, and repeated for 4 cycles, followed by S-1 monotherapy until 1 year after surgery. Study endpoints included feasibility of the 4 cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel as primary, and safety, progression free survival (PFS), and OS as secondary. Sample size was set to be 50, which was determined to reject the feasibility of 50% under the expectation of 75% with power of 90% and two-sided α of 5%. Results: Fifty-three pts, 42 males and 11 females with a median age of 65 years, were enrolled between 5/2007 and 8/2008. Pathological stages included IIIA in 36 pts and IIIB in 17 pts. Planned 4 cycles of treatment were delivered to 41 out of 53 pts, with the feasibility of 77.4% (95% CI 63.8–87.7%, P<0.001). Reasons for discontinuation were recurrent cancer in 1 pt, adverse events in 10, and miscellaneous in 1, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 28% of pts with grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 9%. Non-hematological toxicities of grade 3 or more involved fatigue in 6%, anorexia in 9%, and nausea in 6%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel was well-tolerated and showed good compliance. Although follow-up is ongoing on survival, this regimen could be a candidate of future phase III trial seeking for the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III GC pts after curative D2 gastrectomy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 663-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Fa-Chyi Lee ◽  
Deepti A. Singh ◽  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
...  

Purpose S-1 plus cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric cancer patients. We conducted a phase II multi-institutional trial, in the West, in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma to evaluate activity and safety of this combination. Methods Patients received cisplatin intravenously at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 orally at 25 mg/m2/dose bid (50 mg/m2/d) on days 1 to 21, repeated every 28 days. Patients with histologic proof of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of ≥ 70% and near-normal organ function were eligible. All patients provided a written informed consent. To observe a 45% confirmed overall response rate (ORR), 41 assessable patients were needed. Results All 47 patients were assessed for safety and survival, and 41 patients were assessed for ORR. The median age was 56 years and median KPS was 80%. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was four. The confirmed ORR was 51% (95% CI, 35% to 67%) and it was 49% by an independent review. At the 6-month interval, 71% of patients were alive, with a median survival time of 10.9 months. Frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities included fatigue (26%), neutropenia (26%), vomiting (17%), diarrhea (15%), and nausea (15%); however, stomatitis (2%) and febrile neutropenia (2%) were uncommon. There was one (2%) treatment-related death. Conclusion S-1 plus cisplatin is active against gastric cancer and has a favorable toxicity profile. A global phase III study of S-1 plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin currently is accruing patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document